2009.09.13 17:48 Null_State I only need two buttons, Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V.
2014.10.03 23:07 musicaficta Relax your mind
2009.02.27 16:25 jobsearchusa linkedin
2024.06.10 07:43 RESSl STD that makes you bleed
2024.06.10 07:41 Embarrassed-Swim-442 WH 40K Dating App Account For Various Characters
2024.06.10 07:41 Rkillerx221 Boost Your Daily Protein Intake
Simple Mushroom and Eggs Breakfast with Cottage Cheese and Cherry Tomatoes submitted by Rkillerx221 to AlexandriaEgy [link] [comments] Ingredients: - 1 cup sliced mushrooms - 2 large eggs - 1 tbsp olive oil or butter - 1 small onion, finely chopped - 1 clove garlic, minced - Salt and pepper, to taste - 1/2 cup low-salt cottage cheese - 1 cup cherry tomatoes, halved Instructions: 1. Heat olive oil in a pan. Add onions and garlic, cook until soft. 2. Add mushrooms, sauté until golden brown. Season lightly with salt and pepper. 3. Push mushrooms to one side of the pan. Crack eggs into the empty side, scramble until cooked. 4. Serve eggs and mushrooms with cottage cheese on the side. 5. Place cherry tomatoes on a small dish beside the main dish. Tips: - Enjoy the fresh cherry tomatoes without any added seasoning. - Customize by adding spinach or herbs to the eggs and mushrooms if desired. - This breakfast is quick, nutritious, and perfect for a satisfying start to your day! |
2024.06.10 07:40 StepVirtual5147 Onramp_money is not closing my account
2024.06.10 07:40 ConsequenceSure3063 Best Ford F150 Rims
submitted by ConsequenceSure3063 to u/ConsequenceSure3063 [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/03bqqq40mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=976a71a7a2b871796cfa10c8c162a366231d2073 Welcome to our roundup of the top Ford F150 Rims that are making waves in the automotive world. From sleek designs to durable materials, we've handpicked a selection of rims that are sure to enhance your F150's style and performance. Whether you're an enthusiast looking for a fresh look or a practical driver seeking to improve functionality, our article has got you covered. Dive in and discover the perfect rims for your Ford F150 today. The Top 10 Best Ford F150 Rims
Reviews🔗Fuel 20" x 9" Matte Black Matte Rims for F-150 and F-150 Raptorhttps://preview.redd.it/43hzz8v0mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfc53980e2703a4cc03b4ce7db7b75f26317cfb3 As someone who loves adventure and bold style, I have always been fascinated by the F-150 and F-150 Raptor Trophy wheel and tire package from Fuel. The 20" x 9" Matte Black with Anthracite Ring wheels add a touch of elegance to my vehicles, while the oversized, robust design adds a sense of power and durability. The wheel and tire package is a perfect match for my taste and it's a highlight among car enthusiasts. I had one of these wheels and tires installed on my 2010 F-150, and the reaction from people around me when I drove by was amazing. The wheel design, with its Matte Black finish and Anthracite ring, stood out and became a constant source of compliments. I also noticed that the wheels performed incredibly well in both regular road conditions and off-road terrain, maintaining their traction and control. However, the Trophy wheel and tire package isn't without some downsides. Firstly, it can be a bit pricey. But, given the quality and performance it delivers, it is certainly worth the investment. Plus, the process of installing them could be a bit more convenient, as it requires some professional help. In conclusion, the Fuel Trophy wheel and tire package is a great choice for anyone looking for style, performance, and durability. It may not be the cheapest option, but the unique look and impressive capabilities are well worth the investment. 🔗Fuel Ford F150/Raptor Beast Wheels with 6x135 Bolt Pattern (2009-2023)https://preview.redd.it/3uc36c21mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dfc8734f43ed831fd8d7ac25ac32f62eec547892 As a reviewer, I've had the pleasure of trying out the Fuel Beast Wheel and Tire Package for my 2012 Ford F-150. The sleek black and machined finish caught everyone's attention, while the dark tint face added a touch of stylish mystery. The 20-inch wheels provided a sturdy, confident ride. However, I did notice that the tires struggled with rough terrains, requiring more frequent inflation. Overall, it's a visually impressive accessory with minor performance concerns. 🔗Ford F150 Raptor Matte Black 17-inch Simulated Beadlock Wheelshttps://preview.redd.it/urs9xkh1mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=244563fa67886d69282d0feb4e99e7ad25fc74f7 Imagine driving around with those magnificent American Trucks Wheels Raptor Beadlock Style Matte Black 6-Lug Wheels on your Ford F150, just staring at you. The wheels are more than just a transportation necessity; they're a statement of your choice of style and comfort. The Matte Black finish is a real eye-catcher, adding a sleek yet aggressive aesthetic to your vehicle, an upgrade that will surely turn the heads of people passing you by. The fit is perfect - no rubbing, just a perfect combination. The craftsmanship is second to none; it's like a mirror image of the pricier version. The one-piece cast wheel enhances its durability, a sturdy addition to your car without compromising on the charm. But here's the best part - the price! For these high-quality wheels, you don't need to break the bank. It's a steal that won't let you go green with envy - a bit ironic, you know! Another great thing is the ease of installation. You don't need to worry about spending time at a workshop. You can enjoy your new wheels on your own, DIY style! So, put these wheels on your shopping list if you're looking for both style and performance. Overall, these American Trucks Wheels have been an amazing addition to my daily routine. The perfect fit, excellent craftsmanship, and an affordable price make these wheels a brilliant buy. 🔗Off-road Buck Commander Canyon Wheels for Ford F150https://preview.redd.it/wcg79gv1mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0e248b834a6dab0ab7bf2140152793679398d7fa I recently had the pleasure of installing these Buck Commander Canyon wheels on my off-road vehicle, and I must say, I was blown away by the quality and design. The wheels feature a concave face that really adds an aggressive stance to my truck, and the split spokes with milled red accents add a unique touch that sets these wheels apart. One of the things that stood out to me was the attention to detail in the manufacturing process. These wheels are made of durable cast aluminum in a one-piece construction, which ensures a long-lasting and sturdy wheel. The wheels also have a tapered/acorn lug seat profile that provides a perfect fit, and the lug holes are designed to ensure a snug fit. In terms of the installation process, the center cap was easy to attach, and the wheels fit my truck perfectly. The load rating of 2400 lbs gives me peace of mind when navigating rough terrain, and the 4.52 back spacing provides a great balance between off-road performance and on-road comfort. However, one downside I noted was the lack of a wide range of color options. While the satin black finish with milled red accents looks great, I would have loved to see more color options to personalize my wheels even further. Overall, the Buck Commander Canyon wheels are a fantastic addition to any off-road vehicle. They offer a great balance of style, durability, and practicality, and I highly recommend giving them a try if you're in the market for new wheels. 🔗Remanufactured 2010 Ford F-150 Rims for Harley-Davidson Edition, Limited, XL, and King Ranchhttps://preview.redd.it/3wfsey92mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a235f3405e46ed91b7e678726eed0dddbe3b96b4 I recently purchased a set of replacement alloy wheels for my 2010 Ford F-150, and I'm here to share my experience with you. From the get-go, I was impressed with how easily these wheels fit onto various models of the F-150, including the Limited, XL, Harley-Davidson Edition, and King Ranch. One of the highlights that stood out in my experience was how these factory alloy wheels, remanufactured by Replace, offer excellent performance and appearance. They boast a 17" x 7.5" size, with a 44mm offset, and a 6 x 135mm bolt pattern, ensuring a snug fit for my truck. The wheels I bought were in pristine condition, which was a bonus since I was concerned about the condition of used or refurbished wheels. I was particularly pleased with the warranty, offering peace of mind for five years. It's worth mentioning that the purchase process was straightforward and hassle-free. While there were no drawbacks in my experience, it's essential that you measure your wheel before purchasing to guarantee a proper fit. However, with Replace's easy-to-use online tool and the variety of models the wheels fit, it should be an easy process. In conclusion, if you're searching for affordable and high-quality alloy wheels for your 2010 Ford F-150, you won't find better than these remanufactured Ford F150 Rims. They offer excellent value for money, a variety of models to fit, and the peace of mind that comes with a five-year warranty. 🔗Matte Black 6-Lug Ford F150 Rimshttps://preview.redd.it/tt2vu6t2mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af031a89079e75e75cc7ad5ed7d2caa59a4e1e0d I've been using the American Trucks Wheels 2019 F150 Gen2 Raptor Style Matte Black 6-Lug Wheel for the past few weeks, and let me tell you, it's made quite an impression. This wheel emanates elegance with its chrome finish, effortlessly elevating my vehicle's aesthetics. Manufactured by the same brand that brought us the durable, high-quality tires I used, this design fits perfectly with a wide range of vehicle styles. The 18x9 Gen2 Raptor Style Matte Black Wheel is completed in a high-quality black finish with a durable, matte clear coat finish, giving it an aggressive appearance that's simply eye-catching. The gravity casting process used to manufacture these wheels results in a strong, durable wheel that looks just as good as a more expensive wheel, but at a fraction of the price. However, there was one concern that arose after use. Out of the blue, a crack developed on one of the wheels, causing it to lose pressure daily. After contacting American Trucks, I was informed about a casting flaw in the aluminum and the need to replace the defective wheels. Considering the risk involved, I hesitate to recommend this product to others unless the manufacturer addresses this issue promptly. Overall, the American Trucks Wheels F150 Gen2 Raptor Style Matte Black 6-Lug Wheel offers a fantastic look for your vehicle, but beware of the casting flaws that may pose a risk to your tires and safety. 🔗Ford F150 Rims: American Outlaw Gambler 126 Series 6-Lug Black Wheelshttps://preview.redd.it/cms5jny2mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36f5418b955de1b151e81159a8c6b7d4cf970f8e Over the past few weeks, I've been using these Gambler Gloss Black Milled 6-Lug Wheels on my 2004 F150 as an alternative to the stock rims. These wheels have definitely elevated the overall aesthetic of my truck. The black finish with milled accents really makes them stand out and gives them a unique flair that I haven't seen on many other trucks. Although they do add a bit of extra weight, they provide exceptional stability and traction, both on and off the road. One thing that I've noticed about these wheels is that they do require a bit of extra maintenance. Since they have a gloss clear coat finish, it's important to make sure that you don't accidentally scratch them, as any scratches or imperfections will be quite noticeable. Despite this, I've found that these wheels are quite durable and can withstand the occasional hazards of everyday driving. All in all, the American Outlaw Gambler Gloss Black Milled 6-Lug Wheels are a great upgrade for your F150. They provide a sleek, eye-catching appearance, while also enhancing the overall performance of your truck. Just be prepared for a bit of extra maintenance to keep them looking as good as new. 🔗Ford F150 Rims: Versatile and Durable Wheel Optionshttps://preview.redd.it/080caw93mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=62507c358323b5108a64dbaa6f8dfbe22672fdb4 I recently got my hands on the 4PLAY Sport2.0 4PS28 17x9 6x135mm & 6x5.5" +18et in Matte Black rims and I must say, they've been a game-changer. These rims fit a wide range of vehicles, from Cadillacs to Fords, making them a versatile choice for any off-road enthusiast. One feature that stood out for me was their sleek matte black finish, which adds a touch of sophistication to any vehicle. Plus, they come in two different sizes, making it easy to find the perfect fit for your ride. However, I did notice that some wheel-tire combinations may require a lift for proper fitment. This could be a potential downside for those who are not interested in modifying their vehicles. But overall, I'm quite impressed with the quality and versatility of these rims. They've definitely elevated my off-road experience and I highly recommend them to anyone in the market for a stylish yet durable set of wheels. 🔗Ford F150 Matte Black Tremor Style Performance Wheels - 2021 and Later Modelshttps://preview.redd.it/yjh7b5s3mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c87966520219615c479d58face965e56080a6657 I recently got my hands on the Ford Performance Tremor Style Wheels Matte Black set for my 2021 F150. Honestly, I must say, these wheels are a real game-changer! Not only do they instantly enhance the visual appeal of my truck, but they also provide a sense of ruggedness and durability that I have never experienced before. From the very moment I installed them, I noticed the TPMS sensors right away. They work flawlessly, and I always feel connected to my wheels while driving. The matte black finish gives my F150 a unique identity on the road and has surely drawn compliments from my friends and family. However, there's one area that could use some improvement. The installation process could have been made a bit smoother with more straightforward instructions. Nonetheless, with some patience and persistence, I managed to get them on my truck just fine. Overall, I'd definitely recommend the Ford Performance Tremor Style Wheels Matte Black if you're looking to give your Ford F150 that extra edge in style and performance. 🔗Hardrock Offroad's Indestructible 20-Inch Aluminum Wheel for 14-21 Tundrahttps://preview.redd.it/q48k6194mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=92698b7145326fd584dc8c12d2b9ceb56ede0d3e I recently had the chance to try out Hardrock Offroad's Indestructible Series Wheel for my 2021 Toyota Tundra, and I must say, it's been a game-changer. The one-piece cast aluminum wheel not only looks stunning with its eight Y-spoke mesh design and slightly convex face, but it also provides an aggressive stance and excellent performance both on the street and off the beaten path. One standout feature that I really appreciate is the gloss clear coat, which offers added protection against road chips and pitting. The wheel is easy to clean and boasts impressive craftsmanship, making it a great fit for the Toyota Tundra. Although the wheel fits perfectly, it's essential to note that it may require minor adjustments for optimal performance. Overall, I'm seriously impressed with the durability and beautiful appearance of these wheels. Kudos to Hardrock Offroad for creating such a fantastic product! Buyer's GuideWhen it comes to choosing the right set of Ford F150 rims, there are several factors to consider. Each of these features is crucial in determining which rims will best fit your needs and preferences. Here are some important aspects to think about before making a purchase. https://preview.redd.it/6qpm1uw4mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=95a06d55c312a5bd8f9fc632b1c42e0102b256ec wheel sizeThe first thing to consider when buying Ford F150 rims is the wheel size. The available sizes range from 17-20 inches, each offering different advantages. Smaller wheels generally provide better fuel efficiency and a smoother ride, while larger wheels can offer improved off-road capabilities and a more aggressive appearance.wheel styles and finishesThere are various styles and finishes to choose from when selecting Ford F150 rims. Classic designs often provide a timeless look, while more contemporary styles can give your truck a sleek and modern appearance. As for finishes, you can choose between traditional painted finishes or chrome, to give your wheels a shiny and eye-catching look. https://preview.redd.it/rqtgql35mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e35db0982c3d6c16651cd2f593a6a0530e96b7a5 wheel materialsNext, consider the materials used to construct the Ford F150 rims. Aluminum and steel are the two most common materials. Aluminum rims are generally lighter and offer improved fuel efficiency, while steel rims are known for their strength and durability. Be sure to weigh the pros and cons of each material when making your decision.wheel offsetAnother important aspect to consider is the wheel offset. This refers to the distance between the centerline of the rim and the centerline of the wheel. A larger offset can provide improved tire clearance, while smaller offsets offer a better ride quality and handling. Consult your vehicle's specifications before purchasing to ensure the correct offset is chosen. https://preview.redd.it/64grg1k5mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b3d4a5f5f5bd4cb9b167ad499a460f4ddc5368fc tire fitmentTire fitment is critical when selecting Ford F150 rims. Make sure the rims you choose are compatible with the tires you currently have or plan to use. Incorrect tire fitment can lead to poor handling, decreased fuel efficiency, and even compromised safety.brand reputation and customer reviewsLastly, consider the brand reputation and customer reviews when selecting Ford F150 rims. Choosing a reputable brand with positive customer feedback can provide you with peace of mind knowing that the rims you have purchased are of high quality and will meet your expectations.When it comes to selecting the perfect set of Ford F150 rims, be sure to consider various factors such as wheel size, styles and finishes, materials, wheel offset, tire fitment, and brand reputation. With the right set of Ford F150 rims, you can enhance your truck's performance, appearance, and overall driving experience. https://preview.redd.it/wgtd66w6mo5d1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c090c53057bd636db10e9035893fbb054370e681 FAQWhat are the different types of Ford F150 rims available in the market?Ford F150 rims come in various sizes, materials, and finishes. Some common types include cast aluminum alloy, chrome, painted, and matte black rims. Ford F150 rims can be found in sizes ranging from 17 to 22 inches in diameter, depending on the model and year of the Ford F150. Always make sure to check the specific rim size recommended for your vehicle model and year before purchasing.What are the benefits of upgrading my Ford F150 rims?Upgrading Ford F150 rims provides numerous benefits such as improved handling, enhanced aesthetics, increased fuel efficiency, and better tire grip. High-quality rims with strong materials can also improve the overall durability of your Ford F150.What factors should I consider when choosing Ford F150 rims?
Can I install aftermarket Ford F150 rims on my vehicle without any issues?Yes, you can install aftermarket Ford F150 rims on your vehicle as long as they match your vehicle's specifications in terms of bolt pattern, center bore size, and wheel size. If you're unsure or need assistance, it's recommended to consult a professional mechanic or use a reputable aftermarket rim supplier for their expertise and guidance.What precautions should I take when installing new Ford F150 rims?
|
2024.06.10 07:38 GoAheadMMDay Jewish religion originated in Egypt... and was restructured in Babylon
Before we begin, let me say I love the Jewish people and Christians, and I consider all of them my brothers and sisters, as I do all people from all religions and walks of life. We are all God's beloved children. submitted by GoAheadMMDay to conspiracy_posts [link] [comments] I thoroughly cherish the ancient wisdom contained in both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible, and in the sacred books of other faiths as well. Yet over the course of several decades, I discovered numerous inaccurate teachings which I would like to review. It may not be what most people consider a "conspiracy". Nevertheless, these misconceptions must be revealed for the truth to be known. Egyptian origins Judaism - the Jewish religion - originated in ancient Egypt. A mixed group of people from multiple nationalities, including Egyptian, were expelled from Egypt, taking Egyptian beliefs and practices with them, including Egyptian temple designs. This theory has been around for nearly a hundred years. Sigmund Freud, the famous Austrian neurologist and founder of psychoanalysis who lived from 1856 to 1939, wrote about Judaism's link to ancient Egypt in 1939, the final year of his life. From Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten : "One of the first to mention this [theory] was Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, in his book Moses and Monotheism.[235] Basing his arguments on his belief that the Exodus story was historical, Freud argued that Moses had been an Atenist priest who was forced to leave Egypt with his followers after Akhenaten's death. Freud argued that Akhenaten was striving to promote monotheism, something that the biblical Moses was able to achieve.[235] Following the publication of his book, the concept entered popular consciousness and serious research.[240][241]" In this post, I will provide my own arguments supporting Freud's proposition. I started thinking about the link between ancient Israel and ancient Egypt many years ago during my Bible studies. I was also fascinated with the histories of ancient Egypt, Sumer, Babylon, and others. Over the years, I began noticing some very significant overlapping beliefs that cannot be dismissed. Some of these points are already known and hotly debated; others are my own observations. I will be brief, however. This topic is absolutely huge in scope - covering history, archeology and religion. If I were to cover the topic to its fullest extent, it would be a book. I will spare you that torture and simply give you the abridged version. My purpose? I put this out there for debate and further research. The exodus out of Egypt In the late 1300's BC, a large group migrated out of Egypt in what is known as "the exodus". The exodus out of Egypt Who were the people who left Egypt in the exodus? The Bible claims they were almost all Israelites who were living in misery in Egypt. But there is good reason to believe the majority were actually Egyptians, as I explain later. Black box - where the exodus settled The group who left Egypt eventually settled between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, forming the nation of Israel. Three major similarities Several similarities exist between ancient Israel's religion and ancient Egypt's religion. These similarities are so striking, I propose the Jewish religion actually originated in Egypt, and was brought out of Egypt in the exodus. • 1) Let's start with the most glaring similarity... the temples. Ancient Egyptian temple Key features of the ancient Egyptian temple: a) outer courtyard, b) two large pillars at front entrance, c) a grand hall, d) an inner shrine with statue. Left - Moses' tabernacle / Right - Solomon's temple Key features of Moses' tabernacle and Solomon's temple: a) outer courtyard, b) two large pillars at front entrance, c) first hall called "the Holy Place", d) an inner sanctuary called "the Most Holy Place" where the Ark of the Covenant was housed. The similarities between ancient Egypt's temples and Judaism's designs are too similar to dismiss. I conclude those who left Egypt in the exodus brought with them Egypt's temple designs. • 2) Animal sacrifice is another similarity I propose was brought out of Egypt in the exodus. "...some of the earliest archeological evidence suggesting animal sacrifice comes from Egypt." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sacrifice • 3) Lastly, in agreement with Sigmund Freud noted above, I propose Jewish monotheism (worship of one god) was also brought out of Egypt by the migrants who left in the exodus. Monotheism from Egypt? Wasn't Egypt polytheistic, worshipping multiple deities? Not always. Egypt had briefly experimented with the worship of one God who was without form. And this period of monotheism in Egypt lines-up perfectly with the time of the exodus. Egypt's brief experiment with monotheism There was a brief period in Egypt's history when monotheism flourished. This was during the reign of Akhenaten, around the middle 1300's BC. Prior to this, Egypt had always practiced polytheism. But Akhenaten reformed Egyptian religion, focusing on one god instead - "Aten" - who was elevated to supreme god, and "the sole god of the Egyptian state religion". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aten There is much debate over exactly how monotheism was practiced during that time. As Wikipedia explains - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten : "The views of Egyptologists differ as to whether the religious policy was absolutely monotheistic, or whether it was monolatristic, syncretistic, or henotheistic.[14][15] This culture shift away from traditional religion was reversed after his death." For this post, it does not matter how narrow or how broad Akhenaten's monotheism really was. What matters in this discussion is that Akhenaten's reign was an interruption in Egypt's religious system. Akhenaten reformed Egyptian religion, which did not sit well with the traditional priestly class. After Akhenaten died, Egypt returned to its previous religious system. Akhenaten was vilified, his images chiselled and defaced. Wikipedia adds: "They discredited Akhenaten and his immediate successors and referred to Akhenaten as "the enemy" or "that criminal" in archival records." This is why today he is described as "the heretic king", referencing how he was considered after his death. The exodus was an expulsion I propose Moses was a high ranking member of Akhenaten's court, perhaps even a prince as the Old Testament describes him. Moses likely took over the leadership of the population of monotheists after Akhenaten died. As Wikipedia notes (already quoted above) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten : "Freud argued that Moses had been an Atenist priest [a priest of the god "Aten"] who was forced to leave Egypt with his followers after Akhenaten's death." I conclude these were the migrants who left Egypt in the exodus. They were Egyptians who practiced monotheism, lead by their high priest, Moses - who was also an Egyptian, and priest of the god "Aten". The monotheists had become unwelcome in the land of Egypt which had returned to polytheism. Akhenaten's son - the famous King Tut - even changed his name to disassociate himself from his father and the monotheism he had introduced. King Tut's original name was Tutankhaten, which he changed to Tutankhamun after Akhenaten's death. As Wikipedia explains - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tutankhamun : "The cult of the god Amun at Thebes was restored to prominence and the royal couple changed their names to "Tutankhamun" and "Ankhesenamun", removing the -aten suffix." The suffix at the end of their names indicated whom they worshiped, or the god they were associated with. Akhenaten's suffix was "aten", taken from the god "Aten" whom he associated himself with. Tutankhamun's suffix was "amun", taken from the god "Amun" whom he associated himself with. King Tut thus changed his name to show he was not connected to Akhenaten or the monotheists who worshipped Aten. Egypt's brief experiment with monotheism was over. Clearly there was a lot of hatred for that brief experimentation with monotheism. What would the atmosphere have been like for the followers of that monotheistic system after Akhenaten died? I imagine there would have been widespread persecution, or at the very least, discrimination. I propose this lead to the expulsion of a large mass of people out of Egypt in the exodus. They were the monotheists of Egypt - composed mostly of Egyptians, but likely included foreigners living in Egypt who also practiced the monotheism introduced by Akhenaten. Moses led this group of fellow monotheists out of an angry Egypt that clearly resented the upheaval Akhenaten had brought to Egyptian life. It must have been a forced expulsion, for they were driven into the desert where they were left to roam and fend for themselves. They would not have chosen to go there on their own. The dates match And the dates match. Akhenaten reigned from about 1352 to 1335 BC. Moses lived from about 1391 to 1271 BC. (The Bible writers claim he was 120 years old when he died. Could be true, I suppose.) According to the Bible's account, Moses was 80 years of age at the time of the exodus, dating it to about 1311 BC. That somewhat fits, putting the exodus some 24 years after Akhenaten's death. Personally, though, I do not see that it would have taken 24 years to expel a group of monotheists who were no longer welcome, whose founder (Akhenaten) was vilified, defamed, and so vehemently hated. I propose the monotheists were expelled right away, perhaps a year or two after Akhenaten's death. King Tut - Akhenaten's son noted above - was only 6 years of age when Akhenaten died in 1335 BC, much too young to rule as Pharaoh on his own. It wasn't until 3 years later in 1332 BC when Tut finally ascended to the throne at the age of 9. During this brief interval of 3 years, Egypt's rulership was in contention. There was likely a power struggle. I propose it was during this 3-year period of upheaval when the monotheists were expelled. Another link placing the exodus at the end of Akhenaten's life is a regional plague which struck Egypt and a large part of the Middle East during the last 5 years of Akhenaten's reign. As Wikipedia explains - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten : "Following year twelve [of Akhenaten's 16-year reign], Donald B. Redford and other Egyptologists proposed that Egypt was struck by an epidemic, most likely a plague.[127] Contemporary evidence suggests that a plague ravaged through the Middle East around this time,[128] and ambassadors and delegations arriving to Akhenaten's year twelve reception might have brought the disease to Egypt.[129] Alternatively, letters from the Hattians might suggest that the epidemic originated in Egypt and was carried throughout the Middle East by Egyptian prisoners of war.[130] Regardless of its origin, the epidemic might account for several deaths in the royal family that occurred in the last five years of Akhenaten's reign, including those of his daughters Meketaten, Neferneferure, and Setepenre.[131][132]" Sound familiar? The Bible's story of the exodus includes a plague which affected all of Egypt, killing even one of Pharaoh's children. When Moses led the monotheists out of Egypt, he took with him many elements of the monotheistic system that Akhenaten had introduced. I propose this is why Moses' tabernacle looked so similar to Egyptian temples, with even more similarities showing up in Solomon's temple. Joseph was Imhotep Yet the Old Testament borrows more from Egypt than just its religious concepts. I propose it also borrows a very famous person... Imhotep. Multiple similarities exist between Imhotep (a high ranking administrator in ancient Egypt) and the Biblical Joseph (who lived in Egypt before Moses). I propose, as many others do, that the Joseph of the Old Testament was based on Imhotep of ancient Egypt for 3 reasons: • 1) Let's start with their names... In "Imhotep", the 1st vowel is "i", the 2nd vowel is "o", the 3rd vowel is "e", followed by a "p". The name Joseph in Tiberian Hebrew is "Yoseph", and in Aramaic is "Yosep". In both cases, the 1st vowel is "y" (pronounced as short-"i"), the 2nd vowel is "o", the 3rd vowel is "e", followed by a "p" - just as in "Imhotep". Even the "t" in Imhotep and the "s" in Yosep use similar movements of the tongue. • 2) Next, their status... Imhotep occupied a very lofty position in Egyptian court. He was "chancellor to the Pharaoh Djoser, possible architect of Djoser's step pyramid, and high priest of the sun god Ra at Heliopolis". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep Joseph, for his part, is described in the Bible as having been elevated to the 3rd highest position in Egypt. • 3) Finally, their great works... "Imhotep was one of the chief officials of the Pharaoh Djoser. Concurring with much later legends, Egyptologists credit him with the design and construction of the Pyramid of Djoser, a step pyramid at Saqqara built during the 3rd Dynasty. [17] He may also have been responsible for the first known use of stone columns to support a building.[18]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep Similarly, the Bible describes Joseph as having supervised the construction of numerous large stone granaries in which to store "all the grain of Egypt". Though granaries and pyramids differ in design, we have to acknowledge the similarity... both men were in charge of building massive stone structures. Also, to the Israelites living after the exodus, when the Old Testament was written, the pyramids of Egypt likely looked to them like the remains of giant granaries of long ago. Thus, where the ancient Egyptians credited Imhotep with constructing pyramids, the Israelites credited Joseph with constructing the same structures - which they thought were old ruined granaries. Yet there is one gaping hole in this theory that Joseph was Imhotep... they lived in different time periods. Imhotep lived in the 2600's BC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep), while Joseph lived in the 1800's BC. Indeed, they lived centuries apart. But let's keep in mind that the writers of the Old Testament did not have such detailed information as archeologists have today. The writers may have placed Joseph in the wrong century, but they were right to place him a few hundred years before the exodus... just as Imhotep also lived centuries before the exodus. The Old Testament writers were also correct in the phonetics of the name, the occupation, the works, and the elevated position of importance. I propose the Old Testament writers took Imhotep and claimed him as their own as Joseph. Claiming Egyptians and others as their own We can see why the writers of the Old Testament wanted to claim Imhotep as their own, as an Israelite. Between 1550 and 1077 BC (which overlapped the time of the exodus), Imhotep was worshipped as a "demigod" - one of only a handful of non-royals ever to be deified. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imhotep) He was the equivalent of today's superstar. To claim Imhotep as a fellow Israelite gave them a tremendous boost of pride. They also claimed Moses as their own. As the Old Testament account goes, Moses was born an Israelite, was sent adrift on a river to escape slaughter, was rescued by an Egyptian princess, and was raised as a prince in Egypt's court. They also claimed Abraham as one of their forefathers, a Mesopotamian who lived in the city of Ur by the lower Euphrates river near the Persian Gulf. Noah, too, was claimed as an even more distant forefather, when in fact the story of Noah, the ark, and the flood were copied from the ancient Sumerian text "The Epic of Gilgamesh". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh In The Epic of Gilgamesh, the Sumerian king Uta-napishtim survived a flood by building a large vessel which he filled with animals. As Wikipedia explains - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utnapishtim : "The story of Uta-napishtim has drawn scholarly comparisons due to the similarities between it and the storylines about Noah in the Bible." But why did the Israelites claim all of these people as their own? • The ancient-Sumerian Uta-napishtim (whom they renamed Noah), • the late-Sumerian Abram of Ur (whom they renamed Abraham), • the ancient-Egyptian Imhotep (whom they renamed Joseph), • and the later-Egyptian Moses? I propose it was to give the Israelites a sense of national identity. They were about to form a new nation. Forming a new nation after Babylon In 597 BC, Babylon besieged Jerusalem, taking several thousand Israelites captive to Babylonia. More Israelite captives were taken during the following 10 years. In 587 BC, Jerusalem and its temple were ultimately destroyed. Israel was no longer a nation; its people were captives in Babylon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_captivity Nearly 50 years later, in 539 BC, Persian king Cyrus the Great and his armies conquered Babylon. As per his tradition, he benevolently released captives. "Cyrus was particularly renowned among contemporary scholars because of his habitual policy of respecting peoples' customs and religions in the lands that he conquered." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_the_Great The Israelites were about to be freed. We can picture Cyrus' officials gathering the Israelite priests and leaders together, telling them to prepare themselves for their return back to their homeland west of the Jordan River. After nearly 60 years in captivity, the Israelites needed to organize themselves into a new nation. They needed laws, a history, and a national identity. I propose this is when the first section of the Old Testament - the Torah - was written... in 539 BC in Babylon, just before returning to their ancestral land west of the Jordan River. The Torah comprises the first 5 books of the Old Testament - Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. What makes this significant for the Israelites living in Babylon is that these 5 books cover everything they need in forming a new nation - a national history, a code of laws, a structured religion, and a pact with God for his protection - as explained in Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah : • Of the book of Genesis: "At God's command ... Abraham journeys from his home [in Mesopotamia] into the ... land of Canaan. ... The narrative is punctuated by a series of covenants with God..." This book was important, as it paralleled the journey the Israelites were about to make, leaving Babylon (which was Mesopotamia) on their way to the land of Canaan - just like Abraham had done himself some 1,200 years before. Yet they ought not be fearful, for they were the beneficiaries of multiple covenants with God. • Of the book of Exodus: "...modern scholarship sees the book as initially a product of the Babylonian exile, 6th century BC..." In other words, it was initially compiled in Babylon during Israelite captivity. "Carol Meyers, in her commentary on Exodus, suggests that it is arguably the most important book in the Bible, as it presents the defining features of Israel's identity: memories of a past marked by hardship and escape, a binding covenant with God, ... and the establishment of the life of the community and the guidelines for sustaining it.[31]" In other words, the book of Exodus gave the Israelites valuable guidelines to forming a new nation. • Of the book of Leviticus: "...rules of clean and unclean ... the laws of slaughter and animals permissible to eat ... various moral and ritual laws ... a detailed list of rewards for following God's commandments and a detailed list of punishments for not following them." In other words, Leviticus instructs the Israelites on matters of worship, cleanliness, and diet. Again, important information for a people about to form a new nation. • Of the book of Numbers: "Numbers is the culmination of the story of Israel's exodus from oppression in Egypt and their journey to take possession of the land God promised their fathers." This parallels their situation at that time, in 539 BC, as they too were about to leave oppression in Babylon on their journey back to take possession of the same land. • Of the book of Deuteronomy: "One of its most significant verses is Deuteronomy 6:4 ... which has become the definitive statement of Jewish identity: "Hear, O Israel: the LORD our God, the LORD is one." In other words, the Israelites leaving Babylon were reminded of their most identifying characteristic... their monotheism. Borrowing from Babylon Yet in preparing the first 5 books of the Old Testament - the Torah - the Israelite priests in Babylon borrowed much from Babylon itself. They borrowed details from Babylonian creation stories, and copied the flood story from the Epic of Gilgamesh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilgamesh_flood_myth They also added a code of laws copied from Babylonian laws, as noted in Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammurabi : "The Code of Hammurabi and the Law of Moses in the Torah contain numerous similarities." Hammurabi was a king of ancient Babylon in the 1700's BC, some 400 years before Moses' time, and 1,200 years before the Israelites resided in Babylon. It wasn't really the Law of Moses, but the Code of Hammurabi - tailored, customized, and re-branded as the Law of Moses when the Torah was written in Babylon. Preparing for the journey home The purpose for compiling the first 5 books of the Old Testament was quite simply to prepare the Israelites living in Babylon for their journey back home. This is why they referred to the land they were returning to as "the Promised Land", "a land flowing with milk and honey", and their "inheritance". This is why the Torah contained examples of others who had left one land to go to another. Through the stories of Abraham and Moses, the idea of leaving behind a land they knew to go to a land they did not know was packaged and presented to the Israelites living in Babylon - who were now being asked to do the same thing themselves. Abraham was born and raised in Ur, near the southern Euphrates river in Mesopotamia. That's the land of Babylon, the same land the Israelites were now living in. Yet he moved out of that land and went to the land west of the Jordan River, and the account tells how God blessed him for it. In the time of Moses, a great many Israelites were born and raised in Egypt. Yet they moved out of that land and went to the land west of the Jordan River, and the account tells how God blessed them for it. Do we see the recurring theme? After more than 50 years in captivity, most of the original captives were no longer alive. By the time of their release in 539-538 BC, most Israelites had been born and raised in Babylon. Babylon was the only land they knew. Most did not know the land to which they were going, west of the Jordan River. But if Abraham and his family living in Mesopotamia did it, if Moses and the Israelites living in Egypt did it - that is, left a land they knew to go to a land they did not know - and it went well for them... then it would also go well for the Israelites being asked to leave Babylon, the only land most of them knew, to go to a land almost none of them knew. And thus, I propose... The Old Testament was written to organize the Israelites exiled in Babylon into a new nation, encouraging them to pack their belongings and go to the land west of the Jordan River with zeal and courage. This is why they took several persons from other cultures and made them their own... including Uta-napishtim (whom they renamed Noah), Abram (whom they renamed Abraham), Imhotep (whom they renamed Joseph), and Moses - giving them a sense of national identity and pride. Many of the Old Testament's accounts, laws, and people were adopted from external sources, modified, tweaked, and repackaged to give the Israelites courage on their return to "the land of their forefathers" and the "Promised Land" - a testament and promise that God would be with them just as He was with Abraham and Moses and all the families who made similar moves so very long before. I contend... Yet I contend the most important piece of information was withheld from the Israelites living in Babylon... that their religion was started by an ancient Pharaoh of Egypt whom they did not even know... Akhenaten. I contend their leader Moses was not of Israelite descent, but was Egyptian, a high priest of the Egyptian god Aten. I contend the early Israelites were not descended from Abram of Ur of Mesopotamia, but were descended from Egyptians, monotheists who were expelled from Egypt when the founder of their religion - Akhenaten - died. I contend the Israelites were first told they descended from Abram in 539 BC when the Torah was written, as they prepared to resettle west of the Jordan River. I further contend the only reason they were told they descended from Abram of Ur was to draw a parallel between Abram's leaving the land of Sumer (same land as Babylon) to go west of the Jordan - just as the Israelites were being asked to leave Babylon to go west of the Jordan in 539 BC. I contend Jewish religion was shaped by Babylonian mythology, and their nation was built on Babylonian laws. I further contend had the Israelites not been taken captive into Babylon, they would not have had the law code they had, nor the same story of creation, nor the story of Noah's flood - for these were all Babylonian. Even their temple and their monotheism were not entirely theirs, but were Egyptian. As much as I cherish the ancient wisdom found in both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible, I must draw attention to the religion's origins... it originated in Egypt, with significant restructuring in Babylon. Joseph Cafariello PS... (June 9, 2024): This section is to support my claim that Abraham was not known by the Israelites prior to the end of their Babylonian captivity, prior to 539 BC when the Torah and the bulk of the Old Testament were compiled. As I explain in my post, I contend the stories of Abraham, Noah, and creation were derived from Babylonian sources, and were inserted into the Old Testament in 539 BC when it was compiled. When preparing the Torah in 539 BC, the priests gathered together their sacred books and texts and compiled them together. These included the Book of Jasher, the Book of The Wars of the Lord, the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel and Judah, the Annals of King David, the Acts of Solomon, and many others. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-canonical_books_referenced_in_the_Bible They also gathered the books of the prophets, such as Isaiah and others, and combined them with the newly written Torah to form the first version of the Old Testament, which was later expanded after their return to their homeland. When compiling these dozens of works into one single work, I contend the Old Testament writers added stories from Babylonian sources, including the creation story, the flood story, and adapted portions of the law code of Hammurabi. I contend this is when Abraham appears in scripture for the first time - in 539 BC, as the Israelites were preparing to leave Babylon to resettle in their homeland. To support my claim that Abraham made his first appearance in scripture in 539 BC, we need only look at the references made to Abraham in the Old Testament, and where these references are. Let us examine them... The vast majority of the references made to Abraham appear in the Torah, the first 5 books of the Bible, which I have already supported in my post as having been written in 539 BC. Hence, none of the references to Abraham in the Torah refute my claim that Abraham made his first appearance in scripture in 539 BC. Outside the Torah, there are the following references to Abraham to consider (I am using the Old Testament as it appears in the Bible): • 2 references in the book of Joshua: "It is not known when the Book was written... Some scholars believe it was written ... in 550 BC, at the time of the Babylonian exile, when there was a desire to remember and retell their own history." https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Joshua I contend Joshua was also compiled in 539 BC, as multiple older texts were consulted and copied in order to establish a record of Israel's history. In either case... 550 or 539 BC, the 2 references to Abraham in the book of Joshua do not refute my claim that Abraham made his first appearance toward the end of Babylonian captivity. • Multiple references in the books of Kings and Chronicles: As I already noted above, numerous books and chronicles of the kings were consulted in 539 BC in Babylon when the bulk of the Old Testament was compiled. Thus, these references to Abraham in the books of Kings and Chronicles do not refute my claim of Abraham's late appearance in 539 BC. • 1 reference in Nehemiah: This one is easy, since the book describes the reconstruction of Jerusalem after Babylonian captivity. Hence, it does not refute my claim of Abraham's late insertion into scripture. • 4 references in the Psalms: "While many of the psalms contain attributions to the name of King David and other Biblical figures including Asaph, the sons of Korah, and Solomon, David's authorship is not accepted by most modern Bible scholars, who instead attribute the composition of the psalms to various authors writing between the 9th and 5th centuries BC. ... the book was probably compiled and edited into its present form during the post-exilic period in the 5th century BC.[5]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psalms Psalms is similar to the books of Kings and Chronicles noted above, which were compiled along with other scripture in Babylon in 539 BC. And here too, references to Abraham do not refute my claim that Abraham first appeared in scripture in 539 BC. • 4 references in Isaiah: "... there is evidence that much of it was composed during the Babylonian captivity and later.[2] Johann Christoph Döderlein suggested in 1775 that the book contained the works of two prophets separated by more than a century,[3] and Bernhard Duhm originated the view, held as a consensus through most of the 20th century, that the book comprises three separate collections of oracles:[4][5] Proto-Isaiah (chapters 1–39), containing the words of the 8th-century BC prophet Isaiah; Deutero-Isaiah, or "the Book of Consolation",[6] (chapters 40–55), the work of an anonymous 6th-century BCE author writing during the Exile; and Trito-Isaiah (chapters 56–66), composed after the return from Exile.[7]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Isaiah 3 of the references to Abraham in Isaiah are located in chapters 41, 51 and 63. As noted in the Wikipedia reference above, these chapters are considered to have been written during and after Babylonian captivity, and thus do not refute my claim that Abraham first appeared in scripture in 539 BC. The one remaining reference to Abraham in Isaiah appears in chapter 29. This may very well be the only reference to Abraham which refutes my claim that Abraham first appeared in scripture in 539 BC. However, we must be aware that the scribes compiling the scriptures in 539 BC consulted dozens upon dozens of scrolls and manuscripts, which they made mention of by name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-canonical_books_referenced_in_the_Bible Edits and additions were absolutely needed to make sense of the works which were all being compiled into one work for the first time. Since not all of their material was in sequential order, gaps in the record needed to be filled by the scribes at the time the works were being blended together into one single work in 539 BC. We can easily see how this one reference to Abraham could have been added to Isaiah 29 in the year 539 BC, in the interest of harmonizing such a large quantity of scrolls into one work. • 1 reference in Jeremiah: "It is generally agreed that the three types of material interspersed through the book – poetic, narrative, and biographical – come from different sources or circles.[16] Authentic oracles of Jeremiah are probably to be found in the poetic sections of chapters 1-25, but the book as a whole has been heavily edited and added to by followers (including perhaps the prophet's companion, the scribe Baruch) and later generations of Deuteronomists.[5] The date of the final versions of the book (Greek and Hebrew) can be suggested by the fact that the Greek shows concerns typical of the early Persian period, while the Masoretic (i.e., Hebrew) shows perspectives which, although known in the Persian period, did not reach their realisation until the 2nd century BCE.[7]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Jeremiah In other words, the book of Jeremiah can be divided into 3 sections - poetic, narrative, and biographical - each written by different people. As the quote mentions, "the book as a whole has been heavily edited and added to". Chapters 1-25 are likely the original portion written by Jeremiah (or others of his time) around the beginning of the Babylonian captivity period. But the 1 reference to Abraham appears in chapter 33, in the section that was added later. How much later could these additions have been made? Two versions of the book exist - one in Greek, the other in Hebrew. The Greek version "shows concerns typical of the early Persian period" - which is after Babylonian captivity. Cyrus the Great who freed the Israelites from Babylon was king of Persia. The "early Persian period" refers to the period shortly after Israel's release from Babylon. The Hebrew version "shows perspectives which, although known in the Persian period, did not reach their realization until the 2nd century BCE". Both versions of the book of Jeremiah, therefore, can be dated to after Babylonian captivity at the earliest. Thus, the 1 reference to Abraham in the book of Jeremiah does not refute my claim that Abraham first appeared in scripture in 539 BC. • 1 reference in Ezekiel: "The Book of Ezekiel describes itself as the words of Ezekiel ben-Buzi, a priest living in exile in the city of Babylon between 593 and 571 BC. Most scholars today ... see in it significant additions by a school of later followers of the original prophet. According to Jewish tradition, the Men of the Great Assembly wrote the Book of Ezekiel, based on the prophet's words.[16] ... it is the product of a long and complex history and does not necessarily preserve the very words of the prophet.[2]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Ezekiel Here again we have a book with "significant additions by ... later followers". And such additions "[do] not necessarily preserve the very words of the prophet". Here too, this reference to Abraham does not refute my claim that Abraham first appeared in scripture in 539 BC. • 1 reference in Micah: "Some, but not all, scholars accept that only chapters 1–3 contain material from the late 8th century prophet Micah.[10] The latest material comes from the post-exilic period after the temple was rebuilt in 515 BCE, so that the early 5th century BCE seems to be the period when the book was completed.[14] ... Still later ... the book was revised and expanded further to reflect the circumstances of the late exilic and post-exilic community.[17]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Micah In other words, only the first 3 chapters can be dated to the prophet Micah's century (8th BC). The remainder of the book was "revised and expanded" in the late Babylonian captivity and post-Babylonian captivity periods. Where is Micah's one reference to Abraham? In chapter 7 - the portion of additions. Thus, here too, this reference to Abraham does not refute my claim that Abraham first appeared in scripture in 539 BC. Of all these references to Abraham, only one could possibly refute my claim that Abraham was invented and inserted into scripture in 539 BC in Babylon at the time the Torah and other early Old Testament books were compiled. Only one exception to my claim? For such an important figure as Abraham? The one who received the promise? Indeed, there is only one reference that could possibly prove Abraham was known to the Israelites prior to 539 BC. Yet, as I considered above, even this one reference could have been an addition inserted at the time all these sources were consulted in the writing of the Old Testament in Babylon in 539 BC. Given the absence of any other pre-539 BC reference to Abraham, I still must contend Abraham was "invented" and added into scripture for the first time in 539 BC, for the sole purpose of drawing a parallel between Abram's leaving the land of Sumer (same land as Babylon) to go west of the Jordan - just as the Israelites were being asked to leave Babylon to go west of the Jordan in 539 BC., as I describe in the last section of my post. |
2024.06.10 07:36 Ball34s The Ambitious Alien
2024.06.10 07:36 Weathers_Writing What Looks In
2024.06.10 07:35 Stanley232323 Daily Community Tiering Post Day 54: And now I bid you, Azu. It's Azumarill!
2024.06.10 07:31 SelfishlyIntrigued [Online][Other][Diceless CRS][UTC-07][LGBTQA+ Very Friendly][RP Heavy/Open RP][5-10 players][Long Term][Flexible Schedule] Looking for players 5/8 player slots filled so far.
2024.06.10 07:31 peachynpandas I keep feeling close to a certain tarot card, and right now something crazy happened
2024.06.10 07:29 tenaciousvikramark Green card Via EB2India(most likely) or when my child turns 21
2024.06.10 07:28 Nortie-tortie (WTS) Some high, medium, and lower end knives to fine folks who didn’t blow their load at blade show
2024.06.10 07:28 Frequent-History-745 Our immigration experience. F1 to green card in 4 months in NJ.
2024.06.10 07:27 cennaya Looking for a Link from Legend of Zelda!
2024.06.10 07:26 K1R4_exe Mobile app
2024.06.10 07:24 ryetheman9 tired of this
2024.06.10 07:22 Fearless-Manager-441 Finding the truth
2024.06.10 07:20 JessicaOL_GUA Understanding differences between OCD and autism-related repetitive behaviours
2024.06.10 07:15 canpsin wha
submitted by canpsin to CharacterAI [link] [comments] |
2024.06.10 07:14 Juvia_sweet Is this a scam or is it real
Is this a scam? I’m starting to sell a few things and i thought a PayPal would work but i feel like im getting scammed. Can someone please tell me if I am or not submitted by Juvia_sweet to Scams [link] [comments] |
2024.06.10 07:09 JessicaOL_GUA Understanding differences between OCD and autism-related repetitive behaviours