Myspace unblocker page

Impractical Jokers: LARRY? LARRY!

2012.01.25 02:37 DeadpoolIsMyHomeboy Impractical Jokers: LARRY? LARRY!

The following subreddit contains posts of graphic stupidity among four lifelong friends who compete to embarrass each other.
[link]

2020.07.23 04:02 shoemilk The writings and ramblings of a shoe full of milk

I feel like it's 2001 again and I'm making a myspace page...
[link]

2010.10.26 10:25 smoke52 Die Antwoord All Over The Interwebs

The Die Antwoord subreddit is an online community dedicated to fans of the South African hip-hop group Die Antwoord. It serves as a platform for fans to discuss and share content related to the group, including their music, performances, visuals, and news. The subreddit provides a space for fans to engage in discussions about Die Antwoord's discography, sharing their favorite songs, albums, lyrics, information about upcoming concerts, tours, and other live events.
[link]

2024.06.10 05:05 Physical_Ad6325 My crush just made her tik tok private…

Just venting like…So I sent a friend request to my crush on Facebook and we’ve been friends for a few weeks. I found her TikTok but didn’t use my name and been binge watching her videos, she has LOTS, surprisingly…but she just made it private today but yesterday you could see the content so yeah she just changed it😭ok so why my goofy self go on Facebook and looked at some of her old highlights and accidentally interacted with one of them then I blocked her immediately so once she got the notification she wouldn’t see who it is was from, or at least that’s what I’m hoping was the case. So after a couple hours I unblocked her and sent her another friend request because once you block someone, fb un friends them right, so yeah and were scheduled to work together tomorrow 😭she already teases me so I can only imagine how awkward she’d act if she finds out I’ve been snooping her pages
submitted by Physical_Ad6325 to actuallesbians [link] [comments]

2024.06.09 23:51 MagicThePuff Spell Token Daily - June 9, 2024 (GMT-4) 📖🧙‍♂️🧙🧙‍♀️🔮

Welcome to Spell Token Daily!!!!!! 🔮📖🧙‍♂️🪄💫✨⭐️🌟🌕
(Workaround required for US based IP addresses!! IP/VPN blocking has been activated by the abracadabra team to avoid any SEC backlash!! Forked unblocked links to the abracadabra front end can be found below) ✅
Helpful LINKS and INFORMATION can be found underneath the disclaimer!!! 🐸🦍
Disclaimer:
Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read in this chat with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open chat may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.
Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams. Credit: CryptoCurrency
—> Always DYOR!! (Do Your Own Research) <—
📖🧙‍♂️🪄💫✨⭐️🌟🌕
Promoted blog post —> https://mirror.xyz/0x5744b051845B62D6f5B6Db095cc428bCbBBAc6F9/rpL2QJ1F6Eb7K2Lt5Yy7fnK-Endz6Jr9-7VlYw6jSO8
🔮
FOR SPELLCASTERS IN VPN/IP BLOCKED TERRITORIES - You can try to use a VPN (may have to change VPN location several times before it finds a working IP. Proton VPN is free OR you can try out a community forked IP!
(Will be updating "https://abracadabramoneyunblocked.on-fleek.app/#/" as updates release to keep the Front End working properly!)
It is possible for anyone to fork the abracadabra UI as well!! For more information on forking a UI —> (https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/quickstart/fork-a-repo)
FOR SPELLCASTERS INTERESTED IN BURNING SPELL TOKEN - Send $SPELL to “0x090185f2135308BaD17527004364eBcC2D37e5F6” (Token Contract Address) —> https://etherscan.io/address/0x090185f2135308bad17527004364ebcc2d37e5f6
🔮
Staking: (Check https://wenmerl.in for each “buyback” and “collection”)
Other Staking Methods
(Interest bearing assets can be utilized for loans/leveraging on abracadabra.money, or utilized using different protocols.)
KEEP IN MIND!! $MIM has an intrinsic value of $1 no matter what the market prices it thanks to the collateral backing it. Interest rates CAN BE increased to incentivize repayments until the $1 (or in this case 1 USDT) parity is reached in the main pool!!
HELPFUL LINKS:
https://app.camelot.exchange/
https://swap.defillama.com/
https://curve.fi/
submitted by MagicThePuff to SpellToken [link] [comments]

2024.06.09 09:32 Active_Whereas8035 My 31F ex 31F seems to enjoy hurting me even after we are no longer together. Am I looking into it too much?

My ex Sarah, initiated a breakup because I was too physically ill for her to want to take care of me. Long story short but she gave me a rare STD from a past partner that caused permanent damage to my body. I knew it was her because I had only ever had two sex partners my entire life and my other partner had tested negative for that rare STD. Before doctors could find out what was wrong with me, I developed severe and sudden onset symptoms including frequent vomiting and nausea, severe weight loss, and limping as my legs no longer worked properly. It bothered her that we couldn't party and do all the things she wanted to do. Also, Sarah transitioned from male to female in the middle of our relationship and I welcomed it with open arms because I loved her. I went to clubs with her even though I was disabled and tried to make sure she felt loved and supported as much as possible.
Sarah however, would never return the favor. She would often become cold and distant when I was sick and once even left me on the cold floor of a hotel covered in my own vomit and urine. I begged her to call an ambulance and she turned around and pretended to sleep. When I was finally able to get the strength to get off the ground 7 hours later, I called myself an Uber to the hospital. It turned out that I had a stomach blockage. When I confronted her about this she said she didn't believe that I was ever sick because she "had an ex who lied about having cancer". I showed her official paperwork of multiple diagnoses as a result of this STD. She apologized, told me she believed me, but even then still treated me as though I was still an inconvenience. I felt so embarrassed every time she wanted to go out and party, and I could barely even walk.
There were many instances of verbal abuse as well, often in public places. For example, we went out on a date at a bar once. I had let her know that due to a family emergency, I might take out my phone a few times. The second I take my phone out, she bashed the table, tossed the chair, left a $100 bill on the table and walked out even before the food even came. I was so humiliated and other people asked if I was okay. She apologized after, but that is just one of many instances of this kind of behavior. I am not a perfect human by any means but when I tell you not ONCE did I ever raise my voice at her in the entire relationship... I have a very big fear of confrontation so the way she responded to things caused me to develop panic disorder and symptoms of schizophrenia. I was hospitalized 42 times in one year usually with a BPM over 150 and was admitted to a psych ward. Keep in mind, before I met her I had no prior mental health history. I had a stable job, a healthy body and was never on mental health medications. My only prior relationship of 5 years was also stable and loving but my partner moved across the country so we chose to end things.
The underlying issue was that Sarah was on a cocktail of medications, Antidepressants, anxiety medication, ADHD medication and another drug for mental health which I can't recall. Because of her ADHD, she would sometimes forget to pick up her medications. At the same time, she was experimenting with different medications and dosages (under doctor supervision). This meant she was always on a different combination of psychiatric medications throughout out relationship. Her mood was really unpredictable and I never knew when she would snap. For example, we had just went to ikea that day and everything was great. We had a fun time installing curtains in her new apartment. I would sometimes suffer from really bad brain fog from the antibiotics and panic attack meds I was always on. Well apparently I didn't realize I made a face after she asked me to pass her something, which caused her to yell "Stop making that stupid fucking face I cant stand it". Then she proceeded to mock me...
She would also go through my phone behind my back, accusing me of cheating when I would never do such a thing and there was nothing to even possibly HINT at the thought. She said she did this because her "exes all cheated". Even though she would always go to gay bars alone wearing nothing but lingerie. And I never bothered her once about it. I didn't want to interfere with her freedom of expression. She was finding her new identity (transitioning from male to female)
After 4 long years she broke up with me in public after I coincidentally bumped into her at a bar when our mutual friend and I went out for drinks. Sarah was talking to other girls but I was just so happy to see her and ran to give her a hug. But she seemed upset that I had ruined her day. She went on a rant for 20 minutes about how she can't stand me always being sick and said she fell out of love with me a few months back but didn't want to tell me. She told me soulmates don't exist (I never said they did), how I am "not special" (never said I was) and she could "find someone tonight if she wanted to".
The panic attack I had from her yelling at me so much in public was so bad that I started puking blood. I was taken by ambulance to the hospital and after she never checked up on me. Instead I woke up in the hospital the next day to see that she started following hundreds of plus sized porn stars and sharing their posts. After causing me to drop to 91 lbs at 5'8".
After that I blocked her on all social medias. I had also blocked her number. One day about 6 months after the breakup I received a voicemail from her from another number. She said it was an emergency and was crying so I called her back. She told me how her hamster died because she forgot to feed her and was crying and blaming her ADHD saying she basically forgot the hamster existed. This turned into a long conversation about her apologizing, her feeling lonely because no one wants to date her. She moved across the country and I made it very clear, I had not even the slightest interest in getting back with her.
She said she cared about me as a friend and missed the friendship we had. I agreed to remain friends but only unblocked her on Instagram. She then started sharing with me intimate details of her sex life with strangers and other people she would meet at bars. It seemed like every conversation would turn into her sending me memes about sucking off trans girls and trans penises. Then she would tell me how she was good at sucking dick and would only top people. Then it progressed into telling me how trans girls anuses felt better than vaginas and that was really the last straw for me. I had told her numerous times this made me uncomfortable. She said she was just sharing information that she shares with all her female friends and made me seem unreasonable for not wanting to discuss her sex life. Especially when she knew I was dealing with a death in the family at the same time. And I'm not just a female friend, I pictured myself at one point spending my life with her. Why do I want to picture her sucking dick and what her partner's penises look like?
I make it clear that she has a very bad issue with respecting boundaries and I block her instagram. About 3 weeks later, she makes a new account with the same picture and almost the same name. She likes my posts and all my stories. I go to the page to check the account because I was confused as I thought I blocked her already. As soon as she liked my posts with this alt account, she uploads photos of her making out with other people and talks about how good dick is. Was this behavior intentional or am I just looking too hard into things? I just can't understand what I did to deserve any of this...
submitted by Active_Whereas8035 to relationship_advice [link] [comments]

2024.06.09 02:33 RollFlimsy283 Rookie receiver has an interesting name…

Rookie receiver has an interesting name… submitted by RollFlimsy283 to RetroBowl [link] [comments]

2024.06.08 20:20 Sharp-Put4724 Holly vs. Kendra: A lead-up to the 2015 tweets

Holly vs. Kendra: A lead-up to the 2015 tweets
I won’t be linking to Kendra’s tweets about Holly after her book came out. I think we all know about them and they’re on Google. This is a timeline on the backstory leading up to the 2015 tweets detailing their feud up to that point. Basically, I feel that there has been a long history of covert, subtle bullying from Holly to Kendra.
For starters, look at the book recaps with quotes both Holly and Kendra made toward each other.
Kendra’s book comments about Holly
While Holly and Bridget were aghast calling Kendra’s book ‘lies’, a lot of what they called out as lies were either a matter of interpreting her retelling of events from her perspective, or have some plausibility.
Like her ‘lie’ about not sleeping with Hef before moving in. If you read the excerpt from her book, it’s just a matter of when Kendra officially became a girlfriend after what was essentially a ‘trial run’.
She was still with her boyfriend the night of the party (the same one who sold her sex tape and 'pissed' she left for Hef, so I can see her trying to smooth it over given what happened later) where she was a painted lady, but admits to sleeping with Hef 'a couple of days later' after attending Casablanca night, then a club night, sleeping with Hef on the third date:
On the ride home one of the girls asked me if I wanted to go upstairs into Hefs room with everyone once we got back to the Mansion. In my head I could hear my mom's voice: You know they have orgies up there
Her big 'lie' was to be off by a few days.
Or the idea of Hef asking her to move in the first night without a ‘casting couch’ situation—Playmate and ex-girlfriend Stephanie Heinrich describes a very similar courtship
Holly and Bridget were taken aback at the ‘lie’ that Kendra felt lost at the mansion and wandered around, but in the commentary both things happened—Kendra was overwhelmed and Bridget helped. The retelling doesn’t make it a lie. Or that Kendra said they didn’t re-wear outfits when they did, and Izabella spoke about the pressure to always have new, non-repeat outfits for promotional/press events and Kendra didn’t specify the difference.
Any comments about Holly in ‘Sliding into Home’ basically boil down to ‘we weren’t close at first, her focus was Hef, our interests were different, but we grew closer over the course of the show’.
But in her ‘retaliation’ through her book, there are nonstop digs at Kendra, both subtle and explicit. To name just a few: a loudmouth, entitled, lazy person who fried her brain with drugs.
Holly’s book comments about Kendra
Seriously, she goes in on Kendra.
During the course of the show, there are some revealing moments in the form of passive-aggressive digs at her over the commentary here and here
And a couple out of so many examples of Holly changing the topic on any Kendra-relates scenes to not have attention on her here and here
This article cites reporting from Page Six about the end being near for GND and that Holly and Kendra are fighting:
“Holly and Bridget hate her,” a friend of Wilkinson told Page Six. “They’re totally jealous. She has her own empire now. She’s got a clothing line, a modeling career and an exercise empire. They’re just sitting there hangin’ with Hef.” The friend expounds, “Kendra was never really Hef’s girlfriend. She was cast for the show [E!’s ‘The Girls Next Door’] because Bridget and Holly are old, and they needed a young hot girl for Hef. She was selected from a bunch of Playmate wannabes.” Madison is 28, Marquardt, 34. Wilkinson celebrated her 21st birthday last year. Wilkinson is said to be eyeing her exit from “The Girls Next Door” and the famed mansion next season. “She’s definitely out,” her friend said. “There are too many rules and Holly and Bridget want her gone. They’re so mean to her.”
Holly responded on her MySpace that the article was a lie, and she and Kendra get along fine with no jealousy, only to make a bunch of digs at her expense:
“The latest Page 6 story is especially dumb. Saying I am jealous of Kendra because she has an "empire" and I'm "just sitting around with Hef"? What "empire"? I guess because I have a real full-time job aside from The Girls Next Door (excuse me for having a brain and having something REAL going on in my life as opposed to following in the footsteps of the socialite-of-the-week) means I am "sitting around" doing nothing. I guess having people announce clothing lines and workout products that never come to fruition means you are doing something.”
https://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/25635091.html
In Kendra’s 2011 book ‘Being Kendra’ she wrote:
Of course I’d had relationship with people like Holly Madison and Bridget Marquardt in the past, but they were really just roommates, not close friends. We shared a boyfriend, we shared the spotlight, but now that I’m a mom we’re all just in different places. I just changed. I think it’s something that just happens naturally when you become a mom. You just grow up. Someone like Holly has a different lifestyle from me. I love her but I don’t know the people she hangs out with—they are more on the party scene, and I’ve put those days behind me. We still talk (she always gave me amazing words of encouragement during Dancing with the Stars and sent me fun little notes) but being a Vegas showgirl and constantly on the prowl for a new boyfriend . . . that’s her world, not mine. When it came to the baby, people like that just weren’t around. I was very alone.
[this 2015 article](RadarOnlinehttps://radaronline.com › photos › h...holly madison kendra wilkinson feud hank baskett ...) goes into their falling out—basically that Holly called Kendra fake, and her husband Hank wanted her to distance herself from Playboy:
"He wanted no ties to anyone from her Playboy lifestyle even though that's how Kendra and Hank got together," the friend claimed.
"A lot of it has to do with the fact that Kendra lacked a father figure," the friend claimed. "She just sought father figures in the relationships that she was in."
I would have expected some empathy from Holly towards Kendra on this one; Holly has admitted to losing herself in relationships trying to please her partners, and she also went through a period where she was trying to distance herself from Playboy completely.
Shaded Kendra in this 2013 interview:
Wilkinson herself has a 3-year-old son, yet the 33-year-old Madison has revealed that she still talks to Bridget Marquardt, but not Wilkinson or Hugh Hefner. Madison explained that: ''Bridget and I are still friends, but I don't talk to anyone else. I moved on from the whole Playboy thing five years ago and really never looked back. I'm not one of those girls who goes back to all the parties and things.''
“I tried to be friends with her. I’ve known about three different Kendra’s since I met her.”
“Here was a rookie who had just gone all the way with an old dude and her only concern was how big her room was going to be”
And finally, the nail in the coffin for the ‘we were never really friends’ tweet. Before, there had been a couple of years of Holly vague-tweeting where a couple of fans asked if she was talking about Kendra (screenshots attached)
In her book, Holly wrote:
The next thing I heard from her was a headline she retweeted: Kendra reveals why she is no longer friends with Holly and Bridget!
The actual tweet is that they ‘no longer talk’, but Holly changed it to the harsher ‘no longer friends’.
And the big, damning quote from Kendra was: "We've all found our own little roads to go and that's just the way it goes,"
According to her book, it was actually Holly that lashed out first and insulted Kendra via text, who then replied ‘we were never friends’
I retweeted her post, saying: Thanks for letting me know, Kendra! Of course I wasn't going to stoop to her level and address this only on social media, so I decided to text her how I truly felt: that she was a coward and that she tried to act like the "real" girl on TV, but she's the fakest person I've ever met -and that if she had a problem with me, she should have confronted me like an adult instead of just going silent. This time Kendra responded and the exchange went something like this: Girl, I don't have a problem with you. I just don't like it when people think we are friends, she texted. Do you even have a clue how rude that sounds, what you just said? I replied. WHO ARE YOU????? I DON'T EVEN KNOW YOU! WE WERE NEVER FRIENDS. IT WAS ALL JUST WORK! she responded in all caps. Wow, I'm sorry I was stupid enough to think we were really friends. Have a nice life, I finally texted. After that, I deleted her number from my phone. Kendra and I haven't spoken since, and I have to say, I don't miss her.
In the screenshots attached, although I can’t source the original tweets, it seems that more than once she was vague-tweeting messages that fans wondered if they were about Kendra; enough for Holly to have to clarify that she has ‘never tweeted anything mean about Kendra’
Finally, in 2013 tweeted about Kendra being ‘on the payroll’, yet again putting her down for making her own way.
—————————————- So for all of this lead-up, a constant, steady stream of covert bullying since the inception of the show, by the time Kendra read about how Holly portrayed her, she’d had enough.
And this is just going off of information that is publicly available.
submitted by Sharp-Put4724 to GirlsNextLevel [link] [comments]

2024.06.08 18:22 Embarrassed-Recipe88 Level 4 preferred blocks

So I’m on level 4 with fantastic rating for about a year now. I have my 3 preferred stations-1 sub Same day and 2 fresh stores, days and time set up. I never receive reserved blocks from these stations. Also in the app there is a glitch that says on my unlocked level 4 benefits page, that in order to get reserved blocks and preferred schedule, I have to unblock level 2! I’ve sent a message to support multiple times to fix this and they keep responding that "We received a request to change a region..." which is completely different from what I'm asking for. Any advice?
submitted by Embarrassed-Recipe88 to AmazonFlexDrivers [link] [comments]

2024.06.07 21:49 Main-Divide8602 Unblocked after 10 months

Never been one to hit up Reddit for thoughts or opinions in regards to relationships but figured I’d float my situation out there just to see what people think
Was in a year long relationship that my ex-gf ended due to long distance. Aside from the distance it was a healthy relationship that was a lot fun and extremely passionate. After calling it quits we made small talk thru text for about a month until one night I randomly received a long goodbye and thank you for everything text that also explained that I was gonna be blocked so that we could both move on w/ our lives. Before I could even respond I was blocked both through my phone and IG.
Last night I was searching for my friend on IG whose name starts w/ the same letter as hers and noticed her name pop up in the search bar. Her profile is private but I was unblocked. Usually people say in this situation the person unblocks you because they’ve moved on but what makes this different is that I have a personal IG profile and a seperate business IG. She only unblocked my personal profile. The business profile is still blocked. I’m not even considering reaching out but found i it interesting that only my personal page is unblocked. Any thoughts?
submitted by Main-Divide8602 to dating [link] [comments]

2024.06.07 21:48 Main-Divide8602 Unblocked after 10 months

Never been one to hit up Reddit for thoughts or opinions in regards to relationships but figured I’d float my situation out there just to see what people think
Was in a year long relationship that my ex-gf ended due to long distance. Aside from the distance it was a healthy relationship that was a lot fun and extremely passionate. After calling it quits we made small talk thru text for about a month until one night I randomly received a long goodbye and thank you for everything text that also explained that I was gonna be blocked so that we could both move on w/ our lives. Before I could even respond I was blocked both through my phone and IG.
Last night I was searching for my friend on IG whose name starts w/ the same letter as hers and noticed her name pop up in the search bar. Her profile is private but I was unblocked. Usually people say in this situation the person unblocks you because they’ve moved on but what makes this different is that I have a personal IG profile and a seperate business IG. She only unblocked my personal profile. The business profile is still blocked. I’m not even considering reaching out but found i it interesting that only my personal page is unblocked. Any thoughts?
submitted by Main-Divide8602 to BreakUps [link] [comments]

2024.06.07 21:47 Main-Divide8602 Unblocked after 10 months

Never been one to hit up Reddit for thoughts or opinions in regards to relationships but figured I’d float my situation out there just to see what people think
Was in a year long relationship that my ex-gf ended due to long distance. Aside from the distance it was a healthy relationship that was a lot fun and extremely passionate. After calling it quits we made small talk thru text for about a month until one night I randomly received a long goodbye and thank you for everything text that also explained that I was gonna be blocked so that we could both move on w/ our lives. Before I could even respond I was blocked both through my phone and IG.
Last night I was searching for my friend on IG whose name starts w/ the same letter as hers and noticed her name pop up in the search bar. Her profile is private but I was unblocked. Usually people say in this situation the person unblocks you because they’ve moved on but what makes this different is that I have a personal IG profile and a seperate business IG. She only unblocked my personal profile. The business profile is still blocked. I’m not even considering reaching out but found i it interesting that only my personal page is unblocked. Any thoughts?
submitted by Main-Divide8602 to ExNoContact [link] [comments]

2024.06.07 06:38 321AppleJuice It’s my fault

She broke up with me back in March and I have no one to blame but myself, I can’t pull the usual “fuck my ex” or “I don’t need them anyway” card because the break up was truly my fault, I was a terrible boyfriend but now it’s too late for me to come to this realization since it’s over already, I can’t stop thinking about her, I deleted our pics, removed her on social media, deleted her number, everything you usually do after a break up but it’s not helping because I keep going back to the same thought, that it was all my fault.
she broke up with me because I wouldn’t show her any affection, at first I was confused until she further explained it and I was like “fuck she’s right” I promised her that I would do better but she wasn’t trying to hear it, she already made up her mind and I honestly can’t blame her. I don’t think I’ll ever find anyone like her again, she was sweet, funny, open to learning about my hobbies and what I like to do for fun, she was perfect, and I basically took her for granted.
I broke no contact after about 3 weeks and she immediately shut me down, she told me to let her go, and ever since then I’ve been trying to let go but it’s so hard, I stay awake late at night thinking “what if I was just a better fucking boyfriend” all the memories of the relationship fly through my mind and I’m just like “you should’ve done better”. I’ve tried blocking her but I can only go about a day until I unblock her and look at her page again, and that does me no favors, she gained a new follower? Must be someone she’s talking to. She posted on her story? Must be a picture of her enjoying life without me.
This is just a terrible feeling knowing that the break up is all your fault and you can’t even bring yourself to blame them for breaking up with you, because if I was her…I would’ve broken up with me too, the fact that she even dealt with me for a year is a miracle.
submitted by 321AppleJuice to BreakUp [link] [comments]

2024.06.07 06:11 OneHome5064 I got blocked from PW. I was attending chemistry class and suddenly directed to login page, then it says user is blocked, I emailed them 10 times and called them also, they se unblock ho jayega but kab yeh nahi bata sakte...Maine live chat bhi nahi kara thha.. What is going on I don't know, help me.

submitted by OneHome5064 to PhysicsWallah [link] [comments]

2024.06.07 03:54 NoInsurance8663 Combat Damage and Priority

Board State:
I have an unblocked creature that is equipped with Sword Of Hearth and Home, and a Prime Speaker Zegana. As I attempt to respond to the trigger that the sword puts on the stack, my opponent which I am attacking tries to tell me that no player receives priority during the damage faze because of MTG Rule 510.2.
What I would like to do is cast Momentary Blink targeting Prime speaker Zegana in response to the Sword Of Hearth And Home trigger which I have placed targeting some other creature. Even though damage does not use the stack, I'm assuming that combat damage triggers give the active player priority to respond with spells or activated abilities.
Am I correct? Or am I not allowed to cast spells in response to this trigger?
submitted by NoInsurance8663 to askajudge [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 19:46 samdebord She’s outta her mind I swear.

I unblocked her after dark account just to creep bc I was bored lol (I blocked it back.) she’s even more mentally unwell than she was 6 months ago. The recent 3 videos on her page, trying on clothes, she mentions plastic surgery in EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. & let’s not get it twisted, I am not against plastic surgery in anyways, I mean I’m getting implants myself in September and have already had a few other things done. But holy shit she’s obsessed with getting surgery when she’s only had her arms done and to be frank, they look like dog shit. Whoever done that, there’s no way he’s board certified…. Then she says ‘I have to get them cut off so they can be lifted’…. Like no you don’t Jill. Lifting them doesn’t shrink them lmao, she’s just so obsessed with being the smallest thing possible, she’s gonna make herself flat chested just to say she’s ‘smoll’ like whatever surgeon told her ‘your boobs are gonna be cut off so we can lift them’ is on just as many drugs that i swear she’s on. The work on her neck looks like shit too bc it’s left her with a Roblox head. Whoever done that should be ashamed…. But she’s so obsessed with surgery, fillers, botox, I swear she’ll look unrecognizable soon. Jill is sick in the head and needs serious help. No decent surgeon will touch her in the low state pf physical and mental health she is in and that’s why she’s getting shitty work done. Even her lips haven’t even done properly. Anyways. It’s gross her followers sit by and watch her do this and don’t try to help. I don’t like Jill, but I wish I could help her. I really do. I wish I could be someone to be like hey look Jill being skinny isn’t worth killing yourself over…. I also question Brandon. What husband sits by and watches their wife literally fade into nothing. Social media is gross bc it’s encouraging her. She needs to get off it, get actual mental help from true professionals, and work on her self. I don’t even know if she really even sees a therapist bc it would be so easy to lie about bc of HIPPA.
submitted by samdebord to MamaJillSnark [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 18:59 Used-Solution-1167 Account restricted (personal)

A while ago, my 2-year-old Facebook page (I have £50,000 ad spend this year) was closed due to "some late orders". There is no such thing anyway. A few customers may have given negative feedback. It's incredible how they ask customers about this and impose sanctions on me. They can't manage to block all the bots and spam accounts, but they can patronize over me lol...
Later, I requested a review and it was granted. The page was unblocked because there was no such reason. Orders are already completed on time. But this time, my personal account from which I managed my ad accounts and pages was closed. They asked for ID or passport. I sent it to them. But it stuck like that.
https://i.imgur.com/FsJP22d.png
There has been no update for 2 weeks. When I reached the support team, they had no idea about the issue.
They suggested a few ways for me to reach their "internal team", but this is just nonsense.
Most of you already know that the support team is a structure that serves no purpose and just keeps you busy. The people who have real authority and the ability to take action are the "internal team" they mentioned, but you can never reach them or get an answer.
Anyway, has anyone experienced something like this before and their account got locked like this? Should I do anything extra or just wait? It's not super important to me right now, but if anyone knows, I wanted to know.
Because fortunately I have alternatives to this evil structure. Currently, I spend all my advertising expenses through Google and TikTok.
I recommend this to anyone who is experiencing similar problems here or has been affected by the recent ad fluctuations. You are the one investing money, you don't deserve to be treated badly. Always look for alternative advertising platforms for your business. You will definitely find better. Thus, I hope these guys will lose money and lose their market edge.
submitted by Used-Solution-1167 to FacebookAds [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 17:08 RayRayRaisemeup [TOMT] Zine / Flyer for Brazilian christian teenagers in late 2000s ?

hi everyone, I'm been searching for ages that thing I used to read between 2008 - 2010, I grew up in a christian household and it was very common for teenagers read some warning flyers about stuff ( ifykyk ) and that one material got stuck in my brain since that time, I was around seven - nine years old when that happened so I can't remember the whole thing, but I remember some cool details:
I tried to ask my mom and my father but they can't remember a thing about it unfortunately
If someone can help me to find this I will be very happy :D
submitted by RayRayRaisemeup to tipofmytongue [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 16:12 TokumeiNaHito Brighten's (band) drummer Jimmy Richards solo music search

Hello all! 12+ years ago the drummer from the band Brighten had a solo music project that he had uploaded onto myspace. The main song I was obsessed with is called "Oh Medicine".
I would periodically return to that page to listen to the song again over the years. As we all know, myspace botched their migration a few years ago and hundreds of thousands of photos and music files were lost.
"Oh Medicine" seems to be one of them. So, I'm posting in a desperate plea to ask if anyone happened to have downloaded the music file and is able to share it?
For reference, this is the original myspace profile: https://myspace.com/widowss
This is the spotify for the overall band:
https://open.spotify.com/album/7Lvc2xPtElzIgqEhMM0n5A
I tried checking the "lostmyspace" archives and the waybackmachine, but neither had any hits.
At this point I'm just hoping someone has it archived somewhere!
submitted by TokumeiNaHito to Emo [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 08:29 Great_Penalty_6355 Pinole settings for private relay

Please can someone with know how chip in as to what settings I should use for stopping private relay and a smoother page loading on safari?
So far I've seen the following recommendations but I don't know fully which ones are still required and in which form.
  1. Block or Unblock the following addresses?
mask.apple-dns.net
mask-h2.icloud.com
mask.apple-dns.net
gateway.fe.apple-dns.net
mask-api.fe2.apple-dns.net
mask-canary.icloud.com
canary.mask.apple-dns.net
mask-api.fe.apple-dns.net
2) under etc-pihole> pihole-FTL.conf should the following be true or false?
BLOCK_ICLOUD_PR=false
3) under etc-pihole> pihole-FTL.conf should the following be NXDOMAIN or NULL - I read somewhere on Reddit that NXDOMAIN gives better performance/faster loading with it being NXDOMAIN.
BLOCKINGMODE=NXDOMAIN
4) under etc-pinhole> pihole-dnsmasq.d do we need an extra file xx.NXDOMAIN.conf with the following domains or not?
server=/mask.icloud.com/
server=/mask-h2.icloud.com/
server=/mask-api.fe2.apple-dns.net/
server=/gateway.fe.apple-dns.net/
server=/mask-canary.icloud.com/
server=/canary.mask.apple-dns.net/
server=/mask-api.fe.apple-dns.net/
5) private Wi-Fi turned off or on?
6) limit ip tracking turned off or on?
Edited for completeness.
submitted by Great_Penalty_6355 to pihole [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 07:29 CleverKitten87 HTML/CSS/JS in a Team Site/Page

Hello all~
I'm facing a problem that I have been trying to overcome for the last month.
I am working with SharePoint Enterprise 2019 (on-prem) in an isolated environment. Several features appear to be disabled by the system admin. I was given full control of a blank team site in classic mode in order to create modern and classic pages.
Unfortunately, I have no way of making them look nice since I can't edit the master page etc.
Are there any page templates/layouts that will allow me to achieve this through the content editosnippet web app in the classic page? What about with the embed feature in the modern page?
Essentially time, just want to be able to add a banner at the top of the page. Float page name on top of that banner. A nav bar underneath the banner. Simple content in the body of the page. Custom meet the team card so I can add just a profile pic/avatar, name, title, extension, and email. Lastly an alert section where we can put memos in if the systems are down or important updates.
Is this doable? Or are we stuck with shitty pages that look worse than middle schoolers learning to code in MySpace for the first time?
I have some knowledge of html & css, it's been a long time though so rusty. JS very little.
Thank you 😊
submitted by CleverKitten87 to sharepoint [link] [comments]

2024.06.06 00:25 Feakarkenechaeucaski Understanding Adblockers: A long post to debunk the idea of MV3 or Google being able/intending to kill adblockers.

  1. Is MV3 killing Adblockers like people say? while MV3 is more restricted than MV2, it will not kill adblockers.
  2. Is Google killing adblockers? no, there is Adblockplus, Adguard and uBlock MV3 complaint extensions in the store.
  3. Why do people say Google is killing adblockers then? It's based on not understanding how adblockers filters/rules work.
  4. Will I see Youtube ads because Google is going to workaround how adblockers work? Not exactly, Google can't do anything about it, the method used in MV3 is the same way ads are being blocked in MV2, which is by injecting a JavaScript snippets. The only way Google can do anything is if they completely change the way they deliver their ads, for example, embedding them just like Twitch does it.
  5. I heard adblockers can't update lists frequently like they do now because lists are included in the extensions and reviewing extensions take days, is that true? Yes, that's true, but recently google added a Skip review for eligible changes to extensions that will take care of that (you can read it on their 'developer chrome' blog), and Developers can publish SAFE STATIC RULES updates without needing to go through a review by the extension store. This means Adblockers can normally update their lists and they will be available to users within minutes. This also only applies to extensions that use declarativeNetRequest API, which is aimed at Adblockers and how they do things like updating lists. In fact, this what Google says in their blog about it: "In Manifest V3, developers of content filtering extensions make heavy use of the Declarative Net Request API. These extensions rely on filter lists which can change often and need to be kept up to date for users. We already support dynamic rules and we are adding this option to make sure developers can continue to offer the same set of capabilities in MV3."
    So while the concern is true, how can these factual actions taken by Google, like improving MV3 DNR limits based on Adguard and Adblock Plus feedback, and this skip review for CONTENT FILTERING extensions, can translate to some people as Google is killing adblockers and Google this and Google that? well, it's just a contradictory logic.
But this post is not exactly about MV3 or to defend MV3, the only truth we know is that MV3 is the future in Chromium browsers, and nobody can do anything.
The purpose of this post is to explain how Adblockers work and why MV3 while more restricted in what MV2 allowed extensions to do (Mv3 adds positive and negative things), there shouldn't be big issues for most adblocker rules to be implemented and work and do what Mv2 did. In terms of adblocking, that's what matters here anyway, if a rule is working or not, even if they miss some other features they had, like an easy to use slider or a buttons.
Adblockers aren't doing any magic, a dev anti-adblock implementation might not work in MV2, just like it won't work in Mv3, because adblocking is always evolving to cover many cases where trackers and ads are getting through. This is why you see some scriptlets being implemented just to address a single site, because sometimes that is the best approach, and sometimes a single scriptlet or a different type of rule will cover many at the same time.
So no, this is also not to justify the creation of MV3, but MV3 wasn't made to specifically damage adblocking, MV3 is the whole extension platform, so every extension will be affected. Of course, the explanation behind MV3 is to give Chromium browsers the power with native APIs to do the filtering and everything extensions do, they say it is for performance, battery and security reasons, but in terms of adblockers it doesn't matter if true or not, because right now most major MV3 complaint adblockers are able to block, hide and modify most of what MV2 are doing.
Is MV3 perfect for adblockers? no, but also that can be relative and depends on the website, it works fine in some websites, in others it needs some work. Also, MV3 keeps evolving so it will not have the same features today that they will have in a year, just like a year ago we didn't have userScript and DNR limits were terrible and there was no skip review for static rules.. etc etc.
So of course, I believe many arguments against Mv3 are also based on pure lack of logic and reason, like think about this, why would Google provide Declarative Net Request API, if they don't want extensions to do that? if they wanted to kill most of Adblocker effectiveness they would have done that, the browser can do it natively for developers so why provide an Extension API if the plan is to limit and kill adblockers? that's how some people's logic doesn't make any sense.
Their claims is also based on their lack of knowing how Adblocking rules work, and they think everything is just the doom of dooms by not knowing how Adblockers do what they do, like cosmetics. Do people even know all it does is add display: none !important to an HTML element? that's all it does, and that can be done by every adblocker today, MV2 or MV3, if they are developed correctly. There are some Mv3 that are more advanced than Mv2 adblockers for example.
So this is more to let some people drop the fear and misinformation, with the concepts of Adblocking and the manifestv3 extension platform. It's okay to have some doubt and be uncertain about stuff, but making claims like "google is killing adblockers" or "Google will stop supporting adblockers" are just ridiculous.
And this is why:
First, Like I said, Adblockers don't do 'magic' to do what they do, Adblockers fundamental idea is very simple in the way they do their job, this is because everything done by the Adblockers can be done by anyone using the same features to create websites and all, like Devtools, Block Network Requests, Modify or Add or remove CSS properties, attributes, classes, nodes, modify headers, modify CSP inject JavaScript snippets which would allow to have access to many APIs like remove or set cookies or local storage items, set functions or stop then from running, close windows, stop popups from opening... etc.
This means Adblockers can't be killed because if Google were to block Adblockers for doing simple tasks like that, most other extension would be blocked, for example: 7tv or Betterttv inject JS in Twitch so Twitch page replaces words by images. Dark Reader or midnight-lizard will modify the CSS to modify the way websites look. Something like Inssman or ModHeader will modify and add and remove the request and response headers, and make other advanced stuff that would work like what Adblockers do to do their job.
So for Google to block adblockers, they need to change completely the way web technologies are made, this is also because when you open devtools, a page is an open book, you can check anything a website does and modify it and even retain some changes after you reload the page when you use Sources -> overrides. So it is not possible for Google to do that.
If people think Google could block extensions based on name? Adblockers can just drop the use of "adblockers' in their name and move on. If people think Google could use the Static rules (in MV3 rules that come with the adblocker have to be reviewed by Chrome Extension Store), well, Youtube currently doesn't use any essential static rule for its adblocking, maybe for anti-track purposes but not really for the video ads, so even if Google were to block Adblockers based on other types of rules like Scriptlet injection, there will be an official list to load in the adblocker that will do the job. Adblockers are allowed to use custom rules, and since scriptlet injections rules are not counted towards any Dynamic rules limit in DNR, then you can add as many as you want, because the limits in DNR are for DNR not other types of rules that don't touch the API.
Yes, Adblockers support many type of rules to achieve anything they do, this is important because it seems for the way people comment or write their posts that they think Cosmetics are the same as a Network Request filter and they all obth are limited to DNR API, people should finally stop thinking thata rule can be treated the same as another, especially when we talk about DNR limits.
DNR API is ONLY about Network Request filtering, this is, anything that the browser connects to when loading a page, you can see all these connections in Devtools -> Network, and you can use the Network Request Filtering inside Devtools to achieve the same an adblocker would do (maybe better, since Devtools has access to anything, even extensions, while extensions can only see pages, no internal pages or other extensions.). These ones are the only rules that count towards the limits of declarativeNetRequest API which is replacing WebRequest API. Other rules, like cosmetics or scriptlet injections are not counted towards the limit, so basically, anything that looks like example^ or example$domain=test, example/ads/*$xhr,scriptare the only ones that have to do with DNR API, but if they are simple cosmetics example##.class or Scriptlet Injections example##+js(scriptlet), they are not going to use DNR.
This is very important to understand, because most people make Cosmetic filters either by using native CSS selectors or pseudo-classes or Procedurals (selectors made with JS), and something like Youtube and others use scriptlet injections to achieve the adblocking capabilities, not network request becasue the ads don't get delivered that way or because modifying the way ads are delivered will not get blocked easily by Youtube or any other provider.
So Google can't even do much about adblockers in Youtube, because they would have to change the way ads are delivered to achieve that, just like Twitch did, and even in Twitch there are still workarounds like a scriptlet that lowers the quality to 360p while the ads are running, or extensions to proxy the connection to countries were ads are not implemented. This is the only way they have been able to fight a little the way uBlock, Brave or Adguard implementation to block Youtube ads, by changing a little the JSON stuff, but in 8 months Youtube hasn't been able to do much.
Now, about Anti-adblock technologies, this is not new, any website have been using similar methods to try to scare people and annoy people to disable adblockers, some are more effective the ones, some are not avoidable by simple methods and you need to allow some connections, but basically browsers can't tell if you are using Adblocker or not, what developers do is they build a logic to assume you are using an adblocker. Youtube latest anti-adblocker trick, was to go to Easylist, see an element that is being HIDDEN by cosmetics, and tell the page "if this element has the CSS display: none !important; then display the anti-adblock notice" nothing that wasn't fixed in 3 seconds by filter mantainers, that's it, not anything big to combat adblockers, just what any other website has been using in years, but something like Youtube hasn't really done much to fight adblockers in months for the way scriptlets were made by Adguard and uBlock with tons of research behind them on how to effectively implement them.
So why are people still stuck in the idea that Google can do anything about adblockers? it is fime to stop. Yes, Manifestv3 brings changes some negative changes, but also some positive ones, also some limits and all that, but it's not going to kill adbockers, especially when Google keeps making the extension platform more powerful by adding more APIs, for example recently they added userScripts API, which seems to be amazing allowing extensions to inject JS code natively, easy, without sacrificing performance, and since the idea of Manifestv3 is letting the browser do all the job by native APIs, then the performance between MV3 extensions shouldn't be an issue anymore, now it will be about extensions offering or not specific features and how devs improve and expand the extensions without killing the browser or opening security issues or something.
BTW recently Google made some changes to improve DNR limits. - More Static Rules: Previously only 50 static rulesets could be added per extension and only 10 enabled simultaneously. they were increased to be 50 simultaneusly and 100 rulesets in total. - More Dynamic Rules: 5000 were the limit and it was increased to 30000, but this is only for DNR rules: block, allow, allowAllRequests or upgradeScheme, while other dynamic net request rules stay at 5000. This is the change that was made based on Adguard and Adblock Plus feedback, because between internal lists and custom lists the 5K was too low and hit easily. You could see other limits by finding MAX_NUMBER_OF_DYNAMIC_RULES in Chrome's documentation.
So the limites are not the end of the world either, even if you were going to add your own rules.
Adblockers have evolved, they are not simple network requests and then cosmetics to hide whatever leftovers display in the page, this has needed years of researching and implementations, but they are not going away, because there are already MV3 complaint extensions in Google Extension Store, some are more capable than others, some offer most of the MV2 counterpart rules parity, some need work but it doesn't mean the effectiveness of the adblocker is gone.
These are some of the rules adblockers relay on, of course some have more value than others.
But in Adblocking world, If a rule exists, it will only be valid if the Adblocker supports it, there is no magic here either, a rule is either supported or not, this is why lists have thousands of rules, manually updated by humans everyday and all adblockers I tested, and why it is important for adblockers to find a way to support most of the rules they previously supported, sometimes an adblocker might support a rule and not the other like injecting CSS code in any HTML element, so it's not a limitation of the platform and how developers didn't care to give that feature or not yet.
Of course, if you don't believe me, you and anyone can test these rules and see if their adblocker of choice is effective or not, or if the rules you need to achieve X or Y exist, their documentation should easily let you write your own rules, so anyone could easily write a rule and adapt it to each Adblocker's syntax and see if the adblocker has the support for those features or not. I have done this for years and have made lists, of course Adblockers are always adding new type of rules and evolving so it is hard to keep up, especially if a rule is not documented because it is experimetal and might or not be implemented in the end.
Anyway, these are the main types of adblocking rules so you can see the differences:
Network request: They will block anything you see in Devtools -> Network tab, the most basic one is example^ and they can use modifiers to filter them more and be more specific: document, domain/from, scrpt, 3p, image, xhr, css, popup, redirect, redirect-rule, to, other, media, all. The first part before the $ is the URL the browser sees, the modifiers after the $ are just ways to filter them to be more specific if necessary. So, it requires a bit of reading to know how to write rules but it is easy, especially cosmetics, but for example you can set up to block specific images in specific domains you use test.jpg$image,domain=example or a script when it is loaded as a third-party connection test$script,3p This is what blocks as an Adblocker, any other rule can block, but this is the main one in charge of that and modify or block network request.
Cosmetic: example##.test this are the ones with native CSS selectors and pseudo classes. All it does is whatever you 'select' by using CSS selectors and pseudo classes, will be added the property display: none !important, and that's it, they don't block, only hide whatever element is selected, which is always a misconception of people when they say "Adblocker X is not blocking ads" but it is a static image that just doesn't have a specific rule set up.
Scriptlet Injection: example##+js(scriptlet) these are one of the most important filters in recent years, increasing the importance because injecting JS is powerful, and allows to do too many different things. But for example you could use a scriptlet to stop visibilitychange and then videos won't detect you tabbed out and stop them, so it is a whole world on its own, it is the biggest type of rule, because it allows to do almost anything with a website by injecting JS and using APIs like any pages does, this is the future of adblocking and it's like a reverse-engeneering type of thing, so instead of you building a feature by using JS in a page by a web dev, the adblocker is going stop or remove or modify what was built with JS by using the same JS that is native to the browser, again, no different than what you can do in Devtools. I wonder if Mv3 complain extensions will allow us to use our own scriptlets eventually, userScripts API should be the new better official API way of doing it as far as I know, it only needs dev mode to be enabled and it should allow users to download or add their own JS code to inject in pages, but I am not an extension developer to know the exact details and the performance compared to what MV2 extensions do when injecting scriptlets, but I am positive about it especially when it is a API provided by the browser and all.
Redirection rules: example$redirect=resource or example$redirect-rule= or ABP would use something that has the syntax $rewrite=abp-resource:resource this basically will replace a network request and use a local modified resource, this means you can replace a JS file with a noop one. This is important becuase it's frequent to detect adblockers based on network requests not being delivered, so this will allow the page to think it got the file, but since it is useless, nothing trackers or ads will happen, so you can block the request and faking the deliver of the file.
Content Security Policy (CSP): example$csp=default-src;sandbox;script-src This is not used often but it is very powerful. It works for a whitelisting stuff from a page, so you will add what you want to whitelist depending what you want to do. There are similar ways to achieve that in some adblockers by using $to (at least both $CSP and $to are supported by Adguard in MV3).
Procedural cosmetics: example##.test:upward(:has-text(TEXT)) some use the :contains() instead of :has-text(). But these are just non-native selectors made by JS, they allow amazing things but are slower than native CSS selectors and pseudo classes, so make things easier depending on situation at the cost of performance.
Action operators: :style() example##.test:style(css property) (or in Adguard = example#$?#.test {css property}), :remove(), :remove-attr(), :remove-class(), pretty useful to modify the websites and remove elements instead of hiding them, when hiding is not enough, remove-attr and remove-cass are still available in the form is scriptlet injections, since you have to inject JS to achieve what they do, but using them with normal CSS selectors, looking like normal cosmetics gives more flexibility for the rules and how they are applied in a page, like if an element changes in the page.
There are also the Specific or Generic rules, Generic are the ones that will apply to every page, specific will apply to specific domain(s), and there are also the exceptions, so rules are not applied to specific domains or completely to override something that was added by a filter list, same as $badfilter and other rules that are used in filter lists but users rarely use.
Most of rules that were in MV2 have been implemented in MV3, and the more time that passes the more an adblocker will evolve one way or the other, which is exactly what adblockers have been doing for years.
But in the end, people can test all this and drop the idea of the Evil MV3, because there already 3 major adblocking extensions in the store that are MV3 complaint anyway, some have more features than others, some already support all the same supported rules that they had in Mv2, some will include advanced features eventually, so people should just wait and see, there is still time for Extension Store to hide Mv2 extensions, and for Browser to completely remove Mv2 support, so rushing to judge based on ignorance shouldn't be a thing anymore.
Extensions in the store:
Adblock Plus: This seems to be the only official mainstream MV3 adblocker at the moment, it replaced the MV2 version sometime ago, so their decision to do that shows they were ready for it.
It works fine, every previous rule that was reported to be supported by MV2 in their documentation How-to-write-filters works, also, it allows you to use your own Custom Adblock rules and lists, It also has a logger through devtools.
The only problem people will notice is that it is still the same freemium extension as before, maybe more aggressive now because you need a subscription to unblock some features/lists, but you don't need that because you use any list you want, and you can write your own filters, unless they add scriptlets or something restricted only to premium users, then there is no reason why you can't make them yourself.
It seems to do a good job blocking Youtube ads, in my quick test of watching many videos. ABP compared to uBlock and Adguard has been fast, but lacks many important rules I like to use, so in terms of being for advanced users, it is not, but it works and it is fast. So missing some features like injecting CSS in a page, or adding your own scriptlets is not something I expected for it to have. But for general use it works great.
In the end they just switched all their million of users (between Edge, Chrome and Opera extension stores) to MV3, and I am sure nobody noticed the difference.
uBlock Origin Lite: This extension is also a separated extension from the MV2 conterpart, but it seems to offer good support for the rules.
There are one serious limitations though, no custom adblock rules or lists at the moment. But obviously it is not a limitation of MV3 when the other 2 extensions offer it.
It is really hard to test what exact features it supports or not compared to the MV2, for that single reason, no custom adblock rules.
But It seems to block Youtube ads fine in my experience, so it should be easier to do things when they add custom adblock rules and all that, but seems like it is in a decent spot.
But I made a reverse way of testing rules, a quick one because I didn't want to take hours doin it.
I opened the filter lists and searched for any random rule hltv.*##.leftCol > div [data-link-tracking-page="Widget"]:upward(.leftCol > div) that has :has() and :upward(). If the rule is not present in the domain, I would just create the HTML node structure and see if it works or not.
Well, they work, so it supports procedural cosmetic filters. The only problem I encountered that is not present in ABP or Adguard is that when I modified the rule, the rule has to be come invalid and show the element, for example an attribute, but when modifying the attribute the elements were still hidden with the display: none !important property, which is not what they have to do, like it's not watching the DOM correctly, but it is not an issue people will encounter, but more lika a behavior issue in how other adblockers work.
I also encountered some issues, where cosmetics are not being applied, if I go to cgpress you can see the right side has am ad leftover, but if you use devtools, you see that span[data-ez-ph-id] is in the list of cosmetics being applied, so it works but for some reason the other property being set by the page with display: block !important; is still being applied and not being overriden by what uBlock Lite is adding so you can remove the !important added by cgpress devs and the element will be hidden properly.
But this means it is not the adblocker not being able to do it, it is just it is not applying the cosmetic correctly in some cases, which is something the dev has to fix because ABP doens't have an issue for example.
uBlock Lite is also able to inject CSS with the action operator :style(), if you go to uBlockorg website, you shall see a message that says "uBlock is unrelated to the well-known uBlock Origin." in red, well, that's injected by the adblocker with the :style() action operator. So it supports most good rules, and while it is hard ot test without custom user rules, it's great and fast.
Adguard: Adguard is a separated extension "MV3 Experimental", it offers more features than ABP, by features I mean, rules. The logger is only present if you build and sideload the extension though, no official support for that yet, like ABP implemented, but It allows custom adblock rules and lists.
It seems to have the same issue as Adguard MV2, the performance of ExtendedCss (procedural) cosmetics is a little slower than what you would get in ABP (MV2 or MV3) and last time I reported and issue with native :is() pseudo class, but who knows when they are going to fix it, the issue is present in both MV2 and MV3, so it is not a MV3 issue but Adguard being Adguard.
But it works for the most part, seems like it has some little issues with the Scriptlet Injections though, so it runs when you load the page but then the scriptlet doesn't get injected anymore, which would affect Youtube adblocking, but doesn't mean that they won't improve it, because I tested uBlock Origin Lite and ABP as well and the issues are not there. Since uBlock Lite can do it, we I hope people won't blame MV3 and think it is MV3's fault.
But it offers great features like being able to inject any CSS property you want by using #?#.selector {style}, or you can use $csp to modify the CSP permissions in a page, and $to and many rules you can read in thier Github and the kb page How to create your own ad filters, and while it still doesn't support the great advanced list of rules the MV2 supports, it is closer and closer on each big release. Of course not having a logger makes it hard to test and see what rules are being used by Adguard in the normal version (you can get logger in the dev built version) but we hope eventually all this will be resolved when installing MV3 matters, I guess the most important thing to resolve is the Scriptlet Injection and how it is not working correctly, but other filters seem to work okay... we can only wait and see but Adguard's business comes from adblocking, so you hope they will have the extension ready soon, because Scriptlet Injections is like the most important filter in my opinion, and it's what important sites like Youtube need. So while it supports great features, that single issue is problematic, but it should be okay soon, it was working fine before, it will work fine again.
So... Will people still say Google can kill adblockers after reading this? probaly. Some people might think who am I to 'teach them anything' or don't care about what I wrote in this post and want to get stuck intheir ideas, but at least I am the kind of person who has found and reported bugs in how adblockers apply their rules, misbehaviors and limitations and workarounds and everything like that, this is because I meddle with adblockers enough to do all that. If someone needs a rule or a solution to a problem with a page, I am sure an Adblocker might be able to solve it. This is another thing about adblockers, they have evolved so much to do more than just adblocking or antitracking, you can use its features for so many thing, that you can completely change websites by modify their CSS, not just colors but position, size of the elements etc... I still hope some people learned something and how adblockers are easy to test and experiment with and even if MV3 Adblockers are still not feature parity with MV2, that doesn't mean they are going anywhere, or they can be killed by anyone like Google without changing the whole web.
Any questions about adblockers, I never have issues with that, any rule peopel need, I can help with that too. I know some people are weird on the internet, maybe too passionate to have a conversation, but I still hope someone learned anything from this post. I tried to cover everything I could to explain the details, so I hope I covered most of it so if people are interested they can go to each Adblocker documentation, see what feature they support and maybe learn how to write their own rules and how to fix their web by themselves if necessary.
Thank you very much for reading and have a good day.
submitted by Feakarkenechaeucaski to browsers [link] [comments]

2024.06.05 18:32 PitifulTea4004 Unable to unblock restricted user

Any solution for this? This is from the old post but matches my issue.
I have a user that has been blocked in Office365 due to her account being compromised and sending spam. I've resolved the security issues, however I unable to unblock the user inside the Restricted Users pages since the option is missing when I select the user. I have also connected to the Exchange Online Powershell as the tenant and ran Get-BlockedSenderAddress to verify she is blocked. When I run Remove-BlockedSenderAddress -SenderAddress [useremail@365tenant.com](mailto:useremail@365tenant.com) I get a "Remove-BlockedSenderAddress cmdlet is not recognized" message. I have tried looking around but keep getting sent to the main Microsoft docs that do not appear to mention anything about this error. The tenant in question is entirely on Office 365
submitted by PitifulTea4004 to Office365 [link] [comments]

2024.06.05 16:07 Arokthis How to make it so someone can't contact/message without blocking? (problem with scammers)

Long story short: GF fell for a scammer pretending to be a celebrity. Keeps liking pages/profiles/groups for that celebrity. Scammer(s) make contact, she responds, and we can't keep them out of her DM's once she's replied.
Blocking them doesn't work because she unblocks them or they just make new accounts/pages.
submitted by Arokthis to facebook [link] [comments]

2024.06.05 13:20 Objective_Moose1822 2000's marauders headcannon

I feel like we as a community need a muggle au marauders fic set in the early 2000-2010's.
Like tell me u can't imagine Sirius standing up on bar tables singing gaga out at the top of his lungs. Lily would 100% have a digi cam where she would take some of the best candid shots of everyone. James would have crazy frog as his ring tone and for a week straight would miss call everyone so that they would call him back just so he could listen to it. Peter would have the edgiest myspace page ever, he would dye his hair black for years and he and sirius would drag everyone to my chemical romance concerts. Mary and Marlene would have the juiciest gossip calls. Remus would swear he hates Eminem, but this man would be singing love the way you lie RELEGIOUSLY.
for Halloween lily and James would go as Kim possible and Ron, and u know Sirius would go as shego.
Don't even get me started on when vine would come out. I swear they would be all over that app. You'd hear Marlene yelling "do it for the vine" 24/7. The skittles would be all over it too. Barty would be the first person following the marauders and he would be the first to comment on their vines. He and Evan would giggle abt the hate comments they would post. Regulus would act like he was above it but would always join them. In return Sirius would hold his MySpace page over his head forever.
In anycase if anyone knows a fic like this, do feel free to tell me. I just thought I would share this headcannon.
submitted by Objective_Moose1822 to MaraudersGen [link] [comments]

http://swiebodzin.info