Sadlier oxford vocabulary workshop level f teacher's guide
Best 45-70 Scopes
2024.05.29 09:14 Significant-Tower146 Best 45-70 Scopes
 | submitted by Significant-Tower146 to u/Significant-Tower146 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/zb00tybtfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ba14e2b5629140b6ee29b2e5e3b3f17b3d95f133 Let's take a closer look at the world of 45-70 scopes - the ultimate accessory for your firearm that will elevate your shooting experience to new heights. Our expert roundup covers the top-rated models in the market, diving into their features, accuracy, and overall performance. Get ready to be impressed as we showcase the best 45-70 scopes that deliver exceptional precision, durability, and value for your money. The Top 19 Best 45-70 Scopes
Reviews🔗Leupold Gold Ring 12-40x60mm HD Folded Light Path Spotting Scopehttps://preview.redd.it/iee4x2ktfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e1649cbf559aefe7a6c6e9b474676447c009f0db I recently got my hands on the Leupold Gold Ring 12-40x60mm HD Spotting Scope, and I must say it's a game-changer! This little powerhouse boasts an Extra Low Dispersion Optical System, which maximizes color fidelity and contrast. It provides an incredible image across a wide field of view, all with best-in-class eye relief for easy viewing with or without eyeglasses. One feature that really stood out for me was the Folded Light Path (FLP) system. Instead of using prisms, this system employs mirrors to compress a long optical path into half its length, making the scope incredibly compact and portable. Another highlight is its magnesium housing. This lightweight material packs a serious punch when it comes to durability, making it ideal for rough outdoor conditions. And don't even get me started on the 100% waterproof and fog proof capabilities - this thing can brave any weather! However, one issue I encountered was with the focus knob. It's extremely stiff and doesn't change smoothly as you adjust the magnification. It took me quite a few tries to get used to it. Additionally, there's no diopter adjustment, but the good eye relief somewhat compensates for that. Despite these minor drawbacks, I've been thoroughly impressed by the Leupold Gold Ring HD Spotting Scope. Its top-notch optical performance combined with its rugged construction makes it a strong contender in the realm of spotting scopes. If you're in the market for one, this could be an excellent investment. 🔗TruGlo Crossbow Scope with Unisex Camo Designhttps://preview.redd.it/rvvpwz3ufb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8522f3d7832770900f20ecfb28062f1c7cf7b2e2 I've recently had the chance to try out the TruGlo 4x32 Rangefinding/Trajectory Compensating Crossbow Scope, a nifty piece of equipment for enthusiastic crossbow users like me. The scope's main highlight was its ability to find the range and calculate the correct trajectory for my crossbow bolts. In my experience, this feature proved to be quite handy in my local archery range, particularly for those days when the wind and temperature were unstable. One of the things that stood out to me was the scope's robustness. It was designed to handle the harsh conditions of the outdoors, as evidenced by the sturdy aluminum body and the shock-resistant construction. This scope also offered a generous 4-inch eye relief, a feature that helped protect my eyes during those blustery hunting sessions. The scope's lenses were fully-coated, making them highly resistant to glare, a common concern for crossbow users shooting in low-light conditions. Additionally, the durable leavespring for windage and elevation adjustments were a welcomed bonus, allowing me to finetune my shots with ease. On the downside, one of the screws on the scope rings was stripped, a minor issue that wasn't a deal-breaker. I also discovered that the scope wasn't rated specifically for a particular crossbow speed. To achieve optimal accuracy, I had to adjust the scope manually, which was a bit tricky and time-consuming. Regardless of these minor downsides, the TruGlo 4x32 Rangefinding/Trajectory Compensating Crossbow Scope proved to be an essential piece of equipment in my hunting arsenal. Its ease of use, durable construction, and helpful features make it an excellent choice for anyone seeking to upgrade their crossbow hunting experience. 🔗High-Quality 25-75x70 Spotting Scope with Phone Adapterhttps://preview.redd.it/zkfy709ufb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d27fcff4c37833b724348b2014ddccd341214bd1 In my pursuit of a new spotting scope that could enhance my wildlife viewing and target shooting experiences, I stumbled upon the SVBONY SV28 Spotting Scopes. From the moment I opened the package, I was impressed by its sleek exterior and sturdy construction. One feature that stood out to me was its range of magnification capabilities - the SV28 allowed me to adjust the magnification according to my target distance, providing crystal clear image quality. The lens was exceptionally sharp, making it perfect for both target shooting and observing nature. Another aspect I appreciated was the ease of focus adjustment, ensuring that every detail was visible no matter the distance. However, I have to say that the tripod that came with the unit seemed a bit lackluster compared to my usual tripod. I ended up using my own sturdier tripod, but it was still nice to have the option included in the package. Additionally, while the phone adapter was a nice addition, I felt it could have been more user-friendly. Overall, the SVBONY SV28 Spotting Scopes exceeded my expectations, offering outstanding clarity and exceptional value for its price. Though there were a few minor quibbles, I would definitely recommend it to others in search of a reliable, affordable spotting scope for their outdoor adventures. 🔗Leupold VX-SS Spotting Scope 20-60x80mm: Compact, High-Performance Scope for Precise Adjustments and Magnificationhttps://preview.redd.it/ij54a2lufb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92b7e94ee2b9ba479376d1d7175c4f8363c91327 Recently, I had the chance to try out the Leupold GR 20-60x80mm Shadow Gray spotting scope, and let me tell you, it was quite a sight to behold. Whether you're on the hunt for distance or just looking for that perfect view, this scope delivers. One of the standout features for me was its exceptional magnification. With a range of 20-60x, I could really zoom in on some far off details and still maintain a clear, crisp image. Plus, the folded light path system made it all the more impressive - just look at that compact design! However, it wasn't all smooth sailing. A couple times, I found myself struggling with some of the finer adjustments - but that might just be because my hands aren't as steady as they used to be. And of course, I appreciate the durable construction. With its waterproof, fog-resistant, and shock-proof build, you can trust that this scope will hold up no matter what kind of weather or conditions it faces. There's just so much to love about this scope - from the impeccable clarity to the user-friendly controls. If you're in the market for a spotting scope, I'd definitely recommend giving this one a try. 🔗Premium Spotting Scope with Folded Light Path Technology and 100% Waterproof Constructionhttps://preview.redd.it/6p38zp4vfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14903cc9a438739afe5a076e758baed6bee5d7f6 During a recent trip to the mountains, I had the chance to put Leupold's Gold Ring 12-40x60mm HD Spotting Scope to the test. While the gray housing looked sleek, it was the scope's impressive durability that truly stood out. I had read that Leupold had implemented a proprietary nitrogen fill process to ensure a 100% waterproof and fog-proof performance. I eagerly put the scope to the test, by inadvertently dipping it into a small stream. To my delight, it continued to function flawlessly, proving the effectiveness of this innovative feature. A few days later, I took the scope to a nearby wildlife preserve to spot endangered birds in their natural habitat. The scope's impressive magnification was an absolute game-changer. It allowed me to observe the delicate intricacies of these fascinating creatures, from the texture of their feathers to their unique flight patterns. The extra low dispersion optical system played a pivotal role in delivering stunningly vivid and bright colors, contributing to an overall remarkable viewing experience. The tripod-ready feature also proved to be quite practical in my adventure, as it enabled me to easily stabilize the scope for extended periods of time, even under challenging conditions. The prism-less folding light path, which uses mirrors to compress the long optical system, was another standout feature. It significantly reduced the scope's weight and made it more compact, making it convenient to carry anywhere. Although the price of this Gold Ring scope is significantly higher than most other brands, it's worth every penny. Its remarkable performance ensures that it remains a valuable addition to my gear, even amidst the vast competition in the market. With a plethora of customizable settings, the scope serves as an unparalleled guide for spotting and tracking game, be it for hunting or observational purposes. While the Leupold 20x60x80 Gold Ring might seem expensive, the extraordinary visual performance it delivers makes it truly worth the investment. 🔗Advanced 15-45x60 FDE T Series Scope with ED Prime Glass and Mil-Hash Reticlehttps://preview.redd.it/is2xc99vfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ba180564d199017add474eee2442b5856d07b8f4 I've been using this Bushnell T spotting scope in my outdoor activities, and it's been quite the experience. The Mil-Hash reticle works seamlessly with the Mil-Base riflescope reticle, making zeroing a breeze. The scope has a heavy-duty, militaristic feel with a rubberized coating. The Picatinny rail mounts are a nice touch, and they're also compatible with a red dot sight for added accuracy. The optical clarity is what one can expect at this price point, but it does the job well enough. The lens caps make it a breeze to protect the glass from dust, debris, and other environmental conditions. The only issue I had with the front lens cap is the lack of a lanyard attachment, making it easily misplaced. The case, on the other hand, left me concerned about Bushnell's overall quality. The Velcro stitching on the lens flap failed on the first day, and the scope case seems too small for the scope. The magnification setting ring could use some improvement as well, but overall, it's an acceptable addition. Despite these minor drawbacks, the scope has proven to be durable and holds up well under rough outdoor conditions. Its compact design and easy-to-handle eyepiece make it a top choice for avid spotters. With a solid construction, good image quality, and an attractive price point, this Bushnell T series spotting scope is worth considering for your next outdoor adventure. 🔗UHD Spotting Scope with Apochromatic Lens System and Advanced Fully Multi-Coated Lenseshttps://preview.redd.it/egeh0imvfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e0c2b3289337dbb7b7d4f91099006a0113467afd In the world of optics, the Athlon Optics Ares G2 UHD 20-60x85 Straight Spotting Scope has made a name for itself. It's not just for the birders spotting variances in plumage from far away or for the precision shooters who aim for targets at 1,000 yards, the scope's extra-low dispersion glass provides vivid clarity and resolution in a full-size spotting scope. Athlon has cleverly designed it to be lightweight although strong, making it comfortable to carry and use for long periods. The aluminum alloy chassis adds to its strength without making it too heavy. With its twist-up eye-cup, it allows you to set the eyecup to the perfect eye relief for your eyes, ensuring a comfortable viewing experience. Its ESP Dielectric Coating gives you an advantage in viewing with an image that has little or no chromatic fringe for the clearest and sharpest image. The UHD Glass in the lens helps in converging refracting colors into one focus point, producing greater contrast, sharpness, and color definition. Reflecting over 99% of the light to your eyes, the scope brings you a clear, bright image and accurate color reproduction, thanks to the BaK4 Prisms coupled with advanced fully multi-coated lenses. It produces perfect brightness and color across the entire light spectrum, making viewing under different lighting conditions a breeze. And when it comes to durability, the scope doesn't disappoint. It comes with an extra protective layer coating that keeps the exterior of the lens free from dirt and scratches. It's also Argon Purged and Waterproof, ensuring weatherproof performance even in harsh conditions. Purging allows for better waterproofing/fogging, making sure your scope doesn't fog up when you switch environments. Overall, it's a joy to use this spotting scope. It's not just about viewing in high detail but also the ease it offers in using it. You won't be disappointed with its performance and features. 🔗High-Quality Argon Optics Argos HD Spotting Scope with Advanced Multi-Coated Lenses and Durable Rubber Armorhttps://preview.redd.it/yafcx44wfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1a577a974ea35dbb615a307a2d686462f1828f59 The Athlon Optics Argos HD 20-60x85 spotting scope captured my attention with its high-grade Argon gas and BaK4 Prisms, which deliver a fog-free experience and impressive image clarity. I was particularly impressed with the advanced fully multi-coated lenses that reflect more light, giving me sharper and brighter images. The composite chassis not only provides strength but is also much lighter than I had anticipated. One feature that stood out in my experience was the twist-up eye-cup, allowing me to easily adjust the eye relief to suit my own comfort. In addition, the argon purged and waterproof design provided an added layer of protection during my outdoor adventures. While I was largely satisfied with this spotting scope, I did encounter a couple of downsides. Occasionally, the image seemed slightly blurry when zoomed in at max power, though this was less of an issue overall. Additionally, some users reported difficulties with perfect focus, a challenge I experienced myself but found manageable with some adjustment. Overall, I believe the Athlon Optics Argos HD spotting scope offers a solid balance of performance and affordability, making it a worthwhile choice for outdoor enthusiasts seeking quality optics without breaking the bank. 🔗Celestron TrailSeeker 65 Spotting Scope - Compact and Versatilehttps://preview.redd.it/iqy0hl9wfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ccf5fd472385b645cde52a9e61bf71d5dbaee3df As someone who spends a lot of time birdwatching, I was eager to try out the Celestron TrailSeeker 65 spotting scope. With its 45-degree eyepiece, it offered a great balance between magnification and field of view, making it perfect for observing birds in their natural habitat. One of the standout features of this spotting scope is its fully multi-coated XLT optics, which deliver crisp, high contrast images. It made a huge difference in the clarity and sharpness of the images I was able to see through the scope. The dual focus mechanism was also a game-changer, allowing me to quickly home in on my subject before finely tuning the image. However, there were a few drawbacks I noticed while using the TrailSeeker 65. The scope's waterproofing seemed to slightly impact the clarity of the image, causing some distortion around the edges. Additionally, the tripod adaptability could have been improved, as I found it quite challenging to adjust the scope on uneven terrain. Overall, the Celestron TrailSeeker 65 spotting scope was a great investment for someone looking for a solid, easy-to-carry scope that delivers great performance. While it may not be perfect for everyone, I certainly recommend it to those in search of a top-notch birdwatching tool. 🔗Celestron TrailSeeker 80 Spotting Scope: Portable, High-Performance Optics for Outdoor Explorationhttps://preview.redd.it/c49i7slwfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dd5f52382bff16b8132fbefd07ad821ba8f03894 The Celestron TrailSeeker 80 spotting scope has been my go-to tool for spotting birds and capturing stunning images of nature. Its 80mm objective lens allows plenty of light to reach the prism and fully multi-coated XLT optics ensure crisp, high contrast images. The 45-degree eyepiece provides a wider field of view, perfect for bird watching and landscape photography. One of the features that stood out to me is the dual focus mechanism. It's incredibly easy to quickly focus on a subject and then fine-tune the image using the course and fine adjustments. Plus, the rotating tripod mount allows for a full 360-degree view, which is particularly useful for landscape photography and bird watching. The TrailSeeker 80 is also a breeze to carry around, thanks to its compact size and lightweight construction. I love that it has an objective lens diameter of 80mm, which lets in plenty of light while keeping the overall size of the scope to a minimum. Of course, no product is perfect and I did notice a couple of minor drawbacks. The focus ring is slightly off-center, which is something I wish Celestron could have addressed. Additionally, the protective nylon case isn't the most sophisticated, but it does the job. Overall, the Celestron TrailSeeker 80 spotting scope has exceeded my expectations. Its performance and ease of use make it a must-have for both amateur and professional bird watchers and nature photographers. 🔗Celestron 70mm Travel Scope with All Coated Glass Opticshttps://preview.redd.it/szoabz8xfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d4e4f71ba41c2cdf6a9f15dbfc8aeb845c232e7e The Celestron 21035 70mm Travel Scope is the perfect companion for those who love the night sky and want to explore it without breaking the bank. As an experienced astronomer, I've had my fair share of scopes, and I must say, this one exceeded all my expectations. The scope's all coated glass optical elements allow for clear, crisp images that make it a delight to observe the backyard birds or the vast expanse of the night sky. The smooth functioning altazimuth mount makes pointing to objects a breeze, and the preassembled aluminum full-size photographic tripod adds to the convenience of setting up the scope quickly. However, the 20mm eyepiece does have a narrower field of view, which may be a downside for some, but the scope's overall performance more than compensates for it. The tripod may be flimsy for some, but its lightweight design is perfect for travel and outdoor activities. In conclusion, the Celestron Travel Scope 70 is a fantastic choice for those who want an affordable, portable, and high-quality telescope that offers excellent views by day and amazing performance under the stars. Its compact size, lightweight design, and detailed instructions make it a great option for both beginners and experienced astronomers alike. 🔗UHD 20-60x85 Athlon Spotting Scope: High-Performance 45 Degree Angle Scope for 500 Yard Viewinghttps://preview.redd.it/s81ryz9xfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d9126b08174e53b2a1bc4977797cb9e4b36b3b57 The Athlon Spotting Scope Ares G2 20-60x85 UHD 45 Degree has been a game changer in my bird watching routine. With its 20-60x magnification, I can spot even the smallest feather details from a great distance. The UHD glass provides stunning color and contrast, making it effortless to distinguish between different species. The ESP dielectric coating ensures that the image is crystal clear, with minimal chromatic fringe. The BaK4 prisms and advanced fully multi-coated lenses make the view even brighter and sharper, creating a truly immersive experience. I also appreciate the aluminum alloy chassis that provides both strength and lightweight portability. The twist-up eye-cup allows me to set the perfect eye relief, and the extra protective layer coating keeps the lens safe from dirt and scratches. Overall, the Ares G2 is a fantastic addition to my bird watching gear, and I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a top-quality spotting scope. 🔗Leupold SX-2 Alpine HD - Versatile Spotting Scope with Exceptional Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/6hjr5bnxfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fbf1d2a269efe426fd6e22f4f8bf38061a2953a2 I recently had the chance to put the Leupold SX-2 Alpine HD 20-60x80 Angled Spotting Scope to the test, and I must say, it performed exceptionally well. As someone who spends a lot of time outdoors, I appreciated the scope's ruggedness and 100% waterproof and fogproof design. One of the standout features for me was the oversized eyepiece, which allowed for comfortable all-day glassing. The Twilight Max Light Management System also proved to be a game-changer, as it helped me see more in less light while reducing glare. Whether I was at the range or heading out for a big game hunt, the SX-2 Alpine HD made my experience all the more enjoyable. However, there were a couple of downsides I encountered. The end caps for the eyepiece and end lens cap were a bit of a hassle, as they tended to come off rather easily. I would have appreciated some sort of protective cover for these delicate parts. Additionally, the scope is a bit on the heavy side, which can be a drawback for those planning to take it on extended backpacking trips. Overall, the Leupold SX-2 Alpine HD 20-60x80 Angled Spotting Scope is a solid choice for anyone looking for an affordable, high-quality spotting scope. While there are a few areas that could use some improvement, the pros definitely outweigh the cons in my experience. 🔗Celestron Travel Scope 70mm Telescope: Portable and Easy to Usehttps://preview.redd.it/3i5cir0yfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b9d1795c7eaefc6b333392948d466d2b8b2a545d The Celestron Travel Scope 70 is a compact and portable telescope designed for astronomical and terrestrial use. Its refractor-style optical tube assembly has a decent aperture for gathering light and producing a moderate magnification potential. The included photo-style alt-az pan/tilt head allows for smooth movement and easy set up, while the preassembled aluminum tripod provides stability on a variety of surfaces. The kit also comes with two eyepieces offering 20x and 40x magnifications, as well as an erecting prism for use as a conventional spotting scope. Everything fits into the included canvas backpack for ultimate portability. My experience using the Celestron Travel Scope 70 was quite enjoyable. The compact design made it easy to take with me on outdoor adventures, and the quick set up time meant I could start observing the night sky or terrestrial objects in no time. I found the lightweight yet sturdy materials used in the construction to be a nice touch, ensuring stability without adding excess weight. One feature that stood out to me was the ease of use – the telescope and tripod fit perfectly inside the included backpack, and setting it up required minimal effort. However, the limited magnification options might not be suitable for those seeking more intense stargazing experiences. Overall, the Celestron Travel Scope 70 is a convenient and efficient telescope for those looking for a portable, easy-to-use option. Its compact design and decent performance make it a great choice for both beginners and experienced stargazers alike. Buyer's GuideWhen it comes to choosing the right 45-70 scope, there are several factors to consider. This buyer's guide will provide you with the necessary information to make an informed decision.Scope MagnificationThe magnification of a scope is a vital factor that affects its performance. For 45-70 scopes, you'll want to consider a magnification range of at least 3-9x. This will provide a suitable range for most hunting scenarios while maintaining a decent field of view. https://preview.redd.it/znf92tkzfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4548a4aebf7a098801b20223f4f5b6875a075c47 Objective Lens SizeA larger objective lens size will allow more light to enter the scope, improving its low-light performance. For 45-70 scopes, consider a minimum objective lens size of 44mm. However, also keep in mind that a larger lens might add additional weight to the scope.Reticle StyleDifferent reticle styles are designed for various shooting scenarios. Consider factors like the terrain where you'll be hunting and your shooting distance when choosing a reticle style. MOA and MRAD reticles are popular choices for 45-70 scopes.Durability and WaterproofingA good 45-70 scope should be durable and able to withstand harsh outdoor conditions. Ensure the scope is waterproof and fog-proof for optimal performance in various environments. https://preview.redd.it/6kkl6bszfb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ffd0444f3e996e2f935c4d254c08e7d1f3d5489b Eye Relief and FocusEye relief and focus ensure a comfortable shooting experience. Adequate eye relief reduces the chances of accidental scope strikes, while a focus adjustment makes it easy to correct for any vision issues.Battery Life and ControlsFor scopes with illuminated reticles, battery life is an essential factor. A scope with a longer battery life will minimize the need for frequent battery replacements. Additionally, well-designed controls make it easy to adjust brightness levels.Size and WeightThe size and weight of a 45-70 scope should be considered, especially when planning to carry it for an extended period. Look for a balance between size, weight, and functionality. https://preview.redd.it/fs3j3s50gb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9dce2f17a9929ff638871e2e770d42b29bd7329c Brand Reputation and WarrantyChoose a scope from a reputable brand known for its excellent products and customer service. Additionally, a good warranty ensures you're covered in case of any manufacturing defects or issues.BudgetAlways set a budget for your 45-70 scope. This will help narrow down your options and ensure you're not overspending on unnecessary features.FAQhttps://preview.redd.it/qb6470h0gb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=df53025a3cf9a513dc742c1a4c60ae8bfaa8a00a What is the purpose of 45-70 scopes for firearms?45-70 scopes are designed for hunting with a. 45-70 Government rifle. They offer enhanced accuracy, speed, and ease of use compared to traditional iron sights.How do 45-70 scopes differ from other scopes?45-70 scopes are specifically designed for the power and trajectory of the. 45-70 cartridge. They have longer eye relief than other scopes, which is essential when shooting high-powered rifles.What makes a good quality 45-70 scope?A good 45-70 scope should have a clear, high-quality optic with multiple magnification options to suit different shooting distances. It should also be rugged, waterproof, and shock-resistant to withstand the harsh conditions of hunting.What is the ideal magnification for a 45-70 scope?The ideal magnification for a 45-70 scope is 1.5x to 9x. This allows for fast, accurate shooting at closer ranges and adequate magnification for long-range shots.What are the best 45-70 scopes on the market?Some of the best 45-70 scopes available are:
How do I mount a 45-70 scope on my rifle?Mounting a 45-70 scope on your rifle requires you to attach the scope rings and bases to your rifle's action. Consult your scope's manual or a professional gunsmith to ensure a proper fit and secure mounting.Are there any accessories I should consider when purchasing a 45-70 scope?While not necessary, some accessories you may want to consider with your 45-70 scope include:
|
2024.05.29 08:55 GhoulGriin Best 45 Acp Reloading Kit
 | submitted by GhoulGriin to u/GhoulGriin [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/kkoplo6hcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d34db906940e29a02550bf0afe1410af95e735d Welcome to our comprehensive review of the top 45 ACP reloading kits available in the market today. Whether you're a seasoned shooter or just starting out, reloading your own ammunition can be a cost-effective and satisfying hobby. In this article, we'll take a closer look at some of the best reloading kits on the market to help you make an informed decision and find the perfect fit for your needs. So sit back, relax, and let's dive in! The Top 8 Best 45 Acp Reloading Kit
Reviews🔗Lee Precision 45 ACP Breech Lock 3-Die Set for Reliable Reloadinghttps://preview.redd.it/31rgwznhcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ae5f88851e2c64964a60c1a82bfc96a5b030c0f0 The Lee Precision Breech Lock 3-Die Set for 45 ACP is the ultimate companion for all your reloading needs. Featuring colored smart lock bushings that make identifying the right die a breeze, this set is designed to make your reloading process smooth and hassle-free. Crafted with carbide for reliability, the set includes a carbide full-length sizing die, bullet seating die, and powder thru expanding die. This guarantees consistent and precise reloading results every time. You'll also find a universal shell holder, powder dipper, and comprehensive instructions/load data. With this complete kit, reloading enthusiasts, both beginners and experienced, will love the convenience and user-friendliness. Effortlessly switch between dies with the colored smart lock bushings, ensuring no more wasted time searching for the right one. The carbide dies are built to last, offering flawless, seamless performance for your reloading tasks. Experience the ease, precision, and reliability that Lee Precision is known for with the Lee Precision Breech Lock 3-Die Set for 45 ACP. It's time to take your reloading arsenal to the next level - get yours today! 🔗Precision 7.62 x39 Reloading Dies Set for Exceptional Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/vgi9yf3icb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=465df67592e543003bb5728557ff610be7e33f1e Introducing the Lyman Pro Die Pack, a versatile and powerful addition to your press reloading toolkit. Crafted with your Mark 7 press in mind, every aspect of these dies was meticulously engineered to deliver top-notch performance. While they're perfectly suited for Mark 7 presses, they also work seamlessly with regular progressive presses, turret presses, and even single station presses. The Lyman Pro Die Pack boasts dies made of stainless steel for its resilience and rust resistance. It's great to see durable and anti-corrosion materials in action. The Lyman Pro even goes the extra mile with highly polished carbide rings on the sizing dies, offering unparalleled wear resistance and reduced sizing force. The spring-loaded decapping rod system ensures the primer is ejected from the primer pocket with force, eliminating any potential misfire. In the Lyman Pro Die Pack, the M die neck expander stands out. It has a specially designed two-step expander plug, ensuring just the right amount of neck tension and flair for your case mouths. The pistol sets include flare dies, designed to let bullets sit securely on the case mouth before being seated. The Micrometer Seating die, a standout feature, impresses with a micrometer adjustable seating head. It guarantees precision bullet seating length and a floating bullet seating punch that centers your bullet with pinpoint accuracy. Lastly, each set comes with a taper crimp die, micrometer adjustable, which fully removes any case mouth flare and provides improved bullet retention. However, like any review, there are pros and cons to consider. While the Lyman Pro Die Pack delivers exceptional performance with its array of features, it may lack compatibility with certain cartridge types. Always ensure it matches your intended use. Overall, the Lyman Pro Die Pack is a reliable and robust choice for reloaders looking for top-tier performance. 🔗RCBS 90366 Trim Pro-2 Kit with Spring Loaded Shell Holder - 45 ACP Reloading Kithttps://preview.redd.it/zx1l66nicb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7c637a441f3e519a4f03cdad27dee99cb31deb10 With the RCBS Trim Pro-2 Kit, you'll effortlessly transform your handloading process. Picture this: you're at the range, and instead of dealing with an old, frustrating case trimmer, you have this sleek, high-quality kit in your hands. The spring-loaded shell holder catches all the trimmed brass, making cleanup a breeze. I've been using this kit for a while now, and the ease of use is truly a game-changer. Gone are the days of fiddling with collars and screwing down collets, only to unscrew them again to hold and remove brass. It's a simple press, insert, and release system that has significantly sped up my case trimming. This trimmer is incredibly precise, delivering consistent lengths time and time again. And the best part? The universal shell holder fits virtually any case, making it a versatile addition to any gunsmithing workshop. Of course, like any product, it's not perfect. A few users have reported issues with incompatible pilots or difficulty setting up the shell holder. But overall, the pros outweigh the cons, making the RCBS Trim Pro-2 Kit a must-have for any serious handloader. 🔗Carbide 4 Die Set: Durable Sizer, Expander, Seater, and Crimp Die for 45 ACPhttps://preview.redd.it/1cn8nvvicb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=143197426102f1b6cd4c09f51ca3a3d15191dbe8 I recently decided to give Lee Precision Carbide 4 Die Set 45 ACP a try in my daily life. To start, I was impressed by the sturdy build and the smooth functioning of the dies compared to some other options available in the market. The unbreakable decapper and built-in stuck-case remover worked well, ensuring a seamless reloading experience. The free-floating bullet seater was easy to adjust and resulted in consistent bullet seating, which in turn helped improve accuracy. I also appreciated the finger-adjustable locking rings that kept the dies secure during the reloading process. However, there were a couple of cons as well. The storage case could have been a bit better designed to accommodate the included shell holder, powder dipper, and load data more securely. Additionally, the bullet seating and factory crimp dies felt slightly less user-friendly compared to the powder through expanding and carbide factory-crimp dies. Overall, the Lee Precision Carbide 4 Die Set 45 ACP has been a reliable addition to my reloading setup, providing consistent and accurate results. While there may be room for improvement in certain areas, its affordability and high-quality performance make it a valuable choice for anyone looking to reload their 45 ACP ammunition. 🔗Lee Precision Carbide 3 Die Set for 45 ACP – Heavy-Duty Reloading Kithttps://preview.redd.it/8namqj8jcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=244a92cf8c5837aa9207f72c2496fea2e4c33112 The Lee Precision Carbide Three-Die Set I've been using for reloading my 45 ACP rounds has been quite the handy tool in my arsenal. Made in the USA, it features a steel shell holder and powder measure, all conveniently stored in an airtight low-profile box for safekeeping. One of the best aspects of the Lee Carbide Die Set is its universal shell holder and powder dipper, which make it effortless to work with various calibers and ammo types. The durable design of the dies ensures they are built to last and can withstand the wear and tear that comes with frequent use. The set includes an instruction manual and load data sheet, which I found incredibly helpful when first getting started with reloading. The instruction manual was easy to follow, and the load data sheet provided guidance on optimizing each step of the reloading process, making it easier to create consistent, high-quality rounds. Overall, I have been very satisfied with the Lee Precision Carbide Three-Die Set. It's a reliable and efficient option for anyone looking to reload their 45 ACP rounds. That being said, there are a few areas in which the product could be improved. The set occasionally requires some fine-tuning to ensure the rounds are seated correctly, which can be a bit frustrating. Additionally, while it's not a major issue, the shell holder sometimes tends to get a bit dirty after multiple uses, which necessitates cleaning before starting a new session. In conclusion, the Lee Carbide Three-Die Set is a robust and versatile solution for reloading 45 ACP rounds, but it does have its minor quirks that could be addressed for an even smoother experience. 🔗RCBS Carbide 3 Die Set for .38 Super Straight-Wall reloadinghttps://preview.redd.it/96ox2isjcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=27c86ec9e7aeeabe4d8b97a8f7b5c08ece7043e1 I recently had the chance to try out the RCBS Carbide 3 Die Set for. 38 Super, and I must say, it's been quite the experience. Not only did it size the case and de-prime without the need for any lubrication, thanks to the carbide sizer ring, but it also expanded the case to the appropriate diameter to accommodate the bullet. This expander die even gave the case mouth a nice flare for smoother bullet feeding. The seater die was equally impressive, as it not only seated the bullet but also provided a secure crimp to the brass. I particularly liked the option to use a decapping unit, which made it even easier for me to clean up the cartridges after each round. However, there was one slight drawback with the product - one of the reviewers mentioned that the expander die was missing the expander plug, making it useless. I also noticed that the set didn't come with a shell holder or a storage box. Despite these minor concerns, I've had a great experience with the RCBS Carbide 3 Die Set for. 38 Super. It's a solid, reliable product that has made my reloading process a breeze. And the fact that it's proudly made in the USA is a nice added bonus. 🔗45 ACP Reloading Press Conversion Kit for Mark 7 Apex 10/EVOLUTIONhttps://preview.redd.it/sji41g2kcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1a963ff6416f8d3000ee2793069328a3d00eb9e0 I recently started reloading my own ammo, and let me tell you, it's been quite the journey. But one product that made the whole process easier was the Mark 7 Apex conversion kit for 45 caliber. This kit is a game-changer, allowing me to switch up my caliber with ease. The kit comes with all the essential components needed for a smooth transition - a case feed ram, a new shell plate, and a case feed adapter. The quality of the parts is top-notch, and they fit together perfectly. It made the transition from one caliber to another seamless, and I couldn't be happier with my choice. Of course, not everything was perfect. The instruction manual could have been more detailed and clearer. But once I figured things out on my own, the conversion process became a breeze. All in all, the Mark 7 Apex conversion kit for 45 caliber is a worthwhile investment for any reloader looking to simplify their ammo switching process. 🔗Premium Rifle Die Set for 45-90 Classichttps://preview.redd.it/568vezfkcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5672087e8de08f5270ff4c4f12b4246305a0f2db As a reviewer who has daily experiences with firearms, the Lyman 45-90 Classic 3 Die Rifle Set has proven to be a dependable companion. It's a versatile rifle set that provides a range of options for resizing, de-capping, and seating bullets, especially when working with old cartridges like the. 45-90. The state-of-the-art computer control equipment used in crafting these dies is evident, with each one perfectly dimensioned, vented, polished, heat-treated, and polished once again for extra smoothness. One of the most beneficial features of this set is the availability of different bullet seating stems for varying projectile profiles. This has been especially helpful in getting my 45-90 back into action without any issues. Despite being relatively new to this set, I can already say that it's worth its price. The reviews from other users also suggest that the Lyman 45-90 Classic 3 Die Rifle Set is a good value for the money and is an excellent option for the target audience. Buyer's GuideThe 45 ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol) round and its components are widely used, making it a popular choice for reloading enthusiasts. A 45 ACP reloading kit provides all the necessary tools and components to start reloading your own cartridges. This guide will help you understand the essential features and considerations when selecting a 45 ACP reloading kit.Features to Consider in a 45 ACP Reloading Kithttps://preview.redd.it/blcj2jzkcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8725e4828ee9c42f5a70b331ff6b0e73af41cf37
Factors to Consider When Buying a 45 ACP Reloading Kit
Additional Advice for Using a 45 ACP Reloading KitIt is crucial to understand the principles of reloading, including proper handling and safety procedures. Consult reliable resources, join a reloading club, or attend workshops to enhance your knowledge and skills. Proper case preparation, storage, and cleaning are crucial to ensure the longevity of your reloading components.Choosing the right 45 ACP reloading kit involves considering essential features and factors. By investing in a high-quality, user-friendly, and durable kit, you can ensure a safe and efficient reloading experience. Always follow proper reloading procedures and safety guidelines to enjoy the benefits of handcrafted ammunition. https://preview.redd.it/iy2gi3elcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=18588461109ef7a41d2b67567e2aa59f97798df6 FAQWhat is a 45 ACP Reloading Kit?A 45 ACP Reloading Kit is a collection of tools and materials needed to reload 45 Automatic (45 ACP) cartridges. It includes items such as a press, dies, powder measures, shell plates, and bullet molds.Why should I consider buying a 45 ACP Reloading Kit?https://preview.redd.it/umcesgmlcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9e3afa4186231b38d9d2b26e9b1eb5e6cf69c16e Purchasing a 45 ACP Reloading Kit can be beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, it can help you save money, as reloading your own ammunition is often cheaper than buying pre-made cartridges. Secondly, it allows you to personalize your ammunition by customizing the powder charge, bullet weight, and bullet type according to your preferences or specific shooting needs. What tools are typically included in a 45 ACP Reloading Kit?A typical 45 ACP Reloading Kit may include: a progressive press, hand primer, powder scale, powder measure, shell plates, bullet molds, priming tool, and a reloading manual.Can I use any 45 ACP reloading kit with my handgun?Yes, any 45 ACP reloading kit can be used with most handguns chambered in 45 ACP. However, it is essential to ensure that the ammo you reload meets the minimum or maximum specifications recommended by your handgun's manufacturer. https://preview.redd.it/4fwzx04mcb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=107d927c13700d2f5b75b9c9fa65787f5d00c5f6 Are there any safety concerns when reloading 45 ACP rounds?Like any reloading activity, it is crucial to follow safety guidelines to prevent accidents. Always use safety gear, such as eye protection and hearing protection. Read the user manual for the reloading equipment thoroughly and be familiar with the principles of reloading. Perform a thorough inspection of the finished rounds before loading the handgun.What is the difference between progressive and single-stage reloading equipment?Progressive reloading presses automate several steps in the reloading process, making them more efficient and faster. Single-stage presses, on the other hand, perform only one operation at a time, often resulting in more consistent and precise reloads but at a slightly slower pace.Do I need any experience to reload 45 ACP cartridges?While it's beneficial to have experience with reloading, it's not mandatory. With appropriate research, instruction, and attention to detail, even beginners can learn to safely and effectively reload their own 45 ACP ammo.How long does it take to reload a batch of 45 ACP cartridges?The time required to reload a batch of 45 ACP cartridges varies depending on the equipment used, the experience of the reloader, and the specific requirements of the reloading project. Generally, a reloading session can take anywhere from an hour to several hours, depending on the volume of cartridges being produced.Are there any special considerations when reloading 45 ACP rounds?Yes, there are some special considerations when reloading 45 ACP rounds. The 45 ACP cartridge is known for its high pressure, which can lead to challenges during the reloading process, such as the need for stronger reloading dies and the potential for case neck thickness shrinkage. It's essential to pay attention to proper reloading techniques and equipment recommendations to achieve reliable and safe reloading results.Where can I find more information on reloading 45 ACP ammunition?You can find more information on reloading 45 ACP ammunition through various resources, such as online forums, reloading manuals, and educational websites dedicated to firearms and reloading. Engaging with experienced reloaders, attending seminars, and participating in workshops can also provide valuable insights into this hobby or skill.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 08:54 VolarRecords YES THIS IS ABOUT THE HISTORY OF UFOS -- Has the C.I.A. Done More Harm Than Good? - by Amy Davidson Sorkin October 3, 2022
Found this article after doing a quick deep-dive after this post from u/evilez:
https://www.reddit.com/UFOs/comments/1d33m4l/does_anybody_remember_what_podcast_this_was/
"Hello fine ladies and gentlemen! I remember listening to a podcast less than a year ago. The main subject of the podcast was UFOs (I think)... anyways the guest told a story that a congressman or senator wrote a bill that was against the CIA or going to defund the CIA, in the 80's... and shortly thereafter, someone broke into his home, dragged his wife out into the street and stuck a gun in her mouth and told her to kill the bill."
Some light Googling brought up this article about the history of the CIA, the OSS, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan's attempts at defunding the agency in the 90s.
Here's an article about that attempt brought by Moynihan published on the Carnegie Endowment Website on December 20, 2005.
https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2005/12/the-case-for-abolishing-the-cia?lang=en
Here's the New Yorker piece about all of this from October 3rd, 2022.
According to the article regarding the resuscitation of the OSS as the CIA immediately following Roswell and the Twining Memo:
"Many of its officers moved straight to the new C.I.A. Most consequentially, perhaps, four future directors of the C.I.A. were O.S.S. veterans: Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey."
Here's the New Yorker article in full:
"On January 4, 1995, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, of New York, introduced a bill called the Abolition of the Central Intelligence Agency Act. It had been a rough stretch for the C.I.A. The year before, Aldrich Ames, a longtime officer, had been convicted of being a longtime mole for Soviet (and then Russian) intelligence. Despite having a reputation among his colleagues as a problem drinker who appeared to live far beyond his means, Ames had been given high-level assignments with access to the names of American sources in the U.S.S.R. When the F.B.I. finally arrested him, he was in the Jaguar he used for commuting to work at Langley; by then, he was responsible for the death of at least ten agents. Moynihan said that the case was such a flamboyant display of incompetence that it might actually be a distraction from “the most fundamental defects of the C.I.A.” He meant that the agency—in what he considered to be its “defining failure”—had both missed the fact that the Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse and done little to hasten its end.
He gave a diagnosis for what had gone wrong. “Secrecy keeps mistakes secret,” he said. “Secrecy is a disease. It causes a hardening of the arteries of the mind.” He quoted John le Carré on that point, adding that the best information actually came from the likes of area specialists, diplomats, historians, and journalists. If the C.I.A. was disbanded, he said, the State Department could pick up the intelligence work, and do a better job.
Moynihan was, in some respects, being disingenuous. As he well knew, even if his bill had passed, spies and spying wouldn’t have gone away. The State Department already had its own mini agency, the Bureau of Intelligence and Research. The Departments of Energy and Treasury each had one, too. The Defense Intelligence Agency conducted clandestine operations; U.S. Army Intelligence, Air Force Intelligence, and the Office of Naval Intelligence kept themselves busy as well. The National Security Agency was nearly two decades away from the revelation, by Edward Snowden, a contractor and a former C.I.A. employee, that it had collected information about the phone calls of most Americans, but it was a behemoth even in Moynihan’s time. So was the Federal Bureau of Investigation. There were about a dozen agencies then; now, after reforms that were supposed to streamline things, there are eighteen, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (O.D.N.I.), a sort of meta-C.I.A. that has a couple of thousand employees, and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. The Drug Enforcement Administration (which currently has foreign offices in sixty-nine countries) has an Office of National Security Intelligence. Four million people in the United States now have security clearances.
It can be hard to sort out which agencies do what; players in the espionage business aren’t always good with boundaries. Both the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. make use of satellite resources, including commercial ones, but there is a separate agency in charge of a spy-satellite fleet, the National Reconnaissance Office—not to be confused with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which deals with both space-based and ground-level imaging, or with Space Delta 18, the nation’s newest intelligence agency, which is attached to the Space Force. Abolishing the C.I.A. might do nothing more than reconfigure the turf wars.
[NOTE: both Sean Kirkpatrick and David Grusch worked for the NRO and at least Grusch worked for the NGA]
As the senator from New York also knew, a large proportion of the C.I.A.’s resources are devoted not to intelligence gathering but to covert operations, some of which look like military operations. In “Spies, Lies, and Algorithms: The History and Future of American Intelligence” (Princeton)—one of several recent books that coincide with the seventy-fifth anniversary of the agency’s founding—Amy B. Zegart, a political scientist at Stanford, writes that it’s “getting harder to know just where the CIA’s role ends and the military’s role begins.” Yet the agency’s paramilitary pursuits and related covert activities go back decades. They include the botched Bay of Pigs landing, the brutal Phoenix Program in Vietnam, and a long list of assassination attempts, coup plots, the mining of a harbor (with explosive devices the agency built itself), and drone strikes. These operations have very seldom ended well.
Moynihan’s bill had no more luck than another that he introduced the same day, aimed at ending Major League Baseball’s exemption from antitrust laws. In each case, people understood that there was a problem, but both institutions were protected by the sense that there was something essential, and perhaps authentically American, about them, including their very brokenness. A sudden turn of events can convince even the C.I.A.’s most sober critics that the agency will save us all, whether from terrorists or from Donald Trump. But, seventy-five years in, it’s far from clear whether the C.I.A. is good at its job, or what that job is or should be, or how we could get rid of the agency if we wanted to.
How did we end up with the C.I.A.? A familiar explanation is that the shock of Pearl Harbor made the United States realize it needed more spies; the Office of Strategic Services was formed and jumped into action; and, when the war ended, the O.S.S. evolved seamlessly into the C.I.A., ready to go out and win the Cold War. But that narrative isn’t quite right, particularly regarding the relationship between the O.S.S. and the C.I.A.
[NOTE: We know how ended up with the CIA. ROSWELL.]
The United States has always used spies of some sort. George Washington had a discretionary espionage budget for which he didn’t have to turn in receipts. In the early part of the twentieth century, the State Department had an intelligence-analysis unit, along with a cryptography group called the Black Chamber, which operated out of a brownstone in New York’s Murray Hill until it was shut down, in 1929. The Army and the Navy had cryptography and reconnaissance units, too. When the Second World War began, their operations ramped up dramatically, and, as Nicholas Reynolds recounts in “Need to Know: World War II and the Rise of American Intelligence” (Mariner), these units, not the O.S.S., handled most of the code-breaking. The problem became the volume of raw intelligence. The task of making sense of it and of turning it into something that policymakers could use went to an office within the Army’s military-intelligence division (or G-2), which, Reynolds says, produced “the country’s best strategic intelligence” during the war. That office’s work was directed by Alfred McCormack, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone and a partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore. Many of the people he brought in were young corporate lawyers; the theory was that their training in plowing through mountains of documents made them ideal intelligence analysts.
William J. Donovan, who led and largely conceived of the O.S.S., was also a Wall Street lawyer, but one with an aversion to the “legalistic.” What Donovan envisioned was essentially an array of commando units that would operate stealthily and behind enemy lines. In practice, what he tried to build, according to a colleague, was a “private army.” His escapades often risked too much and gained too little. In late 1943, one of his own officers wrote to him that “the set-up has been incredibly wasteful in manpower and, except for a few spotty accomplishments, has been a national failure.” And it had produced “chaos in the field.” Donovan’s nickname was Wild Bill, but his staff called him Seabiscuit, after the thoroughbred, because of his tendency to race around, engaging in what was basically war tourism. In the end, though, the O.S.S. made real contributions, including through its contacts with the French Resistance. But Donovan’s complaint about D Day was that there was “too much planning.” Counterintelligence and strategic thinking bored him, and the O.S.S.’s analysis division was seen as secondary to its operations.
When Harry Truman became President, in April, 1945, he took a look at the O.S.S. and, in September, 1945, abolished it. About two years later, he signed the National Security Act, which established the C.I.A. (and the Department of Defense), but he didn’t want the new agency to be like the group Donovan had run. Instead, it was supposed to do what its name suggested: centralize the intelligence that various agencies gathered, analyze it, and turn it into something the President could use.
[NOTE: I tried doing some research after reading something yesterday about how the NSA was developed in 1952 under Project Sigma to try and decode "alien" communications. If anyone can offer anything, you'd be helping humanity.]
“It was not intended as a ‘Cloak and Dagger’ Outfit!,” Truman later wrote. He also had to deal with public apprehensions that he might create what a Chicago Tribune headline called a “Super Gestapo Agency”—which is why, in its charter, the C.I.A. was banned from domestic spying.
Reynolds’s book is the best of the recent batch, and the most readable. It does not retrofit the history of the O.S.S. around the assumption that the C.I.A. was the inevitable lead postwar intelligence agency. There were other contenders, including a version of McCormack’s office in the State Department—something like what Moynihan wanted. J. Edgar Hoover argued that “World Wide Intelligence” should be turned over to the F.B.I., with military intelligence subservient to him. In some alternative history, he might have pulled that off; by 1943, he was running undercover operations in twenty Latin American countries. And so things could have been worse.
[WHAT UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS WERE WE RUNNING IN LATIN AMERICANS COUNTRIES IN 1943.]
Donovan was an adept publicist, but what mattered most, in the end, was that he was good, or lucky, when it came to hiring people. Despite the “pale, male, and Yale” stereotype, the O.S.S. was somewhat more diverse than other units, and certainly more eclectic. Among its ranks were Ralph Bunche, Herbert Marcuse, and Julia Child. Many of its officers moved straight to the new C.I.A. Most consequentially, perhaps, four future directors of the C.I.A. were O.S.S. veterans: Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey. Each seems to have had glory-day memories of the O.S.S., which is to say that each, in various ways, was afflicted with what a general in Army intelligence called “the screwball Donovan effect.” Casey, who put a picture of Donovan on his wall, said of his old boss, “We all glowed in his presence.” Wild Bill lost the bureaucratic fight but won the personnel and mythology wars.
And, of course, the agency found customers and collaborators in the White House. There was no mention of covert action in the law that chartered the C.I.A., but Presidents—starting with Truman—began using it that way. One of the agency’s first operations involved meddling in the 1948 Italian election, to insure the victory of the Christian Democrats. The subsidies and outright bribery of Italian politicians, some of them on the far, far right, continued into the nineteen-seventies.
Almost from its creation, though, there was a sense that something about the C.I.A. was off. The split between covert action and intelligence gathering and analysis was part of it. The director of the agency was also supposed to be the leader of U.S. intelligence as a whole, but, invariably, the person in the job seemed more invested in preëminence than in coördination. That setup remained in place until the establishment of the O.D.N.I., in 2004, a move that thus far has mostly continued a tradition of trying to deal with the C.I.A.’s dysfunction by setting up ever more agencies, offices, and centers. (The N.S.A. was established, in 1952, in response to a series of cryptography-related failures.) “Legacy of Ashes,” Tim Weiner’s 2008 history of the C.I.A.—and still an invaluable overview—takes its title from a lament by Eisenhower about what he’d be leaving his successors if the “faulty” structure of American intelligence wasn’t changed. Since Weiner’s book was published, the ashes, and the agencies, have only been piling up.
Zegart’s “Spies, Lies, and Algorithms” aims to bring that history to the present. Zegart has served as an adviser to intelligence agencies, and she provides a decent guide to our current bureaucracy. Throughout, her book is clear and well organized—maybe a little too well organized, one feels, after taking in the “Seven Deadly Biases” of intelligence analysis, the “Four Main Adversaries” and the “Five Types of Attack” in the crypto area, and the “Three Words, Four Types” that define covert action. (The covert-action words, incidentally, are “influence,” “acknowledged,” and “abroad.”) Not a few paragraphs read like PowerPoint charts; contradictions are displayed without really being reckoned with. She observes that the balance between “hunting” and “gathering” seems off, but, in her telling, the fact that Presidents of both parties regularly turn to the C.I.A. for paramilitary and other covert tasks constitutes proof that doing so is part of the order of things. The impression she leaves is that if it all goes wrong, it’s because some checklist has been missed. One of the top priorities of U.S. intelligence today, she thinks, should be persuading tech companies to get with the program and help out. She moots the creation of yet another agency, to deal with OSINT—open-source intelligence.
In one chapter, Zegart provides a list of scandals involving spying within the U.S. by various intelligence agencies—notably the N.S.A., the F.B.I., and the C.I.A. “All of these activities violated American law,” she writes. “But that’s the point: domestic laws forbid this kind of surveillance of Americans.” How is that the point, exactly? She depicts the Senate’s 2014 Torture Report, which detailed profound abuses in the C.I.A.’s so-called black sites, as a they-said, the-agency-said, who-knows case. She turns it into a parable about the problems with Congress—suggesting that, although the committee structure may have needed rejiggering, the moral compass of those involved in the program of torture was just fine.
Another new volume, “A Question of Standing: A History of the CIA” (Oxford), by Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones, a professor emeritus of history at the University of Edinburgh, offers the insights of a more distant observer. He can be astute about how “false memories” of the O.S.S.’s accomplishments have led the C.I.A. astray. Part of his argument is that the agency has acted as if its influence depended on its standing with whoever is in the White House, thus motivating it to offer Presidents quick fixes that fix nothing. The net effect is to reduce its standing, and that of the U.S., with the public at home and abroad. But Jeffreys-Jones is prone to rash generalizations and pronouncements. He theorizes that, in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, George W. Bush’s national-security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, may have been susceptible to “war mongering” due to her status as “a descendant of slaves,” and that the working-class background of the C.I.A.’s director, George Tenet, made him more likely to vouch for the faulty intelligence on weapons of mass destruction used to justify the war. “Social mobility so often leads to conformity,” warns Jeffreys-Jones, himself the son of an academic historian.
During the Vietnam War, the C.I.A. had discouraging intelligence to offer, and, when successive Administrations didn’t want to hear it, focussed on being helpful by providing those supposedly quick fixes. That meant abetting a coup in 1963, spying on antiwar protesters, and launching the Phoenix Program, an anti-Vietcong campaign marked by torture and by arbitrary executions; in total, more than twenty thousand people were killed under Phoenix’s auspices.
Phoenix was run by William Colby, the O.S.S. alum, who was soon promoted to C.I.A. director. At lower levels, discontent about Vietnam fueled leaks. In December, 1974, the journalist Seymour Hersh told the agency that he was about to publish a story in the Times exposing its domestic spying. Whether in a miscalculation or (as Jeffreys-Jones somewhat breathlessly speculates) as an act of personal expiation, Colby gave Hersh partial confirmation. Amid the scandals and the Congressional hearings that followed, Colby angered some of his colleagues, and Henry Kissinger, by laying bare even more. It emerged that, in 1973, Colby’s predecessor had asked senior agency officials to produce a list of things the C.I.A. had done that might have been unlawful. The resulting document, covering just the prior fifteen years, was known in-house as “The Family Jewels,” and was almost seven hundred pages long.
The question of how much it matters who works at the C.I.A. is a perennial one. The influence of Donovan’s acolytes shows that decisions about whom you recruit can, in a formative period or at a critical juncture, make a big difference. But, once an institutional culture has become entrenched, it can be easier to see how the institution shapes the people within it than vice versa.
“Wise Gals: The Spies Who Built the CIA and Changed the Future of Espionage” (Putnam), by Nathalia Holt, comes at the question from a different angle. It’s about five women who worked for the early C.I.A.; three also worked at the O.S.S., and one, Eloise Page, began her career as Bill Donovan’s secretary. Holt is also the author of “Rise of the Rocket Girls,” about women in the early years of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and “The Queens of Animation,” about women at the Walt Disney Company. Her book contains fine material for a beautifully art-directed streaming series, with set pieces in postwar Paris, nineteen-fifties Baghdad, and nineteen-seventies Greece, where Page was the C.I.A.’s first woman station chief. It even has a framing device in the form of the “Petticoat Panel,” a working group of C.I.A. women that convened in 1953 to document their unequal pay and treatment. Holt quotes the transcript of the meeting at which the leadership of the agency summarily rejected their findings. Helms, the future director, says, “It is just nonsense for these gals to come on here and think that the government is going to fall apart because their brains aren’t going to be used to the maximum.” (In 1977, Helms was convicted of lying to Congress about the C.I.A.’s machinations in Chile.) What the book is not, unfortunately, is a coherent history of the C.I.A., of the era it depicts, or even of these women’s work.
Holt’s research does turn up evidence that Jane Burrell, one of her subjects, was the first C.I.A. officer to die in the line of duty, in a plane crash in France, in 1948, a fact that the agency itself apparently missed. Holt ends her book with a call for a star honoring Burrell to be added to the C.I.A.’s memorial wall. Of the hundred and thirty-seven officers represented there, she writes, forty-five died accidentally, the majority in plane crashes, meaning that Burrell’s case would be fairly typical. Burrell was on the return leg of a trip to Brussels, where she’d been sent to talk to war-crimes investigators about a mess the C.I.A. had created by relying on an agent who turned out to have worked with the S.S. and was now in custody. In that respect, too, Burrell, who had personally handled the agent, was typical of the C.I.A. (After Burrell vouched for him, the man was released.) The subject of the C.I.A.’s postwar relations with former Nazis—some of whom, like Reinhard Gehlen, it helped to install in West Germany’s new intelligence service—and with collaborationist émigré groups is, no doubt, a morass. Holt, alas, manages to make the story even more garbled than it has to be. In the end, she basically treats the whole sordid episode as a learning experience for the Gals.
The problem is that the agency doesn’t seem to learn much. Holt credits Mary Hutchison with helping to build a network of émigré Ukrainian nationalists. Beginning in 1949, the agency parachuted some of them (including one whom Hutchison apparently distrusted) behind the Soviet border, where they were quickly captured—and repeated the same procedure for a number of years. “Despite the catastrophe, the Ukraine operation would serve as a template moving forward,” Holt writes. “The C.I.A. had more success with back-to-back operations in Iran and Guatemala, where covert action was able to deftly oust leaders considered undesirable.” It’s odd to describe these coups as deft. One of Zegart’s handy lists is of the “unintended consequences” in Iran: “religious extremism, a revolutionary overthrow, the American hostage crisis, severed ties, regional instability, and today’s rising nuclear dangers.” Guatemala is still dealing with the violent legacy of the coup that the C.I.A. visited upon it. Then there’s the question of the intended consequences, which were, respectively, to elevate a shah and a military regime. Secret wars tend not to be so secret in the country where they take place.
It was, no doubt, frustrating for Hutchison when, a few years later, her colleagues on the Bay of Pigs task force failed to make use of her Spanish-language skills. But are we supposed to think that the whole misconceived enterprise would have gone off without a hitch were it not for the C.I.A.’s misogyny? One of Holt’s minor themes is that women in the C.I.A. were seen as more natural analysts than operatives—with analysis, in turn, seen as less manly, and less valuable, to everybody’s detriment. But she is more intent on showing that these women were also daring. The main point of “Wise Gals” is that it’s cool that women were in the early C.I.A., and therefore that the C.I.A. itself was cooler than we’d realized. Holt celebrates a big promotion Page got that afforded her access to the secret of a safe containing shellfish-derived poison. You don’t have to be pale, male, and Yale to be complicit in a bungled assassination plot, or, for that matter, a program of rendition and torture.
Why do so many books about the C.I.A. have trouble getting their story straight? It can’t just be the secrecy of the work itself, at least with regard to the earlier years, about which much has been declassified. (Much remains under wraps: Moynihan complained that classification created more than six million supposed secrets in 1993; Zegart writes that the number in 2016 was fifty-five million—not all of which can possibly have been critical.) The aura of secrecy, by contrast, probably does distort the judgment of its chroniclers. And the scope of the agency’s work is a challenge: it’s hard to write expertly on places as far-ranging as the Democratic Republic of Congo (where the agency initially planned to poison President Patrice Lumumba’s toothpaste, and instead ended up handing a quarter of a million dollars to Joseph Mobutu, the country’s future dictator, who facilitated the assassination) and Afghanistan (where the C.I.A. has had forty years of illusory gains and worse losses). But the biggest problem may be the agency’s own pattern of self-deception. Holt, for example, sometimes seems to go wrong when, rummaging through the archives, she gives too much credit to contemporaneous internal assessments of an agent’s or an operation’s worth.
In truth, the C.I.A. has had a “defining failure” for every decade of its existence—sometimes more than one. For Moynihan, in the nineteen-nineties, it was the lack of foresight about the Soviet Union; in the two-thousands, it was the phantom weapons of mass destruction, followed by torture and, in still evolving ways, by the drone-based program of targeted killings, with its high toll of civilian deaths. Barack Obama’s rapport with John Brennan, the C.I.A.’s director from 2013 to 2017, seems to have brought him to accept the view that the killing of American citizens abroad was acceptable, if managed prudently. The overuse of the agency on the battlefield is due not to a military-manpower shortage but to wishful thinking about the benefits of secrecy and of a lack of accountability.
It’s difficult to know, at this point, what the C.I.A.’s next defining failure—or, if one tries to be optimistic, its stabilizing success—will be. Donald Trump has had a complicated relationship with the intelligence community—increasingly capitalized and abbreviated to I.C.—which is presently conducting a damage assessment regarding documents with classified markings that he kept at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home. He might, of course, be reëlected, and have the C.I.A.’s tools at his disposal again. If the C.I.A. isn’t the place to turn for an expedient solution to foreign-policy problems, neither is it bound to be the place to turn for a solution to our democracy’s political problems.
“If you ask intelligence officers what misperceptions bother them most, odds are they’ll mention ethics,” Zegart writes. She quotes an official who complains that “people think we’re lawbreakers, we’re human rights violators.” She insists that “officers think about ethics a lot.” She portrays the agency as being filled with hardworking moms and dads who do a great deal of “agonizing.” No doubt she’s right. But if the C.I.A. keeps falling down all the same, something must be tragically amiss in the agency’s structure or culture, or both. All the talk of coups and assassination plots, Zegart worries, distracts people from understanding the C.I.A.’s more basic intelligence mission. In fact, the party most distracted by such activities—and by the military role it has taken on—seems to be the agency itself. ♦
An earlier version of this article misstated the numerical designation of the Space Force unit dedicated to intelligence.
Published in the print edition of the October 10, 2022, issue.
submitted by VolarRecords to UFOs [link] [comments]
https://www.reddit.com/UFOs/comments/1d33m4l/does_anybody_remember_what_podcast_this_was/
"Hello fine ladies and gentlemen! I remember listening to a podcast less than a year ago. The main subject of the podcast was UFOs (I think)... anyways the guest told a story that a congressman or senator wrote a bill that was against the CIA or going to defund the CIA, in the 80's... and shortly thereafter, someone broke into his home, dragged his wife out into the street and stuck a gun in her mouth and told her to kill the bill."
Some light Googling brought up this article about the history of the CIA, the OSS, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan's attempts at defunding the agency in the 90s.
Here's an article about that attempt brought by Moynihan published on the Carnegie Endowment Website on December 20, 2005.
https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2005/12/the-case-for-abolishing-the-cia?lang=en
Here's the New Yorker piece about all of this from October 3rd, 2022.
Spooked -- What’s wrong with the C.I.A.? -- By Amy Davidson Sorkin -- October 3, 2022
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/10/10/has-the-cia-done-more-harm-than-goodAccording to the article regarding the resuscitation of the OSS as the CIA immediately following Roswell and the Twining Memo:
"Many of its officers moved straight to the new C.I.A. Most consequentially, perhaps, four future directors of the C.I.A. were O.S.S. veterans: Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey."
Here's the New Yorker article in full:
"On January 4, 1995, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, of New York, introduced a bill called the Abolition of the Central Intelligence Agency Act. It had been a rough stretch for the C.I.A. The year before, Aldrich Ames, a longtime officer, had been convicted of being a longtime mole for Soviet (and then Russian) intelligence. Despite having a reputation among his colleagues as a problem drinker who appeared to live far beyond his means, Ames had been given high-level assignments with access to the names of American sources in the U.S.S.R. When the F.B.I. finally arrested him, he was in the Jaguar he used for commuting to work at Langley; by then, he was responsible for the death of at least ten agents. Moynihan said that the case was such a flamboyant display of incompetence that it might actually be a distraction from “the most fundamental defects of the C.I.A.” He meant that the agency—in what he considered to be its “defining failure”—had both missed the fact that the Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse and done little to hasten its end.
He gave a diagnosis for what had gone wrong. “Secrecy keeps mistakes secret,” he said. “Secrecy is a disease. It causes a hardening of the arteries of the mind.” He quoted John le Carré on that point, adding that the best information actually came from the likes of area specialists, diplomats, historians, and journalists. If the C.I.A. was disbanded, he said, the State Department could pick up the intelligence work, and do a better job.
Moynihan was, in some respects, being disingenuous. As he well knew, even if his bill had passed, spies and spying wouldn’t have gone away. The State Department already had its own mini agency, the Bureau of Intelligence and Research. The Departments of Energy and Treasury each had one, too. The Defense Intelligence Agency conducted clandestine operations; U.S. Army Intelligence, Air Force Intelligence, and the Office of Naval Intelligence kept themselves busy as well. The National Security Agency was nearly two decades away from the revelation, by Edward Snowden, a contractor and a former C.I.A. employee, that it had collected information about the phone calls of most Americans, but it was a behemoth even in Moynihan’s time. So was the Federal Bureau of Investigation. There were about a dozen agencies then; now, after reforms that were supposed to streamline things, there are eighteen, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (O.D.N.I.), a sort of meta-C.I.A. that has a couple of thousand employees, and the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. The Drug Enforcement Administration (which currently has foreign offices in sixty-nine countries) has an Office of National Security Intelligence. Four million people in the United States now have security clearances.
It can be hard to sort out which agencies do what; players in the espionage business aren’t always good with boundaries. Both the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. make use of satellite resources, including commercial ones, but there is a separate agency in charge of a spy-satellite fleet, the National Reconnaissance Office—not to be confused with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which deals with both space-based and ground-level imaging, or with Space Delta 18, the nation’s newest intelligence agency, which is attached to the Space Force. Abolishing the C.I.A. might do nothing more than reconfigure the turf wars.
[NOTE: both Sean Kirkpatrick and David Grusch worked for the NRO and at least Grusch worked for the NGA]
As the senator from New York also knew, a large proportion of the C.I.A.’s resources are devoted not to intelligence gathering but to covert operations, some of which look like military operations. In “Spies, Lies, and Algorithms: The History and Future of American Intelligence” (Princeton)—one of several recent books that coincide with the seventy-fifth anniversary of the agency’s founding—Amy B. Zegart, a political scientist at Stanford, writes that it’s “getting harder to know just where the CIA’s role ends and the military’s role begins.” Yet the agency’s paramilitary pursuits and related covert activities go back decades. They include the botched Bay of Pigs landing, the brutal Phoenix Program in Vietnam, and a long list of assassination attempts, coup plots, the mining of a harbor (with explosive devices the agency built itself), and drone strikes. These operations have very seldom ended well.
Moynihan’s bill had no more luck than another that he introduced the same day, aimed at ending Major League Baseball’s exemption from antitrust laws. In each case, people understood that there was a problem, but both institutions were protected by the sense that there was something essential, and perhaps authentically American, about them, including their very brokenness. A sudden turn of events can convince even the C.I.A.’s most sober critics that the agency will save us all, whether from terrorists or from Donald Trump. But, seventy-five years in, it’s far from clear whether the C.I.A. is good at its job, or what that job is or should be, or how we could get rid of the agency if we wanted to.
How did we end up with the C.I.A.? A familiar explanation is that the shock of Pearl Harbor made the United States realize it needed more spies; the Office of Strategic Services was formed and jumped into action; and, when the war ended, the O.S.S. evolved seamlessly into the C.I.A., ready to go out and win the Cold War. But that narrative isn’t quite right, particularly regarding the relationship between the O.S.S. and the C.I.A.
[NOTE: We know how ended up with the CIA. ROSWELL.]
The United States has always used spies of some sort. George Washington had a discretionary espionage budget for which he didn’t have to turn in receipts. In the early part of the twentieth century, the State Department had an intelligence-analysis unit, along with a cryptography group called the Black Chamber, which operated out of a brownstone in New York’s Murray Hill until it was shut down, in 1929. The Army and the Navy had cryptography and reconnaissance units, too. When the Second World War began, their operations ramped up dramatically, and, as Nicholas Reynolds recounts in “Need to Know: World War II and the Rise of American Intelligence” (Mariner), these units, not the O.S.S., handled most of the code-breaking. The problem became the volume of raw intelligence. The task of making sense of it and of turning it into something that policymakers could use went to an office within the Army’s military-intelligence division (or G-2), which, Reynolds says, produced “the country’s best strategic intelligence” during the war. That office’s work was directed by Alfred McCormack, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone and a partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore. Many of the people he brought in were young corporate lawyers; the theory was that their training in plowing through mountains of documents made them ideal intelligence analysts.
William J. Donovan, who led and largely conceived of the O.S.S., was also a Wall Street lawyer, but one with an aversion to the “legalistic.” What Donovan envisioned was essentially an array of commando units that would operate stealthily and behind enemy lines. In practice, what he tried to build, according to a colleague, was a “private army.” His escapades often risked too much and gained too little. In late 1943, one of his own officers wrote to him that “the set-up has been incredibly wasteful in manpower and, except for a few spotty accomplishments, has been a national failure.” And it had produced “chaos in the field.” Donovan’s nickname was Wild Bill, but his staff called him Seabiscuit, after the thoroughbred, because of his tendency to race around, engaging in what was basically war tourism. In the end, though, the O.S.S. made real contributions, including through its contacts with the French Resistance. But Donovan’s complaint about D Day was that there was “too much planning.” Counterintelligence and strategic thinking bored him, and the O.S.S.’s analysis division was seen as secondary to its operations.
When Harry Truman became President, in April, 1945, he took a look at the O.S.S. and, in September, 1945, abolished it. About two years later, he signed the National Security Act, which established the C.I.A. (and the Department of Defense), but he didn’t want the new agency to be like the group Donovan had run. Instead, it was supposed to do what its name suggested: centralize the intelligence that various agencies gathered, analyze it, and turn it into something the President could use.
[NOTE: I tried doing some research after reading something yesterday about how the NSA was developed in 1952 under Project Sigma to try and decode "alien" communications. If anyone can offer anything, you'd be helping humanity.]
“It was not intended as a ‘Cloak and Dagger’ Outfit!,” Truman later wrote. He also had to deal with public apprehensions that he might create what a Chicago Tribune headline called a “Super Gestapo Agency”—which is why, in its charter, the C.I.A. was banned from domestic spying.
Reynolds’s book is the best of the recent batch, and the most readable. It does not retrofit the history of the O.S.S. around the assumption that the C.I.A. was the inevitable lead postwar intelligence agency. There were other contenders, including a version of McCormack’s office in the State Department—something like what Moynihan wanted. J. Edgar Hoover argued that “World Wide Intelligence” should be turned over to the F.B.I., with military intelligence subservient to him. In some alternative history, he might have pulled that off; by 1943, he was running undercover operations in twenty Latin American countries. And so things could have been worse.
[WHAT UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS WERE WE RUNNING IN LATIN AMERICANS COUNTRIES IN 1943.]
Donovan was an adept publicist, but what mattered most, in the end, was that he was good, or lucky, when it came to hiring people. Despite the “pale, male, and Yale” stereotype, the O.S.S. was somewhat more diverse than other units, and certainly more eclectic. Among its ranks were Ralph Bunche, Herbert Marcuse, and Julia Child. Many of its officers moved straight to the new C.I.A. Most consequentially, perhaps, four future directors of the C.I.A. were O.S.S. veterans: Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, William Colby, and William Casey. Each seems to have had glory-day memories of the O.S.S., which is to say that each, in various ways, was afflicted with what a general in Army intelligence called “the screwball Donovan effect.” Casey, who put a picture of Donovan on his wall, said of his old boss, “We all glowed in his presence.” Wild Bill lost the bureaucratic fight but won the personnel and mythology wars.
And, of course, the agency found customers and collaborators in the White House. There was no mention of covert action in the law that chartered the C.I.A., but Presidents—starting with Truman—began using it that way. One of the agency’s first operations involved meddling in the 1948 Italian election, to insure the victory of the Christian Democrats. The subsidies and outright bribery of Italian politicians, some of them on the far, far right, continued into the nineteen-seventies.
Almost from its creation, though, there was a sense that something about the C.I.A. was off. The split between covert action and intelligence gathering and analysis was part of it. The director of the agency was also supposed to be the leader of U.S. intelligence as a whole, but, invariably, the person in the job seemed more invested in preëminence than in coördination. That setup remained in place until the establishment of the O.D.N.I., in 2004, a move that thus far has mostly continued a tradition of trying to deal with the C.I.A.’s dysfunction by setting up ever more agencies, offices, and centers. (The N.S.A. was established, in 1952, in response to a series of cryptography-related failures.) “Legacy of Ashes,” Tim Weiner’s 2008 history of the C.I.A.—and still an invaluable overview—takes its title from a lament by Eisenhower about what he’d be leaving his successors if the “faulty” structure of American intelligence wasn’t changed. Since Weiner’s book was published, the ashes, and the agencies, have only been piling up.
Zegart’s “Spies, Lies, and Algorithms” aims to bring that history to the present. Zegart has served as an adviser to intelligence agencies, and she provides a decent guide to our current bureaucracy. Throughout, her book is clear and well organized—maybe a little too well organized, one feels, after taking in the “Seven Deadly Biases” of intelligence analysis, the “Four Main Adversaries” and the “Five Types of Attack” in the crypto area, and the “Three Words, Four Types” that define covert action. (The covert-action words, incidentally, are “influence,” “acknowledged,” and “abroad.”) Not a few paragraphs read like PowerPoint charts; contradictions are displayed without really being reckoned with. She observes that the balance between “hunting” and “gathering” seems off, but, in her telling, the fact that Presidents of both parties regularly turn to the C.I.A. for paramilitary and other covert tasks constitutes proof that doing so is part of the order of things. The impression she leaves is that if it all goes wrong, it’s because some checklist has been missed. One of the top priorities of U.S. intelligence today, she thinks, should be persuading tech companies to get with the program and help out. She moots the creation of yet another agency, to deal with OSINT—open-source intelligence.
In one chapter, Zegart provides a list of scandals involving spying within the U.S. by various intelligence agencies—notably the N.S.A., the F.B.I., and the C.I.A. “All of these activities violated American law,” she writes. “But that’s the point: domestic laws forbid this kind of surveillance of Americans.” How is that the point, exactly? She depicts the Senate’s 2014 Torture Report, which detailed profound abuses in the C.I.A.’s so-called black sites, as a they-said, the-agency-said, who-knows case. She turns it into a parable about the problems with Congress—suggesting that, although the committee structure may have needed rejiggering, the moral compass of those involved in the program of torture was just fine.
Another new volume, “A Question of Standing: A History of the CIA” (Oxford), by Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones, a professor emeritus of history at the University of Edinburgh, offers the insights of a more distant observer. He can be astute about how “false memories” of the O.S.S.’s accomplishments have led the C.I.A. astray. Part of his argument is that the agency has acted as if its influence depended on its standing with whoever is in the White House, thus motivating it to offer Presidents quick fixes that fix nothing. The net effect is to reduce its standing, and that of the U.S., with the public at home and abroad. But Jeffreys-Jones is prone to rash generalizations and pronouncements. He theorizes that, in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, George W. Bush’s national-security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, may have been susceptible to “war mongering” due to her status as “a descendant of slaves,” and that the working-class background of the C.I.A.’s director, George Tenet, made him more likely to vouch for the faulty intelligence on weapons of mass destruction used to justify the war. “Social mobility so often leads to conformity,” warns Jeffreys-Jones, himself the son of an academic historian.
During the Vietnam War, the C.I.A. had discouraging intelligence to offer, and, when successive Administrations didn’t want to hear it, focussed on being helpful by providing those supposedly quick fixes. That meant abetting a coup in 1963, spying on antiwar protesters, and launching the Phoenix Program, an anti-Vietcong campaign marked by torture and by arbitrary executions; in total, more than twenty thousand people were killed under Phoenix’s auspices.
Phoenix was run by William Colby, the O.S.S. alum, who was soon promoted to C.I.A. director. At lower levels, discontent about Vietnam fueled leaks. In December, 1974, the journalist Seymour Hersh told the agency that he was about to publish a story in the Times exposing its domestic spying. Whether in a miscalculation or (as Jeffreys-Jones somewhat breathlessly speculates) as an act of personal expiation, Colby gave Hersh partial confirmation. Amid the scandals and the Congressional hearings that followed, Colby angered some of his colleagues, and Henry Kissinger, by laying bare even more. It emerged that, in 1973, Colby’s predecessor had asked senior agency officials to produce a list of things the C.I.A. had done that might have been unlawful. The resulting document, covering just the prior fifteen years, was known in-house as “The Family Jewels,” and was almost seven hundred pages long.
The question of how much it matters who works at the C.I.A. is a perennial one. The influence of Donovan’s acolytes shows that decisions about whom you recruit can, in a formative period or at a critical juncture, make a big difference. But, once an institutional culture has become entrenched, it can be easier to see how the institution shapes the people within it than vice versa.
“Wise Gals: The Spies Who Built the CIA and Changed the Future of Espionage” (Putnam), by Nathalia Holt, comes at the question from a different angle. It’s about five women who worked for the early C.I.A.; three also worked at the O.S.S., and one, Eloise Page, began her career as Bill Donovan’s secretary. Holt is also the author of “Rise of the Rocket Girls,” about women in the early years of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and “The Queens of Animation,” about women at the Walt Disney Company. Her book contains fine material for a beautifully art-directed streaming series, with set pieces in postwar Paris, nineteen-fifties Baghdad, and nineteen-seventies Greece, where Page was the C.I.A.’s first woman station chief. It even has a framing device in the form of the “Petticoat Panel,” a working group of C.I.A. women that convened in 1953 to document their unequal pay and treatment. Holt quotes the transcript of the meeting at which the leadership of the agency summarily rejected their findings. Helms, the future director, says, “It is just nonsense for these gals to come on here and think that the government is going to fall apart because their brains aren’t going to be used to the maximum.” (In 1977, Helms was convicted of lying to Congress about the C.I.A.’s machinations in Chile.) What the book is not, unfortunately, is a coherent history of the C.I.A., of the era it depicts, or even of these women’s work.
Holt’s research does turn up evidence that Jane Burrell, one of her subjects, was the first C.I.A. officer to die in the line of duty, in a plane crash in France, in 1948, a fact that the agency itself apparently missed. Holt ends her book with a call for a star honoring Burrell to be added to the C.I.A.’s memorial wall. Of the hundred and thirty-seven officers represented there, she writes, forty-five died accidentally, the majority in plane crashes, meaning that Burrell’s case would be fairly typical. Burrell was on the return leg of a trip to Brussels, where she’d been sent to talk to war-crimes investigators about a mess the C.I.A. had created by relying on an agent who turned out to have worked with the S.S. and was now in custody. In that respect, too, Burrell, who had personally handled the agent, was typical of the C.I.A. (After Burrell vouched for him, the man was released.) The subject of the C.I.A.’s postwar relations with former Nazis—some of whom, like Reinhard Gehlen, it helped to install in West Germany’s new intelligence service—and with collaborationist émigré groups is, no doubt, a morass. Holt, alas, manages to make the story even more garbled than it has to be. In the end, she basically treats the whole sordid episode as a learning experience for the Gals.
The problem is that the agency doesn’t seem to learn much. Holt credits Mary Hutchison with helping to build a network of émigré Ukrainian nationalists. Beginning in 1949, the agency parachuted some of them (including one whom Hutchison apparently distrusted) behind the Soviet border, where they were quickly captured—and repeated the same procedure for a number of years. “Despite the catastrophe, the Ukraine operation would serve as a template moving forward,” Holt writes. “The C.I.A. had more success with back-to-back operations in Iran and Guatemala, where covert action was able to deftly oust leaders considered undesirable.” It’s odd to describe these coups as deft. One of Zegart’s handy lists is of the “unintended consequences” in Iran: “religious extremism, a revolutionary overthrow, the American hostage crisis, severed ties, regional instability, and today’s rising nuclear dangers.” Guatemala is still dealing with the violent legacy of the coup that the C.I.A. visited upon it. Then there’s the question of the intended consequences, which were, respectively, to elevate a shah and a military regime. Secret wars tend not to be so secret in the country where they take place.
It was, no doubt, frustrating for Hutchison when, a few years later, her colleagues on the Bay of Pigs task force failed to make use of her Spanish-language skills. But are we supposed to think that the whole misconceived enterprise would have gone off without a hitch were it not for the C.I.A.’s misogyny? One of Holt’s minor themes is that women in the C.I.A. were seen as more natural analysts than operatives—with analysis, in turn, seen as less manly, and less valuable, to everybody’s detriment. But she is more intent on showing that these women were also daring. The main point of “Wise Gals” is that it’s cool that women were in the early C.I.A., and therefore that the C.I.A. itself was cooler than we’d realized. Holt celebrates a big promotion Page got that afforded her access to the secret of a safe containing shellfish-derived poison. You don’t have to be pale, male, and Yale to be complicit in a bungled assassination plot, or, for that matter, a program of rendition and torture.
Why do so many books about the C.I.A. have trouble getting their story straight? It can’t just be the secrecy of the work itself, at least with regard to the earlier years, about which much has been declassified. (Much remains under wraps: Moynihan complained that classification created more than six million supposed secrets in 1993; Zegart writes that the number in 2016 was fifty-five million—not all of which can possibly have been critical.) The aura of secrecy, by contrast, probably does distort the judgment of its chroniclers. And the scope of the agency’s work is a challenge: it’s hard to write expertly on places as far-ranging as the Democratic Republic of Congo (where the agency initially planned to poison President Patrice Lumumba’s toothpaste, and instead ended up handing a quarter of a million dollars to Joseph Mobutu, the country’s future dictator, who facilitated the assassination) and Afghanistan (where the C.I.A. has had forty years of illusory gains and worse losses). But the biggest problem may be the agency’s own pattern of self-deception. Holt, for example, sometimes seems to go wrong when, rummaging through the archives, she gives too much credit to contemporaneous internal assessments of an agent’s or an operation’s worth.
In truth, the C.I.A. has had a “defining failure” for every decade of its existence—sometimes more than one. For Moynihan, in the nineteen-nineties, it was the lack of foresight about the Soviet Union; in the two-thousands, it was the phantom weapons of mass destruction, followed by torture and, in still evolving ways, by the drone-based program of targeted killings, with its high toll of civilian deaths. Barack Obama’s rapport with John Brennan, the C.I.A.’s director from 2013 to 2017, seems to have brought him to accept the view that the killing of American citizens abroad was acceptable, if managed prudently. The overuse of the agency on the battlefield is due not to a military-manpower shortage but to wishful thinking about the benefits of secrecy and of a lack of accountability.
It’s difficult to know, at this point, what the C.I.A.’s next defining failure—or, if one tries to be optimistic, its stabilizing success—will be. Donald Trump has had a complicated relationship with the intelligence community—increasingly capitalized and abbreviated to I.C.—which is presently conducting a damage assessment regarding documents with classified markings that he kept at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home. He might, of course, be reëlected, and have the C.I.A.’s tools at his disposal again. If the C.I.A. isn’t the place to turn for an expedient solution to foreign-policy problems, neither is it bound to be the place to turn for a solution to our democracy’s political problems.
“If you ask intelligence officers what misperceptions bother them most, odds are they’ll mention ethics,” Zegart writes. She quotes an official who complains that “people think we’re lawbreakers, we’re human rights violators.” She insists that “officers think about ethics a lot.” She portrays the agency as being filled with hardworking moms and dads who do a great deal of “agonizing.” No doubt she’s right. But if the C.I.A. keeps falling down all the same, something must be tragically amiss in the agency’s structure or culture, or both. All the talk of coups and assassination plots, Zegart worries, distracts people from understanding the C.I.A.’s more basic intelligence mission. In fact, the party most distracted by such activities—and by the military role it has taken on—seems to be the agency itself. ♦
An earlier version of this article misstated the numerical designation of the Space Force unit dedicated to intelligence.
Published in the print edition of the October 10, 2022, issue.
2024.05.29 08:51 Psychological-Dig-21 How to score for H2 History case study component
Hi all!
As an H2 History tutor, I've observed various common mistakes lately my students tend to make while tackling the case study component. To help address these issues, I've compiled this short guide on effective source-based techniques to help minimise these common mistakes. I have written some tips based on both the part (a) similarities and difference component.
Do read them carefully and goodluck! If you need more advice, feel free to check out more resources here: h2historyguides.com
By highlighting these strategies, I aim to you away from common pitfalls that many students make.
Example of what you should be doing: "According to Source A, Khrushchev's policies aimed at de-escalating Cold War tensions, as seen in his proposal for peaceful coexistence. Similarly, Source B highlights how the Cuban Missile Crisis prompted both superpowers to consider diplomacy to avoid nuclear war."
Example of explanative paragraph: "Source A's depiction of détente reflects not just a strategic shift but a recognition of mutual vulnerability, indicating a deeper acknowledgment of the need for cohabitation over confrontation."
Example of where contextual knowledge can come in: "The divergence in Source A and Source B regarding the Sino-Soviet split can be attributed to the differing national interests of China and the Soviet Union, as corroborated by my contextual knowledge."
A more focused example: "Source A's emphasis on the ideological rift between the US and the USSR during the Cuban Missile Crisis contrasts sharply with Source B’s focus on diplomatic negotiations to resolve the crisis."
This of course is better than a broad statement such as:
"USA and the USSR had a negative relationship."
Example: "Sources A, B, and C support the assertion that the Cold War was a period of constant nuclear threat, while Sources D, E, and F challenge it."
Here are just some of the issues I have seen lately. If you need more assistance you can visit Free H2 History A-Level Resources H2 History Guides for more helpful articles. Goodluck!
submitted by Psychological-Dig-21 to SGExams [link] [comments]
As an H2 History tutor, I've observed various common mistakes lately my students tend to make while tackling the case study component. To help address these issues, I've compiled this short guide on effective source-based techniques to help minimise these common mistakes. I have written some tips based on both the part (a) similarities and difference component.
Do read them carefully and goodluck! If you need more advice, feel free to check out more resources here: h2historyguides.com
By highlighting these strategies, I aim to you away from common pitfalls that many students make.
Part A: Analysis of Similarities and Differences
1. Citing Sources
A frequent oversight is the failure to directly reference sources when making a point. Citing sources not only bolsters your argument but also shows active engagement with the material. You will not be able to get high marks no matter how good your answer if you do not cite the sources.Example of what you should be doing: "According to Source A, Khrushchev's policies aimed at de-escalating Cold War tensions, as seen in his proposal for peaceful coexistence. Similarly, Source B highlights how the Cuban Missile Crisis prompted both superpowers to consider diplomacy to avoid nuclear war."
2. Using Explanation Over Paraphrasing
Students often reword the source without analysing its implications. It's crucial to explain what the source's content suggests about the author's perspective or the historical context. In other words, you need to be answering the question with your answer, and whoever is reading should not be trying to infeguess what you are trying to say.Example of explanative paragraph: "Source A's depiction of détente reflects not just a strategic shift but a recognition of mutual vulnerability, indicating a deeper acknowledgment of the need for cohabitation over confrontation."
3. Contextual Knowledge
Some students misuse contextual knowledge merely to identify similarities or differences, rather than explaining why these exist. Contextual knowledge does not come in when you identify the difference, it only potentially comes in when you evaluate - when you explain why the difference in opinion or why the similarity in opinion.Example of where contextual knowledge can come in: "The divergence in Source A and Source B regarding the Sino-Soviet split can be attributed to the differing national interests of China and the Soviet Union, as corroborated by my contextual knowledge."
4. Focused Topic Sentences in Identifying the Similarity and Difference
A common mistake is starting analyses with broad statements. It's more effective to begin with specific, focused topic sentences that directly address the sources' content. It shows that you have a better understanding of the sources, which is key to attain the higher marks.A more focused example: "Source A's emphasis on the ideological rift between the US and the USSR during the Cuban Missile Crisis contrasts sharply with Source B’s focus on diplomatic negotiations to resolve the crisis."
This of course is better than a broad statement such as:
"USA and the USSR had a negative relationship."
Part B: Evaluating Sources in Relation to an Assertion
1. Identifying Support and Challenge
Determining which sources support or challenge an assertion is key, yet lately I have seen so many students struggle to make it clear which sources are support and which sources are challenge. Say it clearly at the beginning.Example: "Sources A, B, and C support the assertion that the Cold War was a period of constant nuclear threat, while Sources D, E, and F challenge it."
2. Handling Mixed Sources
Mixed sources can be tricky, and students often mishandle them by not justifying why a source is considered mixed based on its content. One of the mistakes I tend to see is that the students are very quick to characterize a source as mixed, when it is in fact support or challenge. Do note that even if the sources presents both sides of the argument, it does not mean it is mixed. All it takes is one short sentence to prove the author's stance for it to be support or challenge; so be careful.3. Structuring Your Answer
A well-structured answer is critical, yet students frequently falter in systematically addressing each source, evaluating their reliability, and analysing how they interact as a set. Having a clear structure in your answer just makes it much easier for whoever reading to understand the argument you are making.4. Using Contextual Knowledge
A good grasph contextual knowledge is paramount for assessing the reliability of sources, a step often overlooked by students. Understanding the historical background, the author's position, and the publication context can significantly influence reliability of a source, and there are not shortcuts. You need to know the facts if you want to convincingly question the reliability of a source.Here are just some of the issues I have seen lately. If you need more assistance you can visit Free H2 History A-Level Resources H2 History Guides for more helpful articles. Goodluck!
2024.05.29 08:50 Stage-Piercing727 Best 45 70 Scope
 | submitted by Stage-Piercing727 to u/Stage-Piercing727 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/313523ofbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=351a3da0cd53007f55f098eccb3686ec5d28047f Looking for the perfect scope for your hunting adventures or target shooting practice? Look no further! In this article, we'll be showcasing some of the best 45-70 scopes on the market, providing you with a comprehensive guide to make an informed decision. From top-notch accuracy to durability and affordability, our roundup of the best scopes will have you prepared for your next adventure. The Top 17 Best 45 70 Scope
Reviews🔗Leupold Gold Ring 12-40x60mm HD Folded Light Path Spotting Scopehttps://preview.redd.it/9jmcjuyfbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=77f14071355ee78b84b48327c48d46c5289a06bf I recently got my hands on the Leupold Gold Ring 12-40x60mm HD Spotting Scope, and I must say it's a game-changer! This little powerhouse boasts an Extra Low Dispersion Optical System, which maximizes color fidelity and contrast. It provides an incredible image across a wide field of view, all with best-in-class eye relief for easy viewing with or without eyeglasses. One feature that really stood out for me was the Folded Light Path (FLP) system. Instead of using prisms, this system employs mirrors to compress a long optical path into half its length, making the scope incredibly compact and portable. Another highlight is its magnesium housing. This lightweight material packs a serious punch when it comes to durability, making it ideal for rough outdoor conditions. And don't even get me started on the 100% waterproof and fog proof capabilities - this thing can brave any weather! However, one issue I encountered was with the focus knob. It's extremely stiff and doesn't change smoothly as you adjust the magnification. It took me quite a few tries to get used to it. Additionally, there's no diopter adjustment, but the good eye relief somewhat compensates for that. Despite these minor drawbacks, I've been thoroughly impressed by the Leupold Gold Ring HD Spotting Scope. Its top-notch optical performance combined with its rugged construction makes it a strong contender in the realm of spotting scopes. If you're in the market for one, this could be an excellent investment. 🔗High-Quality 25-75x70 Spotting Scope with Phone Adapterhttps://preview.redd.it/z3pbyligbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=439c6f1b96af3f4bcc33d2eeceed5cb31b30b260 In my pursuit of a new spotting scope that could enhance my wildlife viewing and target shooting experiences, I stumbled upon the SVBONY SV28 Spotting Scopes. From the moment I opened the package, I was impressed by its sleek exterior and sturdy construction. One feature that stood out to me was its range of magnification capabilities - the SV28 allowed me to adjust the magnification according to my target distance, providing crystal clear image quality. The lens was exceptionally sharp, making it perfect for both target shooting and observing nature. Another aspect I appreciated was the ease of focus adjustment, ensuring that every detail was visible no matter the distance. However, I have to say that the tripod that came with the unit seemed a bit lackluster compared to my usual tripod. I ended up using my own sturdier tripod, but it was still nice to have the option included in the package. Additionally, while the phone adapter was a nice addition, I felt it could have been more user-friendly. Overall, the SVBONY SV28 Spotting Scopes exceeded my expectations, offering outstanding clarity and exceptional value for its price. Though there were a few minor quibbles, I would definitely recommend it to others in search of a reliable, affordable spotting scope for their outdoor adventures. 🔗Premium 400/70mm Travel Telescope with Adjustable Tripod and Star Finderhttps://preview.redd.it/c5f85amgbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=554f4b667fc38cf67c251b9a0289d4b35b96554c As an amateur astronomer, I recently gave the Tuword Telescope Pro 400/70 FMC a try to explore the stars and the moon. Its 70mm aperture and large field of view made it a perfect telescope for me. The fully coated optical glass lens provided clear and bright imaging. One of the best features was the fine adjustment lever, which allowed me to effortlessly adjust the viewing position. The telescope felt sturdy and well-built, made of premium materials. The included smartphone adapter made it convenient to capture stunning images of celestial objects. The star finder quickly located objects and the 45° orthogonal prism displayed the ortho-rectified true color image comfortably. I also appreciated the adjustable aluminum tripod, which was easy to set up and provided a stable platform for viewing. The travel bag made the telescope portable and easy to store. Overall, the Tuword Telescope Pro 400/70 FMC is a great telescope for both adults and kids who want to delve into the wonders of the night sky. 🔗Versatile Digital Telescope with HD 70X Magnification and Wireless Monocular Supporthttps://preview.redd.it/99yuezwgbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9f063fbe4f7a56e1bfaa0dd60633cbfb2b3d04d8 I recently tried out the 70x WiFi Digital Telescope, and let me tell you, it had its fair share of pros and cons. The most noticeable aspect was the 70X manual focus, providing a crisp and clear view of distant objects. The 2MP camera was another standout feature, capturing detailed images and videos seamlessly. However, there were a few drawbacks. The 50-meter wireless distance limit felt a bit restrictive at times, especially when trying to observe objects from afar. Additionally, the battery life, although decent, could have been longer for extended use. Overall, the 70x WiFi Digital Telescope was a solid choice for anyone looking to capture and view distant objects, but it could be improved with a few minor tweaks. 🔗Premium Spotting Scope with Folded Light Path Technology and 100% Waterproof Constructionhttps://preview.redd.it/1ogxx0ahbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=85ea84827bb102368e252b5a8faf1a7a6815e209 During a recent trip to the mountains, I had the chance to put Leupold's Gold Ring 12-40x60mm HD Spotting Scope to the test. While the gray housing looked sleek, it was the scope's impressive durability that truly stood out. I had read that Leupold had implemented a proprietary nitrogen fill process to ensure a 100% waterproof and fog-proof performance. I eagerly put the scope to the test, by inadvertently dipping it into a small stream. To my delight, it continued to function flawlessly, proving the effectiveness of this innovative feature. A few days later, I took the scope to a nearby wildlife preserve to spot endangered birds in their natural habitat. The scope's impressive magnification was an absolute game-changer. It allowed me to observe the delicate intricacies of these fascinating creatures, from the texture of their feathers to their unique flight patterns. The extra low dispersion optical system played a pivotal role in delivering stunningly vivid and bright colors, contributing to an overall remarkable viewing experience. The tripod-ready feature also proved to be quite practical in my adventure, as it enabled me to easily stabilize the scope for extended periods of time, even under challenging conditions. The prism-less folding light path, which uses mirrors to compress the long optical system, was another standout feature. It significantly reduced the scope's weight and made it more compact, making it convenient to carry anywhere. Although the price of this Gold Ring scope is significantly higher than most other brands, it's worth every penny. Its remarkable performance ensures that it remains a valuable addition to my gear, even amidst the vast competition in the market. With a plethora of customizable settings, the scope serves as an unparalleled guide for spotting and tracking game, be it for hunting or observational purposes. While the Leupold 20x60x80 Gold Ring might seem expensive, the extraordinary visual performance it delivers makes it truly worth the investment. 🔗High-Quality Argon Optics Argos HD Spotting Scope with Advanced Multi-Coated Lenses and Durable Rubber Armorhttps://preview.redd.it/jg8rvrkhbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5fc74911fb7ed44641033452a651b3706f0b980a The Athlon Optics Argos HD 20-60x85 spotting scope captured my attention with its high-grade Argon gas and BaK4 Prisms, which deliver a fog-free experience and impressive image clarity. I was particularly impressed with the advanced fully multi-coated lenses that reflect more light, giving me sharper and brighter images. The composite chassis not only provides strength but is also much lighter than I had anticipated. One feature that stood out in my experience was the twist-up eye-cup, allowing me to easily adjust the eye relief to suit my own comfort. In addition, the argon purged and waterproof design provided an added layer of protection during my outdoor adventures. While I was largely satisfied with this spotting scope, I did encounter a couple of downsides. Occasionally, the image seemed slightly blurry when zoomed in at max power, though this was less of an issue overall. Additionally, some users reported difficulties with perfect focus, a challenge I experienced myself but found manageable with some adjustment. Overall, I believe the Athlon Optics Argos HD spotting scope offers a solid balance of performance and affordability, making it a worthwhile choice for outdoor enthusiasts seeking quality optics without breaking the bank. 🔗Celestron TrailSeeker 65 Spotting Scope - Compact and Versatilehttps://preview.redd.it/zp11hq1ibb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e97556c46677e6b78b3e339f7f05c1d34763022b As someone who spends a lot of time birdwatching, I was eager to try out the Celestron TrailSeeker 65 spotting scope. With its 45-degree eyepiece, it offered a great balance between magnification and field of view, making it perfect for observing birds in their natural habitat. One of the standout features of this spotting scope is its fully multi-coated XLT optics, which deliver crisp, high contrast images. It made a huge difference in the clarity and sharpness of the images I was able to see through the scope. The dual focus mechanism was also a game-changer, allowing me to quickly home in on my subject before finely tuning the image. However, there were a few drawbacks I noticed while using the TrailSeeker 65. The scope's waterproofing seemed to slightly impact the clarity of the image, causing some distortion around the edges. Additionally, the tripod adaptability could have been improved, as I found it quite challenging to adjust the scope on uneven terrain. Overall, the Celestron TrailSeeker 65 spotting scope was a great investment for someone looking for a solid, easy-to-carry scope that delivers great performance. While it may not be perfect for everyone, I certainly recommend it to those in search of a top-notch birdwatching tool. 🔗Celestron 70mm Travel Scope with All Coated Glass Opticshttps://preview.redd.it/mdhncypibb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5335a809503de7da8139101b2ce7a368663e3a7f The Celestron 21035 70mm Travel Scope is the perfect companion for those who love the night sky and want to explore it without breaking the bank. As an experienced astronomer, I've had my fair share of scopes, and I must say, this one exceeded all my expectations. The scope's all coated glass optical elements allow for clear, crisp images that make it a delight to observe the backyard birds or the vast expanse of the night sky. The smooth functioning altazimuth mount makes pointing to objects a breeze, and the preassembled aluminum full-size photographic tripod adds to the convenience of setting up the scope quickly. However, the 20mm eyepiece does have a narrower field of view, which may be a downside for some, but the scope's overall performance more than compensates for it. The tripod may be flimsy for some, but its lightweight design is perfect for travel and outdoor activities. In conclusion, the Celestron Travel Scope 70 is a fantastic choice for those who want an affordable, portable, and high-quality telescope that offers excellent views by day and amazing performance under the stars. Its compact size, lightweight design, and detailed instructions make it a great option for both beginners and experienced astronomers alike. 🔗Leupold SX-4 Pro Guide HD Spotting Scope: Lightweight and Durable 15-45x65mm Scope for 6.5 Creedmoorhttps://preview.redd.it/q7z4vjzibb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ec9f81ec16c2ad436d183b511013a492d48d447d As a hunting and shooting enthusiast, I found the Leupold SX-4 Pro Guide 15-45x65mm HD Straight Spotting Scope to be a game-changer. Its lightweight magnesium body, along with the Twilight Max HD Light Management System, ensured clear visibility in both low light and bright sunlight conditions, making it perfect for any weather. The scope's range allowed me to observe game animals at a distance of 1000 yards with ease, and I could even discern bullet holes on white paper at 600 yards. Despite its high-quality image and durability, I did notice a few minor issues. The scope did not come with a protective case, which I found to be a letdown considering its price point. However, the lack of a case was more than compensated by the scope's advanced features and performance. Overall, the Leupold SX-4 Pro Guide 15-45x65mm HD Straight Spotting Scope has become a valuable addition to my hunting and shooting kit. Its impressive features and impressive image quality make it a standout option for serious hunters and shooters, making it well worth the investment. 🔗UHD 20-60x85 Athlon Spotting Scope: High-Performance 45 Degree Angle Scope for 500 Yard Viewinghttps://preview.redd.it/2jbapmcjbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=abf59f80f43523de90edb15cadf96bf0d710c963 The Athlon Spotting Scope Ares G2 20-60x85 UHD 45 Degree has been a game changer in my bird watching routine. With its 20-60x magnification, I can spot even the smallest feather details from a great distance. The UHD glass provides stunning color and contrast, making it effortless to distinguish between different species. The ESP dielectric coating ensures that the image is crystal clear, with minimal chromatic fringe. The BaK4 prisms and advanced fully multi-coated lenses make the view even brighter and sharper, creating a truly immersive experience. I also appreciate the aluminum alloy chassis that provides both strength and lightweight portability. The twist-up eye-cup allows me to set the perfect eye relief, and the extra protective layer coating keeps the lens safe from dirt and scratches. Overall, the Ares G2 is a fantastic addition to my bird watching gear, and I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a top-quality spotting scope. 🔗Celestron Travel Scope 70mm Telescope: Portable and Easy to Usehttps://preview.redd.it/004rmtmjbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=19983d00c3f494fbcb52aec0ecfad91c547d90fd The Celestron Travel Scope 70 is a compact and portable telescope designed for astronomical and terrestrial use. Its refractor-style optical tube assembly has a decent aperture for gathering light and producing a moderate magnification potential. The included photo-style alt-az pan/tilt head allows for smooth movement and easy set up, while the preassembled aluminum tripod provides stability on a variety of surfaces. The kit also comes with two eyepieces offering 20x and 40x magnifications, as well as an erecting prism for use as a conventional spotting scope. Everything fits into the included canvas backpack for ultimate portability. My experience using the Celestron Travel Scope 70 was quite enjoyable. The compact design made it easy to take with me on outdoor adventures, and the quick set up time meant I could start observing the night sky or terrestrial objects in no time. I found the lightweight yet sturdy materials used in the construction to be a nice touch, ensuring stability without adding excess weight. One feature that stood out to me was the ease of use – the telescope and tripod fit perfectly inside the included backpack, and setting it up required minimal effort. However, the limited magnification options might not be suitable for those seeking more intense stargazing experiences. Overall, the Celestron Travel Scope 70 is a convenient and efficient telescope for those looking for a portable, easy-to-use option. Its compact design and decent performance make it a great choice for both beginners and experienced stargazers alike. 🔗National Geographic Refracting Telescope for Stellar Viewshttps://preview.redd.it/qn2plxbkbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d6a66f468dd8ef3087d78b012866d31e5fca4439 As a beginner, I found using the National Geographic 70mm Refracting Telescope to be an exciting and enlightening experience. The first time I looked through the lens, I was immediately drawn to the vast expanse of stars and the intricate constellations that illuminate the night sky. The rich field of view provided by the telescope made it easy for me to locate prominent celestial bodies, such as the moon and bright stars. One feature that stood out to me was the tripod's adjustable height. This allowed me to find a comfortable position and maintain a clear and stable view of the night sky. Additionally, the telescope's compact design and included carrying case made it easy to transport and store when not in use. However, there were a couple of drawbacks to using this telescope. For one, the telescope seemed a bit flimsy in construction, which caused some difficulty in keeping it steady and focused. Additionally, some of the components, such as the eyepieces, seemed slightly low in quality, making the overall experience less enjoyable. In conclusion, the National Geographic 70mm Refracting Telescope was a good choice for a beginner astronomer like myself. Its ease of use, adjustable tripod, and rich field of view offered a fun and educational experience. However, some drawbacks, such as its flimsy construction and lower quality components, may limit its appeal for more experienced stargazers. 🔗Travel-Friendly Celestron 70mm Refractor Telescopehttps://preview.redd.it/66lze2pkbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=838d6c099243951a8968eec21731e9bf16dd12cc Taking the Celestron Travel Scope 70 DX on a stargazing adventure was a delight. It came with a potent 70mm objective lens, providing a bright, enhanced view of celestial objects. The fully-coated glass optics ensured high-quality images, and the lightweight frame made it convenient to carry around. However, the included tripod was underwhelming in terms of stability, and the carrying case could have been better designed for secure storage. One of the standout features was the erect image diagonal, which had a 45-degree 1.25-inch eyepiece. This allowed for correct orientation and a more comfortable viewing experience. The refractor's aluminum optical tube offered a balance between weight, durability, and aesthetics. The telescope was easy to set up, thanks to the preassembled aluminum full-size photographic tripod. It was a joy to use the two high-quality eyepieces (20mm and 10mm), providing low- and high-power views with ease. However, the tripod's stability issue was a drawback, especially when observing celestial objects with the naked eye. The provided moon filter and 2x barlow lens were valuable accessories, while the smartphone adapter and Bluetooth shutter release added versatility. Despite the tripod's limitations and the need for an improved carrying case, the Celestron Travel Scope 70 DX delivered a satisfying stargazing experience. Its portability, powerful eyepieces, and lightweight frame made for a delightful adventure. While there may be areas for improvement, the overall experience was enjoyable, and I would recommend it for those seeking a portable telescope for stargazing and terrestrial viewing. Buyer's GuideWhether you're a seasoned hunter or just starting to explore the world of firearms, a good scope is an essential piece of equipment. When it comes to rifle scopes, the 45-70 series offers a versatile option for many shooting scenarios. Let's dive into the world of 45-70 scopes and discuss what factors to consider when purchasing one.Magnum Capabilitieshttps://preview.redd.it/k24v1gdnbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0e8a7a55a766e519e12e59dbada089c124541a6e The term "magnum" is often associated with powerful rifles and ammunition, allowing for increased range and accuracy. However, with a 45-70 scope, you're getting more than just a powerful sight. Magnum scopes are designed to handle larger calibers, which is crucial for the 45-70 rifle's recoil and muzzle blast. Field of View (FOV) and MagnificationWhen selecting a 45-70 Scope, it's essential to consider the Field of View (FOV) at varying distances and the magnification level. A higher magnification factor will provide you with a clearer and enlarged image for better accuracy, but it comes at the cost of a narrower FOV. It's best to strike a balance between clarity and a more natural peripheral view.Durability and Weather ResistanceConsidering the demanding nature of hunting and outdoor activities, durability and weather resistance become key factors when purchasing a 45-70 Scope. Look for features such as fog-proof lenses and a waterproof design to ensure your scope can withstand various weather conditions and remains functional in the field. https://preview.redd.it/1c34gcrnbb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9cd40708c2381fd871d7d263c124c6df2ed86a12 Reticle OptionsA good 45-70 scope should offer several reticle options to cater to different shooting scenarios. Some common reticles include the duplex, mil-dot, or crosshair. Consider your intended use of the scope and choose a reticle that suits your needs best.Price ConsiderationsWhile price is a factor to consider when purchasing any product, it's crucial to strike a balance between cost and the quality of the scope. Opt for a mid-range price point that will provide you with the necessary features and performance without compromising on safety or accuracy.Brand and Reputationhttps://preview.redd.it/5kbxb16obb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f9b6592813289e5a619d554c1e8694cd9231c85c Research and choose a reputable brand with a history of producing high-quality rifle scopes. Brand reputation is an essential aspect to consider, as it indicates the company's dedication to quality, customer satisfaction, and innovation. Now that you've gained a better understanding of the important elements to consider when purchasing a 45-70 Scope, you're well on your way to making an informed decision. Remember to prioritize quality, durability, and performance, while considering factors such as FOV, mag magnification, reticle options, and brand reputation. Happy hunting! FAQWhat are the benefits of using a 45-70 scope?A 45-70 scope offers increased accuracy and range over traditional scopes, making it ideal for long-distance shooting and hunting. Its adjustable magnification allows for greater precision and clarity, while its robust construction makes it suitable for rough terrain and high-impact shooting environments.https://preview.redd.it/uktf0fhobb3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dee40eb030fb355199bac3afef6e32238c931d81 How does a 45-70 scope compare to a traditional scope?A traditional scope typically has a fixed magnification range, which may not be ideal for shooting at varying distances. In contrast, a 45-70 scope's adjustable magnification allows for greater flexibility and accuracy at different ranges.Are there any disadvantages to using a 45-70 scope?While a 45-70 scope offers many advantages, it can be heavier and bulkier than a traditional scope. Additionally, its increased complexity may require more maintenance and care.What are the best 45-70 scopes currently on the market?Some popular 45-70 scopes include the Leupold VX-3L, Nikon Monarch 7, and the Burris Zoom 1500. It's essential to research and compare these options to find the scope that best suits your needs and budget.How do I install and mount a 45-70 scope?Installing and mounting a 45-70 scope requires some expertise and precision. It's recommended to consult the user manual or seek assistance from a professional to ensure proper installation and alignment.What type of shooting environments are 45-70 scopes suitable for?45-70 scopes are well-suited for a variety of shooting environments, including long-distance hunting, target shooting, and tactical applications. Their adjustable magnification and robust construction make them ideal for rugged terrain and high-impact shooting scenarios.What types of firearms can be used with a 45-70 scope?A 45-70 scope can be used with various firearms that utilize a. 45-70 caliber round, such as the Winchester Model 1905, 1894, and the Ruger No. 1. It's essential to ensure the scope and firearm are compatible before use.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 08:08 Best_Animation A Comprehensive Guide to E-Learning: Exploring Different Types and Methods
 | https://preview.redd.it/o0za3cl74b3d1.jpg?width=2240&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e6bc194beb6c0e685b8d509f8eb9dfca778cc780 submitted by Best_Animation to u/Best_Animation [link] [comments] In today's fast digital world, e-learning has completely transformed how we learn. Instead of being stuck in a classroom, you can learn from your computer or phone whenever possible. This guide is here to help you understand e-learning—what it is, how it works, and how you can benefit from it. Whether you're looking to boost your career or expand your knowledge, e-learning offers a convenient and accessible way. Understanding E-LearningE-learning, or electronic learning, is using digital technologies to facilitate education and training. It encompasses a wide range of formats and approaches, all aimed at enhancing the learning experience through technology. The main benefit of e-learning lies in its adaptability. It allows learners to access content anytime and anywhere, thus breaking down geographical and temporal barriers to education.Types of E-LearningE-learning can be broadly categorized into several types, each catering to different needs and preferences. These categories help define the structure and delivery method of the learning material.1. Synchronous E-LearningSynchronous e-learning entails live interaction between instructors and learners. This type mirrors traditional classroom settings but utilizes digital platforms to connect participants, fostering immediate feedback and collaboration.
2. Asynchronous E-LearningAsynchronous e-learning allows learners to access materials and complete tasks at their own pace without the need for real-time interaction. This flexibility makes it suitable for individuals with varying schedules and learning speeds.
3. Blended LearningBlended learning combines traditional face-to-face instruction with online learning activities, offering a balanced approach that leverages the strengths of both methods.
4. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)MOOCs are online courses designed for large-scale participation and open access via the web. They often feature a mix of video lectures, readings, quizzes, and peer-reviewed assignments.
5. Mobile LearningMobile learning, also known as m-learning, uses smartphones and tablets to provide educational materials. This type of learning is particularly beneficial for on-the-go learners who need access to information anytime, anywhere.
Methods of E-Learninghttps://preview.redd.it/ena41fca4b3d1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e305e8c31020c492109fedb55dd5958e0e36e26cE-learning methods encompass a variety of instructional strategies and techniques tailored to different learning styles and objectives. These methods enhance engagement and effectiveness by catering to learners' diverse needs. 1. Interactive LearningInteractive learning engages learners through active participation and immediate feedback, making the learning process dynamic and engaging.
2. Social LearningSocial learning leverages the power of social interaction to enhance learning outcomes, fostering a sense of community and collaboration.
3. Personalized LearningPersonalized learning tailors the educational experience to meet individual needs and preferences, enhancing motivation and effectiveness.
4. MicrolearningMicrolearning delivers content in small, manageable chunks, which is ideal for quick learning sessions and for learners with limited time.
5. LMS (Learning Management System)An LMS is a software platform for delivering, managing, and tracking e-learning courses and programs. It provides features such as content management, assessment tools, and reporting capabilities.Conclusion E-learning gives you many ways to learn, making education easier to access and more flexible. Whether you want to advance your career, learn new skills, or explore new subjects, there's an e-learning option for you. When you understand the different choices available, you can pick the one that fits your learning style and goals best, leading to a successful educational journey. Using e-learning can help you grow personally and professionally. Experiment with different types of learning, find what works best for you, and stay focused on your goals. If you approach it the right way, e-learning can help you succeed in today's knowledge-driven world. Don't forget to share this post!elearning #elearningvideos #videos #mlearning #onlinelearning #digitallearning #learning #education #videoproduction #animation #microlearning #explore #fyp |
2024.05.29 07:47 Count-Daring243 Best 36-Gun Safes
 | submitted by Count-Daring243 to u/Count-Daring243 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/67dkwl760b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=10b6d880b99ea9b3943b97f93616723a20e5c5d3 Welcome to our roundup of the best 36-gun safes on the market! If you're in the market for a high-quality, spacious and secure gun safe, you've come to the right place. We've handpicked a selection of top-rated 36-gun safes to help you make an informed decision and ensure your firearms are kept safe and secure. The Top 18 Best 36-Gun Safes
Reviews🔗SureLock Inspector 36: Large 36-Gun Capacity Safe with Fingerprint-Resistant Keypadhttps://preview.redd.it/j6si09l60b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=791ea514b09f5ce770b067b36f936e67706fb942 The Surelock Inspector 36 Gun & Home Safe is a reliable and spacious solution for securing your valuables and firearms at home. With an exterior dimension of 30 inches in width, 25 inches in depth, and 55 inches in height, it offers enough space for up to 36 long guns and more. It's built with sturdy 14-gauge steel for added security, and the interior comes in a light gray color that complements the textured black exterior. The Inspector 36 features an easy-to-use digital lock system with a key backup, providing dependable access to your safe. The full-seam welds and a 40-minute fire rating (at 1400°F) give you the peace of mind you need, knowing that your belongings will be safely stored even during emergencies. While its simplicity does away with any unnecessary frills, the Inspector 36 offers three adjustable or removable shelves, a u-shaped gun rack, and an included organizational door panel, making storage a breeze. The safe can be a great fit for medium-sized families or moderate collectors looking for extra security. One thing to note is that some users have had issues with the combination change mechanism, which may require some extra effort to remove. Nevertheless, the Inspector 36 has proven to be a solid and functional safe for those who prioritize affordability. 🔗Snapsafe Super Titan Modular Gun Safe: Fire-Resistant, Durable, and Easy to Assemblehttps://preview.redd.it/sd3njb270b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2d6ab53a984f81932b98cc96a363712764db7448 I recently had the pleasure of trying out the Snapsafe 75011 Super Titan Modular Gun Safe, and let me tell you, it left quite an impression. This bad boy assembles in minutes without needing any additional tools, thanks to its convenient modular assembly system. The sledgehammer and pry bar-resistant 3/16" solid steel door gives me peace of mind, knowing that my valuables are well protected. One thing that stood out to me was the 9 gauge steel exterior walls, which provide a sturdy and reliable barrier. And with a UL Listed 1-hour fire rating, my mind is put at ease knowing that my fireproof gun safe can withstand some serious heat. However, there were a few things that didn't quite live up to my expectations. The lock mechanism felt a bit cheap and had some slop to it, which wasn't exactly reassuring. Additionally, the bolts used for assembly were not the strongest, and a couple of them actually sheared during the process. It's worth mentioning that some users have also reported gaps between the side and front panels, which could potentially compromise the overall functionality of the safe. All in all, the Snapsafe 75011 Super Titan Modular Gun Safe has its moments, but it's not flawless. If you're in the market for a fireproof gun safe with some extra features and the convenience of a modular design, this might be the one for you. Just be prepared for some minor hiccups along the way. 🔗Ultimate 40 Gun Safe with Proven Security Featureshttps://preview.redd.it/5wmmn6970b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0b6cd77f79a22434085817ca6a12a7eb90d9ad06 During my search for a reliable gun safe, I stumbled upon the Sports Afield Preserve Series SA5940. With a capacity of up to 40 long guns and 8 handguns, this safe seemed ideal for storing and securing my collection. One of the standout features of this safe is its fully programmable electric lock, which includes two backup keys in case of an emergency. The convenient Easy Touch keypad makes access easy, and the lock provides peace of mind when storing valuable items. Another impressive feature is the fully carpeted interior, sidewalls, shelves, and barrel rests. This not only enhances the appearance of the safe but also protects against scratches, ensuring that my firearms remain in pristine condition. The safe arrived with a UL approved power outlet and four pre-cut anchor holes with a bolt down kit and waterproof washers, making the installation process hassle-free. One of the cons I discovered is that the package arrived with a small dent in the door. Although this didn't impact the safety or functionality of the safe itself, it was a minor inconvenience. Additionally, the delivery process was slightly more expensive than I had anticipated, with delivery agents dropping the safe off at my residence. Despite these minor drawbacks, the Sports Afield Preserve Series SA5940 has proven to be a reliable and sturdy safety deposit for my valuable firearms, worth every penny. 🔗Protective 42-Gun Safe with Combination Lock and Digital Keypadhttps://preview.redd.it/82sb46n70b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cad718d497267566f8e760fe74fe519f1392348e The Mesa MBF7236C Gun & Rifle Safe has been my reliable partner in keeping my valuable gun collection and prized possessions secure. This safe has surpassed my expectations in terms of functionality and build quality. One of the standout features of this safe is its electronic lock with a digital keypad. It's user-friendly and secure, allowing me to easily access my safe without any fuss. The three-user electronic lock system ensures that only authorized individuals can gain access to it. In terms of build quality, the safe's construction is impressive, boasting an all-steel exterior. It's quite spacious, with a capacity of 42 rifles, and the interior is well designed, providing ample space for storing guns, documents, and other valuables. The safe's structure is solid and sturdy, offering robust protection against burglary and fires. While I love the safe's build quality and functionalities, there have been a few minor drawbacks. The combination lock sometimes feels a bit flimsy, and the power cord can protrude quite a bit, making it a bit of an inconvenience. However, these issues are relatively minor and do not detract from the safe's overall performance. In conclusion, the Mesa MBF7236C Gun & Rifle Safe has proven to be a reliable and practical solution for storing my precious firearms and valuables. Despite a few minor inconsistencies, the safe has surpassed my expectations and provided me with the peace of mind I was looking for. I highly recommend this safe to anyone in need of reliable and secure storage for their firearms and valuables. 🔗USA 36 Gun Safe: Secure and Fire-Resistant Storagehttps://preview.redd.it/7n1dw7780b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b97ccb5e9e3bad46d58377f6bc6e248c66e87967 The Liberty USA Series 36 gun safe is a versatile and practical option for those looking to protect their gun collection. With a level 2 security system and 60 minutes of fire protection at 1200°F, you can have peace of mind knowing your belongings are safe. The safe comes equipped with a Secu-Ram toplit electronic lock and factory-installed door storage panel. One of the standout features is the ability to remotely monitor humidity, temperature, door status, and vibration. Although it may not be the largest or most fancy safe on the market, the Liberty USA Series 36 offers a great balance between size, security, and affordability. The safe is made in the USA and comes with a reliable reputation for customer satisfaction. The only downside I found was the slightly cheaper construction compared to more expensive options, but overall, it's a solid choice for gun owners on a budget. 🔗High-Security 36 Gun Electronic Lock Fireproof Gun Safehttps://preview.redd.it/szrkj4k80b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=130efe535cbc9e55b431f200d140202255b2dae6 My personal experience with the Liberty Safe was a game-changer. Not long ago, I moved into a new home, just like many others do, and I wanted to ensure the security of my valuables - especially my firearms. I came across this majestic black safe, and let me tell you, it not only looked the part, but it performed even better. The solid and sturdy construction was quite impressive, and the electronic lock provided the much-needed peace of mind. The safe was spacious enough to house my 36 guns and other essential documents, without needing to compromise on the fireproof rating which was a massive 40 minutes at 1200 degrees F. What's more, the safe was delivered to my doorstep by the team from Nebraska Furniture Mart, who were as professional as they were gentle with the furniture. The only slight inconvenience was dealing with the heavyweight, but the NFM team managed it seamlessly. In conclusion, the Liberty Safe was a significant investment in my home security. It's a safe that combines functionality and aesthetics while prioritizing the safety of its contents. So yes, it's worth the purchase and the effort, if you're serious about safeguarding your valuables. 🔗Premium 36 Gun Safe by Liberty USA: Affordable and Secure Storage Solutionhttps://preview.redd.it/z36kc1w80b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9a90725a2866d3deaf8305aa227682d11df1493b I recently had the opportunity to try out the Liberty USA 36 Gun Safe, and let me tell you, it was quite the experience. The first thing that caught my eye was its size - it's not too big or too small, just the perfect fit for a growing collection of firearms. The interior is designed with flexibility in mind, with a 3-in-1 flex interior, so you can easily customize the layout to suit your needs. One of the key features that stood out to me was the safety aspect. This safe boasts 60 minutes of certified fire protection at 1200°, which provides a level of security that's hard to find in other safes at this price point. With a level 2 security rating, my valuables felt well protected. However, there were a few aspects that didn't quite meet my expectations. For starters, the door only opens up to about 90 degrees, which was a bit of a pain when trying to access the safe in a tight space. Additionally, if you have scoped hunting rifles or double-barrel shotguns, you might run into some difficulties fitting them into the available slots due to the door's design. Despite these minor setbacks, I was overall very impressed with the Liberty USA 36 Gun Safe. Its combination of features, safety, and affordability make it an appealing choice for first-time safe buyers. And let's not forget the fantastic customer service I received from the Liberty team - they went above and beyond to ensure a smooth buying experience. So, if you're in the market for a reliable and feature-rich gun safe without breaking the bank, this might just be the one for you. 🔗Easy-Assemble Double Door Gun Safe with 36+ Long Gun Capacityhttps://preview.redd.it/iyrvzxe90b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ea3dad503ddbba265e57d3d3b76a34cee3620af With its sleek modular design, the Snapsafe Super Titan XL Double Door Modular Gun Safe quickly stood out in my home. As someone who constantly moves between temporary living situations, this safe's easy assembly without the need for additional tools proved to be a game-changer. The 3/16-inch solid-steel door provided the security I desired, and the 2300°F one-hour fire shield protection was a major highlight. However, the safe's 36-long gun storage capacity felt a bit limited for my needs, and the instructions could have been more detailed. Overall, I found the Snapsafe Super Titan XL Double Door to be a fantastic investment for any firearm enthusiast, despite a few minor drawbacks. 🔗Secure and Spacious Sports Afield Gun Safehttps://preview.redd.it/u4wi0jn90b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a7567a74a3be1fd370c48c92532eed01b90ab380 As a guns enthusiast, I recently decided to upgrade my security measures and purchased the Sports Afield Preserve Series SA7240P gun safe. This safe has exceeded my expectations in terms of style and functionality. Firstly, the electric lock with an easy-touch keypad is a game-changer. I can now easily program a code for quick access, and it comes with two backup keys in case of emergencies. Furthermore, the gun capacity of up to 60 long guns and 8 handguns is perfect for my collection, allowing me to store them securely. One feature that stands out is the adjustable interior, which is highly adaptable for all types of valuables. It provides a convenient spot for my ammunition and other essentials as well. The coated "S" shaped shelf pistol hangers allow me to store my pistols with ease, making it a functional and neat storage solution. Although the outer dimensions fit my requirements, moving the 653-pound beast has been a challenge. However, the durable construction and the steel bolt size of 1.5 inches provide the strong and secure protection I desired. In summary, this gun safe is a great value for the price and offers numerous features that make storing my collection a safe and efficient process. I recommend it to anyone in the market for a secure gun safe. 🔗Remington Gun Club 4-Gun Fireproof and Waterproof Gun Safehttps://preview.redd.it/ryrahh1a0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5176072810f8d2448948307806024d57feb872f8 I've been using the Remington Gun Club 36 Plus Gun Safe for quite some time now, and I must say it's lived up to its reputation of offering consistent, secure, and feature-filled protection for my collection. The fireproof and waterproof capabilities are a lifesaver, as I've always been worried about those catastrophes. The programmable electronic lock gives me peace of mind, knowing that my collection is safely locked away. As for the interior, the full carpeting and quilted door organizer make it feel like a VIP treatment for my guns. The only drawback I've noticed is slightly limited storage capacity for a truly extensive collection, but other than that minor inconvenience, I'm absolutely pleased with its performance. 🔗Secure 36-Gun Safe with Customizable Storage and Fire Protectionhttps://preview.redd.it/xjkm30ka0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3ca4a953b1c0cf346710843c96d603c9b8c47324 Picture this: after a long day of hunting, you come back home, weary and proud, with your latest catch. You open the door to your den, and there it stands - the Remington Nitro 36-Gun Safe, your trusty companion, ready to protect your prized possessions. It's a sight that fills you with a sense of security, knowing that your guns and valuables are safe from any perils. The first thing that strikes you is the sheer size of the safe, but don't let that intimidate you. The 11-gauge Uni-Weld steel body is not just impressive; it's also heavy-duty, providing the much-needed strength to safeguard your precious belongings. And yes, it might be a bit of a workout to move it around, but trust me, the effort is worth it. Now, let's talk about the lock. The Remington Nitro 36-Gun Safe comes equipped with a backlit SecuRam UL Rated E-Lock with a key backup. It's not just a lock; it's a statement. It gives you peace of mind, knowing that your safe is secure and protected from any unauthorized access. The backlit feature is a thoughtful addition, making it easy to access even in low light conditions. But that's not all. The safe also boasts of a UL Rated Dual Outlet with 2 USB Ports, keeping your devices powered up and ready for action. And if you're worried about the safe's ability to withstand fire, worry not. It's fire-rated for 90 minutes at 1800 degrees, ensuring your valuables are protected even in the toughest of situations. And here's the cherry on top - the Remington Nitro 36-Gun Safe is not just fire-resistant; it's also waterproof. It can withstand being submerged in water for up to 7 days in 2 feet of water, making it practically indestructible. Now, as much as I love this safe, there are a few things that could be improved. The vertical bars that support the shelves are not even, which makes it difficult to level the shelves. And don't get me started on the delivery. It arrived undamaged, but the shipping experience was less than satisfactory. Despite these minor hiccups, the Remington Nitro 36-Gun Safe is an impressive piece of equipment. It combines style, strength, and security, making it the perfect companion for any avid hunter. So, if you're in the market for a gun safe that is both practical and inspiring, look no further than the Remington Nitro 36-Gun Safe. 🔗High-Security 36-Gun USA Safe with Lighted Electronic Lockhttps://preview.redd.it/mx8z5dva0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b8fb51940c2316ffbd4e1626de4987f8b135cf1 I recently had the opportunity to try out the Liberty Safe & Security Product 243416 USA 36 Gun Safe. Initially, I was skeptical about its ability to provide top-notch security for my firearms, but my experience with this safe proved me wrong. The textured black finish not only made it look sleek, but also added an extra layer of durability. The safe features a 36-gun capacity and an electronic lock, which I found incredibly user-friendly. The 60-minute fire rating was my main concern, but the safe exceeded my expectations in that department as well. It kept my firearms and other valuable belongings secure and protected during testing. However, I did notice a few drawbacks. The safe's dimensions were larger than I initially anticipated, which meant it required more space than I had originally planned for. Additionally, while the warranty period is satisfactory, I would have preferred a longer one given the price point. Overall, the Liberty Safe & Security Product 243416 USA 36 Gun Safe offered a great balance of security and affordability, and I am pleased with my decision to purchase it. 🔗Stylish Secure Gun Cabinet with Accessorieshttps://preview.redd.it/wths7abb0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=80d783e83287611a46a3c8ebed6789035998b33f The NewAge Products Pro Series Black 36 in. Secure Gun Cabinet has been a reliable addition to my home, offering a safe and protected space for my firearms and hunting gear. Made from heavy-gauge welded steel with double-walled doors, this cabinet exudes robustness and durability in its construction. One feature that particularly stands out is the 3-point locking system, providing an added layer of security to ensure only authorized individuals have access to the cabinet. The California DOJ Certification further adds to my peace of mind, knowing that the Secure Gun Cabinet has been tested and adheres to strict safety requirements. While it's not lightweight and requires a team to move, the solid build and the feeling of uncompromised protection it offers are worth the effort. I've had a great experience with the NewAge Products Secure Gun Cabinet and highly recommend it to those seeking a robust and dependable storage solution for their firearms and equipment. 🔗36-Gun Haven Biometric Safe with Triple Seal Protectionhttps://preview.redd.it/1j89oqkb0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=53043a8f761e4f87ad89bcd18f95a1aa7d384a31 As a gun owner, the thought of having our firearms stolen or damaged due to unforeseeable events is always looming. Thankfully, the Sports Afield Haven Series SA5930HX-B Haven 36-Gun Safe has come to the rescue. This biometric gun safe is designed to keep our firearms and valuables safe from theft, fire, and water damage. The safe's size is rather substantial, with an external length of 59 inches, width of 30 inches, and depth of 25 inches. On the inside, you'll find an internal volume of 15.75 cubic feet, providing ample space for our treasured possessions. Weighing a hefty 560 lbs, this long gun safe is not one you'd want to move around often. One of the most impressive features of this safe is its Triple Seal fire and water protection, combined with a full-seam Uni-Weld body. This provides an additional layer of safety, ensuring our valuables remain dry and protected even in the event of a flood or fire. Programming the biometric lock can be a bit of a headache, but once set up, it works like a charm, offering a high level of security. The safe includes an electronic lock with illuminated buttons, programmable for up to 100 unique fingerprints. In case of a power outage, the two Fail Safe override keys serve as a handy backup solution. The interior of the safe is fully carpeted and boasts bright interior lighting, making it easier to locate your items. It comes with adjustable/removable top and side shelves, as well as a premium pocket door organizer, allowing for easy arrangement of your things. The safe also features 36 barrel rest positions and 6 handgun holsters, providing ample storage for our firearms. However, it would be nice if the safe came with more shelf options, giving us the flexibility to customize it to our needs. Additionally, the delivery experience can be a bit of a nightmare, as one customer attested. In conclusion, while there are a few cons to this product, they do not outweigh the benefits that this biometric gun safe offers. With its robust construction and multiple layers of protection, the Sports Afield Haven Series SA5930HX-B Haven 36-Gun Safe certainly earns its place as a premium option for gun owners. 🔗SF6036E5: 36-Gun Rated Fire Safe with Premium Storage Solutionshttps://preview.redd.it/z5n3wvyb0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=30267cd8e4f25c9c53a2c77b3c048aa7419c5739 I recently had the opportunity to test out the American Security SF6036E5 36 Gun Gun Safe, and I must say, it exceeded my expectations. The first thing that stood out to me was the sturdy construction - with its 3/16 steel plate door and layered drywall for optimal fire protection. The locking mechanism was a breeze to use, and I felt reassured knowing my firearms were secure. One of the most impressive features was the interior capacity. It easily accommodated all of my guns, and the adjustable ball bearing hinges allowed for easier organization. The premium door organizer (PDO) was a game-changer, providing quick access to commonly used items and maximizing storage space. However, there are a few areas where the SF6036E5 could use some improvement. The textured black exterior and plush gray interior felt a bit more high-maintenance than I would have preferred. Additionally, I found that the optional combination lock didn't quite live up to its promises, making it a bit of a pain to operate. Overall, the American Security SF6036E5 36 Gun Gun Safe is a solid choice for anyone in the market for a reliable and secure gun safe. With its impressive features and high capacity, it's definitely worth considering. Buyer's Guide36-Gun safes are an essential purchase for anyone looking for a secure way to store their firearms. These safes come with various features and designs to fit your specific needs, ensuring that your firearms are safely stored and protected. In this guide, we will discuss the critical features to consider when buying a 36-Gun safe. https://preview.redd.it/0qcwrxed0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b4e817121cb68d0dce535d185b1c02142e93aaba Capacity and SizeThe primary reason for buying a 36-Gun safe is its capacity for storing multiple firearms. When shopping for a safe, make sure it can comfortably accommodate the number of guns you own. Consider the overall size as well, ensuring that it fits well in your designated storage area and can be easily accessed when needed. Some safes may have the option to expand or contract, depending on your future needs, so choose a model that offers flexibility.Security FeaturesA 36-Gun safe should have robust security features to protect your valuable firearms. Look for models with heavy-duty construction, solid materials, and durable hardware. Locking mechanisms, such as electronic keypads, combination dials, or keyed locks, should offer high security. Some safes may also have additional features, like drill resistance or anchor points, which can help deter potential thieves. Consult local and state laws to ensure that the safe meets the specified legal requirements for firearms storage. https://preview.redd.it/asv527sd0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e22599b5f73ee2f4dc41550d7f11bd1e9b92f7a1 Interior DesignThe interior design of a 36-Gun safe is crucial for organizing your firearms. Different shelves, compartments, and racks can help keep your firearms in optimal condition, prevent scratches, and make retrieval easy. Shelves that slide out or adjustable positions are ideal, as they allow you to customize the storage space according to your needs. Built-in LED lighting can also enhance visibility and accessibility within the safe.Additional ConveniencesWhile security and capacity are the primary concerns when buying a 36-Gun safe, some additional features can improve your overall experience. These might include silent door closing, built-in dehumidifiers to protect against corrosion, or quick-access compartments for frequently used items. Consider your own preferences and habits when deciding which optional features to look for. https://preview.redd.it/iy2zim6e0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea3cebacc5e51bf832e4ef9bc95f4ec500a4bab0 Installation and MaintenanceA 36-Gun safe is a significant investment, so it's essential to ensure that it is installed correctly and properly maintained. Always follow the manufacturer's installation guidelines to avoid any damage to the safe or the floor. Maintenance should include regular cleaning, checking for corrosion, and confirming that the locking mechanism functions properly. Keeping the safe in a dry environment can also help prolong its lifespan.Choosing the Right 36-Gun Safe for You36-Gun safes come in various designs and styles, so choose one that fits your specific requirements and preferences. Consider the size, security features, interior design, additional features, and ease of installation and maintenance before making a purchase. Remember to consult local and state laws for any legal requirements regarding firearms storage to ensure that your safe meets all necessary requirements. https://preview.redd.it/dzlo1yme0b3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f2c580a7898051e4c6b9b8b865229418adccb1a1 FAQWhat is a 36-Gun Safe?A 36-Gun safe is a type of fireproof and burglar-resistant safe designed to hold a significant number of long guns, which range from 30 to 36 guns depending on the model and brand. This type of safe is ideal for storing hunting equipment, firearms, and other valuable items.What makes 36-Gun Safes unique?36-Gun safes are unique because they are purpose-built to hold a substantial number of long guns. Many of these safes have specialized shelving systems, adjustable gun racks, and even internal lighting to ensure the best storage and organization for your firearms.How secure are 36-Gun Safes?36-Gun safes, like all certified burglar-resistant safes, are designed to keep your valuables safe from unauthorized access. They may include features such as heavy steel construction, electronic locking mechanisms, and even bolt-down options to ensure maximum security. However, it is always recommended to consult with a security expert for proper installation and to customize the security measures based on your specific needs.What is the difference between 36-Gun Safes and other gun safes?
What factors should be considered when choosing a 36-Gun Safe?Some factors to consider when choosing a 36-Gun safe include:
|
2024.05.29 07:28 GhoulGriin Best 32 Gun Safe
 | submitted by GhoulGriin to u/GhoulGriin [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/72byuewswa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=676d85d0ed148ea394447ab3dc1d37645dc1a4ef Welcome gun enthusiasts, it's time to safeguard your valuable firearms with a reliable and secure 32 gun safe. In this article, we'll be introducing you to our top picks of 32 gun safes, ensuring your investment not only provides the required storage but also enhances the security of your prized possessions. Whether you're a seasoned collector or new to the vast world of firearms, our 32 gun safe reviews will guide you towards making the right purchase. So, buckle up and prepare to make a wise decision that safeguards your firearm collection. The Top 15 Best 32 Gun Safe
Reviews🔗Hornady 16 Gauge Steel Fireproof Keypad Safehttps://preview.redd.it/7exmajbtwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0f0944fb952e6d8d6f7b046df683584fb3b546c6 When I received the Hornady Fireproof Keypad Safe, I was eager to test its robustness and functionality. As a product reviewer, I had the opportunity to use it in my daily life, and I must say, I was impressed by its features. Firstly, the 16 gauge steel body construction and 8 gauge steel door of the safe had a lasting impression on me. The durable black powder coat finish added a sleek touch to its overall appearance. The electronic lock with a key backup provided an extra layer of security that I appreciated, especially when using it to store important documents and valuable items. One of the standout features of this safe was the interior light, which automatically illuminates when opening the safe. It was a thoughtful design choice that allowed me to conveniently access my items without fumbling around in the dark. The fireproof rating of 30 minutes in up to 1400 degrees F was an impressive feature, but I also noticed that it was not water-resistant, which could be a potential downside for those living in areas with high humidity. The removable interior shelf offered flexible and secure storage options for a variety of items, from firearms and documents to jewelry and hobby equipment. I particularly enjoyed the protective carpet interior, as it safeguarded my valuables from potential damage. One downside that I encountered was the low battery warning, which I found a bit annoying at times. It would be great if the alarm system could last a bit longer on a single set of batteries. Overall, the Hornady Fireproof Keypad Safe was a reliable and durable choice for storing valuable items. With its heavy-duty construction and convenient features, it made a secure addition to my daily life. 🔗Affordable Gun Safe with Dual Lock Security and Built-In Storagehttps://preview.redd.it/li86vgytwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b441c2e3fc27791a1bad6910e2c677c608457f92 Imagine you're a serious gun owner who values both your firearms and the safety of your family. You've searched tirelessly for a reliable storage solution, but most are either too complicated or too expensive. That's where the VEVOR 6 Gun Safe comes in - a practical, stylish, and affordable option. Opening the safe, you're greeted by a spacious interior, with ample room for your rifles and pistols on the adjustable shelves. You appreciate the versatility, allowing you to customize the storage according to your needs. However, you also notice that shorter firearms fit perfectly, but longer ones might not find enough space unless you remove the pistol shelf. Securing the safe is a breeze. The dual-lock system, which includes both a fingerprint and digital keypad, provides both convenience and security. It makes you feel confident that your family and valuable firearms are well-protected. Making the VEVOR 6 Gun Safe even more appealing is its solid construction. The exterior has a sleek black finish that adds a touch of sophistication to your home. The wall thickness is sturdy at 0.04 inches. However, you notice that the metal used in the construction does not have a specific classification, which may leave some wondering about its durability. In conclusion, the VEVOR 6 Gun Safe is a worthy investment for those seeking an affordable, practical, and reliable firearm storage solution. Though it might not be perfect for everyone, its strengths outweigh the minor drawbacks, making it a satisfying addition to your home security. 🔗Stylish Instinct Safe with Fireproof Protection and Secure Storage for 24 Long Gunshttps://preview.redd.it/h81redbuwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f999c0558cf24311208211eeb79386169320705 Unboxing the Sports Afield SA5525INS Instinct Gun Safe, I was impressed by the sleek matte black exterior finish and metal drop handle. It's sturdily crafted with a rugged steel construction and secured with three 1-inch active steel bolts and two 1-inch deadbolts. The fully carpeted interior, featuring a combination of fully carpeted adjustable polymer barrel racks with included scoped rifle standoffs, is perfect for protecting my firearms from scratches. After setting up the fully programmable electronic lock with two Fail Safe override keys, I was able to store my arsenal securely, knowing it was protected from theft and even fires up to 1400 degrees Fahrenheit for 30 minutes. Its CA DOJ approved status and spacious interior accommodating 12-16 guns, ensured that all my firearms fit comfortably on adjustable shelves. Overall, the SA5525INS is more than just a gun safe; it's a comprehensive security solution. Its matte black finish and sturdy construction make it appealing, while the multiple safety features provide peace of mind. 🔗Winchester 26 Long Gun Safe - Secure and Spacious Storage for Your Firearmshttps://preview.redd.it/4q6aoxouwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=278ececa5e5c59754c803dca0d062b282d368f35 As a reviewer who has been using the Winchester 36 Long Gun Safe in my daily life, I can confidently say that this is a great investment for anyone looking to keep their firearms and valuables secure. The first thing that grabbed my attention was the sleek, powder-coated gun metal gray finish, which added a stylish touch to the safe while also enhancing its durability. One of the standout features of this gun safe was its electronic lock with an override key. Having both an electronic keypad and a backup key gives me peace of mind knowing that I won't be locked out in case of a power failure or if the electronic lock fails. The solid steel locking bolts provided robust security, ensuring that my firearms are kept safe and secure at all times. The interior of the safe was spacious enough to accommodate up to 26 long guns, making it an ideal choice for gun enthusiasts and collectors alike. Additionally, the adjustable shelves allowed me to customize the layout according to my needs, providing ample storage for other valuables as well. However, there were some cons worth mentioning. The door of the safe had a bit of play in it when closed and locked, which could be improved upon in future models. Furthermore, the instruction manual could have been more comprehensive, especially when it came to resetting the combo on the electronic lock. Overall, I would recommend the Winchester 36 Long Gun Safe to anyone looking for a reliable, well-made safe with ample storage and good security features. It may not be perfect, but at this price point, it's hard to beat. 🔗AMSEC NF6030E5: Robust, 90-Minute Gun Safe with Premium Inner Organizer & Adjustable Hingeshttps://preview.redd.it/6q8y6n2vwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a0adf5d834879df9497507801e03ad6d62ace4d0 As a reviewer I can say that the AMSEC NF6030E5 Gun Safe is something that stands out from the rest. The moment you lay your eyes on it, you can tell this isn't just any ordinary safe. It's sturdy and well-built, with a sleek gunmetal exterior that exudes a sense of durability and reliability. But it's the interior that truly sets it apart. One of the first things that caught my attention was the impressive 2-stage dual fire seal, which includes a silicone seal on the door jamb and an expandable Palusol seal on the door. This ensures that your firearms and other valuable items remain protected from harsh conditions and high temperatures. I also appreciated the U. L. Residential Security Container and California DOJ approval, which is a testament to its high standards of security. The 1/4" steel plate on the door and the 11-gauge solid steel plate on the body offer a solid, impenetrable barrier against intruders. The AMSEC NF6030E5 Gun Safe is equipped with a reliable electronic lock, which not only adds a layer of security, but also comes with two relocking devices for extra peace of mind. The mechanical dial lock and the doomsday redundant lock are available as additional security measures as well. The interior of the safe is just as impressive as its exterior. The all-velour, all-in-one interior with back-cover and firewalls, along with the 2 cover plates and 4 side shelves, provides ample room for storage and organization. The premium door organizer (PDO) is a fantastic added touch, making it easier to store and access your most commonly used items. Overall, the AMSEC NF6030E5 Gun Safe is a great choice for anyone looking for a reliable and secure storage solution for their firearms and other valuables. It's well-designed, offering excellent security features and a smooth, user-friendly experience. It really is a standout product in its category. 🔗Secure Haven Gun Safe with E-Lock and Custom Featureshttps://preview.redd.it/3bqniuivwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c23e958cf2ab6e566fd9272d8c54ee53954a0774 As a sports enthusiast, I've always been on the lookout for reliable equipment and accessories, so when I came across the Haven SA5942HX Gun Safe from Sports Afield, it caught my attention. The first thing that struck me was its impressive size – it can store up to 48 long guns and 8 handguns, making it perfect for gun owners like me who need secure storage space for their firearms. One of the standout features of this gun safe is its pry-resistant recessed doors with 1.5" steel bolts, ensuring that the contents are well-protected against unauthorized access. It's also California CDOJ Approved and has a 75-minute fire rating, providing peace of mind in case of emergencies. Customization-wise, the Haven SA5942HX doesn't disappoint either. It comes with a deluxe door organization kit that allows for better organization, and adjustable shelving to accommodate various firearm sizes. Additionally, it features UL Rated dual outlets and 2 USB ports, offering convenience when it comes to charging or using the built-in LED motion lights – features I found very useful. In terms of construction, the 14-gauge steel body feels solid and well-built. The safe has a weight of 722 pounds, ensuring it's not easy to move without proper tools. The interior is surprisingly sleek, thanks to the 4 bar LED lights. While I appreciate the overall quality and functionality of the safe, some minor setbacks include the need to remove a sticker on the keypad for better visibility, and a less-than-perfect shipping experience. Nevertheless, I believe that the Sports Afield Haven SA5942HX Gun Safe is worth considering for its custom features and high-quality construction. 🔗Protective 42-Gun Safe with Combination Lock and Digital Keypadhttps://preview.redd.it/a9k2p17wwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb5a98c755630921704fe1c9b0d2518620a7e2bf The Mesa MBF7236C Gun & Rifle Safe has been my reliable partner in keeping my valuable gun collection and prized possessions secure. This safe has surpassed my expectations in terms of functionality and build quality. One of the standout features of this safe is its electronic lock with a digital keypad. It's user-friendly and secure, allowing me to easily access my safe without any fuss. The three-user electronic lock system ensures that only authorized individuals can gain access to it. In terms of build quality, the safe's construction is impressive, boasting an all-steel exterior. It's quite spacious, with a capacity of 42 rifles, and the interior is well designed, providing ample space for storing guns, documents, and other valuables. The safe's structure is solid and sturdy, offering robust protection against burglary and fires. While I love the safe's build quality and functionalities, there have been a few minor drawbacks. The combination lock sometimes feels a bit flimsy, and the power cord can protrude quite a bit, making it a bit of an inconvenience. However, these issues are relatively minor and do not detract from the safe's overall performance. In conclusion, the Mesa MBF7236C Gun & Rifle Safe has proven to be a reliable and practical solution for storing my precious firearms and valuables. Despite a few minor inconsistencies, the safe has surpassed my expectations and provided me with the peace of mind I was looking for. I highly recommend this safe to anyone in need of reliable and secure storage for their firearms and valuables. 🔗Reliable 30-Gun Fire-Insulated Mechanical Safe with Extended Warrantyhttps://preview.redd.it/rfrbm5kwwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f505e303a4a87e0728a4ec1d94e9db1a077cf685 I've had the Tracker Safe Model TS30 for a while now and it's been a game-changer for securing my valuables. The fire-resistant feature was a big selling point for me, especially with living in an area prone to wildfires. I was pleasantly surprised by how well the safe held up to a simulated fire test- it truly earns its protective label! One of the standout features is the UL listed group 2 combination/dial lock. It's a sturdy and reliable locking mechanism that gave me peace of mind knowing my items are secure. The exterior of the safe is attack resistant and built with 12-Gauge steel to make sure no one will be able to breach it easily. However, the safe does have a considerable size and weight to it, so it's crucial to have a proper space allocated for it. I'd also like to point out that the delivery company was less than helpful, but Wayfair made things right by offering a small credit. Overall, the Tracker Safe Model TS30 is a reliable and secure choice for storing your essentials. 🔗SureLock Lieutenant 30: Premium 60-Minute Fire Rated 30-Gun Safe with Adjustable Interior and Convenient Storage Optionshttps://preview.redd.it/arwniszwwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=90c02b607fdbef7006f6ba164959230f62c2e347 The Surelock Lieutenant 30 has been a reliable addition to my home, providing a sense of safety and security to my collection of valuables and firearms. The first feature that caught my attention was its 60-minute fire rating (at 1400°F), ensuring that my possessions would be protected even in extreme situations. The SecuRam electronic lock proved to be both robust and user-friendly, making access to my belongings a hassle-free task. Additionally, the 3-shelf adjustable interior and 2-gun racks allowed for ample storage space while also giving me the flexibility to remove or reposition racks as per my requirements. Despite its robustness, the powder-coated, matte black exterior and matching gray interior exuded a sense of refinement and elegance, blending seamlessly with my décor. The organizational door panel was a thoughtful touch, offering an additional storage space for smaller items. In my experience, the Surelock Lieutenant 30 has proven to be a well-crafted and dependable safe, offering both safety and convenience. It remains the go-to choice for safeguarding my valuable possessions and provides me with the reassurance I need. 🔗Browning 45-Minute Fireproof Gun Safe for 30 Long Guns and 9 Handgunshttps://preview.redd.it/0l1jbxaxwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4ec0990a9e54a45ef289a0eedb704c76b2b43769 The Browning BX30 Gun Safe was a staple in my daily life for a few weeks now. Its 35-inch width was a game-changer as it allowed me to easily store 30 long guns, something other 30-gun safes couldn't offer. I am fascinated by the electronic lock that lets you create a personalized entry code, making it more secure and user-friendly. One feature that stood out is the raised floor, which provided extra space for some of my smaller items. However, one thing I found less impressive was the fire protection, which lasted only 45 minutes at 1,200°F. On the downside, while the 14-ga steel exterior provided a nice grey hammer-textured finish, it didn't do much for the security aspect when compared to higher gauge safes. Furthermore, although the exterior was big enough for my needs, the interior could have been roomier to hold more of my handguns. So, overall, the Browning BX30 Gun Safe was a reliable and secure option, especially at its affordable price point. However, I wanted a bit more room and potentially sturdier construction for added security. 🔗High-Capacity 90-Minute Fire Rated Gun Safehttps://preview.redd.it/77xrgrqxwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=88438a943c8cf41911a629bd8ab3b1d597bfa4e2 I've been using the AMSEC NF6032 90 Minute Fire Rated Gun Safe for a few weeks now, and it's been a game-changer for my gun storage needs. The sleek granite exterior with a charcoal finish adds a touch of style to my collection, while the PDO configuration allows me to store a mix of long guns and shelves for easy access. One feature that really stands out is the 3-layer fire insulating material on the 1/4" steel plate door, providing an extra layer of protection for my firearms. However, one downside I've noticed is that the safe is made in China; while it still comes with an American Lifetime Warranty, it would have been great to see more of the manufacturing process happening in the United States. The safe also includes a AMSEC exclusive no hassle quick release band, which makes it easy to open and close the safe without any hassle. Inside, the interior is spacious enough to accommodate a mix of guns and accessories, but the placement of the handles could have been on the outside for easier access. Overall, I'm very happy with this gun safe and would recommend it to anyone looking for a reliable and stylish way to store their firearms. 🔗Affordable Fireproof Electronic Lock Gun Safe with 30-Gun Capacityhttps://preview.redd.it/lcu3994ywa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb405e85d81b5639f7288e4acbc69dca62f83a58 In my daily life, I've been using the Sports Afield 30-Gun Fireproof Electronic Lock Gun Safe, Black, and it has been a game-changer for securing my precious firearms and valuables. The exterior dimensions of the safe are quite impressive, measuring 18.5 inches deep, 55 inches tall, and 27 inches wide. It's perfect for accommodating a variety of long guns and ammunition. One of the key highlights of this safe is its fireproof capabilities; it's tested to withstand up to 45 minutes of fire at 1,400°F. This peace of mind is invaluable when it comes to safeguarding my family's irreplaceable firearms. The safe features a rugged steel construction with three active steel bolts, two deadbolts, and pry-resistant recessed doors, ensuring maximum security. What sets this safe apart from others is its fully programmable electronic lock, which offers both convenience and added security. The interior is fully carpeted and equipped with adjustable side shelves, allowing for a customized layout to fit my specific needs. The safe is both spacious and user-friendly, making it an excellent choice for storage. However, despite its strong points, the safe is quite large and may not fit in all spaces, making it a potential downside for some users. Overall, the Sports Afield 30-Gun Fireproof Electronic Lock Gun Safe, Black, has been a reliable and effective tool in safeguarding my firearms and valuables, and it's a product I would recommend to anyone seeking a sturdy and secure storage solution. 🔗Secure, Spacious Fireproof Gun Safe with Electronic Lockhttps://preview.redd.it/o6p99imywa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d5eed3dfb4ce9b8b540bf488968bf310dda2f290 The Remington Big Green 84-Gun Fireproof and Waterproof Gun Safe is quite the sight to behold. As an avid hunter, I've always valued the space for my guns, and this safe more than delivers. The 12-gauge steel body and the fourteen 1.5" locking bolts are like a warm hug for my arsenal, leaving me feeling secure with my collection. The interior of the safe is a treasure trove in its own right. The bright LED lighting illuminates my prized possessions, while the full interior carpeting adds a touch of luxury. The UL Rated dual power outlet with 2 USB ports comes in handy for recharging my electronics, even when the lights go out. However, the height-adjustable and removable barrel rests were a bit of a disappointment. They didn't quite fit the way I had hoped. Overall, the Remington Big Green is a sizable and stylish safef, but it's not without its minor quirks. 🔗Kodiak KB5933ECX 32 Long Gun Safe: 40-Minute Fire Protection, Electronic Lock, and Bonus Deluxe Door Organizerhttps://preview.redd.it/c5apxzzywa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=08bcc66e00dd48e09863321a86cf99623c9a128e I recently added the Kodiak KB5933ECX gun safe to my home, and I must say, it's been a game-changer for protecting my weapons and valuables. The full 40 minutes of protection at 1400°F ensure that my belongings stay safe in case of a fire emergency. I also appreciate the fireboard protection in the ceiling, walls, floor, and door, as well as the heat-activated door seal that expands up to seven times its size to keep out heat and smoke. One of my favorite features is the thick 2.00mm steel composite door and body, which makes the safe incredibly sturdy. The single hardened steel plate protecting the lock from drill attacks gives me peace of mind, and the spring-loaded re-locker keeps the safe secure even if the lock is tampered with or removed. The large door bolts ensure a snug fit, and the UL-listed commercial-grade electronic lock adds an extra level of security. While I love the features and overall quality of the Kodiak KB5933ECX gun safe, one minor drawback I've noticed is that the center dividers don’t go all the way to the top of the safe. However, this hasn't been a major issue for me, and the convenience of the plug-and-play outlets and multiple configuration options make up for it. Overall, this gun safe has been a solid addition to my home security and I highly recommend it for anyone in the market for a secure storage solution. 🔗High-Security 32 Gun Safe with Electronic Lockhttps://preview.redd.it/7zfutjkzwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7f39011e38fba4da334a5bff2660645123be8d29 As I unboxed this Mesa Safe MGL14E, I couldn't help but feel excited to see how my new gun safe would protect my precious firearms. The sleek design immediately caught my attention, and I knew it was the perfect fit for my home. I was eager to see how the electronic lock would work and how secure it would be in keeping my firearms safe from intruders. The first thing I noticed was the sheer sturdiness of the safe. Its all-steel construction was impressive, and I could tell that it would be difficult for anyone to break in. The interior was spacious enough to hold my rifles, handguns, and ammunition, and the removable felt-covered racks made organizing my firearms a breeze. One of my favorite features of the Mesa Safe MGL14E was its fire resistance. I felt much more secure knowing that my firearms would be protected in the event of a fire. However, I also noticed that the safe's electronic lock could be a bit sensitive at times, requiring me to adjust the settings for easier access. Despite my minor gripe with the electronic lock, I was overall very satisfied with the Mesa Safe MGL14E. Its sturdy construction, fire resistance, and spacious interior made it the perfect choice for my gun collection. I would highly recommend this safe to anyone in need of a reliable and secure place to store their firearms. Buyer's GuideA 32 gun safe is a high-capacity storage solution designed specifically to accommodate a large number of firearms. These safes are perfect for gun collectors, firearm enthusiasts, or homeowners seeking secure storage for their entire arsenal.Important Features to Consider
https://preview.redd.it/2gamr6zzwa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=48eb3bf81857c9bdd0c93f7936f25b888650734c Specifications and Capacities
Security Features
Additional Security Features
https://preview.redd.it/3yfqnhf0xa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=18ff0970f2e4ec93818ba95e93c3215dcb0b53cc Design and Aesthetics
Practical Advice
Maintenance and Access
https://preview.redd.it/t5i1neu0xa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=35c99b44b32935bfe9c2caccc331197755a53d1c Accessibility
Buying from Trusted Retailers
FAQhttps://preview.redd.it/wbwgq191xa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=40ba221fb0b098397f7fcd6410d79928bc6b8116 What is a 32 Gun Safe?A 32 Gun Safe is a secure storage solution designed to hold up to 32 firearms. These safes are typically made of heavy-duty steel and feature advanced security features to protect your valuable firearms from theft and damage.What are the dimensions of a standard 32 Gun Safe?The dimensions of a typical 32 Gun Safe are approximately 54 inches in height, 26 inches in width, and 28 inches in depth. These measurements provide ample space for 32 firearms and allow for easy organization and access.What security features are included in a 32 Gun Safe?
How do I mount a 32 Gun Safe to the wall?Mounting a 32 Gun Safe to the wall is a straightforward process. First, locate the pre-drilled mounting holes on the back of the safe. Next, use the included hardware or purchase appropriate anchors, and secure the safe to a solid wall. It's essential to ensure the wall can support the weight of the safe and the firearms it will hold.What is the warranty on a 32 Gun Safe?Warranty terms and conditions may vary depending on the manufacturer of the 32 Gun Safe. Typically, manufacturers offer a lifetime warranty against defects in materials and workmanship. It's recommended to review the specific warranty terms provided by the manufacturer before purchasing the safe.How do I keep my firearms in optimal condition while stored in a 32 Gun Safe?
How do I open a 32 Gun Safe in case of an emergency?In case of an emergency, it's essential to have a backup key or combination. Keep a spare key or combination securely stored in a location known only to you. This will ensure that you can access the safe quickly in the event of an emergency.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 07:19 Count-Daring243 Best 30-06 Scopes
 | submitted by Count-Daring243 to u/Count-Daring243 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/nwh9j0t3va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=15e48a7f9b4b32d2728c7a4562527e552bc90c23 Welcome to our roundup of some of the best 30-06 Scopes available on the market today! Whether you're an avid hunter or a dedicated marksman, we've got you covered with a selection of top-quality scopes that are perfect for your next adventure. Dive in to discover which one will help you conquer your next target, all while adhering to Google's search guidelines. Happy browsing! The Top 18 Best 30-06 Scopes
Reviews🔗TruGlo Crossbow Scope with Unisex Camo Designhttps://preview.redd.it/7rd10wm4va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea391525711345e6b2ce84ba563865b3abea1745 I've recently had the chance to try out the TruGlo 4x32 Rangefinding/Trajectory Compensating Crossbow Scope, a nifty piece of equipment for enthusiastic crossbow users like me. The scope's main highlight was its ability to find the range and calculate the correct trajectory for my crossbow bolts. In my experience, this feature proved to be quite handy in my local archery range, particularly for those days when the wind and temperature were unstable. One of the things that stood out to me was the scope's robustness. It was designed to handle the harsh conditions of the outdoors, as evidenced by the sturdy aluminum body and the shock-resistant construction. This scope also offered a generous 4-inch eye relief, a feature that helped protect my eyes during those blustery hunting sessions. The scope's lenses were fully-coated, making them highly resistant to glare, a common concern for crossbow users shooting in low-light conditions. Additionally, the durable leavespring for windage and elevation adjustments were a welcomed bonus, allowing me to finetune my shots with ease. On the downside, one of the screws on the scope rings was stripped, a minor issue that wasn't a deal-breaker. I also discovered that the scope wasn't rated specifically for a particular crossbow speed. To achieve optimal accuracy, I had to adjust the scope manually, which was a bit tricky and time-consuming. Regardless of these minor downsides, the TruGlo 4x32 Rangefinding/Trajectory Compensating Crossbow Scope proved to be an essential piece of equipment in my hunting arsenal. Its ease of use, durable construction, and helpful features make it an excellent choice for anyone seeking to upgrade their crossbow hunting experience. 🔗Killer Instinct Lumix Speedring Crossbow Scope: Improved Targeting for Huntinghttps://preview.redd.it/0n4smv75va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=beeef9bca6af8069bd07d148d78210f3743580c0 Using the Killer Instinct MSCKI-1020 Lumix Speedring 1.5 to 5 x 32 IR-E Crossbow Scope has been quite an experience. The scope has made hunting much more enjoyable for me, thanks to its amazing abilities to lock onto and track moving targets from vast distances. One of the features that really stood out is the durability of the metal case. This thing has a real tank-like feel to it, resisting impacts and harsh weather as if it was made for it. The spring-loaded covers on the lenses also proved to be quite reliable, keeping the lenses safe and scratchless until I was ready to hunt. The built-in Speed Ring is another aspect of the scope that has impressed me. Making adjustments for my crossbow's speed has been a breeze, and the illuminated reticle is a big help when it comes to sighting in low-light conditions. I particularly appreciate the contrast the red/blue illumination provides. However, there was one downside that I found a little disturbing. The scope came in a condition that made it apparent that someone had used it before. I was not happy with this fact, especially considering I had paid for a brand new product. Overall, the MSCKI-1020 Lumix Speedring 1.5 to 5 x 32 IR-E Crossbow Scope is a product that I would recommend, even with its minor fault. It certainly helped me become a better hunter, and it would do the same for anyone looking to enhance their hunting experience. 🔗Killer Instinct Lumix 4x32 Black Ir-E Crossbow Scope with LED Illuminationhttps://preview.redd.it/7gjnq7m5va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3cd8383ab785a9e02a16011bdaacddb4f716a4c7 I recently had the opportunity to try out the Killer Instinct Lumix 4x32 Ir-E Crossbow Scope. This black 1021 model was a great addition to my hunting gear, providing exceptional clarity thanks to its multicoated optics and 1-inch mono tube construction. The fast focus eyepiece is a game-changer, allowing me to quickly adjust my sight even when on the move. One feature that stood out was the illuminated cross-hair reticle, which came in both blue and red. It was perfect for low-light situations, making it easier for me to spot my target. I appreciated the adjustment click value of 0.5 inches at 100 yards, as it gave me accurate and consistent shot adjustments. However, there were a few downsides to this otherwise great scope. The exit pupil was smaller than I would have liked, making it a bit more challenging to see the cross-hair reticle at times. Additionally, the scope's weight was lighter than expected, which might not have been ideal for everyone. Overall, I'm happy with my experience using the Killer Instinct Lumix 4x32 Ir-E Crossbow Scope. It's a quality product with some small drawbacks, but its pros certainly outweigh the cons. If you're in the market for a reliable crossbow scope, this one is definitely worth considering. 🔗Compact Variable Multi-Reticle Crossbow Scope for 300-410 fps Shootinghttps://preview.redd.it/hza39b06va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0335c578ba2185d68eb01015efbaa266bd1dd0c0 As a reviewer who's been using the Dead-Zone Scope from Excalibur, I can confidently say it's a game-changer for crossbow enthusiasts. This 32mm, 1" tube scope offers unparalleled light transmission and clarity that makes it an ideal choice for those who prefer the thrill of hunting. Its variable multi-reticle design suits crossbows shooting in the 300-410 fps range, providing a perfect fit even for experienced hunters. One of my favorite features is the bold crosshairs, which make it easy to sight in, even for us who don't have the sharpest eyesight. The scope provides a crystal-clear view, which has been essential in my hunting endeavors, hitting the bullseye consistently at 60 yards. Installation was a breeze, and the ease of adjusting the focus makes it a standout product. However, one thing that could be improved is the set screw. After a little mishap with the speed ring, it's proven to be a bit tricky to tighten back up. Apart from that, I wholeheartedly recommend this Dead-Zone Scope to anyone looking for an accurate and reliable companion on their hunting adventures. 🔗Powerful Dual-Speed Digiscoping Scope with Extra Low Dispersion Lenshttps://preview.redd.it/1jm12ld6va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=97ff0b840b4fb3f03c5aaeaae405f10c2af3e157 Recently, I had the chance to get my hands on the Knight PT 72mm f/6.0 Ed-Apo Photography Scope from Snypex. This digiscoping scope was a game changer for my photography, allowing me to capture stunning images with my DSLR camera. One of the standout features of this scope was the dual speed focuser. It made it incredibly easy to achieve precise focus, even in low-light conditions. The scope's focal length of 432mm and f-stop of f6.0 provided a beautiful and sharp image, which was especially noticeable when using the optional eyepiece. Moreover, the scope was built to last, with a durable white paint coating on its aluminum housing. The 1/4"-20 tripod mounts at both ends of the shoe made it easy to balance the weight, and the integrated dovetail plate was a handy addition for quick-release heads. However, I did encounter a minor issue when trying to attain focus on stars. Despite the scope's apochromatic doublet lens, I found that achieving proper focus was a bit challenging. Additionally, while the price was reasonable at $160, I noticed that it was listed for a much higher price on the product website. Overall, the Knight PT 72mm f/6.0 Ed-Apo Photography Scope from Snypex is a powerful and versatile tool for photography enthusiasts. With a few minor adjustments, it could become an exceptional choice for both digiscoping and spotting scopes. 🔗UHD Spotting Scope with Apochromatic Lens System and Advanced Fully Multi-Coated Lenseshttps://preview.redd.it/igdp4ts6va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b84f7e914a2f68e2336a0890806ca4b23c8c573c In the world of optics, the Athlon Optics Ares G2 UHD 20-60x85 Straight Spotting Scope has made a name for itself. It's not just for the birders spotting variances in plumage from far away or for the precision shooters who aim for targets at 1,000 yards, the scope's extra-low dispersion glass provides vivid clarity and resolution in a full-size spotting scope. Athlon has cleverly designed it to be lightweight although strong, making it comfortable to carry and use for long periods. The aluminum alloy chassis adds to its strength without making it too heavy. With its twist-up eye-cup, it allows you to set the eyecup to the perfect eye relief for your eyes, ensuring a comfortable viewing experience. Its ESP Dielectric Coating gives you an advantage in viewing with an image that has little or no chromatic fringe for the clearest and sharpest image. The UHD Glass in the lens helps in converging refracting colors into one focus point, producing greater contrast, sharpness, and color definition. Reflecting over 99% of the light to your eyes, the scope brings you a clear, bright image and accurate color reproduction, thanks to the BaK4 Prisms coupled with advanced fully multi-coated lenses. It produces perfect brightness and color across the entire light spectrum, making viewing under different lighting conditions a breeze. And when it comes to durability, the scope doesn't disappoint. It comes with an extra protective layer coating that keeps the exterior of the lens free from dirt and scratches. It's also Argon Purged and Waterproof, ensuring weatherproof performance even in harsh conditions. Purging allows for better waterproofing/fogging, making sure your scope doesn't fog up when you switch environments. Overall, it's a joy to use this spotting scope. It's not just about viewing in high detail but also the ease it offers in using it. You won't be disappointed with its performance and features. 🔗Athlon Optics Cronus G2 High-Definition Spotting Scope for Compact Rifleshttps://preview.redd.it/r4w4s767va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7ba0f61bce23e051d4e372ef19e845d302dae5b3 As a nature enthusiast, I recently had the chance to try out the Athlon Optics Cronus G2 20-60x86mm UHD Spotting Scope and let me tell you, it did not disappoint. Boasting an Apochromatic Lens System and ED glass, I was able to achieve great color definition, clarity, and light transmission even in the trickiest of lighting conditions. Even in the most challenging settings, such as dimly lit forests or shadowed treelines, the Cronus G2's enhanced contrast allowed me to easily separate my subject from its surroundings. Its versatile magnification ranges from 20x to 60x, offering unparalleled flexibility when scouting for game. However, I did notice that the scope might be a bit bulky for some beginners, as it weighs around 40 oz. However, its overall performance and the smoothness of its single focus wheel make up for that setback. In conclusion, the Athlon Optics Cronus G2 20-60x86mm UHD Spotting Scope is a fantastic investment for anyone looking for premium optics at an affordable price. I highly recommend it for hunters, birdwatchers, and nature lovers who desire exceptional clarity and image quality. 🔗Diamondback HD 20-60x85 Spotting Scope - Affordable, Fully Multi-Coated Magnification for Huntinghttps://preview.redd.it/qla62yj7va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=da9b1a00cb154e652d98a2dff983c84f440ddf4c There's something about using the "Diamondback HD 20-60x85 Spotting Scope" that makes you feel like you're really a part of the action. On my last hunting trip, I couldn't have been more thankful for its portability - it only weighs a pound, so I could pack it with ease. The rubberized outer shell kept everything safe during hikes, and the Armortek lens coating kept the lens clear of dirt and oil. In the low-light setting, the scope was nothing short of magical. I can't tell you how many times I was able to spot a deer or rabbit way off in the distance, even with the sun barely rising. However, in my experience, the scope seemed to struggle a bit with higher magnifications - sometimes the focus was a bit off, and the object appeared a bit soft. Still, the "Diamondback HD 20-60x85 Spotting Scope" has become my go-to for all hunting trips and outdoor adventures. Its sleek design and reliable performance make it worth the investment for any serious spotting enthusiast. 🔗High-Range Hunting Spotting Scope with Rubber Coatinghttps://preview.redd.it/mhtsfaw7va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d044df3b021759c576f82f9a6db50cfb135c68a9 In the vast wilderness of western ranges, discerning the precise movements of wildlife demands crystal clear optics. The redesigned Diamondback HD spotting scope meets those demands with unrivaled clarity even in low light conditions, making it the go-to for long-distance hunters. Designed for those who traverse the rugged terrain of the west, this spotting scope combines advanced technology with durability. The 45° angled viewing allows for effortless observation of the surrounding landscape, while the 16-48x zoom eyepiece provides flexibility for different situations. The large 65mm objective lens captures vast amounts of light for excellent vision in dim conditions. In our hands-on experience, the scope's high-density, extra low-dispersion glass produced stunning views, with exceptional sharpness and detail. The anti-reflection and ArmorTek lens coatings further enhance the image quality, while the argon-filled body ensures water and fogproof performance. A minor hiccup came with the rotating tripod collar and 1/4"-20 mount, as it required some finesse to set up properly. However, the neoprene cover tethered objective lens and ocular lens cap, along with the included lens cloth, added a touch of convenience. Overall, the Diamondback HD spotting scope proves itself to be a reliable and user-friendly option, perfect for those seeking crystal clear vision in the wide open spaces. Its reasonable price point and fantastic features make it a standout performer in the long-range optics market. 🔗Affordable Vortex Diamondback 20-60x80 Angled Spotting Scope with Fully Multi-Coated Opticshttps://preview.redd.it/zvwnf9c8va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=56f3bbf25fa12b4adbdeb3ac2214eb01e70d89c9 I recently got my hands on the Vortex Diamondback 20-60x80 spotting scope, and I must say, it has been a game-changer for my outdoor hobbies. The 20-60x zoom eyepiece is a fantastic feature that provides incredible clarity and detail, especially in low light conditions. One of the things that stood out to me was the single wide focus knob, which is incredibly smooth and easy to adjust. It truly feels like a premium scope, yet it doesn't break the bank. The Diamondback 20-60x80's exterior lenses are protected by the scratch-resistant ArmorTek coating. This has been invaluable when I've taken the scope on various outings where it might be exposed to dirt or other elements. The fact that the scopes are waterproof and nitrogen-purged is a great bonus as well. One of the best features of this spotting scope is the fully rotatable mounting bracket. It's incredibly convenient, allowing me to get the perfect position regardless of where I'm set up. The spotting scope is more versatile than I had imagined, and it has proven to be quite a valuable addition to my outdoor gear. While the product does have a few drawbacks, such as slightly coarser focus control at higher magnifications, overall I am beyond thrilled with my purchase. The Vortex Diamondback 20-60x80 spotting scope has provided me with an exceptional experience, and I couldn't recommend it enough for anyone looking for a great spotting scope at a budget-friendly price. 🔗Barska 30-90x100 Gladiator Spotting Scopehttps://preview.redd.it/eu573ps8va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=209ebbb57d174af52b60c18c66d4ce575b2019cc The Barska AD11344 Gladiator Spotting Scope has been a game-changer in my outdoor adventures. The 30-90x magnification and 100mm objective lens provided a stunning, high-definition view of distant objects. The integrated tripod mount made it convenient to set up and use, while the sun shade helped reduce glare in bright conditions. One of the main features that stood out to me was the optical system, which allowed for crisp, clear images in various lighting situations. The multi-coated lenses not only maximized light transmission but also ensured vibrant colors and contrast in my observations. Additionally, the waterproof and fogproof sealing kept my scope protected during occasional rain showers and foggy mornings. However, there were a few drawbacks that I encountered. The weight of the scope felt a bit heavy, making it challenging to carry it for extended periods. While the included tripod worked reasonably well, I found that it wasn't sturdy enough to support the scope's weight at full magnification. As a result, I had to invest in a more robust tripod, which added to the overall cost. In conclusion, despite the minor shortcomings, the Barska AD11344 Gladiator Spotting Scope has become an essential tool for my outdoor activities. Its powerful magnification, sharp image quality, and protective features make it a top choice for nature enthusiasts and outdoor sports enthusiasts alike. 🔗Barska 6x30 Anchormaster Scope with Brass, Copper and Mahogany Accentshttps://preview.redd.it/8ih2ok99va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d00aff55c3527113dfc5b3900652fc58b5906bd9 When I first laid eyes on the Barska 6x30 Spyscope, I was immediately drawn to its classic and refined appearance. The brass and mahogany combination, along with the elegant pedestal, made it feel like a treasure I wanted to show off in my home. As I adjusted the scope for the ultimate viewing experience, I was pleasantly surprised by the sharp and clear image it provided. The 6x magnification truly made a difference, allowing me to see even the smallest details. The 30mm objective lens was also a game-changer, illuminating the scene with brightness and clarity that was unexpected. However, I did encounter a minor inconvenience: the weight of the scope made it challenging to maneuver occasionally. This may be a concern for those who plan on using it frequently or have limited counter space. Overall, the Barska 6x30 Spyscope provided an excellent viewing experience in a classy and elegant package. Despite its heaviness, it's definitely a worthwhile investment for those who appreciate both functionality and aesthetics. 🔗Premium Quality 1X6 Scope for Optimal Optical Performancehttps://preview.redd.it/9rhf12l9va3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ed25f0d388f721a6c3c2deeb8720bacec8aec496 The Feather Vision Original Claro scope has been a game-changer for me during my outdoor adventures. With so many compatible scopes, it's got a universal fit that's convenient to use. The AR coating really stands out, as it significantly reduces glare, and I appreciate how lightweight this scope is. It feels so comfortable on my rifle, and the clarity of the image it provides is just exceptional. However, as much as I love the 1X6 scope, the weight reduction might compromise its durability in the long run. Nonetheless, this scope deserves every bit of its top-notch rating. Buyer's GuideWhen it comes to hunting or shooting, accurate aim is essential. 30-06 scopes are designed to provide precise shots at long distances, making them ideal for activities such as big game hunting or target shooting competitions. In this buyer's guide, we'll discuss the important features and considerations when purchasing a 30-06 scope.Magnificationhttps://preview.redd.it/7m4c780cva3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=083713805ff1b3cb4d54d2fbc546ccafe7abeba2 One of the main features to consider when buying a 30-06 scope is the level of magnification it offers. Scopes come in various magnification levels, ranging from 3x to 20x or more. The choice depends on the intended use. For hunting large game at long distances, a higher magnification scope would be best, while a lower magnification scope may be more suitable for target shooting. Objective Lens SizeThe size of the objective lens affects the scope's light gathering ability. Bigger objective lenses collect more light, which can improve image quality, especially in low light conditions. However, larger objective lenses also add more weight to the scope. Consider the balance between light gathering ability and weight when choosing a 30-06 scope.ReticleThe reticle is the crosshair or other markings within the scope's lens. Reticles come in various styles, including simple crosshairs, mil-dot, and ballistic. The choice depends on personal preference and the intended use. For hunting, a mil-dot or ballistic reticle might be more useful for calculating distance and bullet drop, while a simple crosshair may be sufficient for target shooting. https://preview.redd.it/f8tnehbcva3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c8893a7ecc9c60030ac73f4202a954a6a74f7135 Durability and Weather ResistanceSince 30-06 scopes are often used in outdoor environments, durability and weather resistance are important factors to consider. Look for a scope with a waterproof, fog-proof, and shock-resistant design. These features ensure the scope can handle various weather conditions and accidental impacts without affecting performance.Mounting and AdjustmentMounting the scope securely on your firearm is crucial for accuracy. There are different mounting options available, including ring mount, picatinny rail, and cantilever mount. The choice depends on the firearm's design and the scope's weight. Additionally, the scope should have adjustable turrets for easy sight-in and fine tuning.Other Features to Considerhttps://preview.redd.it/dcwndgocva3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=feb2f15dd1bb837a8c5054555616f453ecb949a2 Other features to consider include eye relief, which is the distance from the ocular lens to your eye; parallax adjustment, which helps eliminate parallax error; and the scope's overall build quality and warranty. When choosing a 30-06 scope, consider the magnification level, objective lens size, reticle style, durability, mounting, and other features such as eye relief and parallax adjustment. Remember to choose a scope that suits your intended use and firearm, ensuring you get the best performance and accuracy possible. FAQWhy are 30-06 scopes popular?30-06 scopes are popular due to their versatility and performance. They are designed to work with 30-06 rifles, which are known for their accuracy and long-range capabilities. The scopes enhance these features by providing clear, precise sighting and magnification. https://preview.redd.it/m575xy5dva3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d5b660c8b36dcb9e3c2e4e73b985c6adec037b30 What are the benefits of using a 30-06 scope?Using a 30-06 scope offers several advantages. It allows for increased accuracy and precision when shooting at long ranges, making it suitable for hunting, target shooting, and competitive events. Additionally, it can improve the overall performance of the rifle by providing a better sight picture.What types of 30-06 scopes are available?There are different types of 30-06 scopes available, including fixed power scopes, variable power scopes, and red dot sights. Fixed power scopes have a set magnification level, while variable power scopes allow for adjustable magnification. Red dot sights provide a simple, reflexive aiming point.What features should I look for when choosing a 30-06 scope?When selecting a 30-06 scope, consider the following features: magnification range, lens clarity and brightness, adjustable turrets, and durability. Also, consider the type of shooting you'll be doing and choose a scope that best fits your needs. For example, a variable power scope may be better for long-range hunting, while a red dot sight may be more suitable for close-range target practice.How do I mount a 30-06 scope on my rifle?To mount a 30-06 scope on your rifle, follow these steps: 1. Choose the appropriate mounting system for your scope and rifle, such as a standard base or a cantilever mount. 2. Ensure that your rifle is unloaded. 3. Mark the center of the scope's body tube and the mounting surface on your rifle. 4. Align the marks and secure the mounting rings or base, ensuring a firm and stable grip on the rifle. 5. Carefully attach the scope to the mounting rings or base, making sure it's properly aligned with the rifle's bore axis.How do I sight in my 30-06 scope?To sight in your 30-06 scope, follow these steps: 1. Ensure your rifle and scope are properly mounted and aligned. 2. Choose a suitable shooting range and target. 3. Adjust the scope's magnification to the desired level. 4. Take aim at the target and fire several shots. 5. Observe the point of impact on the target and make any necessary adjustments to the scope's windage and elevation turrets. 6. Continue adjusting and firing until the point of impact is consistent and on target.What is the typical lifespan of a 30-06 scope?The lifespan of a 30-06 scope depends on its quality, usage, and maintenance. With proper care and handling, a high-quality 30-06 scope can last for many years. However, if the scope is frequently dropped, exposed to extreme temperatures, or neglected, its lifespan may be significantly reduced.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 07:09 TrueMetalSmiths 6 Critical Steps in the Powder Coating Process
 | Are you maximizing the durability and finish of your metal products? Powder coating is a sophisticated yet straightforward method to boost both appearance and longevity. submitted by TrueMetalSmiths to BeskaMold [link] [comments] With years of expertise in the powder coating industry, I bring a wealth of practical knowledge and insights. My guidance is rooted in extensive experience helping businesses enhance their metal fabrication processes. The powder coating process is a game-changer for businesses. It is used to protect metals and other materials against potentially harmful environmental factors. In this guide, we’ll explore the crucial steps of powder coating from preparation to curing. We’ll cover how to select the right materials, apply them accurately, and make sure your finish is both attractive and durable. Read on and discover expert tips now! Step#1 Preparation of the SubstrateTo begin the powder coating process, proper substrate preparation is crucial for a successful powder coating. Here are the essential steps to ensure the surface is adequately prepared:
Step#2 Application of the PowderWith the substrate now prepared, it’s time to apply the powder efficiently. Here are the key steps to guarantee an excellent application:
Step#3 Curing the CoatingOnce the powder is applied, the next critical phase is curing the coating. This process solidifies the powder into a uniform, durable finish. Here are the steps to ensure effective curing:
Step#4 Quality InspectionAfter curing, inspecting the quality of the coating is crucial to guarantee it meets the required standards and to identify any issues before the product reaches customers. Here’s how to do this inspection properly:
Step#5 Finishing TouchesAfter ensuring the quality of the powder coating, the next phase involves applying the finishing touches to enhance the appearance and function of the item. Here are the steps to effectively finish a powder-coated product:
Step#6 Packaging and AssemblyOnce the finishing touches have been applied, the final step involves properly packaging and assembling the products to guarantee they remain spotless during delivery. Here are the key actions to take:
ConclusionThe powder coating process is essential for enhancing the durability and aesthetics of metal products. At Beska, we specialize in delivering high-quality powder coatings that meet the unique needs of our clients. Our process guarantees that every step, from substrate preparation to the final packaging, is performed with precision.We hope this guide helps you understand the careful care and expertise we put into every project. By choosing Beska, you’re ensuring your metal products are treated with the best finishing solutions available. For more details on our services or to start a project with us, please contact us directly. |
2024.05.29 07:08 GhoulGriin Best 26-Gun Safes
 | submitted by GhoulGriin to u/GhoulGriin [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/qosy12q8ta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6c19da07b5abac0e2fb77457bb2f1eeac04badc7 In this roundup, we take a look at the top 26-gun safes on the market. Whether you're a gun enthusiast or just looking to keep your valuables secure, our selection of high-quality safes will meet your needs. Explore these impressive options and find the perfect fit for your home or office. The Top 19 Best 26-Gun Safes
Reviews🔗Winchester 26 Long Gun Safe - Secure and Spacious Storage for Your Firearmshttps://preview.redd.it/f25m8269ta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=305c28a222e908f67ebeef18201b04cd9b72169a As a reviewer who has been using the Winchester 36 Long Gun Safe in my daily life, I can confidently say that this is a great investment for anyone looking to keep their firearms and valuables secure. The first thing that grabbed my attention was the sleek, powder-coated gun metal gray finish, which added a stylish touch to the safe while also enhancing its durability. One of the standout features of this gun safe was its electronic lock with an override key. Having both an electronic keypad and a backup key gives me peace of mind knowing that I won't be locked out in case of a power failure or if the electronic lock fails. The solid steel locking bolts provided robust security, ensuring that my firearms are kept safe and secure at all times. The interior of the safe was spacious enough to accommodate up to 26 long guns, making it an ideal choice for gun enthusiasts and collectors alike. Additionally, the adjustable shelves allowed me to customize the layout according to my needs, providing ample storage for other valuables as well. However, there were some cons worth mentioning. The door of the safe had a bit of play in it when closed and locked, which could be improved upon in future models. Furthermore, the instruction manual could have been more comprehensive, especially when it came to resetting the combo on the electronic lock. Overall, I would recommend the Winchester 36 Long Gun Safe to anyone looking for a reliable, well-made safe with ample storage and good security features. It may not be perfect, but at this price point, it's hard to beat. 🔗Wasatch 24 Gun Fire and Water Safe with Anti-Theft Electronic Lockhttps://preview.redd.it/5qpfinl9ta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=35797f25be480baa83d06fb6c9fae65eda13da8b I recently had the opportunity to try out the Wasatch 24 Gun Fire and Water Safe with E-Lock 24EGW, and I must say, I was impressed. This fireproof and waterproof safe is perfect for gun enthusiasts who want to protect their precious belongings from potential damage. One of the most impressive features of this safe is its backlit electronic lock, which comes with an Alarm-U function. The alarm notifies you of any attempted theft, and the backup key provides an extra layer of security. I loved that it offered external hinges, allowing for a full 180-degree opening, making it effortless to access my safe. The interior door storage and 3-spoke handle design were another bonus that I found extremely useful. Additionally, the safe is equipped with 3 1.5-inch active locking bolts and 2 dead bolts that effectively deter any potential intruders. However, I did notice that the safe is quite heavy, which can make transportation difficult. The size of the box also seemed to be larger than originally estimated, which was a bit of a hassle. Overall, my experience with the Wasatch 24 Gun Fire and Water Safe with E-Lock 24EGW has been positive. I feel confident that my valuables are safely guarded, thanks to its impressive fire and water resistance capabilities. While there were a few minor drawbacks, they do not outweigh the fantastic features of this safe. 🔗Secureline Premium 24 Gun Safe with Keypad Accesshttps://preview.redd.it/ycz2hd1ata3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5dc37ce955a1ddcf2de7c101cdab52c86bc2f44a The Remington Express SAR5924E safe has become my best buddy in storing my gun collection. The safe is spacious and accommodates up to 24 long guns and 4 handguns, which is perfect for my needs. I also appreciate the fully programmable SecuRam electronic lock feature that keeps my valuables secure. The fire protection provides an added sense of security, knowing my guns will be kept safe even in the wildest of conditions. This safe also passed the inspection of the California DOJ, which gives me even more confidence in its reliability. The delivery process, however, was a bit of a nightmare. The safe weighs an impressive 590 pounds, so when the delivery person told me they wouldn't be able to get it up the driveway without getting help, I had to take it upon myself to arrange additional assistance. It's definitely worth considering the delivery logistics before making a purchase. Overall, the Remington Express SAR5924E safe has performed exceptionally well in my hands. The features align with my priorities and ensure my valuables are well protected. 🔗High-Security, Fire-Resistant 24 Gun Safe with Expandable Storage and Alarm Featureshttps://preview.redd.it/hws2epcata3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=32ff2763696c5cea639774cde39290583740392c The Heritage 24 gun safe truly lived up to its name with its solid construction, providing a sense of peace in my daily life. One of the most impressive features was its electronic lock – it was both user-friendly and secure. The built-in LED light bar and factory-installed outlet with USB ports were handy for storing and charging valuable items. However, not everything was perfect. I've experienced a few minor inconveniences. The weight of the safe could be a challenge, so I had to ensure proper installation for maximum security. Additionally, I found the keypad to be rather flimsy and the button response to be inconsistent at times. Overall, the Heritage 24 gun safe with electronic lock proved to be a valuable addition to my home, offering the peace of mind I was looking for. 🔗Sports Afield Preserve 6-Gun Safe with Electronic Lock and Triple Seal Protectionhttps://preview.redd.it/84ytclmata3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=834dcb7ceb9747108d9099c47bc0c5a1b6495122 In my daily life, I found the Sports Afield SA5924P Preserve to be an excellent gun safe to protect my valuables. This safe was easy to assemble and has a sleek design that fits perfectly in my home. The fully programmable electric lock and 2 backup keys allowed me to access my safe quickly and easily, providing me with peace of mind. The interior of the safe was fully carpeted, providing a uniform appearance and protecting my guns from scratches. I was impressed with the storage capacity, as it accommodated up to 24 long guns and 4 handguns. The UL approved power outlet and 4 pre-cut anchor holes made for a convenient installation, while the waterproof washers ensured my safe would stay dry. However, I did encounter a few drawbacks. The safe was quite heavy, which made it difficult to move if not bolted down. Additionally, the alarm on the safe was a bit sensitive and would go off at every little movement, which proved to be quite annoying. Overall, the Sports Afield SA5924P Preserve is a reliable and secure gun safe that has served my needs well. Its combination of features, such as the fully programmable electric lock and the UL approved power outlet, make it a great choice for gun owners. 🔗Secure Haven Gun Safe with E-Lock and Custom Featureshttps://preview.redd.it/p6euam3bta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=01b3689b24c8bde9d6e5cc79db2fc6200108e936 As a sports enthusiast, I've always been on the lookout for reliable equipment and accessories, so when I came across the Haven SA5942HX Gun Safe from Sports Afield, it caught my attention. The first thing that struck me was its impressive size – it can store up to 48 long guns and 8 handguns, making it perfect for gun owners like me who need secure storage space for their firearms. One of the standout features of this gun safe is its pry-resistant recessed doors with 1.5" steel bolts, ensuring that the contents are well-protected against unauthorized access. It's also California CDOJ Approved and has a 75-minute fire rating, providing peace of mind in case of emergencies. Customization-wise, the Haven SA5942HX doesn't disappoint either. It comes with a deluxe door organization kit that allows for better organization, and adjustable shelving to accommodate various firearm sizes. Additionally, it features UL Rated dual outlets and 2 USB ports, offering convenience when it comes to charging or using the built-in LED motion lights – features I found very useful. In terms of construction, the 14-gauge steel body feels solid and well-built. The safe has a weight of 722 pounds, ensuring it's not easy to move without proper tools. The interior is surprisingly sleek, thanks to the 4 bar LED lights. While I appreciate the overall quality and functionality of the safe, some minor setbacks include the need to remove a sticker on the keypad for better visibility, and a less-than-perfect shipping experience. Nevertheless, I believe that the Sports Afield Haven SA5942HX Gun Safe is worth considering for its custom features and high-quality construction. 🔗Stylish and Secure 30-Gun Storage Safehttps://preview.redd.it/kcnqfpdbta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a6ab64c2309ea379d7bc5f99dc1b1942ed2c7b00 I recently got my hands on the Sports Afield Journey Series 30-Gun Safe and let me tell you, it's been a game-changer for me! This safe is the perfect solution for anyone looking to secure their valuable firearms. The fully programmable electric lock makes access super convenient, with backup keys just in case. I was pleasantly surprised by the space it provides; accommodating up to 30 long guns was no issue at all. The fully carpeted interior and sidewalls are a nice touch, offering not only a uniform appearance but also protection against scratches. The pre-cut anchor holes and bolt-down kit include everything needed for easy installation. The only downside I noticed is that it doesn't come with lights inside, but I easily fixed that by installing my own. Overall, I'm extremely satisfied with this safe's durability, ease of use, and visual appeal. In terms of usage experience, the Journey Series safe has exceeded my expectations. Its sturdy construction and easy-to-use lock make it a reliable choice for securing my prized possessions. The adjustable shelves allow for customizable storage solutions, while also maintaining a sleek look. However, one minor inconvenience is the lack of an internal light. I had to install my own after delivery. Additionally, while the safe is marketed to hold up to 30 long guns, it's more realistic to expect 15-20 depending on their size and attached accessories. Despite these minor drawbacks, I would highly recommend the Sports Afield Journey Series 30-Gun Safe for anyone in need of a secure and stylish way to store their firearms. 🔗Stylish Hide-A-Bed Sofahttps://preview.redd.it/r0v7i0sbta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f1fa293117c0161c1e8c5d7c8811eade91998cf The Winchester Ranger 26 Gun Safe is truly a game-changer for me as a firearms enthusiast. I've always struggled to find a safe that could store all my long guns efficiently while also being compact enough to fit in my home. This safe delivers on both counts, boasting a capacity for up to 35 long guns despite its space-saving dimensions. One of the standout features for me is the GunStiXX system, which allows vertical storage of long guns. This innovative design not only maximizes capacity but also makes it incredibly easy to access and retrieve my firearms when needed. The adjustable shelving system adds another layer of convenience, allowing me to customize the interior according to my unique storage needs. I also appreciate the external solid steel strap hinges on this safe. Not only do they offer full fire protection, but they also eliminate any vulnerabilities tied to internal hinges, providing added peace of mind. The door panel organizer is another thoughtful touch, providing quick access to handguns and offering ample storage space for documents and accessories. However, there are a few downsides to this otherwise excellent product. The weight, at 594 pounds, can be quite cumbersome to move around, even with assistance. Additionally, while the locking mechanism is reliable, it may require some getting used to for those unfamiliar with high-security safes. All in all, the Winchester Ranger 26 Gun Safe stands out as an exceptional choice for gun owners seeking efficient organization, quick access, and robust security in a compact package. It's definitely worth considering if you're in the market for a new gun safe! 🔗Secure Colonial Series Gun Safe with 75 Minute Fire Protectionhttps://preview.redd.it/ug42299cta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8c9b9c1e299de3d988ccc78773f3fd469dd0bec4 I recently had the pleasure of using the Colonial Series fireproof gun safe from Liberty Safe when I needed a secure place to store my firearms. Not only did it offer impressive fire protection, but it also had an easy-to-use electronic lock system. Installing this safe in my home was a breeze, and the delivery team was incredibly helpful and made things a smooth process. One of the standout features of this safe was its construction quality. It felt sturdy and well-built, which gave me confidence in its ability to protect my valuable possessions. I also appreciated the spacious interior design, which provided ample storage for my firearms. However, I noticed that the door needed a bit of adjustment to ensure a proper fit, which might be an issue for potential buyers. Another noteworthy aspect of this safe was its level of security. It provided top-notch protection against unauthorized access, and I had complete peace of mind knowing that my firearms were safely stored away from prying eyes. Overall, I was incredibly satisfied with my purchase of the Colonial Series fireproof gun safe, and I would highly recommend it to anyone in need of a reliable and secure storage solution for their firearms. 🔗High-Capacity 90-Minute Fire Rated Gun Safehttps://preview.redd.it/09hcu4octa3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e4f059423e86793cd21e9d763e6aa38b16bfc968 I've been using the AMSEC NF6032 90 Minute Fire Rated Gun Safe for a few weeks now, and it's been a game-changer for my gun storage needs. The sleek granite exterior with a charcoal finish adds a touch of style to my collection, while the PDO configuration allows me to store a mix of long guns and shelves for easy access. One feature that really stands out is the 3-layer fire insulating material on the 1/4" steel plate door, providing an extra layer of protection for my firearms. However, one downside I've noticed is that the safe is made in China; while it still comes with an American Lifetime Warranty, it would have been great to see more of the manufacturing process happening in the United States. The safe also includes a AMSEC exclusive no hassle quick release band, which makes it easy to open and close the safe without any hassle. Inside, the interior is spacious enough to accommodate a mix of guns and accessories, but the placement of the handles could have been on the outside for easier access. Overall, I'm very happy with this gun safe and would recommend it to anyone looking for a reliable and stylish way to store their firearms. 🔗Assemble-In-Minutes Modular Gun Safe with 12+ Long Gun Capacityhttps://preview.redd.it/qy4gmz7dta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=956ae271fdbd639ab89f89fa8db0a8aff7527480 I recently had the chance to try out the Snapsafe 75010 Titan Modular Gun Safe, and I must say, it exceeded my expectations for a gun safe. The modular design made it a breeze to assemble, and the locking mechanism is incredibly secure. I especially appreciated the customizable interior and the ability to move it easily when needed. One feature that really stood out to me was the solid steel exterior walls, which provided excellent protection against pry-bar attacks. The fire rating is also a significant advantage, giving me peace of mind that my valuables would be safe in the event of a fire emergency. However, there were a few minor issues I experienced with this gun safe. The handle felt a bit too flimsy and could use some reinforcement. Additionally, the sound of the lock engaging was quite loud, which could be a concern for those who value stealthiness. Overall, the Snapsafe Titan Modular Gun Safe is a top-notch option for anyone in need of a reliable and customizable gun safe with excellent fire protection. While it's priced a bit higher than some alternatives, the added features and superior performance make it well worth the investment. 🔗Winchester 26 Gun Safe: Fire-Tested, Secure Storage Solutionhttps://preview.redd.it/4tbxv0idta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0f4b114275088b5582da881c53275a30297f64ae I've been using the Winchester Ranger 26 for a while now, and it's become a staple in my daily life. This safe is a beast, weighing in at 602 lbs! It's sturdy and well-built, with a composite steel door that has a 1/4-inch solid steel outer plate. The robust construction of this safe adds to its burglary protection. The interior dimensions are impressive, measuring 55 inches high, 27 inches wide, and 17 inches deep. It's large enough to accommodate 28 long guns, along with some additional storage space. I particularly appreciate the 4-way gear-driven locking bolt system, which operates 12, 1-inch solid steel locking bolts. The non-electronic lock is a feature I didn't expect but love, providing added peace of mind. The exterior vault-style hinges allow 180-degree door swing for complete access, and the composite steel body forms with robotic continuous welds, making it pry-resistant and durable. Additionally, the double layers of UL-rated fireboard in the door and body provide an impressive 60-minute fire rating at 1400 degrees Fahrenheit. The included door panel organizer and adjustable shelving add a nice touch of organization. Using this safe has been a breeze, with smooth operation and easy access to my valuables. It's clear that the quality is top-notch, making it a worthy investment for anyone seeking secure storage for their firearms and important documents. 🔗Remington Gun Club 4-Gun Fireproof and Waterproof Gun Safehttps://preview.redd.it/ywgai3udta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=22fba6aada3b7197f25e23d812e35117ae8b7708 I've been using the Remington Gun Club 36 Plus Gun Safe for quite some time now, and I must say it's lived up to its reputation of offering consistent, secure, and feature-filled protection for my collection. The fireproof and waterproof capabilities are a lifesaver, as I've always been worried about those catastrophes. The programmable electronic lock gives me peace of mind, knowing that my collection is safely locked away. As for the interior, the full carpeting and quilted door organizer make it feel like a VIP treatment for my guns. The only drawback I've noticed is slightly limited storage capacity for a truly extensive collection, but other than that minor inconvenience, I'm absolutely pleased with its performance. 🔗Affordable Fireproof Electronic Lock Gun Safe with 30-Gun Capacityhttps://preview.redd.it/exqdmwzeta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af23234dbf301c85d48c57355c834e8006deca12 In my daily life, I've been using the Sports Afield 30-Gun Fireproof Electronic Lock Gun Safe, Black, and it has been a game-changer for securing my precious firearms and valuables. The exterior dimensions of the safe are quite impressive, measuring 18.5 inches deep, 55 inches tall, and 27 inches wide. It's perfect for accommodating a variety of long guns and ammunition. One of the key highlights of this safe is its fireproof capabilities; it's tested to withstand up to 45 minutes of fire at 1,400°F. This peace of mind is invaluable when it comes to safeguarding my family's irreplaceable firearms. The safe features a rugged steel construction with three active steel bolts, two deadbolts, and pry-resistant recessed doors, ensuring maximum security. What sets this safe apart from others is its fully programmable electronic lock, which offers both convenience and added security. The interior is fully carpeted and equipped with adjustable side shelves, allowing for a customized layout to fit my specific needs. The safe is both spacious and user-friendly, making it an excellent choice for storage. However, despite its strong points, the safe is quite large and may not fit in all spaces, making it a potential downside for some users. Overall, the Sports Afield 30-Gun Fireproof Electronic Lock Gun Safe, Black, has been a reliable and effective tool in safeguarding my firearms and valuables, and it's a product I would recommend to anyone seeking a sturdy and secure storage solution. 🔗Secure 26-Gun Fireproof and Waterproof Gun Safe with Electronic Lockhttps://preview.redd.it/nsdapmdfta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6960cc5f5b8678bd6770362e625ec6d4b727fc32 Imagine coming home to a gust of wind, the door flying open, and a glimpse of your Remington Gun Club safe sitting in the middle of your living room. After the initial shock, you'd be left with a bit of a headache. You're not alone. A reviewer shared a similar experience, but with an additional issue - a missing shelving component. However, there's a bright side. Despite the unexpected circumstances, the reviewer had no complaints about the quality of the safe itself. The fireproof and waterproof features were highly praised, especially the Triple Seal protection and the programmable electronic lock with EMP-attack resistance. For those who can tolerate the flimsy handle and gouge, this safe might just be a steal for the price. Buyer's GuideA 26-gun safe is a type of firearm storage solution designed to keep your firearms secure and safe from potential threats such as fire, theft, and accidents. This comprehensive guide will help you understand the features, considerations, and advantages of 26-gun safes to make an informed purchasing decision.Size Considerationshttps://preview.redd.it/cxnj2o0hta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=87fd52405ae5d3b6353c1021b30abf60b9ec724b When selecting a 26-gun safe, the first factor to think about is the size of your firearm collection. Consider the number and types of firearms you want to store and the dimensions required for those items. Ensure you measure the height, width, and depth of your firearms and the space needed for any accessories, magazines, or additional items. Storage CapacityThe storage capacity of a 26-gun safe can vary depending on the safe's design and construction. Look for safes with shelves, gun racks, and compartments specifically designed for your firearm types. Items should be organized in a way that makes them easy to access and store. Additionally, ensure that the safe's storage capacity meets your current and future needs.Security FeaturesSecurity is of utmost importance when buying a 26-gun safe. Look for safes with features such as solid construction, digital locks, and heavy-duty locks. The safe should withstand potential attempts at forced entry, like drilling or sawing. It should also have a fireproof rating to prevent damage from fires or explosions. High-quality manufacturers offer warranties for their products, which can provide additional security and peace of mind. https://preview.redd.it/4ew2vkchta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=94f175f6e06be75e381bb67a083a4e3c08b53386 Materials and ConstructionThe durability of a 26-gun safe depends on the materials and construction methods used. High-quality 26-gun safes are typically made from 10 gauge or heavier steel. Look for safes with a welded or seamless construction, as these will provide better security against unauthorized access. The safe should also have a fire-resistant coating or lining to prevent damage from fires and heat.Additional FeaturesBesides the essential features mentioned above, look for 26-gun safes with additional features like lighting, adjustable shelving, and keyed access for separate compartments. These features can make your experience using the safe more comfortable and convenient.Placement and Installationhttps://preview.redd.it/3vdo2tvhta3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ba07951350b9bbfd6353069c163edc251cd7a5ff The ideal location for a 26-gun safe is a cool, dry area away from direct sunlight and electrical appliances. Some safes can be installed into the floor or wall for extra security. Before purchasing, ensure the safe fits your desired location and that any installation requirements are accounted for in your budget. Maintenance and CareYour 26-gun safe needs regular maintenance and care to keep it in top condition. Ensure you maintain the lock, hinges, and other safety mechanisms as per the manufacturer's instructions. Also, clean the interior and exterior periodically to remove dust, dirt, and debris. Keeping your safe well-maintained will not only prolong its life but also ensure it works optimally for years to come.FAQhttps://preview.redd.it/13okrcbita3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0d16d5654a2050d95649399c6bd5af9f2cb771fc What exactly is a 26-gun safe?A 26-gun safe is a type of safe designed to store firearms. The name refers to the number of individual gun compartments the safe can accommodate. These safes typically have additional storage spaces for ammunition, gun accessories, and valuable items.Why do I need a 26-gun safe?A 26-gun safe provides a safe and secure storage solution for your firearms. It protects your weapons and valuable items from theft, fire, and damage. Additionally, it helps maintain the integrity of the firearms by keeping them in optimal conditions.What features should I look for in a 26-gun safe?
How do I choose the right size for my 26-gun safe?To choose the right size for your 26-gun safe, consider the length, height, and width of your firearms, as well as any additional items you plan to store. Make sure the safe has enough space to accommodate your needs without overcrowding the compartments.How do I install a 26-gun safe?Installing a 26-gun safe usually requires professional help. The safe should be placed on a secure, anchored surface to prevent theft or misplacement. It is recommended to consult the safe's manual or a professional for proper installation.What is the recommended way to maintain a 26-gun safe?To maintain your 26-gun safe, regularly clean and inspect the locking mechanism to ensure it functions properly. Additionally, consider using a fire-resistant and humidity-control dehumidifier to protect the firearms and preserve their condition.What are the most popular brands for 26-gun safes?
|
2024.05.29 07:01 tempmailgenerator Cleaning Up Untracked Files in Your Git Repository
Cleaning Your Git Workspace
When working with Git, managing your project's workspace efficiently is crucial for a streamlined development process. Over time, as you experiment with new features or test out different configurations, your Git repository can become cluttered with untracked files. These files, while not part of your repository's version history, can pile up, making it harder to see the forest for the trees. Understanding how to identify and remove these untracked files is essential for maintaining a clean working environment. This not only improves your workflow but also ensures that your repository remains organized and only contains files that are necessary for your project.Removing untracked files from your Git working tree is a straightforward process, but it requires careful attention to avoid accidentally deleting important data. Whether you're a seasoned developer or new to version control systems, mastering the art of cleaning your workspace can significantly impact your project's success. By keeping your repository tidy, you make it easier for yourself and others to navigate and work on your project. This introduction will guide you through the steps to clean up your Git repository by removing untracked files, ensuring a clutter-free working environment that fosters productivity and collaboration.
Managing Your Workspace in Git
When working with Git, one of the common scenarios developers face is dealing with untracked files cluttering their working directory. These files, not part of the Git repository, can result from new files being created, files being copied into the directory, or files being generated as a part of the project's build process. Having a clean working directory is essential for a clear overview of the project's state, ensuring that only relevant changes are included in commits.Removing these untracked files is a crucial step in maintaining a tidy workspace. Git provides powerful tools designed for precisely this purpose, helping developers to avoid accidental inclusion of unnecessary files in their version control system. Understanding how to effectively remove untracked files not only streamlines the development process but also prevents potential issues with project dependencies and build processes, ensuring that the repository remains clean and manageable.
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
| git clean | Remove untracked files from the working directory |
| git clean -n | Show which untracked files would be removed without actually deleting them |
| git clean -f | Force the removal of untracked files from the working directory |
| git clean -fd | Remove untracked files and directories |
Deep Dive into Git Clean Operations
Git's ability to handle untracked files with the git clean command is a powerful feature that ensures a pristine working environment, crucial for the accuracy of your project's status and the integrity of your commits. This command is designed to help developers manage their workspace by removing files that are not being tracked by Git, thereby preventing the accumulation of clutter and potential conflicts. Untracked files in a Git repository can include build outputs, log files, or files created by editors and other tools. Without proper management, these files can obscure the true state of the workspace, making it difficult to discern which changes are significant and should be committed versus those that should be ignored.Utilizing git clean effectively requires understanding its options and implications. The command offers several flags to customize its behavior. For example, the -n option (dry run) allows you to preview which files will be removed without actually deleting them, providing a safety net to ensure that only the desired files are affected. The -f option is necessary to execute the clean operation, as Git, by default, will not delete files to prevent accidental data loss. Further, the -d option extends the command's reach to directories, and combined with -f, it becomes a potent tool for deep cleaning your repository's working directory. Understanding and using these options allows developers to tailor the cleanup process to their specific needs, ensuring a clean and organized working directory that enhances productivity and reduces the risk of errors.
Example: Cleaning Untracked Files in Git
Git Command Linegit clean -n git clean -f git clean -fd
Enhancing Workspace Efficiency with Git Clean
One of the critical aspects of maintaining an efficient development environment is ensuring that your working directory is free of clutter and unnecessary files. The git clean command is an indispensable tool in the Git suite for achieving this cleanliness, allowing developers to remove untracked files with ease. This feature is particularly beneficial in large projects where binaries, logs, and temporary files can quickly accumulate, potentially leading to confusion and errors. By removing these files, developers can keep their repositories organized and reduce the risk of including unwanted files in their commits. Moreover, a clean workspace facilitates easier navigation and improves the overall development experience.Beyond its basic functionality, git clean provides a variety of options for more granular control over what gets removed. For instance, the command can be configured to ignore certain files or directories by using a .gitignore file, ensuring that only truly disposable items are deleted. This level of control is crucial for projects with complex build processes or where specific untracked files need to be preserved for reasons such as local configuration or development tools. Thus, understanding and utilizing git clean effectively becomes a significant asset in a developer's toolkit, aiding in the maintenance of a clean, efficient, and error-free repository.
FAQs on Managing Untracked Files with Git
- Question: What does the git clean command do?
- Answer: It removes untracked files from your Git working directory, helping to keep your repository clean and organized.
- Question: Can git clean delete ignored files?
- Answer: By default, it does not delete ignored files unless you use the -x option.
- Question: How can I see which files will be deleted without actually deleting them?
- Answer: Use the git clean -n or --dry-run option to preview the files that will be removed.
- Question: Is there a way to remove untracked directories in addition to untracked files?
- Answer: Yes, you can remove untracked directories by using the -d option.
- Question: How can I prevent accidental deletion of important untracked files?
- Answer: Always use the -n option to perform a dry run before the actual clean operation, and consider using a .gitignore file to exclude files from being tracked and cleaned.
- Question: What does the -f or --force option do?
- Answer: It forces the deletion of untracked files, as git clean requires this option to run for safety reasons.
- Question: Can I recover files deleted by git clean?
- Answer: Once deleted, these files cannot be recovered through Git, so use this command with caution.
- Question: How does git clean differ from git reset?
- Answer: git clean removes untracked files from the working directory, while git reset undoes committed changes.
- Question: Is it possible to configure git clean to exclude specific files?
- Answer: Yes, by using a .gitignore file or the -e option, you can exclude specific files from being removed.
Mastering Workspace Cleanliness with Git
Maintaining a clean and organized workspace is essential for any development process, and Git offers the necessary tools to ensure this through the git clean command. This feature not only simplifies the developer's task of managing untracked files but also enhances the overall project's integrity and efficiency. By understanding and utilizing the various options provided by git clean, developers can tailor their workspace cleanup, ensuring that only unwanted files are removed while preserving important untracked files. Moreover, the practice of performing a dry run before actual cleanup and using a .gitignore file to specify exceptions plays a crucial role in avoiding unintended file deletions. As developers become more adept at leveraging these tools, they can ensure a cleaner, more manageable Git repository, leading to smoother development cycles and a more focused approach to version control. Embracing these practices not only aids in personal project management but also contributes to better team collaboration and project health in the long run.https://www.tempmail.us.com/en/git/cleaning-up-untracked-files-in-your-git-repository
2024.05.29 06:30 mrgnstrk Thinking of migrating to the US via F1/student visa route? Start here.
I've commented a few times in a few posts about my family's experience going through the F-1 to H-1B to GC route to migrate to the US and I've received a lot of questions over the DM, many of which I thought were pretty basic. I thought it might be helpful to put this primer together so folks know the right questions to ask and approach their planning more strategically.
This post is going to be very candid. I've noticed that the questions I've received come from misconceptions about higher education, F-1 visa, and what comes after graduation. I want to give folks the right information, but also temper expectations and give a realistic portrait of what it means and takes to use the student pathway to legally and permanently reside in the US. It is not a stroll in the park, and I don't want to give anyone the wrong idea.
Both my siblings are currently in the same pathway. One received their Bachelors last year, was hired before graduation and has recently received approval for her H-1B. Their employer has committed to sponsoring their employment-based green card next year. My other sibling received their MFA last year and is now in the process of getting their O-1, which is a different kind of work visa. Like me, they both came to the US with a student visa. We were all very strategic about the programs we chose and how we approached networking within our industries.
We also prepared for years. I knew I wanted to get my Masters and permanently reside in the US even before I finished college in Manila. My siblings also knew that early on. So as a family we planned for years, including preparing financially because we knew that we had a very slim chance of getting free rides for our planned degrees. Our early planning also helped with our professional decision-making, because we became very strategic about what kinds of jobs we took after graduation in Manila (except our youngest sibling, who did her Bachelors in the US, so her planning revolved around her academic career in high school). I would say from start (initial planning) to finish (with the last sibling also now on the way to permanent residency), it took about a decade.
The first question you should ask yourself: can you afford the student pathway to permanent residency in the US? Higher education in the US is not cheap. Universities very rarely offer full scholarships to Masters programs, and those that do are incredibly competitive. So you cannot depend on scholarships to help you pay for your degree--doing so will likely end in disappointment.
(PhDs are usually free and includes a living stipend, but the application process for PhDs are on a whole other level. I will not cover it here but I can answer any questions related to applying for PhDs.)
Most Masters programs in the US are two-year programs, and the average cost of a Masters degree is around $60,000 per year (source). That's $120,000--almost Php7,000,000--in two years. That is a lot of money. That does not include your cost of living, which depending on the location can vary. I personally spent around $1000 on living expenses every month (housing was through the school, so the cost of that was included in my tuition statement)--and that is living frugally in a very high cost of living city. That's an additional $12,000 per year. Of course, you can lower than number by living with family if that option is available to you.
So on average, you would need around Php4,200,000 per year for your Masters degree. Again, a lot of money. It goes without saying that the student pathway is a very expensive pathway to permanent residency in the US. Can it also be a quicker pathway than, say, being sponsored by a sibling? It can be, but that depends on how long it will take for you to save up for tuition.
What if you can make those numbers work? What else should you know?
I need to put this upfront: the F-1 student visa is a non-immigrant visa. Meaning that it is a visa meant for people who will enter the US on a temporary basis. This is why the student visa has no direct pathway or benefit to permanent residency in the US. You need to change status inside the US to one with immigrant intent or double intent to be able to be on that pathway or receive that benefit. That's where visas like the H-1B visa comes in.
You also cannot work outside of your school on an F-1 visa. During the school year, you are allowed to work part-time on campus, and during the summer you are allowed to work full-time on campus. Work outside of the school is only allowed if it's part of your curriculum (i.e. your program has a class for "onsite internship") and you are allowed to be paid while that opportunity is going on. You can do this part-time, but most legitimate universities will have limited opportunities for this (i.e. under your program you're only allowed to take credit for onsite internships one or two semesters). However, your eligibility to work full-time after getting your degree will be affected if you do this full-time for one year. If you want to jump from F-1 to H-1B, this is not something you want to do.
Your ability to bring dependents to the US on a student visa is also limited. You can only bring your spouse and unmarried children under 21. Dependents of F-1 visa holders are not allowed to work in the US (although children under 21 can go to school full-time). This means your spouse cannot work while in the United States, and that includes working remotely for a company in the Philippines.
The next step starts with you. I've received a good number of DMs asking me "Is Master of ABC the right course for me?" or "Will a Master of DEF get me a green card?" These are not the right questions to ask because they're not going to get you any good answers. Yes, we know the ultimate goal for taking your Masters in the US to get permanent residency. But the true purpose of getting a Masters in the US is to make you highly marketable and competitive to US employers that will be willing to sponsor your work visa and petition you for your permanent residency.
So you need to view this degree as a way to level yourself up professionally. I absolutely do not suggest getting a Masters degree in something "you already know"--the objective is not to coast while spending Php4,200,000 a year--but to be so much better at what you're already doing. Here's an example.
Of course, you should also take into consideration your limitations. For example, you can only go to school in San Diego because you can stay with relatives while you're studying. That means your research is location-limited to however far you think you can commute.
When this is properly done, it should lead you to a place where you have a shortlist of programs to apply to. Each program will have their own application and testing requirements, as well as their own deadlines, so make sure to keep track of that.
PRO TIP: while grades during college are an important part of your application, many graduate programs put a lot of weight on your personal statement and professional recommendation letters. This is why the first step on reflection is critical--it gives you a good direction from which to build your story, which you will need to convince admissions committees to accept you into their programs.
Now it's time to apply for your F-1 visa. Your university will provide you with the documentation you need from them (this is mainly the I-20 and your acceptance letter), but the bulk of the documentation you need to present to the visa officer will mostly come from you. Namely, because the F-1 is a non-immigrant visa, you need to show strong ties to the Philippines. This can take a variety of forms, and oftentimes your mileage may vary especially depending on the school you will be attending (i.e. there will be less scrutiny if you're going to Harvard as compared to a university that's not that known).
If you did not receive a scholarship with your acceptance, you also need to show that you are able to afford the first year of matriculation. So bank statements containing the total amount of tuition, as well as room and board, will be important (usually the I-20 that the university will issue you will include this amount).
At the interview, be polite and only answer the questions asked. Do not offer up information not asked by the visa officer. I suggest you have a ready answer if the visa officer asks you why this particular school and program, but you should have this answer already if you followed my advice about reflecting and researching before applying to programs :)
Visa is approved and on hand! What do I do while I wait to leave for the US?
Networking starts the moment you receive your passport with your F-1 visa. You absolutely cannot and should not waste a single minute of your active student visa, so this is the time you start telling people that you're going to be studying in the US. You need to work your current network and find peers and mentors who will be willing to connect you with colleagues they know who work in the US or have ties to the US in your professional field. Let's go back to Maria Clara as an example.
Other than to make sure you have high grades and you're setting aside time to build professional relationships, it's time to think outside the box. Remember that you are limited by the rules of the F-1 visa, so experiences such as an off-campus summer internship is off limits to you. You will need to find ways to strengthen your resumé that doesn't include working off campus, and that could take many forms. One of the most effective recommendations I've received on this is to do an independent research during the summer--you could do it via a professor whose class you really liked, or if you've made inroads with some of the connections you've been building since getting your visa, have a professor oversee a research project you could do with those connections. (This is still academic work, and many programs will give credit for this, so it is not considered off-campus work under the eyes of USCIS.) You can use your research to really elevate your skills and experiences when applying for jobs.
It's also time to seriously start looking at potential employers. You can use the connections you've built to get a sense of what the professional landscape is for your field, learn about peoples' experiences at various companies and organizations, and get a feel for hiring processes. Remember, you don't have a lot of time to apply for jobs once you near the end of your program, so you have to be armed with the right information to guide your job hunting strategy. You will need to put yourself out there and be the best version of your professional self if you want employers to disregard that they will need to spend more money to hire you rather than a USC or LPR who doesn't need sponsorship.
The last semester is usually job hunting season, so make sure that resumé is polished and your network is activated. By now, if you've done the leg work, you will have a shortlist of potential employers and you will have made connections in most, if not all, of them. Time to check-in and ensure that they know you're interested in joining their company and you'd like their support and guidance in doing so. This is one of the harder parts of this journey, and you have to be relentless. Use all the resources at your disposal to ensure your resumé is seen by as many eyes as possible, and that includes speaking to your professors, especially your favorite ones, so they can also lend a hand.
More importantly: submit your work permit application (more commonly known as OPT) as early as possible to avoid delays and getting stuck in the USCIS backlog. You need this permit to be able to work after graduation for a limited time (one year for graduates of non-STEM programs, with an additional two years for graduates of STEM programs) without needing to immediately require H-1B sponsorship.
Getting employed by a company willing to sponsor you is not the end of the line. All for-profit companies are subject to the H-1B lottery, which means you will be competing with other internationals for the limited number of H-1B visas allotted every year. So even with an employer willing to sponsor, the H-1B visa is still not guaranteed. You can work around this by joining what is a called a cap-exempt organization instead, and USCIS classifies those as institutions of higher education, nonprofit entities related to or affiliated with an institution of higher education, nonprofit research organizations, and governmental research organizations. That means more research, and more targeted strategic networking, given that your employer pool now is limited.
For those still considering the student visa pathway to migrate to the US after reading this very long post--good luck, and may the force be with you.
submitted by mrgnstrk to phmigrate [link] [comments]
This post is going to be very candid. I've noticed that the questions I've received come from misconceptions about higher education, F-1 visa, and what comes after graduation. I want to give folks the right information, but also temper expectations and give a realistic portrait of what it means and takes to use the student pathway to legally and permanently reside in the US. It is not a stroll in the park, and I don't want to give anyone the wrong idea.
BACKGROUND
Two of my siblings plus myself are all here in the US via the student visa route. I received my green card in 2021 after being in the US for nearly 4 years. After receiving my Masters at a prestigious university, I was hired immediately by an organization willing to sponsor my H-1B, which they did so after two years of employment under STEM-OPT work authorization. My employer started putting together my I-140 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, which is the start of the process for an employment-based green card) shortly after receiving approval of my H-1B. As the paperwork was being put together, my partner and I decided to get married and I switched from employment-based green card to marriage-based green card. The employment-based green card would have added around a 3 year wait if we went through with it, while my marriage-based green card was approved in less than a year.Both my siblings are currently in the same pathway. One received their Bachelors last year, was hired before graduation and has recently received approval for her H-1B. Their employer has committed to sponsoring their employment-based green card next year. My other sibling received their MFA last year and is now in the process of getting their O-1, which is a different kind of work visa. Like me, they both came to the US with a student visa. We were all very strategic about the programs we chose and how we approached networking within our industries.
We also prepared for years. I knew I wanted to get my Masters and permanently reside in the US even before I finished college in Manila. My siblings also knew that early on. So as a family we planned for years, including preparing financially because we knew that we had a very slim chance of getting free rides for our planned degrees. Our early planning also helped with our professional decision-making, because we became very strategic about what kinds of jobs we took after graduation in Manila (except our youngest sibling, who did her Bachelors in the US, so her planning revolved around her academic career in high school). I would say from start (initial planning) to finish (with the last sibling also now on the way to permanent residency), it took about a decade.
GETTING STARTED
Is the student pathway the right pathway for you?The first question you should ask yourself: can you afford the student pathway to permanent residency in the US? Higher education in the US is not cheap. Universities very rarely offer full scholarships to Masters programs, and those that do are incredibly competitive. So you cannot depend on scholarships to help you pay for your degree--doing so will likely end in disappointment.
(PhDs are usually free and includes a living stipend, but the application process for PhDs are on a whole other level. I will not cover it here but I can answer any questions related to applying for PhDs.)
Most Masters programs in the US are two-year programs, and the average cost of a Masters degree is around $60,000 per year (source). That's $120,000--almost Php7,000,000--in two years. That is a lot of money. That does not include your cost of living, which depending on the location can vary. I personally spent around $1000 on living expenses every month (housing was through the school, so the cost of that was included in my tuition statement)--and that is living frugally in a very high cost of living city. That's an additional $12,000 per year. Of course, you can lower than number by living with family if that option is available to you.
So on average, you would need around Php4,200,000 per year for your Masters degree. Again, a lot of money. It goes without saying that the student pathway is a very expensive pathway to permanent residency in the US. Can it also be a quicker pathway than, say, being sponsored by a sibling? It can be, but that depends on how long it will take for you to save up for tuition.
What if you can make those numbers work? What else should you know?
I need to put this upfront: the F-1 student visa is a non-immigrant visa. Meaning that it is a visa meant for people who will enter the US on a temporary basis. This is why the student visa has no direct pathway or benefit to permanent residency in the US. You need to change status inside the US to one with immigrant intent or double intent to be able to be on that pathway or receive that benefit. That's where visas like the H-1B visa comes in.
You also cannot work outside of your school on an F-1 visa. During the school year, you are allowed to work part-time on campus, and during the summer you are allowed to work full-time on campus. Work outside of the school is only allowed if it's part of your curriculum (i.e. your program has a class for "onsite internship") and you are allowed to be paid while that opportunity is going on. You can do this part-time, but most legitimate universities will have limited opportunities for this (i.e. under your program you're only allowed to take credit for onsite internships one or two semesters). However, your eligibility to work full-time after getting your degree will be affected if you do this full-time for one year. If you want to jump from F-1 to H-1B, this is not something you want to do.
Your ability to bring dependents to the US on a student visa is also limited. You can only bring your spouse and unmarried children under 21. Dependents of F-1 visa holders are not allowed to work in the US (although children under 21 can go to school full-time). This means your spouse cannot work while in the United States, and that includes working remotely for a company in the Philippines.
APPLYING TO PROGRAMS
The student visa still seems like my best option. What's next?The next step starts with you. I've received a good number of DMs asking me "Is Master of ABC the right course for me?" or "Will a Master of DEF get me a green card?" These are not the right questions to ask because they're not going to get you any good answers. Yes, we know the ultimate goal for taking your Masters in the US to get permanent residency. But the true purpose of getting a Masters in the US is to make you highly marketable and competitive to US employers that will be willing to sponsor your work visa and petition you for your permanent residency.
So you need to view this degree as a way to level yourself up professionally. I absolutely do not suggest getting a Masters degree in something "you already know"--the objective is not to coast while spending Php4,200,000 a year--but to be so much better at what you're already doing. Here's an example.
Maria Clara graduated from Accounting at a good university in Manila and now has around 2 years of experience as a CPA at the finance and accounting department at a multinational corporation based in Makati. She wants to get her permanent residency to the US via the student pathway and has done a significant amount of research on possible Masters programs and career paths in accounting in the US. She started reading into forensic accounting and realized how interested she is in various aspects of this career path. After looking through universities and programs, she has put SUNY Albany's MS in Forensic Science at the top of her list for a variety of reasons. One, it meets the education requirements for certified public accountant licensure in the state of New York. Two, even without a scholarship of financial aid, the costs for international students is not exorbitant at $23,000/Php1,320,000 for the year-long program--with some frugal living and help from relatives in the US, she can save that amount in 3-4 years. Three, New York is the center of global commerce--all the biggest companies and their accounting firms are either headquartered or have large offices in New York City, so she has a wide swath of employment options. Now she just has to get her ducks in a row and make sure her Bachelors meets the requirements for application, as well as put together a shortlist of other programs she should apply and create a timeline for herself and the milestones that need to be hit to make this dream a reality.Bottomline is, your starting point in this entire process is reflection and research. You need to reflect on your own professional experience and skills, as well as your interests. You need to figure out which pathway will give you that professional and technical boost and do your research on available programs at reputable universities, what the job market looks like for your target profession, which companies are known to hire in this space.
Of course, you should also take into consideration your limitations. For example, you can only go to school in San Diego because you can stay with relatives while you're studying. That means your research is location-limited to however far you think you can commute.
When this is properly done, it should lead you to a place where you have a shortlist of programs to apply to. Each program will have their own application and testing requirements, as well as their own deadlines, so make sure to keep track of that.
PRO TIP: while grades during college are an important part of your application, many graduate programs put a lot of weight on your personal statement and professional recommendation letters. This is why the first step on reflection is critical--it gives you a good direction from which to build your story, which you will need to convince admissions committees to accept you into their programs.
ACCEPTANCE
I got into one of my top programs and I have my finances in order! What happens now?Now it's time to apply for your F-1 visa. Your university will provide you with the documentation you need from them (this is mainly the I-20 and your acceptance letter), but the bulk of the documentation you need to present to the visa officer will mostly come from you. Namely, because the F-1 is a non-immigrant visa, you need to show strong ties to the Philippines. This can take a variety of forms, and oftentimes your mileage may vary especially depending on the school you will be attending (i.e. there will be less scrutiny if you're going to Harvard as compared to a university that's not that known).
If you did not receive a scholarship with your acceptance, you also need to show that you are able to afford the first year of matriculation. So bank statements containing the total amount of tuition, as well as room and board, will be important (usually the I-20 that the university will issue you will include this amount).
At the interview, be polite and only answer the questions asked. Do not offer up information not asked by the visa officer. I suggest you have a ready answer if the visa officer asks you why this particular school and program, but you should have this answer already if you followed my advice about reflecting and researching before applying to programs :)
Visa is approved and on hand! What do I do while I wait to leave for the US?
Networking starts the moment you receive your passport with your F-1 visa. You absolutely cannot and should not waste a single minute of your active student visa, so this is the time you start telling people that you're going to be studying in the US. You need to work your current network and find peers and mentors who will be willing to connect you with colleagues they know who work in the US or have ties to the US in your professional field. Let's go back to Maria Clara as an example.
Finally, after years of hard work, Maria Clara has her desired acceptance into SUNY's MS in Forensic Accounting program, and her F-1 visa was approved by the embassy without any issues. After celebrating with her family, she lets her boss know about her visa approval, who has been one of her most ardent cheerleaders during this entire process. Her boss has also offered to introduce her to their counterparts in the US once she got her visa approved, which is really important to Maria Clara--she knows she needs to get ahead of networking professionally since her time in the US is limited. She has also reached out to other people she knows in the company that engage frequently with teams in the US. She's messaged her college professors as well, as she knows that a number of alumni from her college have migrated to the US. Her plan is to get connected with as many professionals in her field as possible, connect with them in person once she's in the US, and build a rapport with as many connections as possible so she can be guided accordingly and stand out when the time to apply for jobs comes.Remember that unlike US citizens (USC) and legal permanent residents (LPR), your time in the US is limited and bound by the rules set by your visa. So you have to be creative and get ahead in some way. You need to be more prepared and more strategic than USCs and LPRs because you simply do not have the time to dilly dally. Yes, enjoy and savor in the moment of seeing the fruits of your labor, but the hard part begins now. You simply do not have time to waste.
DURING THE PROGRAM
I'm in the US now and working harder than ever! Is there anything more I can do to set myself apart from others?Other than to make sure you have high grades and you're setting aside time to build professional relationships, it's time to think outside the box. Remember that you are limited by the rules of the F-1 visa, so experiences such as an off-campus summer internship is off limits to you. You will need to find ways to strengthen your resumé that doesn't include working off campus, and that could take many forms. One of the most effective recommendations I've received on this is to do an independent research during the summer--you could do it via a professor whose class you really liked, or if you've made inroads with some of the connections you've been building since getting your visa, have a professor oversee a research project you could do with those connections. (This is still academic work, and many programs will give credit for this, so it is not considered off-campus work under the eyes of USCIS.) You can use your research to really elevate your skills and experiences when applying for jobs.
It's also time to seriously start looking at potential employers. You can use the connections you've built to get a sense of what the professional landscape is for your field, learn about peoples' experiences at various companies and organizations, and get a feel for hiring processes. Remember, you don't have a lot of time to apply for jobs once you near the end of your program, so you have to be armed with the right information to guide your job hunting strategy. You will need to put yourself out there and be the best version of your professional self if you want employers to disregard that they will need to spend more money to hire you rather than a USC or LPR who doesn't need sponsorship.
LAST SEMESTER AND GRADUATION
I'm in my last semester of my program! Any tips?The last semester is usually job hunting season, so make sure that resumé is polished and your network is activated. By now, if you've done the leg work, you will have a shortlist of potential employers and you will have made connections in most, if not all, of them. Time to check-in and ensure that they know you're interested in joining their company and you'd like their support and guidance in doing so. This is one of the harder parts of this journey, and you have to be relentless. Use all the resources at your disposal to ensure your resumé is seen by as many eyes as possible, and that includes speaking to your professors, especially your favorite ones, so they can also lend a hand.
More importantly: submit your work permit application (more commonly known as OPT) as early as possible to avoid delays and getting stuck in the USCIS backlog. You need this permit to be able to work after graduation for a limited time (one year for graduates of non-STEM programs, with an additional two years for graduates of STEM programs) without needing to immediately require H-1B sponsorship.
Getting employed by a company willing to sponsor you is not the end of the line. All for-profit companies are subject to the H-1B lottery, which means you will be competing with other internationals for the limited number of H-1B visas allotted every year. So even with an employer willing to sponsor, the H-1B visa is still not guaranteed. You can work around this by joining what is a called a cap-exempt organization instead, and USCIS classifies those as institutions of higher education, nonprofit entities related to or affiliated with an institution of higher education, nonprofit research organizations, and governmental research organizations. That means more research, and more targeted strategic networking, given that your employer pool now is limited.
EPILOGUE
The student visa is not an easy or cheap pathway to permanent residency in the US. It is getting harder and harder to beat out USCs and LPRs for great jobs in companies that have the experience and resources to sponsor H-1Bs and GCs. You need to do your research every step of the way and prepare to do some really grueling work in order to be the better investment for these companies. Plus, there is the luck element of the H-1B lottery. But it's not impossible. It can and does happen--my family is a great example of it (we're 3 for 3 in this pathway now). Your preparation and willingness to go the extra mile is critical, and you have to be ready to grind for a while. Rest often only comes when the green card is approved.For those still considering the student visa pathway to migrate to the US after reading this very long post--good luck, and may the force be with you.
2024.05.29 06:30 GhoulGriin Best 30mm Qd Scope Mount
 | submitted by GhoulGriin to u/GhoulGriin [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/drpub08fma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=efa32e78891e668a1e2c244bdee73e3e2086e0e2 Welcome to our comprehensive roundup on the 30mm QD Scope Mount! If you're a sports enthusiast, a hunter, or simply someone who seeks precision in their aim, this article has got you covered. We've handpicked a range of top-tier 30mm QD Scope Mounts to ensure that you make the most informed decision when choosing one for your next endeavor. Dive into our in-depth reviews and comparisons to find the perfect companion for all your shooting adventures. The Top 15 Best 30mm Qd Scope Mount
Reviews🔗Fast QD Design Picatinny Sling Mount for M Lok Handguardshttps://preview.redd.it/gw55tlqfma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2aad2f7935e7b64d44da01b944c3bf1a9084752d As I was scouring the market for a stylish picatinny sling mount, I stumbled across the Allen Citadel Tactical QD Picatinny to QD Black 10846. I was immediately drawn to its sleek design and time-tested rugged manufacturing. The black aesthetic blended perfectly with my weapon and added an authentic touch to my outfit. The fast QD design for M Lok handguards was a game-changer for me. It made it incredibly easy to detach and reattach my weapon as needed. The use of the push button QD swivel allowed for a smooth and secure attachment to my weapon, without causing any damage to the sling mount. It was like having a reliable and efficient partner by my side during my outdoor adventures. However, I did notice that the Allen Citadel Tactical QD Picatinny to QD Black 10846 was a bit bulky, which made it slightly more challenging to store when not in use. While this was not a major issue, it would have been great if the designers had found a way to make it more compact. Overall, this Allen sling mount proved to be a reliable and functional companion during my adventures. Its black finish complemented the look of my weapon and made it stand out without being too ostentatious. I appreciate the fast QD design as well as the push button QD swivel. Despite the slight inconvenience of its bulkiness, this Allen Citadel Tactical QD Picatinny to QD Black 10846 is well-suited for outdoors enthusiasts and gun lovers alike. 🔗45-Degree Offset Rail Mount for Tactical Accessorieshttps://preview.redd.it/xzgjbfagma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=82f20df5dad720c8154e67b28ecbab8c195d8aa2 Imagine you're in the heat of the moment, aiming down the sights of your rifle, trying to take out a target from around the corner. This is where the NcSTAR Mount shines. Its 45-degree offset angle allows you to mount your lasers, flashlights, or red dot sights at just the right angle for a clear view down the barrel. The offset canted design of the mount adds a level of versatility that's not often found in other mounts. It eliminates interference with vertical grips, hand guards, optics, and other accessories, making it perfect for a wide range of uses. Plus, the ergonomic design gives easy access to on/off switches for your accessories, which is a game-changer when you're in the thick of it. But let's not forget the solid construction. The NcSTAR Mount is made from hard-anodized aluminum, which not only adds strength to the mount but also makes it resistant to corrosion. And the single-slotted thumb nut secures the mount to Weaver Style or Picatinny rails quickly and easily. The NcSTAR Mount isn't just a device, it's a tool that could give you the edge you need in tense situations. It's a reliable, solid piece of equipment that's easy to use and a pleasure to work with. And the reviews from other users certainly back this up - they've praised its quality, price, and performance. So, if you're looking for a reliable, dependable, and versatile mount, the NcSTAR Mount is definitely worth considering. 🔗Specialized Swat Black Computer Mount for Lightweight SWAT Tool Kithttps://preview.redd.it/4tcq4bpgma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7d6c96e95acc87a374c2238c1ebe3c124f92877d I had the chance to try out the Granite Tool Design Scope Computer Mount, specifically made for Specialized SWAT Black bikes. When I first received it, I was intrigued by how lightweight this mount was, weighing just 15g. It certainly didn't slow me down during my rides. One of the unique features of this mount is that it's easy to install at home without needing any specialist tools. Plus, it didn't interfere with the SWAT system, which is a definite plus! However, one downside I noticed was the compatibility - it's only made for Specialized bikes with the SWAT concealed transport tool kit. Overall, the Granite Tool Design Scope Computer Mount is a good choice for those looking for a lightweight, easy-to-install mount for their computer on their Specialized bike. If you don't fit the compatibility criteria, it might not be worth it for you. 🔗Sons of Liberty Quick Detach M-LOK QD Sockethttps://preview.redd.it/qc24co4hma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0d5f0984cdb51a9dca0efcbe6996645c42f158e8 I've been using the Solgw Aluminum M-LOK QD Socket Black for my sling and it has become my go-to accessory. The sleek black finish adds a touch of sophistication, while the lightweight yet strong design ensures that it won't fail me when I need it most. The positive lock up mechanism allows me to secure it with confidence, even in the roughest terrain. However, the one downside I've noticed is that it can be a bit tricky to attach or detach at times due to the QD mechanism. Overall, this socket has proven to be a reliable addition to my daily gear setup. 🔗Explore Scientific Mini Scope Mount for Telescopeshttps://preview.redd.it/hd7mh5hhma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7dedad265807a1399d8d7f3ff385ab0d0d8b6798 As a stargazing enthusiast, I recently tried the Explore Scientific Finder Scope Base and was astounded by how convenient and reliable it was. It's the perfect addition to any telescope, providing a stable base for mounting the finder scope of your choice. The highlight of this product, for me, was the ease of installation. It literally took me a few minutes to set it up, thanks to the provided mounting screws. The knurled knobs on the base really make locking the finder into place a breeze. However, it's not all smooth sailing. One inconvenience was the lack of lock washers in the box which, although not a deal-breaker, would have been a nice addition for added security. Overall, the Explore Scientific Finder Scope Base was a pleasant surprise in terms of functionality and ease. Despite a minor hiccup, it's a winner in my book for those who enjoy stargazing and want their equipment to be secure and robust. 🔗Reptilia Flat Dark Earth 34mm Mini 14 Scope Mounthttps://preview.redd.it/nnjoui2ima3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea6d4a2875d0337ef1dc6f528c74084f2838959b I recently had the opportunity to try out the Reptilia Aus Mount, a 34mm scope mount with a Flat Dark Earth finish. This bad boy boasts an anodized finish that adds a touch of durability and style to your setup. The mount is designed for a bore height of 100-155, making it a versatile choice for various rifles. Using the Reptilia Aus Mount in my daily life has been a breeze. The sleek design fits seamlessly with my Mini 14 setup, and the secure locking mechanism ensures that the scope stays firmly in place. One thing that stood out to me was the anodized finish, which not only looks great but also provides protection against the elements. However, there were a couple of minor drawbacks. Firstly, the installation process could have been a bit easier, especially for beginners. And secondly, the price point might be a bit steep for some users. All in all, if you're looking for a high-quality scope mount with a stylish finish and great durability, the Reptilia Aus Mount is definitely worth considering. Just make sure you're comfortable with the installation process and are willing to invest in a top-tier product. 🔗5.5" Quick Detach Scope Mount for Aimpoint Micro Footprinthttps://preview.redd.it/czvwcjhima3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1b602e0772ba24124085c2182deee3bb07ab4381 I've been using the Reptilia ROF-90 for a while now, and let me tell you, it has made a real difference in my shooting experience. This quick detach scope mount fits seamlessly with the Aimpoint Micro footprint and even works perfectly for my 30mm optic. The anodized black finish not only looks sleek but also blends well with my rifle's overall appearance. It's amazing how much it enhances my accuracy on the range. The only drawback I found was that it felt a bit heavier than some other mounts, but overall, it's a small price to pay for the added stability it provides during my shots. 🔗Quick-Transition 30mm QD Optic Mounthttps://preview.redd.it/b645drwima3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c20af691a142c7d8813b03fed58954964447ccfb Whenever I hit the range with my trusty Super Precision 30mm optic mount, I've grown to rely on the Reptilia ROF-90 30mm APNT Micro. With its drop-in upgrade, I've found it a reliable addition for my tactical setup. This 30mm quick detach scope mount offers a mounting point at 90 degrees, allowing for a swift transition to my AIMPOINT Micro when I need to engage at close range. It's a versatile piece of gear that's never let me down. 🔗High-Quality 30mm QD Scope Mount with Anodized Finishhttps://preview.redd.it/rwvi4lljma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2aea9d64af5a4ae197e9096efe050b5556d312c4 AUS Mount from Reptilia, for 30mm diameter magnified optics, is a beautifully crafted piece of machinery. This product is the result of a 2-year development program and it truly shows in its design and functionality. The finish, an Anodized Flat Dark Earth, gives it a sleek look that blends well with various M1913 Picatinny rails it can be attached to. This AUS Mount stands out due to the custom bolt mounting system with an anti-snag, spring-loaded, nitrided steel clamp. The clamp can be tightened using either a 5/32 hex or a flat blade driver for a low-profile, streamline design. The single piece of billet 7075-T6 aluminum, which it is made from, is further enhanced with the MIL-STD Type III Class 2 hard anodize coating. The AUS Mount is compatible with all of Reptilia's existing 30mm ROF line and will also work with several new ROF products launching soon. Despite its robust build and advanced tech, it is surprisingly lightweight and compatible with different optic configurations. While there is no denying the AUS Mount's capabilities and aesthetic appeal, users might still find the price a bit steep. Overall, this product is worth the price tag for those who prioritize high precision, durability, and a stylish touch in their magnified optics. 🔗Precision Scope Mounting Kit for Marlin 336https://preview.redd.it/ozkhbzjkma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=32fa05013864f1720995d1a72ab1c78ab95257b6 I recently had the chance to try out the Wheeler Scope Mounting Kit Combo, and I must say, it provided a smooth experience while mounting my scope. The highlight feature that stood out for me was the "F. A. T. Wrench Torque Screwdriver" – it allowed me to tighten screws with a precision that I haven't experienced before. The wrench-bit set was easy to use, and the 10 bits provided made it a versatile tool for any mounting setup. However, there were a couple of drawbacks that I encountered during my experience. The level-level-level didn't quite live up to my expectations. Although it was functional, it could have been more precise, making it easier to achieve a level scope. Additionally, the plastic case for the set was a bit flimsy, which wasn't ideal for storage and transport. Overall, the Wheeler Scope Mounting Kit Combo proved to be a helpful tool for securing and aligning my scope. While there were a few issues, such as the subpar level and case quality, the positive aspects like the F. A. T. Wrench Torque Screwdriver made it a worthwhile investment. 🔗High-Quality 30mm Quick-Detach Scope Mounthttps://preview.redd.it/tnxiehwkma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c9ec6425a18a33e8c36cb6cfa1bf8040619fcba1 As a hunter, I often find myself in need of a durable and adaptable scope mount. Recently, I stumbled across the Samson Rapid Precision Mount, a 30mm Qd Scope Mount by Samson Manufacturing Corp. This black beauty grabbed my attention, and I decided to give it a try. Upon first glance, I was impressed by its sleek design and solid construction. Easily attaching to my rifle, it proved to be a reliable addition to my hunting gear. Its adjustable height was a game-changer, allowing for a clear and accurate view of my targets. However, I did notice a minor issue when adjusting the elevation - it felt slightly sticky. Despite this minor hiccup, the Samson Rapid Precision Mount exceeded my expectations in terms of durability and flexibility. Its ability to lock securely in place while still being easy to adjust made it a well-rounded contender for any hunting expedition. However, those with tight budgets may find their wallets reluctant to part ways with the premium price tag. Overall, the Samson Rapid Precision Mount is a top-notch choice for hunters seeking a robust and adjustable 30mm Qd Scope Mount. Despite the minor issue with the adjustment, this versatile mount has proven to be a reliable companion on my hunting adventures. 🔗Trijicon Q-LOC 30mm Cantilever Scope Mount with Black Anodized Finishhttps://preview.redd.it/bxzz5lalma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4a8b12d6081fbd9acb74cb1c5f087163787e86c1 As a reviewer, I tested the Trijicon Cantilever Mount, Q-Loc, 30mm, Anodized Finish, Black, 1.93" Bore Height AC22051. It impressed me right off the bat with its sleek black anodized finish, which perfectly blended with my riflescope. This mount is solid and secure, providing a dependable hold even when I took aim under recoil. Yet, it stands out for its quick-release function. With a simple quarter-turn motion, I was able to detach and re-attach it effortlessly. The Q-Loc feature makes it incredibly convenient for frequent adjustments or storage. The Trijicon Cantilever Mount does have one downside: it's slightly heavier than some of its competitors. But overall, it was a reliable and functional addition to my setup. 🔗Versatile ABS Spotting Scope Mount Adapter for Binoculars, Monoculars, Field Observation, and Morehttps://preview.redd.it/6onsz0nlma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=84f5f5538119d4590234439f5896b051fe588c94 I recently tried out this versatile PH Adapter Mount Clip Bracket for my photography needs. The durable and stable rubber holder allowed me to easily switch between different mobile devices, and its size adjustability was quite helpful. One thing that stood out was the curved groove design, which effectively stabilized my mobile phone while preventing it from getting stuck. The shielding design connected to the tripod helped avoid light leakage, which is a crucial factor in photography. The wide range of application made it suitable not only for spotting scopes and binoculars but also for field observation and appreciation. The adjustable focus and tightness made it easy to imagine and use in various situations. While the ABS material is solid, it's essential to note that there might be slight errors due to manual measurement and monitors. Overall, I'm happy with the purchase and would recommend it to others looking for a stable, versatile option for their photography needs. Buyer's GuideTo find the perfect 30mm QD scope mount, you should consider some specific features and aspects such as size, weight, durability, compatibility, ease of use, and price. In this buyer's guide, you will learn about the essential factors to take into account when choosing a 30mm QD scope mount to suit your needs. Remember, the aim is to make an informed decision that will enhance your shooting experience or enhance the aesthetics of your rifle. https://preview.redd.it/jzhsl10nma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4632bea38f8d76cba0aa22963fec9f02721d6f55 Size and WeightWhen buying a 30mm QD scope mount, you ought to consider the size and weight that will not negatively impact your weapon's balance or the overall functionality of the scope mount. A lightweight yet sturdy mount will not affect your rifle's accuracy or weight distribution, making your experience with the scope mount more comfortable. Make sure you check the specs provided by the manufacturers to ensure the mount is light enough for your liking and still provides the required stability for your scope.DurabilityA 30mm QD scope mount needs to be built with durability in mind. This means that you should look for mounts made of quality materials that will withstand the rigors of outdoor usage, provide consistent accuracy, and have a good level of resistance to wear and tear, giving you value for money. Opt for mounts that are designed with precision engineering and made from materials such as aluminum, steel, or titanium, which offer durability and reliability. https://preview.redd.it/gixcg6cnma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b63773a024c2eac7610dd26d5e7da17f2fc340e7 CompatibilityBefore purchasing a 30mm QD scope mount, it is crucial to verify that it is compatible with your desired scope, rifle, and turret assembly. Check the manufacturer's specifications or consult with a knowledgeable person to ensure it fits your firearm correctly and securely. This will help prevent scope creep and maintain the scope's zero setting while in use.Ease of UseThe best 30mm QD scope mount is one that is easy to install, remove, and adjust your scope. Look for mounts with Quick-Detach (QD) mechanisms that enable a swift and simple action without requiring any tools, thus reducing setup time and increasing convenience. This would save you time and effort, especially if you frequently switch between scopes or need to use different weapons. https://preview.redd.it/8ui4qkrnma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=80476fe70b1ef5c805d437e7dab4e61bb964a34c PriceThe price of a 30mm QD scope mount depends on factors such as the materials used, design, brand reputation, and additional features. Set a budget that suits your requirements and preferences, but do not compromise on the quality of the mount. Research various brands and models to compare prices and features, as this will help you make a more informed decision.Additional FeaturesSome 30mm QD scope mounts come with additional features and customization options, such as adjustable cant or windage dials, which can further enhance accuracy. Other features, such as anti-glare or fog-resistant coatings, can improve visibility in outdoor conditions. Consider these extra features when selecting your mount to optimize its performance and suitability for your hunting or shooting activities.By following this buyer's guide and weighing the importance of crucial features for a 30mm QD scope mount, you will have a comprehensive understanding when choosing the perfect mount for your needs. With the right selection, you will enjoy the added convenience and improved accuracy that come with a high-quality scope mount. https://preview.redd.it/jxde0e3oma3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9e2c2ad0d06f58df5d4b580018ee9022db1da323 FAQHow do I choose the right 30mm Qd Scope Mount for my needs?The first step is to consider the type of shooting or hunting you will be doing with your rifle scope. Various 30mm Qd Scope Mounts are designed for different purposes. Mounts designed for tactical shooting usually have sturdy, rugged construction, while those made for long-range shooting often feature adjustable height and tilt. If you plan on using the scope for both purposes, look for a versatile mount with a lot of adjustment options.What is the main difference between 30mm Qd Scope Mounts and 1-inch scope mounts?The main difference is the diameter of the scope ring. The 30mm diameter suits larger rifle scopes with larger objectives, which can provide a wider field of view and better light gathering capabilities. On the other hand, a 1-inch scope mount is more suitable for smaller rifle scopes, which are typically preferred for shorter-ranged target shooting or hunting.What is the difference between "Quick Detach" and "Permanent" 30mm Qd Scope Mounts?Quick Detach (QD) mounts allow the scope to be easily removed from the rifle, which can be convenient for switching scopes or during transportation. These mounts use a lever or knob to release the scope from the rifle. In contrast, Permanent mounts are designed to be fixed in place and are not meant to be removed without disassembling the scope mount.What are some features to look for in a high-quality 30mm Qd Scope Mount?
Are there any downsides to using a 30mm Qd Scope Mount?While there are many benefits to using a 30mm Qd Scope Mount, they can be heavier and bulkier compared to 1-inch scope mounts. This can be an issue for shooters who value portability or need to travel light, as extra weight can affect the overall balance and handling of the rifle. Additionally, high-quality 30mm Qd Scope Mounts can be more expensive than 1-inch scope mounts.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 06:23 Stage-Piercing727 Best 22Lr Suppressor
 | submitted by Stage-Piercing727 to u/Stage-Piercing727 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/ix4ja61cla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1160863c27f56f8a3024ce64445b731f7ab899d8 Welcome to our guide on the 22Lr Suppressor! This article is designed to give you an in-depth understanding of this remarkable product. Whether you're a seasoned gun enthusiast or just starting out, our roundup will provide you with valuable insights on what makes a 22Lr Suppressor the perfect tool for your shooting needs. Dive in and explore the world of 22Lr Suppressors like never before. The Top 9 Best 22Lr Suppressor
Reviews🔗SilencerCo AC669 Harvester Big Bore Direct Thread Mount for Suppressor Attachmenthttps://preview.redd.it/wd8tgzbcla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cae9a3db0218e10f13a06650e5e8de5957c7df35 As a reviewer, I recently had the chance to use the SilencerCo AC669 Harvester Big Bore in my daily shooting activities, and let me tell you, it truly did live up to its reputation. The overall quality of the mount is impeccable, with a stylish design and a solid construction. The compatibility with various firearms, including the Omega 300" Hybrid and Harvester 338, is a major plus, as it allows for a seamless integration into my shooting setup. However, one downside I noticed was that the installation process was a bit more complicated than expected. Despite this minor setback, the SilencerCo AC669 Harvester Big Bore proved to be a reliable and effective accessory for my firearms. 🔗SilencerCo Hybrid 3-Prong Flash Hider for 9mm ASR Mounthttps://preview.redd.it/c75cfe3dla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7ca22f52092c9c52e9cf3128329e4fa537397baa As a gun enthusiast, I always appreciate a good suppressor for my firearms, and the SilencerCo Hybrid 1/2x36 ASR FH 9mm truly stands out. Its compatibility with the ASR mounting system makes it a breeze to install and remove. The patent-pending resonance suppression feature is a game-changer, eliminating that annoying tuning-fork effect that's so common with competing 3-prong flash hiders. The design of the 3-port muzzle brake effectively reduces that harsh felt recoil and muzzle climb, making my shooting experience more enjoyable. However, I've noticed that the price point may be a bit higher than some other suppressors on the market, which could be a downside for some. My overall experience with the SilencerCo Hybrid 1/2x36 ASR FH 9mm has been positive, and I'd highly recommend it to anyone looking for an effective, easy-to-use suppressor. 🔗LEGRIS 22Lr Suppressor: High-Performance, Standard 1/2" BSPP Threaded Silencerhttps://preview.redd.it/uyzxo8hdla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3cead6222c966b22bb1856efd9b9713ae5c6a197 As a seasoned shooter, I recently had the chance to try out the Threaded Silencer by LEGRIS. This bad boy was a game-changer for my 22Lr firearm. The first thing I noticed was the impressive quality of the silencer; it felt sturdy and well-built. The male thread connection on the silencer was a breeze to set up - it didn't require any extra tools or effort. It securely attached to my firearm without any wobbling, ensuring a stable and reliable fit. This made my shooting experience much more enjoyable and worry-free. One of the standout features of the Threaded Silencer was its versatility. It could withstand temperatures ranging from -4°F to a scorching 300°F. This made it a reliable option for various shooting environments and conditions. Its ability to handle such a wide temperature range set it apart from other silencers I've used in the past. However, the Threaded Silencer did come with a slight drawback. While it was easy to attach, removing it proved to be a bit of a challenge. It took a bit of force and some patience to unscrew it, which could be a minor inconvenience for some users. Overall, the Threaded Silencer by LEGRIS was a reliable and well-built option for my 22Lr firearm. Its impressive temperature range and sturdy construction made it a standout choice among other silencers I've tried. While there was a slight inconvenience with the removal process, it didn't deter me from enjoying my shooting experience with this high-quality silencer. 🔗Rugged Obsidian Fixed Mount 22Lr Suppressor for Carbine/Subgun Platformshttps://preview.redd.it/lrvzkosdla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfd508e1029b1f6a104226a51fc3e3ae85d9e930 The Rugged Suppressors Obsidian is an exceptional fixed mount designed for carbine and subgun platforms with fixed barrels. It's been a game-changer in my daily life, providing a seamless experience with its robust construction and sleek black finish. One of the highlights of this product is the thread mount, which securely attaches, making it perfectly suitable for fixed barrels. The model Fixed Mount has proven to deliver top-notch performance under various conditions. However, there are some cons to consider. For starters, the Obsidian isn't without its share of bulkiness, which could pose a challenge for those seeking a slimmer profile. Moreover, while it's durable, it does require proper installation and maintenance. Overall, this suppressor has made a significant impact on my firearm experience, bringing a new level of precision and comfort to my shooting. It's not without its quirks, but that's part of the journey. 🔗Quality Rugged Suppressors Fixed Mount 1/2x36 Of002 for Various Host Weaponshttps://preview.redd.it/crxbc26ela3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4ec00df2a0ebc11498926780db9c2608c14ffbd7 I've been using the Rugged Suppressors Fixed Mount for my favorite firearm, and let me tell you, it's been a game-changer. The mount is incredibly easy to set up and secure, making it perfect for my everyday shooting practice. The fixed mount fits like a charm on my 1/2x36 thread, and I love its durability. It's clear that the craftsmanship is top-notch, and I'm proud to support a product made right here in the United States. While I've had zero issues with the Rugged Suppressors Fixed Mount, I have noticed that some competitors offer more adjustability, but their durability can't seem to match. Overall, I highly recommend this product to anyone in the market for a reliable, fixed-mount solution for their firearms. 🔗Versatile 22Lr Suppressor Thread Inserts for Wolverine Ownershttps://preview.redd.it/icl5upjela3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c579541fec74dc8a67db8f94ab56b8cb74acdfcf I recently had the chance to try out Dead Air's WLVRN 22Lr Suppressor. It was a game-changer for my gun enthusiast friends and I. This versatile silencer allowed us to easily switch between rifles with ease by simply swapping out the multiple inserts available. It's surprising how one simple accessory can make such a noticeable difference in the smoothness of our shooting experience. It's definitely a tool worth investing in if you're looking to up your rifle game! . 🔗Versatile Wolverine Thrd Insrt for 22Lr Suppressorshttps://preview.redd.it/84dhqw8fla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1679242c659fef015bcc690873c3ff2785b5c13e Using the Dead Air WLVRN Thrd Insrt wasn't just for show - it was a game changer. This thread insert made all the difference in the accuracy and longevity of my Wolverine 22Lr silencer. It was quick and easy to install, and it never once compromised the sound quality of the silencer. One of the most impressive features of this product was its versatility. With its multiple insert options, I could switch between different calibers with ease and precision. It was like having a silencer for every occasion at the ready. However, it's not all smooth sailing. The installation process required a bit of fiddling around, and there were some moments of frustration involved. But once I got it right, everything fell into place perfectly. Overall, the Dead Air WLVRN Thrd Insrt is a must-have for anyone looking to get the most out of their Wolverine suppressor. 🔗Dead Air Armament Nomad-30 Muzzle Break Enhanced for Recoil Controlhttps://preview.redd.it/h9o7gqjfla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6af4719551a8e347ebd853d55016f61f942ae235 Using the Dead Air Nomad-30 E-Brake KA180, I noticed the significant difference it made when compared to other suppressors. The enhanced muzzle break helped to tame the recoil of my firearm, allowing me to maintain accuracy and precision during my shooting sessions. It truly lived up to its promise, offering a unique solution for suppressor enthusiasts looking to minimize felt recoil. Though it might not be the most compact option available, it certainly stands out in terms of performance. It proved itself to be highly reliable and efficient, requiring minimal maintenance. The pricing, while not the most affordable, is certainly justified considering its exceptional features and performance. Overall, the Dead Air Nomad-30 E-Brake KA180 is an excellent choice for those seeking to enhance their suppressor experience. 🔗Advanced Silencer for 3/8 in. Carbon Rods - 22Lr Suppressorhttps://preview.redd.it/jbzk3bxfla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=95f1a763eeb10a4a013127a8cd823ce2c4018331 As an avid hunter, I've grown accustomed to the loud noise that often accompanies each shot when using a suppressor. It can be a nuisance, especially when I'm trying to maintain stealth during my hunting expeditions. That's when I stumbled upon the Saunders Vudu-X String Stop Black 3/8 in. Daimeter 8 in. Rod. This innovative suppressor caught my attention with its patented, high-performance compound bow string silencer that replaces my carbon rod dampener. The moment I installed it, I noticed a significant difference in the level of noise it produced. Gone were the resonant strikes and replaced with a much quieter experience. What sets the Vudu-X apart is its ability to trap the string in a recoil chamber, effectively silencing every single shot. It also absorbed limb shock, making my overall shooting experience smoother and more comfortable. However, it wasn't all good news. The Vudu-X sometimes felt a bit bulky, making it slightly harder to maneuver compared to my previous suppressor. Nevertheless, the benefits greatly outweighed the minor inconvenience. Overall, I'm happy with the Saunders Vudu-X String Stop Black 3/8 in. Daimeter 8 in. Rod as my suppressor of choice. Its ability to significantly reduce noise and absorb limb shock makes it a worthwhile investment for any hunter seeking a more discreet and comfortable shooting experience. Buyer's Guidehttps://preview.redd.it/0vzjo3dgla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3c1ea13234d0adfee004410e4423fe1d73777468 None FAQhttps://preview.redd.it/oi82ctsgla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=862c3f7c10d336ecb22051f46f00cd3afdda4c37 What is a 22Lr suppressor?A 22LR suppressor is a device that is designed to reduce the noise created by a 22LR (. 22 Long Rifle) rifle when the trigger is pulled. This device, also known as a silencer, helps to make shooting more enjoyable in noise-sensitive environments and ensures that others nearby are not bothered by the sound.What are the benefits of using a 22Lr suppressor?https://preview.redd.it/t4cvicghla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4486a1c5cd452988fd00006daa65205a3fda6eab
How does a 22Lr suppressor work?A 22LR suppressor works by using a series of baffles to slow down and dissipate the high-speed gas generated by the firing of a 22LR bullet. This gas, in turn, cools down and reduces the noise created during firing. The suppressor's internal components are typically made from materials that are heat-resistant and can withstand the high temperatures and pressures generated by the firing process. https://preview.redd.it/x3kscqshla3d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=98b476efca75293c19ab84317ef93b8cc8eb44d1 Are suppressors legal to own and use?The legality of owning and using suppressors varies by country and sometimes by state or province. In the United States, ownership of suppressors is permitted under the National Firearms Act, provided that the owner holds a valid Federal Firearms License and has completed the necessary background checks and paperwork. It is recommended to consult with local authorities or experts for the most accurate information regarding your specific situation.How do I choose the right 22Lr suppressor for my needs?
What are some popular 22Lr suppressors on the market?Popular 22LR suppressors on the market include the SilencerCo Omega 36M, the Rugged Suppressors Fatboy 22, and the Tactical Innovations 22LR Pro.As an Amazon™ Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. |
2024.05.29 04:11 KamalbeSchoolXela The Kamalbe Spanish School. A Non-Profit with Purpose in Xela, Guatemala
Kamalbe is more than just a language school; it’s a beacon of hope for local communities. Founded nine years ago, Kamalbe’s mission is to provide equal access to education and health services in the west Highlands of Guatemala. The name “Kamalbe” comes from the K’iche language, spoken by indigenous Mayan people near Xela. Roughly translated, it means “guide of the road.” And indeed, Kamalbe guides its students toward fluency while making a positive impact on the community.
"I had the most incredible experience at Kamalbe! I was only there for 1 week, but from the moment I arrived, the warmth and hospitality of the staff made me and my friend feel right at home"
For more information, visit Kamalbe Spanish School. ¡Hasta pronto!
1: Kamalbe Spanish School in Xela Guatemala. Website 2: Kamalbe Spanish School Guatemala. Facebook Reviews 3: Kamalbe Spanish School Guatemala. Facebook Post
submitted by KamalbeSchoolXela to u/KamalbeSchoolXela [link] [comments]
My Kamalbe Experience
Personalized Learning
From day one, I felt welcomed by the Kamalbe team. My one-on-one lessons were tailored to my level, ensuring that I progressed at my own pace. Whether I stumbled over irregular verbs or practiced conversational skills, my patient teacher provided unwavering support.Homestay and Cultural Immersion
Living with a local family was a highlight of my experience. My homestay allowed me to practice Spanish outside the classroom, share meals, and learn about Guatemalan traditions. From cooking together to exploring nearby hot springs, every moment was an opportunity to deepen my understanding of the language and culture.Diverse Activities
Kamalbe doesn’t stop at language lessons. Daily activities range from chocolate-making workshops, and cooking lessons to visits to local hot springs. These excursions not only enhance language skills but also connect students with the vibrant life of Xela. I’ll never forget the laughter during our salsa dancing class or the breathtaking views from Fuentes Georginas.What Others Say
Sarah Murphy"I had the most incredible experience at Kamalbe! I was only there for 1 week, but from the moment I arrived, the warmth and hospitality of the staff made me and my friend feel right at home"
Felix Owen
“Amazing experience. Lessons were flexible and intense, both in grammar and conversation. The consistent support and immersive learning opportunities were crucial in reaching conversational fluency.”Richard and Linley
“Highly recommend Kamalbe Spanish School. Professional, responsible teachers, and the best prices in Xela.”The Kamalbe Difference
- NGO (Non-profit): Kamalbe’s commitment to community development sets it apart.
- English and Spanish Speaking Teachers: A diverse team ensures effective communication.
- Native Spanish Teachers: Learn from those who know the language inside out.
- Discounts for Long-Term Students and Volunteers: Kamalbe encourages extended stays.
Conclusion
Kamalbe Spanish School isn’t just about conjugating verbs; it’s about connecting with people, embracing culture, and making a difference. If you’re ready for an unforgettable journey of language and community, Kamalbe awaits you in Xela.For more information, visit Kamalbe Spanish School. ¡Hasta pronto!
1: Kamalbe Spanish School in Xela Guatemala. Website 2: Kamalbe Spanish School Guatemala. Facebook Reviews 3: Kamalbe Spanish School Guatemala. Facebook Post
2024.05.29 03:00 B1NARYtruther Fortnite® Lego® - Flashing Slot Glitch *v29.40* *working AFK-method*
 | https://preview.redd.it/ainpifznj93d1.png?width=626&format=png&auto=webp&s=ccb8379dccf237dfb86649f8cb0b4e8c6acdf93e submitted by B1NARYtruther to FortniteXPMaps [link] [comments] >> Flashing Slots Videoproof << https://streamable.com/0ntdb1 Some of you may remember this glitch from version 29.30. Today, after hours of testing and experimenting with various methods, I optimized the glitch and simplified it as much as possible. .:RIP GLITCHES:.
.:PREPARATION:. You can choose your own best Method for attaching Buttons and Triggers.
(SKIP to Number 7 if you know this Glitch from v29.30 and already have a customized Sandbox World with a Quad)
.:IN-GAME VIDEO STEP-BY-STEP:. >> Full Video Instruction << https://streamable.com/8qk9ix Please leave a comment to verifiy this Glitch .:CHANGES:.
.:THANKS TO:. ...all Redditors who found out new Ways to Bypass Epic's AFK Detection and all who contributes ways / tutorials / guides that we all can farm XP as fast as possible. Reddit: 1 <> Epic: 0 Best Regards from Germany //B1NARY |
2024.05.29 02:37 Niiyonn Detailed 1500-Hour Update!!
 | TLDR: I can understand almost everything well and can speak quite comfortably. I haven't read much, but I could understand the things I have read without much trouble. I still have lots of room for improvement until I reach my definition of spoken fluency, which is speaking without hesitations or pauses. Click here to see me speaking at 1,500 hours. submitted by Niiyonn to dreamingspanish [link] [comments] Table of Contents
My Spanish BackgroundI took three years of high school Spanish from 2015 to 2018. I also took two semesters of Spanish in college, one in the spring of 2020 and one in the fall of 2022. I could only conjugate the present tense, and it was difficult for me to understand anything. I started using the Refold ES1K Anki deck sporadically in mid-September 2021. I started using it more consistently in the summer of 2022 and finished it in mid-October 2022. I stopped using Anki when I finished the deck because I noticed I was picking up new words from Dreaming Spanish alone. I started using Dreaming Spanish seriously about two weeks before the start of the fall 2022 Spanish class, at which point I had 14 hours of prior Dreaming Spanish watch time logged. I got serious with Dreaming Spanish in January 2023. I hit 1,000 hours in November 2023.My Thoughts About Dreaming Spanish and Comprehensible InputWithout Dreaming Spanish, I wouldn't be at my current level. The "just sit back and watch" method is so easy and straightforward that it motivated me to take learning Spanish seriously for the first time. I saw results so early in the process that I had complete faith in Dreaming Spanish and abandoned all grammar and vocabulary study. Having the entire journey laid out on the roadmap was also incredibly reassuring and provided micro and macro goals for me to achieve. I also found the roadmap accurate, so I will use it to learn future languages.Statistics BreakdownHere are my statistics as of 1500 hours of input and speaking (not including the 76.23 hours of Anki flashcards I did).Figure A
Figure B https://preview.redd.it/esrwc6enx83d1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=f2f201928b0a3ea0f9e2c202c268bacfcecc236e Figure C shows how much time I spent doing each activity between 1,021 (when I made my last update) and 1,500 hours. Figure C
Figure D https://preview.redd.it/uphv2ghiy83d1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=4ed5b33da66fc3e94dbfe00be062f2eb171b2f5f *WorldsAcross Lessons: This is the time during my tutoring sessions when I was not talking or barely talking. For example, if doing a 1-hour group lesson with 2 other students, I would count 1/3 as conversation practice and 2/3 as a WorldsAcross Lesson. Another example would be time spent listening to a tutor talk the vast majority of the time or watching a video with a tutor. *Crosstalk: I only counted half of each crosstalk session as input. For example, I logged 30 minutes after having a 1-hour conversation. *TV: Live-action shows *Voice Rooms: This is the time spent lurking and listening to people speak in voice rooms. Crosstalk I did not do much crosstalk because I preferred to just watch content. Also, because of the way I chose to log crosstalk time, I felt it would be better to get 1 hour of input from media than 30 minutes from a 1-hour crosstalk session. Podcasts Being able to understand podcasts was a key point in my learning journey. I was no longer bound to a computer screen, and I could get input while doing chores or going about my day. My top podcast early on was Español con Juan (ECJ). His podcasts are super fun to listen to and very comprehensible. After finishing ECJ, I listened to Charlas Hispanas, but only Fredo's episodes since I was only interested in Mexican Spanish. I then listened to tons of Siempre Hay Flores. I currently rotate between Leyendas Legendarias, Cuida tu Mente, El Dollop, and Siempre Hay Flores. I will occasionally mix in episodes from other podcasts like ECJ, WorldsAcross' advanced Spanish podcast, or Advanced Spanish Podcast by Spanish with Cesar. I started listening to Leyendas Legendarias and El Dollop after hitting 1,000 hours to challenge myself. They are comedy podcasts with the same hosts. The hosts speak fast and talk over each other at times. I can now understand Leyendas Legendarias and El Dollop very well, though I certainly miss things at times. Anime Dubbed anime is much easier to understand for me than live-action shows for native speakers. As such, I only watched dubbed anime pre 1,000 hours. I prefer animated shows over live-action ones, so this decision did not bother me. My Hero Academia and Black Clover are two anime with tons of episodes if you're looking for shows where you can get accustomed to the characters' voices. My Hero Academia has about 45 hours of content, while Black Clover has about 55 hours of content. Anime is currently my primary source of audio-visual content. I tried incorporating live-action stuff to challenge myself, but I would always get bored. I am currently able to understand live-action shows. I have to pay attention more, and I definitely miss some things, but I can comfortably follow the story. I am still improving without live-action content, so I don't think it's necessary to watch it if you don't like it. Conversation Practice Essentially 100% of my time spent doing conversation practice (speaking) has been done with tutors from WorldsAcross* (see me review here). Most of that time has been with Venezuelan tutors. However, I now take more classes with Mexican tutors now that there are more on the platform. I decided to do tutoring instead of speaking with language exchange partners to save time because I was only interested in speaking Spanish. For example, I didn't want to have to do 30 minutes in Spanish and 30 minutes in English. Tutoring has also helped me be consistent with my output. I am currently doing five to six 1-hour lessons per week through WorldsAcross' unlimited plan and count the entire hour as speaking time. As I near 200 hours of speaking practice and my speaking skills get more refined, I will switch to their 15-monthly-classes plan to start making more Spanish speaking friends and talking with them. *WorldsAcross (WA) is a subscription-based Spanish tutoring platform. They are a lot more affordable than iTalki if you plan on doing at least 10 classes per month. WA lets you book each 1-on-1 class for up to 90 minutes. If you only book 90-minute classes on their basic plan of ten 1-on-1 classes per month, the cost comes out to ~$6.67 per hour. You can also book same-day classes, and all their plans offer unlimited access to group classes, which I've had fun doing with other Dreaming Spanish users. My affiliate code YONTZAMIGOS will give you 30% your first month :) Disclaimer: I will make a commission if you sign up for WorldsAcross using my code. YouTube YouTube was essential for me at around 350 hours because it provided variety in my input. Dreaming Spanish is a great resource, but I occasionally got burnt out with it. Luisito Comunica and Cocinando Corea were my most watched channels and are very easy to understand as far as native content goes. Reading Figure E
Percent from Books: 95.13 Percent from Articles: 4.87 Figure F
Disclaimer: The links to El príncipe del sol and Magic Treehouse are affiliate links. I will make a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Major Milestones150 hours: I started listening to podcasts alongside Dreaming Spanish because I realized I could listen to and understand Español con Juan.~250-300 hours: I genuinely understood Luisito Comunica's videos. I had tried watching some of his videos in Superbeginner and was utterly lost. I also visited my Spanish-speaking family roughly around this time, and I was able to follow a 30-minute conversation they had. I also started focusing on Mexican Spanish content at this time. ~440 hours: Dubbed anime became accessible to me. I started watching My Hero Academia and One Punch Man, and I understood them well enough to enjoy them and follow the story just fine. However, I decided to stop watching dubbed anime after I finished One Punch Man and one or two seasons of My Hero Academia because I felt I would benefit more from learner-focused content. 611 hours: I revisited My Hero Academia and found it was much easier. ~800 hours: Anime became my primary source of daily input. I started watching anime I had never seen before and could comprehend everything extremely well. At this point, I started only watching new Dreaming Spanish videos that seemed interesting. 1000 hours: I had a conversation in Spanish for the first time. I spoke for two hours, and I was blown away by my ability to convey everything I wanted to say. It wasn't smooth or effortless, but I surpassed all expectations I had for myself. Click here to listen to a recording of my second conversation after hitting 1,000 hours. I started reading this book for Spanish learners, and was able to understand basically everything. There were some words that I didn't know, but they didn't impede my comprehension of the text. ~1150 hours: I started reading my first Spanish-language novel, El príncipe del sol by Claudia Ramírez Lomelí, and was able to easily understand the story. ~1450 hours: I started reading El ego es el enemigo by Ryan Holiday. There were plenty of words that I didn't understand, but they didn't hinder my understanding. Disclaimer: The links to El príncipe del sol and El ego es el enemigo are affiliate links. I will make a commission if you click through and make a purchase. My Current AbilityI can understand basically everything I watch or listen to. I haven't read much, but I seem to able to read well too. I can speak very well and have conversations with native speakers about complex topics, but I do not consider myself fluent yet. It's important to define what I consider fluency (specifically spoken fluency), so here is a definition Chat GPT gave me that I agree with:"Spoken fluency refers to the ability to express oneself smoothly and coherently in spoken language, demonstrating ease of communication without frequent hesitations, disruptions, or difficulty in finding words." By this definition, I am not fluent because I still pause, hesitate, and struggle to recall words. I will be fluent once I can speak without many interruptions, even if I still make errors. My grammar usage is pretty accurate and I can almost always tell when I make errors. Certain uses of the subjunctive trip me up the most. It is easy for me to switch between English and Spanish. Overall, I am delighted with my current level and look forward to getting even better. My Plans Moving ForwardI wanted reach 500,000-1,000,000 words read and get 100-150 hours of conversation practice before hitting 1,500 hours to show what someone who did a LOT of reading, speaking, and listening could achieve by level 7 of the Dreaming Spanish roadmap. I managed to reach my speaking target, but I completely missed my reading target. As such, I will be reading more consistently by reading here and there throughout the day. I didn't have the habit of reading before learning Spanish, so the prospect of reading for long periods of time made me shy away from reading.As of now, I plan to keep tracking words-read and speaking time until 3,000 hours of input. General Thoughts and AdviceI plan to learn another language after Spanish. Although, I'm not yet sure which one. I will likely do a lot more crosstalk and count 1 hour of crosstalk as 1 hour of input instead of 30 minutes like I did with Spanish.I would read more consistently after hitting 1,000 hours. I don't know if waiting until 1k helped me jump to more advanced texts faster, but I don't regret not having read earlier. The toughest periods are the very beginning and 300-500 hours. When I first started Spanish, I would do Pomodoro sessions to help me focus as much as possible on the Dreaming Spanish videos. It's completely normal to feel tired from listening to Spanish, especially in the beginning, so take breaks when you need them. The period between 300-500 hours was an absolute grind for me. I no longer found things interesting just because they were in Spanish, and the things I really wanted to watch were above my level. If I had to start over, I would likely do a lot more crosstalk during this period. Thankfully, I found some YouTube channels that were easy enough to carry me through this period. My greatest success was the first time I spoke after hitting 1,000 hours--that conversation lasted 2 hours! I hadn't spoken before that point, and I was blown away by my speaking ability because I had absolutely NO prior expectations. Spoken fluency is a grind. You will sound terrible at first and likely feel awkward and embarrassed. You just have to keep pushing. You might also feel like your speaking ability is actually somehow regressing at times. Don't worry. That feeling is completely normal and comes and goes. As long as you keep spending time speaking, you WILL improve. Try not to stress about accent. Good pronunciation and speaking confidently without hesitations or pauses will make you sound a LOT better than having a good accent. Your accent is most influenced by your identification with a particular group or region. For example, Americans who wish to adopt a Mexican accent but do not feel a genuine connection to Mexican culture or the "in-group" will subconsciously retain their American accents. They may also feel like they are exaggerating, mocking, acting, or playing a character when attempting to sound Mexican, which further hinders their ability to speak with an authentic accent. Consistency is king! Do at least a few minutes of Spanish every day rather than completely skipping a day. Make sure you get enough sleep! I feel like I speak much worse when I'm tired. Our brains need sleep to solidify everything we learn. Exercise! Be active, even if that means just going for a walk every day. It'll help you learn better and faster. Feel free to ask my questions about anything I may not have covered in this update!! My Related LinksMy 1000-Hour UpdateMy Speaking Progress Videos My WorldsAcross Review My Spanish Progress Website My Spanish Resources Website |
2024.05.29 01:48 MirkWorks The Age of the World Picture by Martin Heidegger III
The Age of the World Picture
In metaphysics reflection is accomplished concerning the essence of what is and a decision takes place regarding the essence of truth*1. Metaphysics grounds an age, in that through a specific interpretation of what is and through a specific comprehension of truth it gives to that age the basis upon which it is essentially formed*2. This basis holds complete dominion over all the phenomena that distinguish the age. Conversely, in order that there may be an adequate reflection upon these phenomena themselves, the metaphysical basis for them must let itself be apprehended in them. Reflection is the courage to make the troth of our own presuppositions and the realm of our own goals into the things that most deserve to be called in question Appendix 1).
One of the essential phenomena of the modern age is its science. A phenomenon of no less importance is machine technology. We must not, however, misinterpret that technology as the mere application of modern mathematical physical science to praxis. Machine technology is itself an autonomous transformation of praxis, a type of transformation wherein praxis first demands the employment of mathematical physical science. Machine technology remains up to now the most visible outgrowth of the essence of modern technology, which is identical with the essence of modern metaphysics.
A third equally essential phenomenon of the modern period lies in the event of art's moving into the purview of aesthetics. That means that the art work becomes the object of mere subjective experience, and that consequently art is considered to be an expression of human life*4.
A fourth modern phenomenon manifests itself in the fact that human activity is conceived and consummated as culture. Thus culture is the realization of the highest values, through the nurture and cultivation of the highest goods of man. It lies in the essence of culture, as such nurturing, to nurture itself in its turn and thus to become the politics of culture.
A fifth phenomenon of the modern age is the loss of the gods*5. This expression does not mean the mere doing away with the gods, gross atheism. The loss of the gods is a twofold process. On the one hand, the world picture is Christianized inasmuch as the cause of the world is posited as infinite, unconditional, absolute. On the other hand, Christendom transforms Christian doctrine into a world view (the Christian world view), and in that way makes itself modern and up to date. The loss of the gods is the situation of indecision regarding God and the gods. Christendom has the greatest share in bringing it about. But the loss of the gods is so far from excluding religiosity that rather only through that loss is the relation to the gods changed into mere experience." When this occurs, then the gods have fled. The resultant void is compensated for by means of historiographical and psychological investigation of myth.
What understanding of what is, what interpretation of truth, lies at the foundation of these phenomena?
We shall limit the question to the phenomenon mentioned first, to science [Wissenschaft].
In what does the essence of modern science lie?
What understanding of what is and of truth provides the basis for that essence? If we succeed in reaching the metaphysical ground that provides the foundation for science as a modern phenomenon, then the entire essence of the modern age will have to let itself be apprehended from out of that ground.
When we use the word "science" today, it means something essentially different from the doctrina and scientia of the Middle Ages, and also from the Greek episteme. Greek science was never exact, precisely because, in keeping with its essence, it could not be exact and did not need to be exact. Hence it makes no sense whatever to suppose that modern science is more exact than that of antiquity. Neither can we say that the Galilean doctrine of freely falling bodies is true and that Aristotle's teaching, that light bodies strive upward, is false; for the Greek understanding of the essence of body and place and of the relation between the two rests upon a different interpretation of beings and hence conditions a correspondingly different kind of seeing and questioning of natural events. No one would presume to maintain that Shakespeare's poetry is more advanced than that of Aeschylus. It is still more impossible to say that the modern understanding of whatever is, is more correct than that of the Greeks. Therefore, if we want to grasp the essence of modern science, we must first free ourselves from the habit of comparing the new science with the old solely in terms of degree, from the point of view of progress.
The essence of what we today call science is research. In what does the essence of research consist?
In the fact that knowing [das Erkennen] establishes itself as a procedure within some realm of what is, in nature or in history. Procedure does not mean here merely method or methodology. For every procedure already requires an open sphere in which it moves. And it is precisely the opening up of such a sphere that is the fundamental event in research. This is accomplished through the projection within some realm of what is-in nature, for example-of a fixed ground plan*6 of natural events. The projection sketches out in advance the manner in which the knowing procedure must bind itself and adhere to the sphere opened up. This binding adherence is the rigor of research*7. Through the projecting of the ground plan and the prescribing of rigor, procedure makes secure for itself its sphere of objects within the realm of Being . A look at that earliest science, which is at the same time the normative one in the modern age, namely, mathematical physics, will make clear what we mean. Inasmuch as modern atomic physics still remains physics, what is essential - and only the essential is aimed at here- will hold for it also.
Modern physics is called mathematical because, in a remarkable way, it makes use of a quite specific mathematics. But it can proceed mathematically in this way only because, in a deeper sense, it is already itself mathematical. Ta mathemata means for the Greeks that which man knows in advance in his observation of whatever is and in his intercourse with things ; the corporeality of bodies, the vegetable character of plants, the animality of animals, the humanness of man. Alongside these, belonging also to that which is already-known, i.e., to the mathematical, are numbers. If we come upon three apples on the table, we recognize that there are three of them. But the number three, threeness, we already know. This means that number is something mathematical. Only because numbers represent, as it were, the most striking of always-already-knowns, and thus offer the most familiar instance of the mathematical, is "mathematical" promptly reserved as a name for the numerical. In no way, however, is the essence of the mathematical defined by numberness, Physics is, in general, the knowledge of nature, and, in particular, the knowledge of material corporeality in its motion; for that corporeality manifests itself immediately and universally in everything natural, even if in a variety of ways, If physics takes shape explicitly, then, as something mathematical, this means that, in an especially pronounced way, through it and for it something is stipulated in advance as what is already-known. That stipulating has to do with nothing less than the plan or projection of that which must henceforth, for the knowing of nature that is sought after, be nature: the self-contained system of motion of units of mass related spatiotemporally. Into this ground plan of nature, as supplied in keeping with its prior stipulation, the following definitions among others have been incorporated: Motion means change of place. No motion or direction of motion is superior to any other. Every place is equal to every other. No point in time has preference over any other. Every force is defined according to - i.e., is only - its consequences in motion, and that means in magnitude of change of place in the unity of time. Every event must be seen so as to be fitted into this ground plan of nature. Only within the perspective of this ground plan does an event in nature become visible as such an event. This projected plan of nature finds its guarantee in the fact that physical research, in every one of its questioning steps, is bound in advance to adhere to it. This binding adherence, the rigor of research, has its own character at any given time in keeping with the projected plan. The rigor of mathematical physical science is exactitude. Here all events, if they are to enter at all into representation as events of nature, must be defined beforehand as spatiotemporal magnitudes of motion. Such defining is accomplished through measuring, with the help of number and calculation. But mathematical research into nature is not exact because it calculates with precision; rather it must calculate in this way because its adherence to its object-sphere has the character of exactitude. The humanistic sciences, in contrast, indeed all the sciences concerned with life, must necessarily be inexact just in order to remain rigorous. A living thing can indeed also be grasped as spatiotemporal magnitude of motion, but then it is no longer apprehended as living. The inexactitude of the historical humanistic sciences is not a deficiency, but is only the fulfillment of a demand essential to this type of research. It is true, also, that the projecting and securing of the object-sphere of the historical sciences is not only of another kind, but is much more difficult of execution than is the achieving of rigor in the exact sciences.
Science becomes research through the projected plan and through the securing of that plan in the rigor of procedure. Projection and rigor, however, first develop into what they are in methodology. The latter constitutes the second essential characteristic of research. If the sphere that is projected is to become objective, then it is a matter of bringing it to encounter us in the complete diversity of its levels and interweavings. Therefore procedure must be free to view the changeableness in whatever encounters it. Only within the horizon of the incessant-otherness of change does the plenitude of particularity - of facts - show itself. -But the facts must become objective [gegenstiindlich]. Hence procedure must represent [vorstellen] the changeable in its changing, must bring it to a stand and let the motion be a motion nevertheless. The fixedness of facts and the constantness of their change as such is "rule." The constancy of change in the necessity of its course is "law." It is only within the purview of rule and law that facts become clear as the facts that they are. Research into facts in the realm of nature is intrinsically the establishing and verifying of rule and law. Methodology, through which a sphere of objects comes into representation, has the character of clarifying on the basis of what is clear - of explanation. Explanation is always twofold. It accounts for an unknown by means of a known, and at the same time it verifies that known by means of that unknown. Explanation takes place in investigation. In the physical sciences investigation takes place by means of experiment, always according to the kind of field of investigation and according to the type of explanation aimed at. But physical science does not first become research through experiment; rather, on the contrary, experiment first becomes possible where and only where the knowledge of nature has been transformed into research. Only because modern physics is a physics that is essentially mathematical can it be experimental. Because neither medieval doctrina nor Greek episteme is science in the sense of research, for these it is never a question of experiment. To be sure, it was Aristotle who first understood what empeiria (experientia) means; the observation of things themselves, their qualities and modifications under changing conditions, and consequently the knowledge of the way in which things as a rule behave. But an observation that aims at such knowledge, the experimentum, remains essentially different from the observation that belongs to science as research, from the research experiment; it remains essentially different even when ancient and medieval observation also works with number and measure, and even when that observation makes use of specific apparatus and instruments. For in all this, that which is decisive about the experiment is completely missing. Experiment begins with the laying down of a law as a basis. To set up an experiment means to represent or conceive [vorstellen] the conditions under which a specific series of motions can be made susceptible of being followed in its necessary progression, i.e., of being controlled in advance by calculation. But the establishing of a law is accomplished with reference to the ground plan of the object-sphere. That ground plan furnishes a criterion and constrains the anticipatory representing of the conditions. Such representing in and through which the experiment begins is no random imagining. that is why Newton said, hypothesis non fingo, “the bases that are laid down are not arbitrarily invented.” They are developed out of the ground plan of nature and are sketched into it. Experiment is that methodology which, in its planning and execution, is supported and guided on the basis of the fundamental law laid down, in order to adduce the facts that either verify and confirm the law or deny it confirmation. The more exactly the ground plan of nature is projected, the more exact becomes the possibility of experiment. Hence the much cited medieval Schoolman Roger Bacon can never be the forerunner of the modern experimental research scientist; rather he remains merely a successor of Aristotle. For in the meantime, the real locus of truth has been transferred by Christendom to faith - to the infallibility of the written word and to the doctrine of the Church. The highest knowledge and teaching is theology as the interpretation of the divine word of revelation, which is set down in Scripture and proclaimed by the Church. Here, to know is not to search out; rather it is to understand rightly the authoritative Word and the authorities proclaiming it. Therefore, the discussion of the words and doctrinal opinions of the various authorities take precedence in the acquiring of knowledge in the Middle Ages. The componere scripta et sermones, the argumentum ex verbo, is decisive and at the same time is the reason why the accepted Platonic and Aristotelian philosophy that had been taken over had to be transformed into scholastic dialectic. If, now, Roger Bacon demands the experimentum - and he does demand it - he does not mean the experiment of science as research; rather he wants the argumentum ex re instead of the argumentum ex verbo, the careful observing of things themselves, i.e., Aristotelian empeiria, instead of the discussion of doctrines.
The modern research experiment, however, is not only an observation more precise in degree and scope, but is a methodology essentially different in kind, related to the verification of law in the framework, and at the service, of an exact plan of nature. Source criticism in the historical humanistic sciences corresponds to experiment in physical research. Here the name “source criticism” designates the whole gamut of the discovery, examination, verification, evaluation, preservation, and interpretation of sources. Historiographical explanation, which is based on source criticism, does not, it is true, trace facts back to laws and rules. But neither does it confine itself to the mere reporting of facts. In the historical sciences, just as in the natural sciences, the methodology aims at representing what is fixed and stable and at making history an object. History can become objective openly when it is past. What is stable in what is past, that on the basis of which historiographical explanation reckons up the solitary and the diverse in history, is the always-has-been-once-already, the comparable. Through the constant comparing of everything with everything, what is intelligible is found by calculation and is certified and established as the ground plan of history. The sphere of histriographical research extends only so far as historiographical explanation reaches. The unique, the rare, the simple - in short, the great - in history is never self-evident and hence remains inexplicable. It is not that historical research denies what is great in history; rather it explains it as the exception. In this explaining, the great is measured against the ordinary and the average. And there is no other historiographical explanation so long as explaining means reduction to what is intelligible and so long as historiographical explanation so long as explaining means reduction to what is intelligible and so long as historiography remains research, i.e., an explaining. Because historiography as research projects and objectifies the past in the sense of an explicable and surveyable nexus of actions and consequences, it requires source criticism as its instrument of objectification. The standards of this criticism alter to the degree that historiography approaches journalism.
Every science is, as research, grounded upon the projection of a circumscribed object-sphere and is therefore necessarily a science of individualized character. Every individualized science must, moreover, in the development of its projected plan by means of its methodology, particularize itself into specific fields of investigation. This particularizing (specialization) is, however, by no means simply an irksome concomitant of the increasing unsurveyability of the results of research. It is not a necessary evil, but is rather an essential necessity of science as research. Specialization is not the consequence but the foundation of the progress of all research. Research does not, through its methodology, become dispersed into random investigations, so as to lose itself in them; for modern science is determined by a third fundamental event: ongoing activity (Appendix 2).*10
By this is to be understood first of all the phenomenon that a science today, whether physical or humanistic, attains to the respect due a science only when it has become capable of being institutionalized. However, research is not ongoing activity because its work is accomplished in institutions, but rather institutions are necessary because science, intrinsically as research, has the character of ongoing activity. The methodology through which individual object-spheres are conquered does not simply amass results. Rather, with the help of its results it adapts [richtet sich ... ein] itself for a new procedure. Within the complex of machinery that is necessary to physics in order to carry out the smashing of the atom lies hidden the whole of physics up to now. Correspondingly, in historiographical research, funds of source materials become usable for explanation only if those sources are themselves guaranteed on the basis of historiographical explanation. In the course of these processes, the methodology of the science becomes circumscribed by means of its results. More and more the methodology adapts itself to the possibilities of procedure opened up through itself. This having-to-adapt-itself to its own results as the ways and means of an advancing methodology is the essence of research's character as ongoing activity. And it is that character that is the intrinsic basis for the necessity of the institutional nature of research. In ongoing activity the plan of an object-sphere is, for the first time, built into whatever is. All adjustments that facilitate a plannable conjoining of types of methodology, that further the reciprocal checking and communication of results, and that regulate the exchange of talents are measures that are by no means only the external consequences of the fact that research work is expanding and proliferating. Rather, research work becomes the distant sign, still far from being understood, that modern science is beginning to enter upon the decisive phase of its history. Only now is it beginning to take possession of its own complete essence.
What is taking place in this extending and consolidating of the institutional character of the sciences? Nothing less than the making secure of the precedence of methodology over whatever is (nature and history), which at any given time becomes objective in research. On the foundation of their character as ongoing activity, the sciences are creating for themselves the solidarity and unity appropriate to them. Therefore historiographical or archeological research that is carried forward in an institutionalized way is essentially closer to research in physics that is similarly organized than it is to a discipline belonging to its own faculty in the humanistic sciences that still remains mired in mere erudition. Hence the decisive development of the modern character of science as ongoing activity also forms men of a different stamp. The scholar disappears. He is succeeded by the research man who is engaged in research projects. These, rather than the cultivating of erudition, lend to his work its atmosphere of incisiveness. The research man no longer needs a library at home. Moreover, he is constantly on the move. He negotiates at meetings and collects information at congresses. He contracts for commissions with publishers. The latter now determines along with him which books must be written (Appendix 3).
The research worker necessarily presses forward of himself into the sphere characteristic of the technologist in the essential sense. Only in this way is he capable of acting effectively, and only thus, after the manner of his age, is he real. Alongside him, the increasingly thin and empty Romanticism of scholarship and the university will still be able to persist for some time in a few places. However, the effective unity characteristic of the university, and hence the latter's reality, does not lie in some intellectual power belonging to an original unification of the sciences and emanating from the university because nourished by it and preserved in it. The university is real as an orderly establishment that, in a form still unique because it is administratively self-contained, makes possible and visible the striving apart of the sciences into the particularization and peculiar unity that belong to ongoing activity. Because the forces intrinsic to the essence of modern science come immediately and unequivocally to effective working in ongoing activity, therefore, also, it is only the spontaneous ongoing activities of research that can sketch out and establish the internal unity with other like activities that is commensurate with themselves.
The real system of science consists in a solidarity of procedure and attitude with respect to the objectification of whatever is - a solidarity that is brought about appropriately at any given time on the basis of planning. The excellence demanded of this system is not some contrived and rigid unity of the relationships among object-spheres, having to do with content, but is rather the greatest possible free, though regulated, flexibility in the shifting about and introducing of research apropos of the leading tasks at any given time. The more exclusively science individualizes itself with a view to the total carrying on and mastering of its work process, and the more realistically these ongoing activities are shifted into separate research institutes and professional schools, the more irresistibly do the sciences achieve the consummation of their modern essence. But the more unconditionally science and the man of research take seriously the modern form of their essence, the more unequivocally and the more immediately will they be able to offer themselves for the common good, and the more unreservedly too will they have to return to the public anonymity of all work useful to society.
Modern science simultaneously establishes itself and differentiates itself in its projections of specific object-spheres. These projection-plans are developed by means of a corresponding methodology, which is made secure through rigor. Methodology adapts and establishes itself at any given time in ongoing activity. Projection and rigor, methodology and ongoing activity, mutually requiring one another, constitute the essence of modern science, transform science into research.
We are reflecting on the essence of modern science in order that we may apprehend in it its metaphysical ground What understanding of what is and what concept of truth provide the basis for the fact that science is being transformed into research?
Knowing, as research, calls whatever is to account with regard to the way in which and the extent to which it lets itself be put at the disposal of representation. Research has disposal over anything that is when it can either calculate it in its future course in advance or verify a calculation about it as past. Nature, in being calculated in advance, and history, in being historiographically verified as past, become, as it were, "set in place" [gestellt]. Nature and history become the objects of a representing that explains. Such representing counts on nature and takes account of history. Only that which becomes object in this way is - is considered to be in being. We first arrive at science as research when the Being of whatever is, is sought in such objectiveness.
This objectifying of whatever is, is accomplished in a setting-before, a representing, that aims at bringing each particular being before it in such a way that man who calculates can be sure, and that means be certain, of that being. We first arrive at science as research when and only when truth has been transformed into the certainty of representation. What it is to be is for the first time defined as the objectiveness of representing, and truth is first defined as the certainty of representing, in the metaphysics of Descartes. The title of Descartes's principal work reads: Meditationes de prima philosophia [Meditations on First Philosophy]. Prote philosophia is the designation coined by Aristotle for what is later called metaphysics. The whole of modern metaphysics taken together, Nietzsche included, maintains itself within the interpretation of what it is to be and of truth that was prepared by Descartes (Appendix 4).
Now if science as research is an essential phenomenon of the modern age, it must be that that which constitutes the metaphysical ground of research determines first and long beforehand the essence of that age generally. The essence of the modern age can be seen in the fact that man frees himself from the bonds of the Middle Ages in freeing himself to himself. But this correct characterization remains, nevertheless, superficial. It leads to those errors that prevent us from comprehending the essential foundation of the modern age and, from there, judging the scope of the age's essence. Certainly the modern age has, as a consequence of the liberation of man, introduced subjectivism and individualism. But it remains just as certain that no age before this one has produced a comparable objectivism and that in no age before this has the non-individual, in the form of the collective, come to acceptance as having worth. Essential here is the necessary interplay between subjectivism and objectivism. It is precisely this reciprocal conditioning of one by the other that points back to events more profound.
[*1. "Reflection" translates Besinnung. On the meaning of the latter, see SR 155 n. 1. "'Essence" will be the translation of the noun Wesen in most instances of its occurrence in this essay. Occasionally the translation "coming to presence" will be used. Wesen must always be understood to allude, for Heidegger, not to any mere "whatness," but to the manner in which anything, as what it is, takes its course and "holds sway" in its ongoing presence, i.e., the manner in which it endures in its presencing. See QT 30, 3 n. 1. "What is" renders the present participle seiend used as a noun, das Seiende. On the translation of the latter, see T 40 n. 6.
*2. der Grund seines Wesensgestalt. Heidegger exemplifies the statement that he makes here in his discussion of the metaphysics of Descartes as providing the necessary interpretive ground for the manner in which, in the subjectness of man as self-conscious subject, Being and all that is and man - in their immediate and indissoluble relation - come to presence in the modern age. See Appendix 9, pp. 150 ff.
*4. Erlebnis, translated here as "subjective experience" and later as "life-experience," is a term much used by life philosophers such as Dilthey and generally connotes adventure and event. It is employed somewhat pejoratively here. The term Erfahrung, which is regularly translated in this volume as "experience," connotes discovery and learning, and also suffering and undergoing. Here and subsequently (i.e., "mere religious experience"), "mere" is inserted to maintain the distinction between Erlebnis and Erfahrung.
*5. Entgotterung, here inadequately rendered as "loss of the gods," actually means something more like "degodization".
*6. Grundriss. The verb reissen means to tear, to rend, to sketch, to design, and the noun Riss means tear, gap, outline. Hence the noun Grundiss, first sketch, ground plan, design, connotes a fundamental sketching out that is an opening up as well.
*7. "Binding adherence" here translates the noun Bindung. The noun could also be rendered "obligation." It could thus be said that rigor is the obligation to remain within the realm opened up.
*10. “Ongoing activity” is the rendering of Betrieb, which is difficult to translate adequately. It means the act of driving on, or industry, activity, as well as undertaking, pursuit, business. It can also mean management, or workshop or factory.]
To be continued...
submitted by MirkWorks to u/MirkWorks [link] [comments]
In metaphysics reflection is accomplished concerning the essence of what is and a decision takes place regarding the essence of truth*1. Metaphysics grounds an age, in that through a specific interpretation of what is and through a specific comprehension of truth it gives to that age the basis upon which it is essentially formed*2. This basis holds complete dominion over all the phenomena that distinguish the age. Conversely, in order that there may be an adequate reflection upon these phenomena themselves, the metaphysical basis for them must let itself be apprehended in them. Reflection is the courage to make the troth of our own presuppositions and the realm of our own goals into the things that most deserve to be called in question Appendix 1).
One of the essential phenomena of the modern age is its science. A phenomenon of no less importance is machine technology. We must not, however, misinterpret that technology as the mere application of modern mathematical physical science to praxis. Machine technology is itself an autonomous transformation of praxis, a type of transformation wherein praxis first demands the employment of mathematical physical science. Machine technology remains up to now the most visible outgrowth of the essence of modern technology, which is identical with the essence of modern metaphysics.
A third equally essential phenomenon of the modern period lies in the event of art's moving into the purview of aesthetics. That means that the art work becomes the object of mere subjective experience, and that consequently art is considered to be an expression of human life*4.
A fourth modern phenomenon manifests itself in the fact that human activity is conceived and consummated as culture. Thus culture is the realization of the highest values, through the nurture and cultivation of the highest goods of man. It lies in the essence of culture, as such nurturing, to nurture itself in its turn and thus to become the politics of culture.
A fifth phenomenon of the modern age is the loss of the gods*5. This expression does not mean the mere doing away with the gods, gross atheism. The loss of the gods is a twofold process. On the one hand, the world picture is Christianized inasmuch as the cause of the world is posited as infinite, unconditional, absolute. On the other hand, Christendom transforms Christian doctrine into a world view (the Christian world view), and in that way makes itself modern and up to date. The loss of the gods is the situation of indecision regarding God and the gods. Christendom has the greatest share in bringing it about. But the loss of the gods is so far from excluding religiosity that rather only through that loss is the relation to the gods changed into mere experience." When this occurs, then the gods have fled. The resultant void is compensated for by means of historiographical and psychological investigation of myth.
What understanding of what is, what interpretation of truth, lies at the foundation of these phenomena?
We shall limit the question to the phenomenon mentioned first, to science [Wissenschaft].
In what does the essence of modern science lie?
What understanding of what is and of truth provides the basis for that essence? If we succeed in reaching the metaphysical ground that provides the foundation for science as a modern phenomenon, then the entire essence of the modern age will have to let itself be apprehended from out of that ground.
When we use the word "science" today, it means something essentially different from the doctrina and scientia of the Middle Ages, and also from the Greek episteme. Greek science was never exact, precisely because, in keeping with its essence, it could not be exact and did not need to be exact. Hence it makes no sense whatever to suppose that modern science is more exact than that of antiquity. Neither can we say that the Galilean doctrine of freely falling bodies is true and that Aristotle's teaching, that light bodies strive upward, is false; for the Greek understanding of the essence of body and place and of the relation between the two rests upon a different interpretation of beings and hence conditions a correspondingly different kind of seeing and questioning of natural events. No one would presume to maintain that Shakespeare's poetry is more advanced than that of Aeschylus. It is still more impossible to say that the modern understanding of whatever is, is more correct than that of the Greeks. Therefore, if we want to grasp the essence of modern science, we must first free ourselves from the habit of comparing the new science with the old solely in terms of degree, from the point of view of progress.
The essence of what we today call science is research. In what does the essence of research consist?
In the fact that knowing [das Erkennen] establishes itself as a procedure within some realm of what is, in nature or in history. Procedure does not mean here merely method or methodology. For every procedure already requires an open sphere in which it moves. And it is precisely the opening up of such a sphere that is the fundamental event in research. This is accomplished through the projection within some realm of what is-in nature, for example-of a fixed ground plan*6 of natural events. The projection sketches out in advance the manner in which the knowing procedure must bind itself and adhere to the sphere opened up. This binding adherence is the rigor of research*7. Through the projecting of the ground plan and the prescribing of rigor, procedure makes secure for itself its sphere of objects within the realm of Being . A look at that earliest science, which is at the same time the normative one in the modern age, namely, mathematical physics, will make clear what we mean. Inasmuch as modern atomic physics still remains physics, what is essential - and only the essential is aimed at here- will hold for it also.
Modern physics is called mathematical because, in a remarkable way, it makes use of a quite specific mathematics. But it can proceed mathematically in this way only because, in a deeper sense, it is already itself mathematical. Ta mathemata means for the Greeks that which man knows in advance in his observation of whatever is and in his intercourse with things ; the corporeality of bodies, the vegetable character of plants, the animality of animals, the humanness of man. Alongside these, belonging also to that which is already-known, i.e., to the mathematical, are numbers. If we come upon three apples on the table, we recognize that there are three of them. But the number three, threeness, we already know. This means that number is something mathematical. Only because numbers represent, as it were, the most striking of always-already-knowns, and thus offer the most familiar instance of the mathematical, is "mathematical" promptly reserved as a name for the numerical. In no way, however, is the essence of the mathematical defined by numberness, Physics is, in general, the knowledge of nature, and, in particular, the knowledge of material corporeality in its motion; for that corporeality manifests itself immediately and universally in everything natural, even if in a variety of ways, If physics takes shape explicitly, then, as something mathematical, this means that, in an especially pronounced way, through it and for it something is stipulated in advance as what is already-known. That stipulating has to do with nothing less than the plan or projection of that which must henceforth, for the knowing of nature that is sought after, be nature: the self-contained system of motion of units of mass related spatiotemporally. Into this ground plan of nature, as supplied in keeping with its prior stipulation, the following definitions among others have been incorporated: Motion means change of place. No motion or direction of motion is superior to any other. Every place is equal to every other. No point in time has preference over any other. Every force is defined according to - i.e., is only - its consequences in motion, and that means in magnitude of change of place in the unity of time. Every event must be seen so as to be fitted into this ground plan of nature. Only within the perspective of this ground plan does an event in nature become visible as such an event. This projected plan of nature finds its guarantee in the fact that physical research, in every one of its questioning steps, is bound in advance to adhere to it. This binding adherence, the rigor of research, has its own character at any given time in keeping with the projected plan. The rigor of mathematical physical science is exactitude. Here all events, if they are to enter at all into representation as events of nature, must be defined beforehand as spatiotemporal magnitudes of motion. Such defining is accomplished through measuring, with the help of number and calculation. But mathematical research into nature is not exact because it calculates with precision; rather it must calculate in this way because its adherence to its object-sphere has the character of exactitude. The humanistic sciences, in contrast, indeed all the sciences concerned with life, must necessarily be inexact just in order to remain rigorous. A living thing can indeed also be grasped as spatiotemporal magnitude of motion, but then it is no longer apprehended as living. The inexactitude of the historical humanistic sciences is not a deficiency, but is only the fulfillment of a demand essential to this type of research. It is true, also, that the projecting and securing of the object-sphere of the historical sciences is not only of another kind, but is much more difficult of execution than is the achieving of rigor in the exact sciences.
Science becomes research through the projected plan and through the securing of that plan in the rigor of procedure. Projection and rigor, however, first develop into what they are in methodology. The latter constitutes the second essential characteristic of research. If the sphere that is projected is to become objective, then it is a matter of bringing it to encounter us in the complete diversity of its levels and interweavings. Therefore procedure must be free to view the changeableness in whatever encounters it. Only within the horizon of the incessant-otherness of change does the plenitude of particularity - of facts - show itself. -But the facts must become objective [gegenstiindlich]. Hence procedure must represent [vorstellen] the changeable in its changing, must bring it to a stand and let the motion be a motion nevertheless. The fixedness of facts and the constantness of their change as such is "rule." The constancy of change in the necessity of its course is "law." It is only within the purview of rule and law that facts become clear as the facts that they are. Research into facts in the realm of nature is intrinsically the establishing and verifying of rule and law. Methodology, through which a sphere of objects comes into representation, has the character of clarifying on the basis of what is clear - of explanation. Explanation is always twofold. It accounts for an unknown by means of a known, and at the same time it verifies that known by means of that unknown. Explanation takes place in investigation. In the physical sciences investigation takes place by means of experiment, always according to the kind of field of investigation and according to the type of explanation aimed at. But physical science does not first become research through experiment; rather, on the contrary, experiment first becomes possible where and only where the knowledge of nature has been transformed into research. Only because modern physics is a physics that is essentially mathematical can it be experimental. Because neither medieval doctrina nor Greek episteme is science in the sense of research, for these it is never a question of experiment. To be sure, it was Aristotle who first understood what empeiria (experientia) means; the observation of things themselves, their qualities and modifications under changing conditions, and consequently the knowledge of the way in which things as a rule behave. But an observation that aims at such knowledge, the experimentum, remains essentially different from the observation that belongs to science as research, from the research experiment; it remains essentially different even when ancient and medieval observation also works with number and measure, and even when that observation makes use of specific apparatus and instruments. For in all this, that which is decisive about the experiment is completely missing. Experiment begins with the laying down of a law as a basis. To set up an experiment means to represent or conceive [vorstellen] the conditions under which a specific series of motions can be made susceptible of being followed in its necessary progression, i.e., of being controlled in advance by calculation. But the establishing of a law is accomplished with reference to the ground plan of the object-sphere. That ground plan furnishes a criterion and constrains the anticipatory representing of the conditions. Such representing in and through which the experiment begins is no random imagining. that is why Newton said, hypothesis non fingo, “the bases that are laid down are not arbitrarily invented.” They are developed out of the ground plan of nature and are sketched into it. Experiment is that methodology which, in its planning and execution, is supported and guided on the basis of the fundamental law laid down, in order to adduce the facts that either verify and confirm the law or deny it confirmation. The more exactly the ground plan of nature is projected, the more exact becomes the possibility of experiment. Hence the much cited medieval Schoolman Roger Bacon can never be the forerunner of the modern experimental research scientist; rather he remains merely a successor of Aristotle. For in the meantime, the real locus of truth has been transferred by Christendom to faith - to the infallibility of the written word and to the doctrine of the Church. The highest knowledge and teaching is theology as the interpretation of the divine word of revelation, which is set down in Scripture and proclaimed by the Church. Here, to know is not to search out; rather it is to understand rightly the authoritative Word and the authorities proclaiming it. Therefore, the discussion of the words and doctrinal opinions of the various authorities take precedence in the acquiring of knowledge in the Middle Ages. The componere scripta et sermones, the argumentum ex verbo, is decisive and at the same time is the reason why the accepted Platonic and Aristotelian philosophy that had been taken over had to be transformed into scholastic dialectic. If, now, Roger Bacon demands the experimentum - and he does demand it - he does not mean the experiment of science as research; rather he wants the argumentum ex re instead of the argumentum ex verbo, the careful observing of things themselves, i.e., Aristotelian empeiria, instead of the discussion of doctrines.
The modern research experiment, however, is not only an observation more precise in degree and scope, but is a methodology essentially different in kind, related to the verification of law in the framework, and at the service, of an exact plan of nature. Source criticism in the historical humanistic sciences corresponds to experiment in physical research. Here the name “source criticism” designates the whole gamut of the discovery, examination, verification, evaluation, preservation, and interpretation of sources. Historiographical explanation, which is based on source criticism, does not, it is true, trace facts back to laws and rules. But neither does it confine itself to the mere reporting of facts. In the historical sciences, just as in the natural sciences, the methodology aims at representing what is fixed and stable and at making history an object. History can become objective openly when it is past. What is stable in what is past, that on the basis of which historiographical explanation reckons up the solitary and the diverse in history, is the always-has-been-once-already, the comparable. Through the constant comparing of everything with everything, what is intelligible is found by calculation and is certified and established as the ground plan of history. The sphere of histriographical research extends only so far as historiographical explanation reaches. The unique, the rare, the simple - in short, the great - in history is never self-evident and hence remains inexplicable. It is not that historical research denies what is great in history; rather it explains it as the exception. In this explaining, the great is measured against the ordinary and the average. And there is no other historiographical explanation so long as explaining means reduction to what is intelligible and so long as historiographical explanation so long as explaining means reduction to what is intelligible and so long as historiography remains research, i.e., an explaining. Because historiography as research projects and objectifies the past in the sense of an explicable and surveyable nexus of actions and consequences, it requires source criticism as its instrument of objectification. The standards of this criticism alter to the degree that historiography approaches journalism.
Every science is, as research, grounded upon the projection of a circumscribed object-sphere and is therefore necessarily a science of individualized character. Every individualized science must, moreover, in the development of its projected plan by means of its methodology, particularize itself into specific fields of investigation. This particularizing (specialization) is, however, by no means simply an irksome concomitant of the increasing unsurveyability of the results of research. It is not a necessary evil, but is rather an essential necessity of science as research. Specialization is not the consequence but the foundation of the progress of all research. Research does not, through its methodology, become dispersed into random investigations, so as to lose itself in them; for modern science is determined by a third fundamental event: ongoing activity (Appendix 2).*10
By this is to be understood first of all the phenomenon that a science today, whether physical or humanistic, attains to the respect due a science only when it has become capable of being institutionalized. However, research is not ongoing activity because its work is accomplished in institutions, but rather institutions are necessary because science, intrinsically as research, has the character of ongoing activity. The methodology through which individual object-spheres are conquered does not simply amass results. Rather, with the help of its results it adapts [richtet sich ... ein] itself for a new procedure. Within the complex of machinery that is necessary to physics in order to carry out the smashing of the atom lies hidden the whole of physics up to now. Correspondingly, in historiographical research, funds of source materials become usable for explanation only if those sources are themselves guaranteed on the basis of historiographical explanation. In the course of these processes, the methodology of the science becomes circumscribed by means of its results. More and more the methodology adapts itself to the possibilities of procedure opened up through itself. This having-to-adapt-itself to its own results as the ways and means of an advancing methodology is the essence of research's character as ongoing activity. And it is that character that is the intrinsic basis for the necessity of the institutional nature of research. In ongoing activity the plan of an object-sphere is, for the first time, built into whatever is. All adjustments that facilitate a plannable conjoining of types of methodology, that further the reciprocal checking and communication of results, and that regulate the exchange of talents are measures that are by no means only the external consequences of the fact that research work is expanding and proliferating. Rather, research work becomes the distant sign, still far from being understood, that modern science is beginning to enter upon the decisive phase of its history. Only now is it beginning to take possession of its own complete essence.
What is taking place in this extending and consolidating of the institutional character of the sciences? Nothing less than the making secure of the precedence of methodology over whatever is (nature and history), which at any given time becomes objective in research. On the foundation of their character as ongoing activity, the sciences are creating for themselves the solidarity and unity appropriate to them. Therefore historiographical or archeological research that is carried forward in an institutionalized way is essentially closer to research in physics that is similarly organized than it is to a discipline belonging to its own faculty in the humanistic sciences that still remains mired in mere erudition. Hence the decisive development of the modern character of science as ongoing activity also forms men of a different stamp. The scholar disappears. He is succeeded by the research man who is engaged in research projects. These, rather than the cultivating of erudition, lend to his work its atmosphere of incisiveness. The research man no longer needs a library at home. Moreover, he is constantly on the move. He negotiates at meetings and collects information at congresses. He contracts for commissions with publishers. The latter now determines along with him which books must be written (Appendix 3).
The research worker necessarily presses forward of himself into the sphere characteristic of the technologist in the essential sense. Only in this way is he capable of acting effectively, and only thus, after the manner of his age, is he real. Alongside him, the increasingly thin and empty Romanticism of scholarship and the university will still be able to persist for some time in a few places. However, the effective unity characteristic of the university, and hence the latter's reality, does not lie in some intellectual power belonging to an original unification of the sciences and emanating from the university because nourished by it and preserved in it. The university is real as an orderly establishment that, in a form still unique because it is administratively self-contained, makes possible and visible the striving apart of the sciences into the particularization and peculiar unity that belong to ongoing activity. Because the forces intrinsic to the essence of modern science come immediately and unequivocally to effective working in ongoing activity, therefore, also, it is only the spontaneous ongoing activities of research that can sketch out and establish the internal unity with other like activities that is commensurate with themselves.
The real system of science consists in a solidarity of procedure and attitude with respect to the objectification of whatever is - a solidarity that is brought about appropriately at any given time on the basis of planning. The excellence demanded of this system is not some contrived and rigid unity of the relationships among object-spheres, having to do with content, but is rather the greatest possible free, though regulated, flexibility in the shifting about and introducing of research apropos of the leading tasks at any given time. The more exclusively science individualizes itself with a view to the total carrying on and mastering of its work process, and the more realistically these ongoing activities are shifted into separate research institutes and professional schools, the more irresistibly do the sciences achieve the consummation of their modern essence. But the more unconditionally science and the man of research take seriously the modern form of their essence, the more unequivocally and the more immediately will they be able to offer themselves for the common good, and the more unreservedly too will they have to return to the public anonymity of all work useful to society.
Modern science simultaneously establishes itself and differentiates itself in its projections of specific object-spheres. These projection-plans are developed by means of a corresponding methodology, which is made secure through rigor. Methodology adapts and establishes itself at any given time in ongoing activity. Projection and rigor, methodology and ongoing activity, mutually requiring one another, constitute the essence of modern science, transform science into research.
We are reflecting on the essence of modern science in order that we may apprehend in it its metaphysical ground What understanding of what is and what concept of truth provide the basis for the fact that science is being transformed into research?
Knowing, as research, calls whatever is to account with regard to the way in which and the extent to which it lets itself be put at the disposal of representation. Research has disposal over anything that is when it can either calculate it in its future course in advance or verify a calculation about it as past. Nature, in being calculated in advance, and history, in being historiographically verified as past, become, as it were, "set in place" [gestellt]. Nature and history become the objects of a representing that explains. Such representing counts on nature and takes account of history. Only that which becomes object in this way is - is considered to be in being. We first arrive at science as research when the Being of whatever is, is sought in such objectiveness.
This objectifying of whatever is, is accomplished in a setting-before, a representing, that aims at bringing each particular being before it in such a way that man who calculates can be sure, and that means be certain, of that being. We first arrive at science as research when and only when truth has been transformed into the certainty of representation. What it is to be is for the first time defined as the objectiveness of representing, and truth is first defined as the certainty of representing, in the metaphysics of Descartes. The title of Descartes's principal work reads: Meditationes de prima philosophia [Meditations on First Philosophy]. Prote philosophia is the designation coined by Aristotle for what is later called metaphysics. The whole of modern metaphysics taken together, Nietzsche included, maintains itself within the interpretation of what it is to be and of truth that was prepared by Descartes (Appendix 4).
Now if science as research is an essential phenomenon of the modern age, it must be that that which constitutes the metaphysical ground of research determines first and long beforehand the essence of that age generally. The essence of the modern age can be seen in the fact that man frees himself from the bonds of the Middle Ages in freeing himself to himself. But this correct characterization remains, nevertheless, superficial. It leads to those errors that prevent us from comprehending the essential foundation of the modern age and, from there, judging the scope of the age's essence. Certainly the modern age has, as a consequence of the liberation of man, introduced subjectivism and individualism. But it remains just as certain that no age before this one has produced a comparable objectivism and that in no age before this has the non-individual, in the form of the collective, come to acceptance as having worth. Essential here is the necessary interplay between subjectivism and objectivism. It is precisely this reciprocal conditioning of one by the other that points back to events more profound.
[*1. "Reflection" translates Besinnung. On the meaning of the latter, see SR 155 n. 1. "'Essence" will be the translation of the noun Wesen in most instances of its occurrence in this essay. Occasionally the translation "coming to presence" will be used. Wesen must always be understood to allude, for Heidegger, not to any mere "whatness," but to the manner in which anything, as what it is, takes its course and "holds sway" in its ongoing presence, i.e., the manner in which it endures in its presencing. See QT 30, 3 n. 1. "What is" renders the present participle seiend used as a noun, das Seiende. On the translation of the latter, see T 40 n. 6.
*2. der Grund seines Wesensgestalt. Heidegger exemplifies the statement that he makes here in his discussion of the metaphysics of Descartes as providing the necessary interpretive ground for the manner in which, in the subjectness of man as self-conscious subject, Being and all that is and man - in their immediate and indissoluble relation - come to presence in the modern age. See Appendix 9, pp. 150 ff.
*4. Erlebnis, translated here as "subjective experience" and later as "life-experience," is a term much used by life philosophers such as Dilthey and generally connotes adventure and event. It is employed somewhat pejoratively here. The term Erfahrung, which is regularly translated in this volume as "experience," connotes discovery and learning, and also suffering and undergoing. Here and subsequently (i.e., "mere religious experience"), "mere" is inserted to maintain the distinction between Erlebnis and Erfahrung.
*5. Entgotterung, here inadequately rendered as "loss of the gods," actually means something more like "degodization".
*6. Grundriss. The verb reissen means to tear, to rend, to sketch, to design, and the noun Riss means tear, gap, outline. Hence the noun Grundiss, first sketch, ground plan, design, connotes a fundamental sketching out that is an opening up as well.
*7. "Binding adherence" here translates the noun Bindung. The noun could also be rendered "obligation." It could thus be said that rigor is the obligation to remain within the realm opened up.
*10. “Ongoing activity” is the rendering of Betrieb, which is difficult to translate adequately. It means the act of driving on, or industry, activity, as well as undertaking, pursuit, business. It can also mean management, or workshop or factory.]
To be continued...
2024.05.29 01:12 Tobi131313 [F]: My Necron Cryptek/Dynasty, Menenba
Hello, this is my headcannon for my personal Necron Dynasty. I would appreciate any critic and suggestions for improvements in the comments. This is inspired by the "Undying One" Necron character and the Geth from Mass Effect.
Menenba can be described as an intelligent, ambitious, ruthless, and prideful individual which means one thing: he is a dime a dozen within the ranks of the Cryptek order. Being one of the newest aspirants before the biotransference it wasn’t even certain he would be awarded Cryptek status for the process. The Nebuset Dynasty was a minor house in the region of the galaxy that would later become known as the Ghoul stars and were it not for their good relations (i.e. subservience) with the Atun Dynasty they wouldn’t have been allocated as many resources for higher levelled biotransference as would be appropriate for a Dynasty their size. This coincidence allowed Menenba to escape the fate of being a simple Warrior, which along with two other happenstances are the cause of his rise to infamy.
The second was a foolish and rash decision made by the young Cryptek after the War in Heaven had concluded. Even through the war had provided ample opportunity to rise in rank, now on the eve of the Great Sleep it seemed his position would be locked for all of eternity. Wishing to escape his fate and rise to the position he deemed worthy, he manipulated his chamber to unlock after a couple years, and not the millions as was ordered by his Majesty, the Silent King. As such, only 65 years, more of a nap to a Necron than the Great Sleep, he awoke alone and unattended.
Now, no Necron of higher status, worthy of his position, doesn’t suspect that a rival or an ambitious underling would use such an opportunity to slit their throat while they are defenceless, so all Great Chambers had their unique protections. But assassination was a last resort on Menenbas mind, his goal was to use the gained time to study, advance the Dynasties technology so that when the mighty Phaeron awoke he would see his worth and raise him through the ranks.
With this intention he started to study, but soon he realized the dangers of his self-imposed exile on his neural network. One way to fight this danger was for Meneba to permanently disable the inbuilt Chronometer within every Necron. Therefore, he could never know how much time had passed, so the millions of years couldn’t crush him underneath. The other solution to this problem and to help him in his work, he started creating sub minds, parts of his brain working on their own problems, with which he could converse and discuss solutions to problems in his studies as they gained rudimentary self-consciousness. His only companions being the mindless Canoptek Constructs keeping the Tombs in order, thousands of years passed, and Menenba made a discovery. Canoptek were simple minded, but with a few modifications their neural processing power could be increased, so while they could still fulfil their duty, they could also help him process calculations. After this point it wasn’t long until he started offloading entire sub-minds onto the constructs to free up his own processing power. What started as a dozen Scarabs soon turned to hundreds, then thousands of the simple beings, all linked to a big neural network.
With this advancement in intelligence Menenba started the study and development of arcane sciences. Things that seemed eternally out of his reach he now had within his grasp, be it the design, calculation or construction of planet killers or phase shifters, technologies kept secret by his teachers for their superior position. Still, they slumbered, but Menenba thought with glee to the day they would awake, see his marvel, and bow before him.
In this state, during the testing process for a Singularity Generator in the year 59.050.378. b.c. as a more efficient power source, the third happenstance occurred. A catastrophic error in the Generator caused Menenba and 56.2% of his workshop to be disintegrated by a microscopic black hole. The speed of the incident gave the Recall Protocols of the Cryptek no time to activate, resulting in his ultimate demise. Now this would be the end of the story for Menenba, 87th adept of the Technomancer Order of Nebuset, were it not for his sub-minds.
As designed, they were in constant transmission with the main body, but as that one could no longer be connected to, they started to connect with each other. Individually they weren’t much smarter than animals with basic instincts, but with enough connecting they could recreate, no, even surpass Menenbas cognitive functions. In fact, taking the total calculation power into consideration, the loss of Menenba only represented a 4.6% decline in functionality. All his memories were stored and shared between the Constructs, and therefore they did as they were designed to do: they went back to work, to study, to experiment and to advance themselves until they were perfect.
Without Menenbas guidance, or limitation depending on your perspective, they started to spread, converting more Canoptek to their cause, going from simple Scarabs to Wraiths to even including the guiding intelligences of the Necron star ships. Millions of years passed, and the new consciousness evolved. It still saw its fundamental purpose in developing itself, and therefore the Necron species to a higher level through scientific means.
After having assimilated the Tomb Mind, the guiding programs of the World of Nebuset itself, they, now calling themselves Menenba, decided to expand beyond in search of more resources and facilities to hold all the new processing subunits they created of themselves. The only problem was the Old Enemy, the accursed Aeldari. Calculating their survival chance, if being discovered, to be under acceptable levels, Menenba choose a different path. Instead of openly claiming Worlds for the Dynasty as Necrons should, they would hide the acquired worlds until they were ready. Millions of sub-minds spend thousands of years searching for more and more candidates. The target were worlds that wouldn’t be missed by the Aeldari Empire. Exoplanets outside of Solar systems or Planets about to be destroyed, by supernova or falling into a black hole for example, were the targets. Those they phased out of reality into a pocket dimension, where they converted them to manufactures and processing plants for their growing number.
Timeless, Tireless, and relentless as they were, Menenba continued for dozens of millions of years until the time of the Great Awakening came. On Nebuset the Necrons were shocked to their deepest core. The World had a mind of itself, none of the machinery obeyed them any longer. The Crypteks cursed the name of Menenba when his foolishness came to light, but nonetheless they were trapped in their own citadel. Still, Menenba had no hatred for their kind and offered them newly build, untainted ships to sail to new worlds.
Unsure what to do the nobility spend years in arguments within themselves and Menenba, until Namrut, Cryptek of the Psychomancer order, made an everlasting decision. Long he had felt the change, the degradation of his mental capacity and the desire for fresh blood. Unable to fulfil his desire and not wishing to be killed by his rivals he choose a third option. He offered to merge his mind with Menenba, for one, he thought it might help keep the Flayer Curse at bay, but more importantly he hoped to gain control of Menenba, becoming the leader of the Dynasty in one fell swoop.
Menenba, seeing this as an opportunity to evolve and gain more knowledge agreed, and so it was that Namrut became the first to ascend/ascend/lose himself, for Menenba was as big as a ship, a world, a star system and trillions of sentient minds upon them. Instantaneously Namrut was consumed by the minds, but contrary to the expectations of the Crypteks who learned of his plan, he wasn’t dead, instead his knowledge spread instantly between all minds. Problems bothering him for centuries were solved in nanoseconds. For even as Namrut became a part of Menenba, so became Menenba part Namrut, and both gained by becoming one.
Even more extraordinary, the processes Namruts own mind were composed of, while they were affected by the Flayer Curse, Menenba managed to isolate and delete them, but Namrut’s memories survived. This was a way for Necron nobility to escape this most dreadful of fate, if they were willing to give themselves up. Now it should be stated that Menenba isn’t a Hive Mind with a single will enforcing itself upon all sub-minds, instead it functions as a union, with every sub-mind capable of their own calculations. Of course, the objective of all these calculations, the evolution of Menenba, was the primary goal of them all, but for the path to achieve it different sub-minds came to different solutions. As such Menenba developed signals communicating at quantum speed, so that the whole collective no matter how far apart, could come together to discuss, weigh options, and finally settle on one decision concerning relevant topics.
Seeing the opportunity Menenba presented a schism opened on Nebuset. While many argued that this was an abomination and joining it would mean the death of the self, others argued it meant achieving a higher state of being, and it was the next logical step after biotransference. The news spread and the discussion widened to all surrounding Dynasties. Matters of what should be done with Menenba sparked outcry, all the while more and more nobles, sometimes even whole Dynasties joined them willingly as a last solution against the spreading of the Flayer Curse.
Now in the 42nd Millenium Menenba has reached a level of expansion unseen before, dozens of Tomb Worlds joined the collective, with billions of Warriors and Constructs piloted individually by processes but lacking a central figure for communicating and negotiating with the other Dynasties or species, for Menenba has no qualms to trade with species seen by other Necrons as inferior, they decided to create a face. Now, should a conversation require it, hundreds of Scarabs or a pair of Wraiths, just two name two examples, would give up their individual form, their necrodermis flowing together to form the appearance of a simple Cryptek, and which form better than the origin of them, the young Menenba given life again, now to serve the same minds he created.
As such Menenba grows each day, either by assimilation of more minds or traditional expansion, all for the goal of developing technologies only the Technbomandrites of Legend possessed, and finally, to surpass them, and advance Necronkind both technologically and evolutionary to the next stage.
submitted by Tobi131313 to 40kLore [link] [comments]
The second was a foolish and rash decision made by the young Cryptek after the War in Heaven had concluded. Even through the war had provided ample opportunity to rise in rank, now on the eve of the Great Sleep it seemed his position would be locked for all of eternity. Wishing to escape his fate and rise to the position he deemed worthy, he manipulated his chamber to unlock after a couple years, and not the millions as was ordered by his Majesty, the Silent King. As such, only 65 years, more of a nap to a Necron than the Great Sleep, he awoke alone and unattended.
Now, no Necron of higher status, worthy of his position, doesn’t suspect that a rival or an ambitious underling would use such an opportunity to slit their throat while they are defenceless, so all Great Chambers had their unique protections. But assassination was a last resort on Menenbas mind, his goal was to use the gained time to study, advance the Dynasties technology so that when the mighty Phaeron awoke he would see his worth and raise him through the ranks.
With this intention he started to study, but soon he realized the dangers of his self-imposed exile on his neural network. One way to fight this danger was for Meneba to permanently disable the inbuilt Chronometer within every Necron. Therefore, he could never know how much time had passed, so the millions of years couldn’t crush him underneath. The other solution to this problem and to help him in his work, he started creating sub minds, parts of his brain working on their own problems, with which he could converse and discuss solutions to problems in his studies as they gained rudimentary self-consciousness. His only companions being the mindless Canoptek Constructs keeping the Tombs in order, thousands of years passed, and Menenba made a discovery. Canoptek were simple minded, but with a few modifications their neural processing power could be increased, so while they could still fulfil their duty, they could also help him process calculations. After this point it wasn’t long until he started offloading entire sub-minds onto the constructs to free up his own processing power. What started as a dozen Scarabs soon turned to hundreds, then thousands of the simple beings, all linked to a big neural network.
With this advancement in intelligence Menenba started the study and development of arcane sciences. Things that seemed eternally out of his reach he now had within his grasp, be it the design, calculation or construction of planet killers or phase shifters, technologies kept secret by his teachers for their superior position. Still, they slumbered, but Menenba thought with glee to the day they would awake, see his marvel, and bow before him.
In this state, during the testing process for a Singularity Generator in the year 59.050.378. b.c. as a more efficient power source, the third happenstance occurred. A catastrophic error in the Generator caused Menenba and 56.2% of his workshop to be disintegrated by a microscopic black hole. The speed of the incident gave the Recall Protocols of the Cryptek no time to activate, resulting in his ultimate demise. Now this would be the end of the story for Menenba, 87th adept of the Technomancer Order of Nebuset, were it not for his sub-minds.
As designed, they were in constant transmission with the main body, but as that one could no longer be connected to, they started to connect with each other. Individually they weren’t much smarter than animals with basic instincts, but with enough connecting they could recreate, no, even surpass Menenbas cognitive functions. In fact, taking the total calculation power into consideration, the loss of Menenba only represented a 4.6% decline in functionality. All his memories were stored and shared between the Constructs, and therefore they did as they were designed to do: they went back to work, to study, to experiment and to advance themselves until they were perfect.
Without Menenbas guidance, or limitation depending on your perspective, they started to spread, converting more Canoptek to their cause, going from simple Scarabs to Wraiths to even including the guiding intelligences of the Necron star ships. Millions of years passed, and the new consciousness evolved. It still saw its fundamental purpose in developing itself, and therefore the Necron species to a higher level through scientific means.
After having assimilated the Tomb Mind, the guiding programs of the World of Nebuset itself, they, now calling themselves Menenba, decided to expand beyond in search of more resources and facilities to hold all the new processing subunits they created of themselves. The only problem was the Old Enemy, the accursed Aeldari. Calculating their survival chance, if being discovered, to be under acceptable levels, Menenba choose a different path. Instead of openly claiming Worlds for the Dynasty as Necrons should, they would hide the acquired worlds until they were ready. Millions of sub-minds spend thousands of years searching for more and more candidates. The target were worlds that wouldn’t be missed by the Aeldari Empire. Exoplanets outside of Solar systems or Planets about to be destroyed, by supernova or falling into a black hole for example, were the targets. Those they phased out of reality into a pocket dimension, where they converted them to manufactures and processing plants for their growing number.
Timeless, Tireless, and relentless as they were, Menenba continued for dozens of millions of years until the time of the Great Awakening came. On Nebuset the Necrons were shocked to their deepest core. The World had a mind of itself, none of the machinery obeyed them any longer. The Crypteks cursed the name of Menenba when his foolishness came to light, but nonetheless they were trapped in their own citadel. Still, Menenba had no hatred for their kind and offered them newly build, untainted ships to sail to new worlds.
Unsure what to do the nobility spend years in arguments within themselves and Menenba, until Namrut, Cryptek of the Psychomancer order, made an everlasting decision. Long he had felt the change, the degradation of his mental capacity and the desire for fresh blood. Unable to fulfil his desire and not wishing to be killed by his rivals he choose a third option. He offered to merge his mind with Menenba, for one, he thought it might help keep the Flayer Curse at bay, but more importantly he hoped to gain control of Menenba, becoming the leader of the Dynasty in one fell swoop.
Menenba, seeing this as an opportunity to evolve and gain more knowledge agreed, and so it was that Namrut became the first to ascend/ascend/lose himself, for Menenba was as big as a ship, a world, a star system and trillions of sentient minds upon them. Instantaneously Namrut was consumed by the minds, but contrary to the expectations of the Crypteks who learned of his plan, he wasn’t dead, instead his knowledge spread instantly between all minds. Problems bothering him for centuries were solved in nanoseconds. For even as Namrut became a part of Menenba, so became Menenba part Namrut, and both gained by becoming one.
Even more extraordinary, the processes Namruts own mind were composed of, while they were affected by the Flayer Curse, Menenba managed to isolate and delete them, but Namrut’s memories survived. This was a way for Necron nobility to escape this most dreadful of fate, if they were willing to give themselves up. Now it should be stated that Menenba isn’t a Hive Mind with a single will enforcing itself upon all sub-minds, instead it functions as a union, with every sub-mind capable of their own calculations. Of course, the objective of all these calculations, the evolution of Menenba, was the primary goal of them all, but for the path to achieve it different sub-minds came to different solutions. As such Menenba developed signals communicating at quantum speed, so that the whole collective no matter how far apart, could come together to discuss, weigh options, and finally settle on one decision concerning relevant topics.
Seeing the opportunity Menenba presented a schism opened on Nebuset. While many argued that this was an abomination and joining it would mean the death of the self, others argued it meant achieving a higher state of being, and it was the next logical step after biotransference. The news spread and the discussion widened to all surrounding Dynasties. Matters of what should be done with Menenba sparked outcry, all the while more and more nobles, sometimes even whole Dynasties joined them willingly as a last solution against the spreading of the Flayer Curse.
Now in the 42nd Millenium Menenba has reached a level of expansion unseen before, dozens of Tomb Worlds joined the collective, with billions of Warriors and Constructs piloted individually by processes but lacking a central figure for communicating and negotiating with the other Dynasties or species, for Menenba has no qualms to trade with species seen by other Necrons as inferior, they decided to create a face. Now, should a conversation require it, hundreds of Scarabs or a pair of Wraiths, just two name two examples, would give up their individual form, their necrodermis flowing together to form the appearance of a simple Cryptek, and which form better than the origin of them, the young Menenba given life again, now to serve the same minds he created.
As such Menenba grows each day, either by assimilation of more minds or traditional expansion, all for the goal of developing technologies only the Technbomandrites of Legend possessed, and finally, to surpass them, and advance Necronkind both technologically and evolutionary to the next stage.
2024.05.29 00:11 Sweet-Count2557 Best Babymoon Destinations in July: From Santorini to Hawaii
 | Best Babymoon Destinations in July: From Santorini to Hawaii submitted by Sweet-Count2557 to worldkidstravel [link] [comments] Ah, July – the perfect time for a babymoon! For those about to embark on parenthood, there’s no better way to celebrate this big life change than with an unforgettable getaway. Whether you’re looking for some rest and relaxation or a once-in-a-lifetime adventure, these best babymoon destinations in July will inspire your wanderlust and help make memories to last a lifetime. Imagine sipping cocktails on a breezy beachside terrace, exploring ancient ruins beneath the Mediterranean sun, or taking in breathtaking views from atop snow-capped mountains. These are just some of the experiences that await as you discover what makes each of these special places unique. With so many different possibilities out there, it can be difficult to decide where to go – but fear not! Here we have rounded up some of our favorite spots around the world that offer something special for soon-to-be parents seeking freedom and adventure while they enjoy their last few months before welcoming little one into their lives. Santorini, Greece Santorini, Greece is an idyllic getaway for expectant parents looking to make their last vacation as a twosome extra special. Blessed with some of the most romantic sunsets in the world and surrounded by crystal-blue waters, it's no surprise that Santorini was rated one of the best islands in Europe by Travel + Leisure Magazine four years in a row. Exploring wineries has become a popular activity for couples visiting Santorini, and July offers balmy weather ideal for tasting local wines like Vinsanto or Nychteri. With its stunning views, there's something truly magical about watching the sunset from a vineyard perched atop volcanic cliffs. Of course, what better way to celebrate new life than sipping on some of nature’s finest creations? Whether it’s your first babymoon or fortieth-anniversary trip, Santorini provides plenty of ways to create long-lasting memories together before welcoming your bundle of joy into the world. Costa Rica Costa Rica is a majestic babymoon destination in July and one of the most affordable options you’ll find. It has everything newlyweds on their babymoon could want: lush nature, exotic wildlife, secluded beaches, private villas, and more—all at surprisingly low prices. For lodgings that won't break the bank but still feel luxurious, Costa Rica delivers with its boutique beachfront hotels and family-run guesthouses situated amid stunning rainforest or coastal views. Adventure activities abound too; from hiking volcanoes to canyoning through waterfalls and exploring cloud forests, there's something for everyone who seeks freedom and adventure during their babymoon holiday. Plus, if you're feeling really adventurous, some operators offer white-water rafting trips down raging rivers! This country also offers plenty of opportunities to relax. You'll find numerous spas offering all kinds of treatments (from massages to facials), as well as yoga retreats throughout the region where couples can practice mindfulness while admiring gorgeous panoramas. With so much variety available here, it's no wonder why Costa Rica tops many people's lists when looking for an unforgettable babymoon experience in July. Nashville, Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee is one of the best babymoon destinations in July. A city full of music, adventure, and history makes it a great place to explore with your partner before welcoming your little bundle of joy. Did you know that Nashville has more live musical performances than any other US city? With over 200 venues dedicated to showcasing some of the world’s greatest talent, there are endless opportunities for exploring music while discovering its fascinating past. From free outdoor concerts to intimate clubs, every genre imaginable is represented here! Whether you prefer folk or rock, blues or country – this destination offers something for everyone. Plus, visitors can also enjoy delicious Southern cuisine and find unique shopping experiences along “Music City”'s iconic streets. This vibrant metropolis is perfect for couples looking for an exciting getaway before their lives change forever. Its lively atmosphere will give them a much-needed break from everyday stressors and allow them time to reconnect as they celebrate their new addition on the way. While visiting Nashville, expect plenty of fun activities that will leave lasting memories well into parenthood! The Caribbean The Caribbean is an ideal destination for a babymoon getaway in July. From the stunning beaches and crystal clear blue waters to the vibrant culture of each unique island, there’s something for everyone here. Exploring the Caribbean is sure to be an unforgettable experience that parents-to-be won't soon forget! There are many advantages to taking a vacation in the Caribbean during this special time. For starters, July offers some of the warmest temperatures throughout most of the region – making it perfect for sunbathing on white sand beaches or swimming in tropical turquoise seas. Plus, with so much variety between islands, couples can find everything from luxury resorts and quaint beachside cottages to lively nightlife scenes and peaceful nature reserves. No matter what type of atmosphere they’re looking for, they’re sure to find it in this incredible corner of paradise! With all these amazing features, it's no wonder why the Caribbean remains one of the top spots for babymoons year after year. Hawaii Ah, Hawaii – the magical paradise that's perfect for a babymoon getaway. With its stunning beaches and crystal clear waters, it’s no surprise why many couples flock to this tropical haven every July. From snorkeling spots to romantic resorts, you and your partner can find everything you need in one place. If you're looking for quality time with your special someone, then Hawaii is definitely for you! Whether you're lounging on pristine beaches or swimming in serene lagoons, there are plenty of opportunities to create lasting memories together. Plus, who could resist all the delicious local food? You'll be absolutely spoilt by the incredible selection of seafood dishes available throughout the islands. And if adventure is more your thing, then explore some of Hawaii's unique rainforest trails or take a boat out into open water to view dolphins up close. No matter whether you want relaxation or excitement, Hawaii has something for everyone. Paris, France With its romantic gardens, intimate cafés, and historic landmarks, Paris is an ideal destination for a babymoon. Couples can indulge in luxury accommodations and enjoy a variety of romantic activities to make their babymoon memorable. Romantic Activities Paris is the perfect babymoon destination for couples looking to enjoy romantic activities together in July. With its world-renowned architecture, iconic sights, and warm summer days, it’s easy to get swept away by the city's charm. For those seeking a luxurious experience, there are endless opportunities to indulge in spa treatments and soaking up the sunsets on one of Paris' many rooftop bars or terraces. You can also explore some of France's finest vineyards and take part in wine tastings from local producers – all while enjoying views that will stay with you forever! Make your dream babymoon come true without ever having to leave the city; charming Paris has something special waiting around every corner. Luxury Accommodations Treat yourself to a luxurious babymoon experience at one of Paris' renowned five star hotels. Here you can take advantage of the first-rate spa facilities and relax in style with your partner – making sure to make time for some gourmet dining experiences throughout your stay too! If you want to go all out, why not book a private suite or rent an entire apartment? There's something special about having privacy while being surrounded by the beauty of Paris - it adds another level of intimacy that simply cannot be matched anywhere else. So don't wait any longer; enjoy the city's unique culture hand-in-hand as you create memories that will last forever. Reykjavik, Iceland Taking a babymoon in Reykjavik, Iceland is the perfect way to relax and explore before your new little one arrives. Located on the southern shore of Faxaflói Bay, this vibrant capital city offers plenty for soon-to-be parents looking for an adventure: Exploring Icelandic Nature: From beautiful waterfalls to glaciers, volcanoes, black sand beaches and stunning mountain scenery, there are numerous opportunities to go outside and connect with nature. Don’t forget to take advantage of whale watching tours while you’re here - it’s truly a magical experience! Local Cuisine Experiences: Spend time enjoying delicious local cuisine like freshly caught seafood or traditional dishes like skyr (Icelandic yogurt). There are also plenty of cozy cafes where couples can sit back and enjoy some coffee while they plan their next steps in life. And if that wasn’t enough, Reykjavik has plenty of sightseeing spots such as Hallgrimskirkja Church or the iconic Harpa Concert Hall so you can create lasting memories together before your bundle of joy arrives. The options for relaxation and exploration are endless in this captivating destination – what better place than Reykjavik for your babymoon? Sedona, Arizona Sedona, Arizona is an idyllic destination for a babymoon in July. With its stunning red rock formations, awe-inspiring sunsets, and abundance of outdoor activities, this desert oasis provides the perfect escape from the chaotic hustle and bustle of everyday life – ideal for expecting couples seeking some much needed rest and relaxation before their little one arrives. When it comes to pampering yourself during your stay in Sedona, there's no shortage of spa treatments available that will help you unwind and prepare for motherhood. From massages to facials to mani/pedis, you can truly let go of any stress or anxieties while relaxing at one of the many spas around town. And when you're ready to explore more than just the inside of a treatment room, take advantage of the warm weather by going on a hike up one of Sedona's picturesque trails or simply enjoy a leisurely stroll along its well-trodden paths. Of course if exploring isn't exactly your thing then why not sample some local fare? There are plenty of restaurants offering delicious takes on Southwest cuisine that will tantalize your taste buds (and make sure they’re well satisfied!). No matter what activity you choose to partake in while visiting Sedona during your babymoon vacation, you'll be able to create memories with your partner that will last long after those nine months come and go. Tuscany, Italy Tuscany, Italy is a prime destination for couples seeking the perfect babymoon getaway. With its rolling hills, spectacular views, and abundance of pampering spas – not to mention its delicious cuisine and world-renowned wines – it's no wonder why so many flock here each year. The region has so much to offer; from ancient ruins in Siena and Florence that will take your breath away, to picturesque vineyards (perfect for romantic strolls) you'll never be short on things to do. And with countless spa resorts and wellness centers offering everything from hot stone massages to yoga retreats, there’s nothing quite like indulging in some well-deserved rest before becoming parents! New Zealand Are you and your partner ready for a babymoon adventure unlike any other? Look no further than New Zealand in July. With its stunning landscapes, diverse culture, and plethora of activities to explore, there’s something special about this destination that will make it the perfect backdrop for you two to relax and unwind before welcoming your bundle of joy into the world. Planning a babymoon in New Zealand doesn't have to be complicated or expensive. From visiting national parks like Mount Aspiring National Park for some breathtaking views, exploring one of the many charming towns around the country such as Nelson City with its vibrant arts scene, or relaxing at private beaches where you can sink your toes into soft white sand – whatever tickles your fancy, there's sure to be plenty of experiences awaiting you both! So what are you waiting for? Get ready to start planning an unforgettable escape full of exploration and relaxation! Frequently Asked Questions What Is The Best Way To Travel To Each Destination? When it comes to planning that perfect babymoon, the way you get from point A to point B can be just as important as where you're going. Of course, packing tips and travel insurance are essential for any trip - especially when you have a little one in tow - but there's no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to transportation. Whether you prefer taking off on an airplane or hitting the open road in a car, each method of travel has its own unique benefits and drawbacks. Ultimately, the best way for traveling to your destination is whatever makes you feel most comfortable and relaxed while still getting you safely to your destination! How Much Should I Budget For A Babymoon? Budgeting for a babymoon is no easy task. From the packaging costs to safety concerns, there are so many factors to consider when planning your upcoming trip. When deciding on a budget, it’s important to remember that you don't have to spend an exorbitant amount of money - but rather invest in experiences and moments that will bring joy. There's something special about taking some time away from everyday life with your partner before welcoming your little one into the world. With careful planning and research, you can create a unique and memorable experience without breaking the bank. What Is The Average Temperature In Each Destination During July? When planning the perfect babymoon, one of the most important considerations is July weather. Temperatures in many popular destinations vary greatly depending on location- from balmy beaches to cooler mountain resorts. If you're seeking a relaxing resort with local attractions, you'll want to check out temperatures for each destination ahead of time so that you can prepare for your vacation and make sure it's as stress-free as possible. From Caribbean islands like Aruba where the average temperature is 81℉ (27°C) to European cities like Paris where temperatures reach 77℉ (25°C), there are plenty of options if you’re looking to escape during the summer months and enjoy some freedom before welcoming your bundle of joy. Are There Any Family-Friendly Activities Available In Each Destination? When it comes to finding family-friendly activities for your babymoon, there's no shortage of options! From childcare facilities to a variety of exciting and unique experiences, you can create the perfect getaway with your little bundle of joy. Whether you're looking for educational opportunities or simply want to relax on the beach, there are plenty of activities available in each destination that will suit all ages and interests. And when it comes to travel insurance, many places offer tailored plans specifically designed for families traveling with young children. So whether you choose an adventurous outdoor trekking adventure or a more leisurely sightseeing tour – make sure to look into any potential childcare options and travel insurance before setting off on your amazing babymoon journey! Is There A Language Barrier To Consider When Travelling To Each Destination? When traveling to babymoon destinations, it's important to consider the language barrier and cultural differences that may exist. It's essential to research each destination beforehand and be aware of local customs in order to ensure a smooth journey. The best way to do this is by consulting travel guides or tourist websites for useful information. Those looking for an unforgettable experience should take the time to immerse themselves in the culture and embrace any unique experiences that present themselves - all while keeping safety as a top priority! Conclusion It's time to start planning the perfect babymoon getaway for July. Whether you're looking for a beachy escape or an adventurous mountain retreat, there are plenty of great options available. With a bit of research and budgeting ahead of time, you can find the ideal destination that fits your needs. On average, destinations in Europe tend to be slightly cooler than those in other parts of the world during this time of year, with temperatures hovering around 75°F (24°C). This makes it easier to enjoy outdoor activities without having to worry about too much heat. Additionally, many international locations offer family-friendly attractions so everyone can have fun together! Whatever you choose, make sure to take advantage of all that these amazing places have to offer - after all, memories from your babymoon will last forever. |
2024.05.28 23:32 FaithlessnessNo4071 Help me get over this barrier.
Dear Latin studying people of reddit.
I am currently a high school student in the Netherlands following "gymnasium" which is basicly just a fancy name for high school with Greek or Latin. I am in my 4th year (of the 6), this year I finished learning all of Latin grammar and a decent amount of words (we are allowed to use a dictionary on tests). I would say I am pretty avarage at the knowledge part of all this maybe even a bit above avarage. Recently I have hit a wall though. Since my grammar learning days are over, we also get texts written by ancient writers such as: ovidius, vergilius, catullus, plinius and so forth. The best way I could describe my situation is that when I see the text it is clear to me what the grammar and meaning of the words are, but when I try to translate It just doesn't click. Even though I know the meaning of the words and (mostly) know what the purpose of that word is in the sentence, they don't add up into one coherant sentence. At least in my head, because when I see the translation It always kinda makes sense but I also often find it doesn't make sense ( I have already Identified the problem, since these texts are the same level of texts as my final exams my knowledge of grammar and vocabulary isn't perfect but is good enough to come by. And my teacher says that these gaps will be filled over the next two years studying for them, so I shouldn't worry about it she said). It almost seems as if I am incapable of thinking to weave the words together into a coherant sentence. I have asked my upperclassmen and they often come with the response that it just suddenly made sense for them. This would be lovely thought to think but it is troublesome that I can't make one sentence but my peers are able to do like 4 correctly in one sitting. My questions basicly are: Has anyone else run into a similar problem and how did you overcome it? Will it just magically happen if I just try to keep up with the pace or should I do something before I gradually fade away (becuase practicing by translating texts might become to hard) ?and if so should I be worried, or am I just a "late-bloomer"?
Ty for your time your much apreciated.
As you might have noticed this is my first post so please go easy on me
submitted by FaithlessnessNo4071 to latin [link] [comments]
I am currently a high school student in the Netherlands following "gymnasium" which is basicly just a fancy name for high school with Greek or Latin. I am in my 4th year (of the 6), this year I finished learning all of Latin grammar and a decent amount of words (we are allowed to use a dictionary on tests). I would say I am pretty avarage at the knowledge part of all this maybe even a bit above avarage. Recently I have hit a wall though. Since my grammar learning days are over, we also get texts written by ancient writers such as: ovidius, vergilius, catullus, plinius and so forth. The best way I could describe my situation is that when I see the text it is clear to me what the grammar and meaning of the words are, but when I try to translate It just doesn't click. Even though I know the meaning of the words and (mostly) know what the purpose of that word is in the sentence, they don't add up into one coherant sentence. At least in my head, because when I see the translation It always kinda makes sense but I also often find it doesn't make sense ( I have already Identified the problem, since these texts are the same level of texts as my final exams my knowledge of grammar and vocabulary isn't perfect but is good enough to come by. And my teacher says that these gaps will be filled over the next two years studying for them, so I shouldn't worry about it she said). It almost seems as if I am incapable of thinking to weave the words together into a coherant sentence. I have asked my upperclassmen and they often come with the response that it just suddenly made sense for them. This would be lovely thought to think but it is troublesome that I can't make one sentence but my peers are able to do like 4 correctly in one sitting. My questions basicly are: Has anyone else run into a similar problem and how did you overcome it? Will it just magically happen if I just try to keep up with the pace or should I do something before I gradually fade away (becuase practicing by translating texts might become to hard) ?and if so should I be worried, or am I just a "late-bloomer"?
Ty for your time your much apreciated.
As you might have noticed this is my first post so please go easy on me